IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v14y2025i5p79-d1657614.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Designing and Modeling Value-Added Production Sharing Contracts (VAPSC): From Offshore Gas to LNG in Lebanon

Author

Listed:
  • Evgenii Marin

    (Faculty of Economics, Saint Petersburg Mining University, 199106 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

  • Tatiana Ponomarenko

    (Faculty of Economics, Saint Petersburg Mining University, 199106 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

  • Fatima Dirani

    (Faculty of Economics, Saint Petersburg Mining University, 199106 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

Abstract

This article presents the value-added production-sharing contract (VAPSC), an extension of traditional production-sharing contracts (PSCs), which encompasses raw materials production, subsequent processing, and the final ‘sharing’ of goods. Developing countries often face challenges in oil and gas exploration, production, and sector development, necessitating new collaborative frameworks between governments, industries, and international companies. The study justifies the economic terms of VAPSC that align with Lebanon’s national regulations, focusing on offshore gas production and the subsequent production and sale of liquefied natural gas (LNG). The research evaluates VAPSC application in Lebanon through a case study involving offshore gas field development, LNG plant construction, and consequent LNG-sharing. Results demonstrate the VAPSC potential to promote petroleum sector development by generating added value for both the state and society, as well as economic efficiency for the contractor. The research contributes to contract theory by introducing VAPSC as a novel framework for integrating hydrocarbon extraction, subsequent processing, and value-added product distribution, offering a replicable model for other resource-rich developing nations. The main findings include the design of a new type of contract—VAPSC—along with an economic-mathematical model for optimizing government-investor partnerships and the definition of key contractual terms.

Suggested Citation

  • Evgenii Marin & Tatiana Ponomarenko & Fatima Dirani, 2025. "Designing and Modeling Value-Added Production Sharing Contracts (VAPSC): From Offshore Gas to LNG in Lebanon," Resources, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-27, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:79-:d:1657614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/14/5/79/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/14/5/79/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diana Dmitrieva & Victoria Solovyova, 2024. "A Taxonomy of Mineral Resource Projects in the Arctic: A Path to Sustainable Financing?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Andrey Lebedev & Alexey Cherepovitsyn, 2024. "Waste Management during the Production Drilling Stage in the Oil and Gas Sector: A Feasibility Study," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-30, February.
    3. Fatima Dirani & Tatiana Ponomarenko, 2021. "Contractual Systems in the Oil and Gas Sector: Current Status and Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Shafiqul Hassan & Yusuff Jelili Amuda & Mohsin Dhali & Saghir Munir Mehar, 2023. "Contract Structure of Production Sharing Agreement by International Oil Company in Exploration of Petroleum Resources in Developing Countries," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(3), pages 7-14, May.
    5. Williamson, Oliver E, 1996. "Revisiting Legal Realism: The Law, Economics, and Organization Perspective," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 5(2), pages 383-420.
    6. Zhang, Zhikai & He, Mengxi & Zhang, Yaojie & Wang, Yudong, 2022. "Geopolitical risk trends and crude oil price predictability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    7. Leffler, Keith B & Rucker, Randal R, 1991. "Transactions Costs and the Efficient Organization of Production: A Study of Timber-Harvesting Contracts," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(5), pages 1060-1087, October.
    8. Cerqueti, Roy & Ventura, Marco, 2020. "Optimal concession contracts for oil exploitation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chuanguo Zhang & Mengfan Dong, 2023. "China’s embodied oil outflow: estimation and structural path analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(12), pages 14861-14885, December.
    2. Xiao, Jihong & Wen, Fenghua & He, Zhifang, 2023. "Impact of geopolitical risks on investor attention and speculation in the oil market: Evidence from nonlinear and time-varying analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    3. Özkan, Oktay & Destek, Mehmet Akif & Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel & Esmaeili, Parisa, 2024. "Unlocking the impact of international financial support to infrastructure, energy efficiency, and ICT on CO2 emissions in India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    4. Chen, Zhiguo & Gao, Wei & Zafar, Quratulain & Dördüncü, Hazar, 2023. "Natural resources extraction and geopolitical risk: Examining oil resources extraction in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    5. Wang, Sen & Bogle, Tim & van Kooten, G. Cornelis, 2012. "Forestry and the New Institutional Economics," Working Papers 130818, University of Victoria, Resource Economics and Policy.
    6. Ibrahim Demir, 2016. "The firm size, farm size, and transaction costs: the case of hazelnut farms in Turkey," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 47(1), pages 81-90, January.
    7. Fedorov, Semyon & Lavrutich, Maria & Hagspiel, Verena & Lerdahl, Thomas, 2022. "Risk and benefit sharing schemes in oil exploration and production," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    8. Quigley, Neil & Evans, Lewis & Boyd, Haleigh, 2000. "The Efficiency of Contractual Arrangements in Private Agricultural Product Markets," Working Paper Series 3918, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    9. Lai, Fujun & Xiong, Deping & Zhu, Sha & Li, Yunzhong & Tan, Yanzhi, 2023. "Will geopolitical risks only inhibit corporate investment? Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    10. Conlin, Michael & Orsini, Joe & Tang, Meng-Chi, 2013. "The effect of an agent’s expertise on National Football League contract structure," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 275-281.
    11. Elias A. Udeaja & Jeremiah M. Tule & Seyi Saint Akadiri & Elijah O. Akanni & Peter F. Offum, 2024. "Do economic policy uncertainty and geopolitical risk impede economic transformation? Evidence from resource rich country," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 48(4), pages 1145-1165, December.
    12. Marian Moszoro & Pablo T. Spiller & Sebastian Stolorz, 2016. "Rigidity of Public Contracts," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(3), pages 396-427, September.
    13. Benito Arruñada, 2012. "Property as an economic concept: reconciling legal and economic conceptions of property rights in a Coasean framework," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 59(2), pages 121-144, July.
    14. Ronnie Figueiredo & Mohammad Soliman & Alamir N. Al-Alawi & Maria José Sousa, 2022. "The Impacts of Geopolitical Risks on the Energy Sector: Micro-Level Operative Analysis in the European Union," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-12, November.
    15. Carias Vega, Dora & Keenan, Rodney J., 2016. "Transaction costs and the organization of CFEs: Experiences from ejidos in Quintana Roo, Mexico," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-8.
    16. Yang, Tianle & Dong, Qingyuan & Du, Min & Du, Qunyang, 2023. "Geopolitical risks, oil price shocks and inflation: Evidence from a TVP–SV–VAR approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PB).
    17. Fatima Dirani & Tatiana Ponomarenko, 2021. "Contractual Systems in the Oil and Gas Sector: Current Status and Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, September.
    18. Jed Devaro & Fidan Ana Kurtulus, 2010. "An Empirical Analysis of Risk, Incentives and the Delegation of Worker Authority," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 63(4), pages 641-661, July.
    19. Antinori, Camille M. & Rausser, Gordon C., 2010. "The Mexican Common Property Forestry Sector," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt8qh479p8, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    20. Yoder, Jonathan & Hossain, Ishrat & Epplin, Francis & Doye, Damona, 2008. "Contract duration and the division of labor in agricultural land leases," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 65(3-4), pages 714-733, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:79-:d:1657614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.