IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i7p2481-d158199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychological Factors Linking Perceived CSR to OCB: The Role of Organizational Pride, Collectivism, and Person–Organization Fit

Author

Listed:
  • Eaint Yadanar Oo

    (Business School, Korea University; 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • Heajung Jung

    (School of Business, Konkuk University, 120 Neungdong-ro, Gwanjin-gu, Seoul 05029, Korea)

  • In-Jo Park

    (Department of Psychology, Henan University, 1 Jinming St., Kaifeng 475004, Henan, China)

Abstract

Despite a growing amount of research on the impact of perceived corporate social responsibility (CSR) on employee behavior, psychological factors explaining why and for whom the relationship holds have yet to be fully investigated. Drawing on social identity theory, this study examined organizational pride as the underlying psychological mechanism explaining the relationship between CSR perception and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), and tested the moderating effects by two individual difference variables: collectivism orientation and person–organization fit. Analyses of survey data collected from 210 employees in South Korea showed that organizational pride mediated the CSR perception–OCB relationship. In addition, collectivism orientation strengthens the CSR–pride relationship, while person–organization fit strengthens the OCB–pride relationship. This research contributes to the relevant literature by stressing the importance of individual characteristics in predicting and understanding the effects of CSR perception on employee behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Eaint Yadanar Oo & Heajung Jung & In-Jo Park, 2018. "Psychological Factors Linking Perceived CSR to OCB: The Role of Organizational Pride, Collectivism, and Person–Organization Fit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2481-:d:158199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2481/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2481/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tyler, Tom R. & Blader, Steven L., 2002. "Autonomous vs. comparative status: Must we be better than others to feel good about ourselves?," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 813-838, September.
    2. Carroll, Archie B., 1991. "The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 39-48.
    3. Ali H. Muhammad, 2014. "Perceived Organizational Support and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Case of Kuwait," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(3), pages 59-72, May.
    4. Glavas, Ante & Kelley, Ken, 2014. "The Effects of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Attitudes," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 165-202, April.
    5. Abraham Carmeli & Ashler Tishler, 2004. "The relationships between intangible organizational elements and organizational performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(13), pages 1257-1278, December.
    6. Kenneth De Roeck & Assâad El Akremi & Valérie Swaen, 2016. "Consistency Matters! How and When Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect Employees’ Organizational Identification?," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(7), pages 1141-1168, November.
    7. K de Roeck & Valérie Swaen & Assâad El Akremi, 2016. "Consistency matters! How and when does Corporate Social Responsibility affect employees’ organizational identification? Journal of Management Studies," Post-Print halshs-01520879, HAL.
    8. Lea, Stephen E. G. & Webley, Paul, 1997. "Pride in economic psychology," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 18(2-3), pages 323-340, April.
    9. Su-Yol Lee & Yong Won Seo, 2017. "Corporate Social Responsibility Motive Attribution by Service Employees in the Parcel Logistics Industry as a Moderator between CSR Perception and Organizational Effectiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-13, February.
    10. Kim, Chung Hee & Amaeshi, Kenneth & Harris, Simon & Suh, Chang-Jin, 2013. "CSR and the national institutional context: The case of South Korea," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2581-2591.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pasricha, Palvi & Nivedhitha, K.S. & Raghuvanshi, Juhi, 2023. "The perceived CSR-innovative behavior conundrum: Towards unlocking the socio-emotional black box," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    2. Erhan Boğan & Bekir Bora Dedeoğlu, 2020. "Hotel employees' corporate social responsibility perception and organizational citizenship behavior: Perceived external prestige and pride in organization as serial mediators," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2342-2353, September.
    3. Heung-Jun Jung & Mohammad Ali, 2017. "Corporate Social Responsibility, Organizational Justice and Positive Employee Attitudes: In the Context of Korean Employment Relations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-24, October.
    4. Erifili-Christina Chatzopoulou & Dimitris Manolopoulos & Vasia Agapitou, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Outcomes: Interrelations of External and Internal Orientations with Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(3), pages 795-817, September.
    5. Yasser Yassin & Markus Beckmann, 2025. "CSR and employee outcomes: a systematic literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(1), pages 595-641, February.
    6. David A. Jones & Alexander Newman & Ruodan Shao & Fang Lee Cooke, 2019. "Advances in Employee-Focused Micro-Level Research on Corporate Social Responsibility: Situating New Contributions Within the Current State of the Literature," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 293-302, June.
    7. Saskia Crucke & Marie Servaes & Tom Kluijtmans & Shana Mertens & Eveline Schollaert, 2022. "Linking environmentally‐specific transformational leadership and employees' green advocacy: The influence of leadership integrity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), pages 406-420, March.
    8. Mehran Nejati & Azadeh Shafaei, 2023. "Why do employees respond differently to corporate social responsibility? A study of substantive and symbolic corporate social responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 2066-2080, July.
    9. Fasilat Aramide Sanusi & Satirenjit Kaur Johl, 2020. "A proposed framework for assessing the influence of internal corporate social responsibility belief on employee intention to job continuity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2437-2449, November.
    10. Moustafa Abdelmotaleb & Sudhir K. Saha, 2020. "Socially Responsible Human Resources Management, Perceived Organizational Morality, and Employee Well-being," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 385-399, June.
    11. Hafiz Yasir Ali & Muhammad Asrar‐ul‐Haq & Shaheera Amin & Sadaf Noor & Muhammad Haris‐ul‐Mahasbi & Muhammad Kashif Aslam, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility and employee performance: The mediating role of employee engagement in the manufacturing sector of Pakistan," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2908-2919, November.
    12. Sajjad A. Afridi & Bilal Afsar & Asad Shahjehan & Zia U. Rehman & Maqsood Haider & Mehboob Ullah, 2020. "Retracted: Perceived corporate social responsibility and innovative work behavior: The role of employee volunteerism and authenticity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1865-1877, July.
    13. Yunhong Hao & Qamar Farooq & Yanni Zhang, 2018. "Unattended social wants and corporate social responsibility of leading firms: Relationship of intrinsic motivation of volunteering in proposed welfare programs and employee attributes," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1029-1038, November.
    14. Wójcik Piotr, 2018. "The business case for corporate social responsibility: A literature overview and integrative framework," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 26(1), pages 121-148, March.
    15. Lan, Lan & Zhou, Zhifang, 2024. "Complementary or substitutive effects? The duality of digitalization and ESG on firm's innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    16. Sabrina Scheidler & Laura Marie Edinger-Schons & Jelena Spanjol & Jan Wieseke, 2019. "Scrooge Posing as Mother Teresa: How Hypocritical Social Responsibility Strategies Hurt Employees and Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 339-358, June.
    17. Byung‐Jik Kim & Nayoung Jeon & Harim Sohn & Nahee Lee & Min‐Jik Kim, 2024. "The impact of corporate social responsibility on employee burnout: The crucial role of work overload," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4345-4360, September.
    18. Yeunjae Lee, 2020. "Toward a Communality with Employees: The Role of CSR Types and Internal Reputation," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(1), pages 13-23, February.
    19. Muhammad Amir Ch, Hafiza Safia Shaukat, Maham Iqbal, 2021. "Explore the Impact on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Pride through Evaluation of Perceived Organizational CSR: A Structural Equation Modelling," Journal of Management Sciences, Geist Science, Iqra University, Faculty of Business Administration, vol. 8(1), pages 50-70, March.
    20. María Garrido‐Ruso & Beatriz Aibar‐Guzmán, 2022. "The moderating effect of contextual factors and employees' demographic features on the relationship between CSR and work‐related attitudes: A meta‐analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1839-1854, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2481-:d:158199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.