IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i8p2597-d159670.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Imbalanced Development and Economic Burden for Urban and Rural Wastewater Treatment in China—Discharge Limit Legislation

Author

Listed:
  • Meishu Wang

    (School of Law, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China)

  • Hui Gong

    (State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

Abstract

Water pollution control is a great challenge for China. Compared with urban regions, the wastewater treatment in rural areas is much undeveloped, which is highly related with the much delayed legislation for rural wastewater. Imbalanced urban-rural development and the economic burden of urban and rural wastewater treatment in China was investigated from the perspective of discharge limit legislation. For now, the national discharge limit for rural wastewater is still vacant, although the national discharge limit for urban wastewater had been released for more than ten years. Recently, local rural wastewater discharge limits from several provinces were released, however, based on quite different principles. Some categories emphasized environmental sensitivity with the discharge limit equal and were more strict than urban standards, while some focused on resource recovery for rural regions with loose discharge limits. This study compared the financial burden between rural and urban regions in 31 provinces under different discharge limit legislation conditions. It was revealed that the resources recovery category discharge principle helped to decrease the financial burden imbalance with a reduced Gini coefficient from 0.37 to 0.17. The reduced economic burden from the implementation of a suitably designed rural discharge limit promoted balancing the rural-urban gap and lowering uncertainties and risk of sustainable rural wastewater treatment. This study also revealed the urgency of rural water legislation and proposed development with a balanced financial burden for urban and rural residents under suitable discharge limits, providing a profound insight for environmental management with a focus on balanced urban-rural development for the policy-makers in developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Meishu Wang & Hui Gong, 2018. "Imbalanced Development and Economic Burden for Urban and Rural Wastewater Treatment in China—Discharge Limit Legislation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-12, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:8:p:2597-:d:159670
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2597/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2597/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bosi, Stefano & Seegmuller, Thomas, 2006. "Optimal cycles and social inequality: What do we learn from the Gini index?," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 35-46, March.
    2. Jacobson, Arne & Milman, Anita D. & Kammen, Daniel M., 2005. "Letting the (energy) Gini out of the bottle: Lorenz curves of cumulative electricity consumption and Gini coefficients as metrics of energy distribution and equity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(14), pages 1825-1832, September.
    3. Grunewald, Nicole & Jakob, Michael & Mouratiadou, Ioanna, 2014. "Decomposing inequality in CO2 emissions: The role of primary energy carriers and economic sectors," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 183-194.
    4. Marzouk, Mohamed & Ali, Mohamed, 2018. "Mitigating risks in wastewater treatment plant PPPs using minimum revenue guarantee and real options," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 121-133.
    5. Samuel Kotz & Christian Kleiber, 2002. "A characterization of income distributions in terms of generalized Gini coefficients," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 19(4), pages 789-794.
    6. Shrestha, Asheem & Chan, Toong-Khuan & Aibinu, Ajibade A. & Chen, Chuan, 2017. "Efficient risk transfer in PPP wastewater treatment projects," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 132-140.
    7. Chuansheng Wang, 2018. "An Analysis of Rural Household Livelihood Change and the Regional Effect in a Western Impoverished Mountainous Area of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, May.
    8. Yan Yan & Chunli Zhao & Yuan Quan & Huiting Lu & Yi Rong & Gang Wu, 2017. "Interrelations of Ecosystem Services and Rural Population Wellbeing in an Ecologically-Fragile Area in North China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-12, April.
    9. Druckman, A. & Jackson, T., 2008. "Measuring resource inequalities: The concepts and methodology for an area-based Gini coefficient," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 242-252, April.
    10. Ling-Hin Li, 2017. "Balancing Rural and Urban Development: Applying Coordinated Urban–Rural Development (CURD) Strategy to Achieve Sustainable Urbanisation in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, October.
    11. Molero-Simarro, Ricardo, 2017. "Inequality in China revisited. The effect of functional distribution of income on urban top incomes, the urban-rural gap and the Gini index, 1978–2015," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 101-117.
    12. Lambert, Peter J., 1985. "Social welfare and the gini coefficient revisited," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 19-26, February.
