Author
Listed:
- Alan Niscioli
(Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Berrimah Farm Science Precinct, GPO Box 3000, Darwin, NT 0801, Australia
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Constancio A. Asis
(Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Berrimah Farm Science Precinct, GPO Box 3000, Darwin, NT 0801, Australia
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Joanne Tilbrook
(Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Berrimah Farm Science Precinct, GPO Box 3000, Darwin, NT 0801, Australia)
- Dallas Anson
(Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Berrimah Farm Science Precinct, GPO Box 3000, Darwin, NT 0801, Australia)
- Danilo Guinto
(Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Berrimah Farm Science Precinct, GPO Box 3000, Darwin, NT 0801, Australia
Auckland Council, Private Bag 92300, Victoria Street West, Auckland 1142, New Zealand)
- Mila Bristow
(Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Berrimah Farm Science Precinct, GPO Box 3000, Darwin, NT 0801, Australia)
- David Rowlings
(Centre for Agriculture and Bioeconomy (CAB), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia)
Abstract
Litter and pruning biomass are integral to nutrient cycling in the plant–soil ecosystem, contributing significantly to organic matter formation and humus development through decomposition and nutrient mineralization, which ultimately influence soil fertility and health. However, the litterfall dynamics in mango orchards are not well understood, and its contribution to nutrient cycling has seldom been measured. This study aimed to estimate litterfall and pruning biomass in mango orchards and assess the nutrient contents of various biomass components. Litter and pruning biomass samples were collected from four commercial mango orchards planted with Kensington Pride (‘KP’) and ‘B74’ (‘Calypso ® ’) cultivars in the Darwin and Katherine regions, using litter traps placed on the orchard floors. Samples were sorted (leaves, flowers, panicles, fruits, and branches) and analyzed for nutrient contents. Results showed that most biomass abscissions occurred between late June and August, spanning approximately 100 days involving floral induction phase, fruit set, and maturity. Leaves made up most of the abscised litter biomass, while branches were the primary component of pruning biomass. The overall ranking of biomass across both regions and orchards is as follows: leaves > branches > panicles > flowers > fruits. The carbon–nitrogen (C:N) ratio of litter pruning material ranged from 30 (flowers) to 139 (branches). On a hectare basis, litter and biomass inputs contained 1.2 t carbon (C), 21.2 kg nitrogen (N), 0.80 kg phosphorus (P), 4.9 kg potassium (K), 8.7 kg calcium (Ca), 2.0 kg magnesium (Mg), 1.1 kg sulfur (S), 15 g boron (B), 13.6 g copper (Cu), 99.3 g iron (Fe), 78.6 g manganese (Mn), and 28.6 g zinc (Zn). The results indicate that annual litterfall may contribute substantially to plant nutrient supply and soil health when incorporated into the soil to undergo decomposition. This study contributes to a better understanding of litter biomass, nutrient sources, and nutrient cycling in tropical mango production systems, offering insights that support accurate nutrient budgeting and help prevent over-fertilization. However, further research is needed to examine biomass accumulation under different pruning regimes, decomposition dynamics, microbial interactions, and broader ecological effects to understand litterfall’s role in promoting plant growth, enhancing soil health, and supporting sustainable mango production.
Suggested Citation
Alan Niscioli & Constancio A. Asis & Joanne Tilbrook & Dallas Anson & Danilo Guinto & Mila Bristow & David Rowlings, 2025.
"Litter and Pruning Biomass in Mango Orchards: Quantification and Nutrient Analysis,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-17, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4452-:d:1655324
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4452-:d:1655324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.