IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i5p1436-d144733.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tropical Fruits as an Opportunity for Sustainable Development in Rural Areas: The Case of Mango in Small-Sized Sicilian Farms

Author

Listed:
  • Riccardo Testa

    () (Department of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Sciences, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, 4-90128 Palermo, Italy)

  • Salvatore Tudisca

    () (Department of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Sciences, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, 4-90128 Palermo, Italy)

  • Giorgio Schifani

    () (Department of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Sciences, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, 4-90128 Palermo, Italy)

  • Anna Maria Di Trapani

    () (Department of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Sciences, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, 4-90128 Palermo, Italy)

  • Giuseppina Migliore

    () (Department of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Sciences, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, 4-90128 Palermo, Italy)

Abstract

Over the last decades, in many rural areas in Southern Europe, farmers have abandoned agricultural activity, especially on small-sized farms, leading to an exodus from rural areas towards urbanized ones. In this context, in the early 1980s, some Sicilian farmers introduced mango on their small-sized farms, as certain areas of Sicily are well suited to tropical and subtropical crops, but also to meet increasing consumer interest for these fruits, as they are perceived as functional foods. This paper aimed to evaluate the economic sustainability of mango and to determine whether its introduction could be considered as an alternative to traditional crops. In particular, an economic-financial analysis of mango orchards on small-sized Sicilian farms was performed by adopting a discounted cash flow approach. In order to provide as comprehensive information as possible, mango was compared with two traditional crops that have always played an important socio-economic role in Southern Italy: wine grape and orange. Results showed a clear economic convenience for mango orchards, denoting an annual gross margin of 14,617.03 €/ha, on average 20 times higher than orange orchards and just less than 40 times higher in respect to vineyards. The higher profitability of mango was also confirmed without considering public grants for the planting phase, and by varying current sales prices and costs. However, it should be considered that the cultivation of mango could represent an opportunity for sustainable development only for certain Sicilian areas, as it is closely related to favorable pedo-climatic conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Riccardo Testa & Salvatore Tudisca & Giorgio Schifani & Anna Maria Di Trapani & Giuseppina Migliore, 2018. "Tropical Fruits as an Opportunity for Sustainable Development in Rural Areas: The Case of Mango in Small-Sized Sicilian Farms," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 10(5), pages 1-1, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:1436-:d:144733
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1436/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1436/
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dirk Vrebos & Francesca Bampa & Rachel E. Creamer & Ciro Gardi & Bhim Bahadur Ghaley & Arwyn Jones & Michiel Rutgers & Taru Sandén & Jan Staes & Patrick Meire, 2017. "The Impact of Policy Instruments on Soil Multifunctionality in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 9(3), pages 1-1, March.
    2. Benjamin L. Turner & Vincent Tidwell & Alexander Fernald & José A. Rivera & Sylvia Rodriguez & Steven Guldan & Carlos Ochoa & Brian Hurd & Kenneth Boykin & Andres Cibils, 2016. "Modeling Acequia Irrigation Systems Using System Dynamics: Model Development, Evaluation, and Sensitivity Analyses to Investigate Effects of Socio-Economic and Biophysical Feedbacks," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 8(10), pages 1-1, October.
    3. Massimiliano Borrello & Francesco Caracciolo & Alessia Lombardi & Stefano Pascucci & Luigi Cembalo, 2017. "Consumers’ Perspective on Circular Economy Strategy for Reducing Food Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 9(1), pages 1-1, January.
    4. Dorin Badiu & Felix H. Arion & Iulia C. Muresan & Ramona Lile & Viorel Mitre, 2015. "Evaluation of Economic Efficiency of Apple Orchard Investments," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 7(8), pages 1-13, August.
    5. Gasol, Carles M. & Brun, Filippo & Mosso, Angela & Rieradevall, Joan & Gabarrell, Xavier, 2010. "Economic assessment and comparison of acacia energy crop with annual traditional crops in Southern Europe," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 592-597, January.
    6. Marianne Hubeau & Fleur Marchand & Guido Van Huylenbroeck, 2017. "Sustainability Experiments in the Agri-Food System: Uncovering the Factors of New Governance and Collaboration Success," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 9(6), pages 1-1, June.
    7. Verónica León-Bravo & Federico Caniato & Maria Caridi & Thomas Johnsen, 2017. "Collaboration for Sustainability in the Food Supply Chain: A Multi-Stage Study in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 9(7), pages 1-1, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    discounted cash flow; economic sustainability; Mangifera indica ; sensitivity analysis;

    JEL classification:

    • Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics
    • Q0 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General
    • Q2 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation
    • Q3 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation
    • Q5 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:1436-:d:144733. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (XML Conversion Team). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.