    13. Grunewald, Nicole & Jakob, Michael & Mouratiadou, Ioanna, 2014. "Decomposing inequality in CO2 emissions: The role of primary energy carriers and economic sectors," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 183-194.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xueru Yang & Haoming Li & Wenhong (Miranda) Chen & Hui Fu, 2019. "Corporate Community Involvement and Chinese Rural Tourist Destination Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Meishu Wang & Hui Gong, 2018. "Not-in-My-Backyard: Legislation Requirements and Economic Analysis for Developing Underground Wastewater Treatment Plant in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-10, October.
    3. Daizhong Tang & Baorui Li & Yuan Qiu & Linlin Zhao, 2020. "Research on Urban and Rural Coordination Development and Its Driving Force Based on the Space-time Evolvement Taking Guangdong Province as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Meishu Wang & Hui Gong, 2019. "Expected Rural Wastewater Treatment Promoted by Provincial Local Discharge Limit Legislation in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-13, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meishu Wang & Hui Gong, 2019. "Expected Rural Wastewater Treatment Promoted by Provincial Local Discharge Limit Legislation in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Yuan, Qiang & McIntyre, Neil & Wu, Yipeng & Liu, Yichao & Liu, Yi, 2017. "Towards greater socio-economic equality in allocation of wastewater discharge permits in China based on the weighted Gini coefficient," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 196-205.
    3. Bei Guan & Xiuqiong Liang & Yang Yang & Xiang Sun & Jiawei Wang & Danyi Wei & Bin Wang & Han Cheng, 2024. "Optimal allocation of water pollutant discharge permits based on Environmental Gini Coefficient (EGC): a case study of Qinhuai river basin in Nanjing, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 5179-5198, February.
    4. Chen, Jiandong & Cheng, Shulei & Song, Malin, 2017. "Decomposing inequality in energy-related CO2 emissions by source and source increment: The roles of production and residential consumption," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 698-710.
    5. Sun, Tao & Zhang, Hongwei & Wang, Yuan & Meng, Xiangming & Wang, Chenwan, 2010. "The application of environmental Gini coefficient (EGC) in allocating wastewater discharge permit: The case study of watershed total mass control in Tianjin, China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(9), pages 601-608.
    6. Wanbei Jiang & Weidong Liu, 2020. "Provincial-Level CO 2 Emissions Intensity Inequality in China: Regional Source and Explanatory Factors of Interregional and Intraregional Inequalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Xintao Li & Dong Feng & Jian Li & Zaisheng Zhang, 2019. "Research on the Spatial Network Characteristics and Synergetic Abatement Effect of the Carbon Emissions in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Urban Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, March.
    8. Overland, Indra & Juraev, Javlon & Vakulchuk, Roman, 2022. "Are renewable energy sources more evenly distributed than fossil fuels?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 379-386.
    9. Xiaofei Han & Jianling Jiao & Lancui Liu & Lanlan Li, 2017. "China’s energy demand and carbon dioxide emissions: do carbon emission reduction paths matter?," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 86(3), pages 1333-1345, April.
    10. Rongrong Li & Xue-Ting Jiang, 2017. "Inequality of Carbon Intensity: Empirical Analysis of China 2000–2014," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-12, April.
    11. Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2011. "Conceptualizing urban household energy use: Climbing the "Energy Services Ladder"," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1659-1668, March.
    12. Jibran Hussain & Saeed Siyal & Riaz Ahmad & Qaiser Abbas & Yu Yitian & Liu Jin, 2024. "Impact of Energy Crises on Income Inequality: An Application of Piketty’s Hypothesis to Pakistan," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, September.
    13. Fan, Wei & Li, Li & Wang, Feiran & Li, Ding, 2020. "Driving factors of CO2 emission inequality in China: The role of government expenditure," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    14. Meng Yang & Yisheng Liu & Jinzhao Tian & Feiyu Cheng & Pengbo Song, 2022. "Dynamic Evolution and Regional Disparity in Carbon Emission Intensity in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, March.
    15. Cheng, Shulei & Fan, Wei & Zhang, Jian & Wang, Ning & Meng, Fanxin & Liu, Gengyuan, 2021. "Multi-sectoral determinants of carbon emission inequality in Chinese clustering cities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    16. Zhaojun Wang & Amanda M. Countryman & James J. Corbett & Mandana Saebi, 2021. "Economic and environmental impacts of ballast water management on Small Island Developing States and Least Developed Countries," Papers 2108.13315, arXiv.org.
    17. Shi, Kaifang & Yu, Bailang & Zhou, Yuyu & Chen, Yun & Yang, Chengshu & Chen, Zuoqi & Wu, Jianping, 2019. "Spatiotemporal variations of CO2 emissions and their impact factors in China: A comparative analysis between the provincial and prefectural levels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 170-181.
    18. Mussini, Mauro, 2020. "Inequality and convergence in energy intensity in the European Union," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    19. Druckman, A. & Jackson, T., 2008. "Measuring resource inequalities: The concepts and methodology for an area-based Gini coefficient," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 242-252, April.
    20. Wu, Shimei & Chen, Zhan-Ming, 2023. "Carbon inequality in China: Evidence from city-level data," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:8:p:2597-:d:159670. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.