IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i3p671-d134244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable and Low Greenhouse Gas Emitting Rice Production in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Review on the Transition from Ideality to Reality

Author

Listed:
  • Ngonidzashe Chirinda

    (Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Palmira 6713, Colombia)

  • Laura Arenas

    (Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Palmira 6713, Colombia)

  • Maria Katto

    (Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Palmira 6713, Colombia)

  • Sandra Loaiza

    (Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Palmira 6713, Colombia)

  • Fernando Correa

    (Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Palmira 6713, Colombia)

  • Manabu Isthitani

    (Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Palmira 6713, Colombia)

  • Ana Maria Loboguerrero

    (Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Palmira 6713, Colombia
    Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), Palmira 6713, Colombia)

  • Deissy Martínez-Barón

    (Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Palmira 6713, Colombia
    Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), Palmira 6713, Colombia)

  • Eduardo Graterol

    (Fondo Latinoamericano para Arroz de Riego (FLAR), Palmira 6713, Colombia)

  • Santiago Jaramillo

    (Fondo Latinoamericano para Arroz de Riego (FLAR), Palmira 6713, Colombia)

  • Carlos Felipe Torres

    (Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales (IDEAM), Bogotá, 111711, Colombia)

  • Miguel Arango

    (Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria (CORPOICA), Via Puerto López 502007, Colombia)

  • Myriam Guzmán

    (Federación Nacional de Arroceros (FEDEARROZ), Bogotá 111831, Colombia)

  • Ivan Avila

    (Federación Nacional de Arroceros (FEDEARROZ), Bogotá 111831, Colombia)

  • Sara Hube

    (Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIA), Santiago 7083150, Chile)

  • Ditmar Bernardo Kurtz

    (Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Corrientes 3400, Argentina)

  • Gonzalo Zorrilla

    (National Agricultural Research Institute (INIA), Treinta y Tres 33000, Uruguay)

  • Jose Terra

    (National Agricultural Research Institute (INIA), Treinta y Tres 33000, Uruguay)

  • Pilar Irisarri

    (Department of Plant Biology, College of Agriculture, University of the Republic, Montevideo 12900, Uruguay)

  • Silvana Tarlera

    (Department of Biosciences, College of Chemistry and Science, University of the Republic, Montevideo 11800, Uruguay)

  • Gabriel LaHue

    (Department Plant Sciences; Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA)

  • Walkyria Bueno Scivittaro

    (Embrapa Clima Temperado (CPACT), Pelotas, RS 96010-971, Brazil)

  • Aldo Noguera

    (Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería (MAG), Asunción 1329, Paraguay)

  • Cimelio Bayer

    (Department of Soil Science, Universidad Federal de Río Grande del Sur (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS 91540-000, Brazil)

Abstract

The burgeoning demand for rice in Latin America and Caribbean (LAC) exceeds supply, resulting in a rice deficit. To overcome this challenge, rice production should be increased, albeit sustainably. However, since rice production is associated with increases in the atmospheric concentration of two greenhouse gases (GHGs), namely methane (CH 4 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O), the challenge is on ensuring that production increases are not associated with an increase in GHG emissions and thus do not cause an increase in GHG emission intensities. Based on current understanding of drivers of CH 4 and N 2 O production, we provide here insights on the potential climate change mitigation benefits of management and technological options (i.e., seeding, tillage, irrigation, residue management) pursued in the LAC region. Studies conducted in the LAC region show intermittent irrigation or alternate wetting and drying of rice fields to reduce CH 4 emissions by 25–70% without increasing N 2 O emissions. Results on yield changes associated with intermittent irrigation remain inconclusive. Compared to conventional tillage, no-tillage and anticipated tillage (i.e., fall tillage) cause a 21% and 25% reduction in CH 4 emissions, respectively. From existing literature, it was unambiguous that the mitigation potential of most management strategies pursued in the LAC region need to be quantified while acknowledging country-specific conditions. While breeding high yielding and low emitting rice varieties may represent the most promising and possibly sustainable approach for achieving GHG emission reductions without demanding major changes in on-farm management practices, this is rather idealistic. We contend that a more realistic approach for realizing low GHG emitting rice production systems is to focus on increasing rice yields, for obvious food security reasons, which, while not reducing absolute emissions, should translate to a reduction in GHG emission intensities. Moreover, there is need to explore creative ways of incentivizing the adoption of promising combinations of management and technological options.

Suggested Citation

  • Ngonidzashe Chirinda & Laura Arenas & Maria Katto & Sandra Loaiza & Fernando Correa & Manabu Isthitani & Ana Maria Loboguerrero & Deissy Martínez-Barón & Eduardo Graterol & Santiago Jaramillo & Carlos, 2018. "Sustainable and Low Greenhouse Gas Emitting Rice Production in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Review on the Transition from Ideality to Reality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:671-:d:134244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/3/671/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/3/671/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joshua Schimel, 2000. "Rice, microbes and methane," Nature, Nature, vol. 403(6768), pages 375-377, January.
    2. Benjamin J. DeAngelo, Francisco C. de la Chesnaye, Robert H. Beach, Allan Sommer and Brian C. Murray, 2006. "Methane and Nitrous Oxide Mitigation in Agriculture," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I), pages 89-108.
    3. Ngonidzashe Chirinda & Laura Arenas & Sandra Loaiza & Catalina Trujillo & Maria Katto & Paula Chaparro & Jonathan Nuñez & Jacobo Arango & Deissy Martinez-Baron & Ana María Loboguerrero & Luis A. Becer, 2017. "Novel Technological and Management Options for Accelerating Transformational Changes in Rice and Livestock Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, October.
    4. J. Su & C. Hu & X. Yan & Y. Jin & Z. Chen & Q. Guan & Y. Wang & D. Zhong & C. Jansson & F. Wang & A. Schnürer & C. Sun, 2015. "Expression of barley SUSIBA2 transcription factor yields high-starch low-methane rice," Nature, Nature, vol. 523(7562), pages 602-606, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cristiano Maboni & Tiago Bremm & Leonardo José Gonçalves Aguiar & Walkyria Bueno Scivittaro & Vanessa de Arruda Souza & Hans Rogério Zimermann & Claudio Alberto Teichrieb & Pablo Eli Soares de Oliveir, 2021. "The Fallow Period Plays an Important Role in Annual CH 4 Emission in a Rice Paddy in Southern Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J. West & Arlene Fiore & Larry Horowitz, 2012. "Scenarios of methane emission reductions to 2030: abatement costs and co-benefits to ozone air quality and human mortality," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 114(3), pages 441-461, October.
    2. Ron SANDS & Katja SCHUMACHER, 2008. "Decomposition Analysis and Climate Policy in a General Equilibrium Model of Germany," EcoMod2008 23800124, EcoMod.
    3. Eory, Vera, 2015. "Evaluating the use of marginal abatement cost curves applied to greenhouse gas abatement in agriculture," Working Papers 199777, Scotland's Rural College (formerly Scottish Agricultural College), Land Economy & Environment Research Group.
    4. Ekholm, Tommi & Soimakallio, Sampo & Moltmann, Sara & Höhne, Niklas & Syri, Sanna & Savolainen, Ilkka, 2010. "Effort sharing in ambitious, global climate change mitigation scenarios," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 1797-1810, April.
    5. Ajay Gambhir & Tamaryn Napp & Adam Hawkes & Lena Höglund-Isaksson & Wilfried Winiwarter & Pallav Purohit & Fabian Wagner & Dan Bernie & Jason Lowe, 2017. "The Contribution of Non-CO 2 Greenhouse Gas Mitigation to Achieving Long-Term Temperature Goals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-23, May.
    6. Alauddin, Mohammad & Rashid Sarker, Md. Abdur & Islam, Zeenatul & Tisdell, Clement, 2020. "Adoption of alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation as a water-saving technology in Bangladesh: Economic and environmental considerations," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    7. Fredrik Hedenus & Stefan Wirsenius & Daniel Johansson, 2014. "The importance of reduced meat and dairy consumption for meeting stringent climate change targets," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 79-91, May.
    8. Alain Bernard & Marc Vielle, 2008. "GEMINI-E3, a general equilibrium model of international–national interactions between economy, energy and the environment," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 173-206, May.
    9. Jie Tang & Jingjing Wang & Zhaoyang Li & Sining Wang & Yunke Qu, 2018. "Effects of Irrigation Regime and Nitrogen Fertilizer Management on CH 4 , N 2 O and CO 2 Emissions from Saline–Alkaline Paddy Fields in Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, February.
    10. Gang Zhang & Dejian Wang & Yuanchun Yu, 2020. "Investigation into the Effects of Straw Retention and Nitrogen Reduction on CH 4 and N 2 O Emissions from Paddy Fields in the Lower Yangtze River Region, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Cheng, Kun & Ogle, Stephen M. & Parton, William J. & Pan, Genxing, 2013. "Predicting methanogenesis from rice paddies using the DAYCENT ecosystem model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 261, pages 19-31.
    12. T. Kober & B. C. C. Van Der Zwaan & H. Rösler, 2014. "Emission Certificate Trade And Costs Under Regional Burden-Sharing Regimes For A 2°C Climate Change Control Target," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(01), pages 1-32.
    13. Vermont, Bruno & De Cara, Stéphane, 2010. "How costly is mitigation of non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture?: A meta-analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 1373-1386, May.
    14. Rose, Steven K. & Ahammad, Helal & Eickhout, Bas & Fisher, Brian & Kurosawa, Atsushi & Rao, Shilpa & Riahi, Keywan & van Vuuren, Detlef P., 2012. "Land-based mitigation in climate stabilization," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 365-380.
    15. Xinyun Gu & Shimei Weng & Yu’e Li & Xiaoqi Zhou, 2022. "Effects of Water and Fertilizer Management Practices on Methane Emissions from Paddy Soils: Synthesis and Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-12, June.
    16. Tangzhe Nie & Peng Chen & Zhongxue Zhang & Zhijuan Qi & Yanyu Lin & Dan Xu, 2019. "Effects of Different Types of Water and Nitrogen Fertilizer Management on Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Yield, and Water Consumption of Paddy Fields in Cold Region of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-16, May.
    17. Beach, Robert & Creason, Jared & Ohrel, Sara & Ragnauth, Shaun & Ogle, Stephen & Li, Changsheng & Salas, William, 2015. "Marginal Abatement Cost Curves for Global Agricultural Non-CO2 Emissions," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211208, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Takeda, Naoya & López-Galvis, Lorena & Pineda, Dario & Castilla, Armando & Takahashi, Taro & Fukuda, Shinji & Okada, Kensuke, 2019. "Evaluation of water dynamics of contour-levee irrigation system in sloped rice fields in Colombia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 107-118.
    19. Ishfaq, Muhammad & Farooq, Muhammad & Zulfiqar, Usman & Hussain, Saddam & Akbar, Nadeem & Nawaz, Ahmad & Anjum, Shakeel Ahmad, 2020. "Alternate wetting and drying: A water-saving and ecofriendly rice production system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    20. Edjabou, Louise Dyhr & Smed, Sinne, 2013. "The effect of using consumption taxes on foods to promote climate friendly diets – The case of Denmark," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 84-96.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:671-:d:134244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.