IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i14p2262-d1700727.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pricing and Emission Reduction Strategies of Heterogeneous Automakers Under the “Dual-Credit + Carbon Cap-and-Trade” Policy Scenario

Author

Listed:
  • Chenxu Wu

    (College of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Yuxiang Zhang

    (College of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Junwei Zhao

    (College of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Chao Wang

    (College of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Weide Chun

    (College of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

Abstract

Against the backdrop of increasingly severe global climate change, the automotive industry, as a carbon-intensive sector, has found its low-carbon transformation crucial for achieving the “double carbon” goals. This paper constructs manufacturer decision-making models under an oligopolistic market scenario for the single dual-credit policy and the “dual-credit + carbon cap-and-trade” policy, revealing the nonlinear impacts of new energy vehicle (NEV) credit trading prices, carbon trading prices, and credit ratio requirements on manufacturers’ pricing, emission reduction effort levels, and profits. The results indicate the following: (1) Under the “carbon cap-and-trade + dual-credit” policy, manufacturers can balance emission reduction costs and NEV production via the carbon trading market to maximize profits, with lower emission reduction effort levels than under the single dual-credit policy. (2) A rise in credit trading prices prompts hybrid manufacturers (producing both fuel vehicles and NEVs) to increase NEV production and reduce fuel vehicle output; higher NEV credit ratio requirements raise fuel vehicle production costs and prices, suppressing consumer demand. (3) An increase in carbon trading prices raises production costs for both fuel vehicles and NEVs, leading to decreased market demand; hybrid manufacturers reduce emission reduction efforts, while others transfer costs through price hikes to boost profits. (4) Hybrid manufacturers face high carbon emission costs due to excessive actual fuel consumption, driving them to enhance emission reduction efforts and promote low-carbon technological innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Chenxu Wu & Yuxiang Zhang & Junwei Zhao & Chao Wang & Weide Chun, 2025. "Pricing and Emission Reduction Strategies of Heterogeneous Automakers Under the “Dual-Credit + Carbon Cap-and-Trade” Policy Scenario," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-34, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:14:p:2262-:d:1700727
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/14/2262/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/14/2262/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cheng, Lefeng & Yu, Feng & Huang, Pengrong & Liu, Guiyun & Zhang, Mengya & Sun, Runbao, 2025. "Game-theoretic evolution in renewable energy systems: Advancing sustainable energy management and decision optimization in decentralized power markets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    2. Bengang Gong & Xuan Xia & Jinshi Cheng, 2020. "Supply-Chain Pricing and Coordination for New Energy Vehicles Considering Heterogeneity in Consumers’ Low Carbon Preference," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Jia, Tingwen & Li, Chengjiang & Wang, Honglei & Hu, Yu-jie & Wang, Shiyuan & Xu, Guoteng & Hoang, Anh Tuan, 2024. "Subsidy policy or dual-credit policy? Evolutionary game analysis of green methanol vehicles promotion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    4. Yu, Hui & Li, Ying & Wang, Wei, 2023. "Optimal innovation strategies of automakers with market competition under the dual-credit policy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    5. Anna Stepanova & Antonio Tesoriere, 2011. "R&D With Spillovers: Monopoly Versus Noncooperative And Cooperative Duopoly," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 79(1), pages 125-144, January.
    6. David F. Drake & Paul R. Kleindorfer & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2016. "Technology Choice and Capacity Portfolios under Emissions Regulation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 25(6), pages 1006-1025, June.
    7. Qiangfei Chai & Yiming Li & Zhongdong Xiao & Kee-hung Lai, 2022. "Optimal Carbon Abatement Strategy for Manufacturers under Cap-and-Trade," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-21, September.
    8. Yi, Yongxi & Fu, Ao & Zhang, Sheng & Li, Yuqiong, 2024. "Dynamic pricing and joint carbon reduction strategies at the production and consumption end in a dual-channel fuel vehicle supply chain," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    9. Ishikawa, Nana & Shibata, Takashi, 2021. "R&D competition and cooperation with asymmetric spillovers in an oligopoly market," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 624-642.
    10. Liukai Yu & Xuehai Jiang & Yujie He & Yangyang Jiao, 2022. "Promoting the Diffusion of New Energy Vehicles under Dual Credit Policy: Asymmetric Competition and Cooperation in Complex Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-20, July.
    11. Lefeng Cheng & Pengrong Huang & Mengya Zhang & Ru Yang & Yafei Wang, 2025. "Optimizing Electricity Markets Through Game-Theoretical Methods: Strategic and Policy Implications for Power Purchasing and Generation Enterprises," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-90, January.
    12. He, Haonan & Li, Shiqiang & Wang, Shanyong & Zhang, Chaojia & Ma, Fei, 2023. "Value of dual-credit policy: Evidence from green technology innovation efficiency," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 182-198.
    13. Kangda Chen & Fuquan Zhao & Han Hao & Zongwei Liu, 2018. "Synergistic Impacts of China’s Subsidy Policy and New Energy Vehicle Credit Regulation on the Technological Development of Battery Electric Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, November.
    14. Zhongrui Wang & Qinghua Wu, 2021. "Carbon emission reduction and product collection decisions in the closed-loop supply chain with cap-and-trade regulation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(14), pages 4359-4383, July.
    15. Jing Shao & Hangjun Yang & Anming Zhang, 2019. "Adoption of Electric Vehicles: Manufacturers’ Incentive and Government Policy," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 53(2), pages 175-17-198.
    16. Chaabane, A. & Ramudhin, A. & Paquet, M., 2012. "Design of sustainable supply chains under the emission trading scheme," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 37-49.
    17. Ma, Miaomiao & Meng, Weidong & Huang, Bo & Li, Yuyu, 2023. "The influence of dual credit policy on new energy vehicle technology innovation under demand forecast information asymmetry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    18. Luo, Zheng & Chen, Xu & Wang, Xiaojun, 2016. "The role of co-opetition in low carbon manufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(2), pages 392-403.
    19. Xu, Xiaoping & He, Ping & Xu, Hao & Zhang, Quanpeng, 2017. "Supply chain coordination with green technology under cap-and-trade regulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 433-442.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cao, Kaiying & Guo, Qiang & Xu, Yuqiu, 2023. "Information sharing and carbon reduction strategies with extreme weather in the platform economy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    2. Xu, Song & Govindan, Kannan & Wang, Wanru & Yang, Wenting, 2024. "Supply chain management under cap-and-trade regulation: A literature review and research opportunities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    3. Sina Abbasi & Babek Erdebilli, 2023. "Green Closed-Loop Supply Chain Networks’ Response to Various Carbon Policies during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-30, February.
    4. Zhitao Xu & Adel Elomri & Shaligram Pokharel & Fatih Mutlu, 2019. "The Design of Green Supply Chains under Carbon Policies: A Literature Review of Quantitative Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, May.
    5. Shaojian Qu & Guoqing Jiang & Ying Ji & Guangming Zhang & Nabe Mohamed, 2021. "Newsvendor’s optimal decisions under stochastic demand and cap-and-trade regulation," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(12), pages 17764-17787, December.
    6. Pun, Hubert & Ghamat, Salar, 2025. "Cap-and-trade under a dual-channel setting in the presence of information asymmetry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 322(2), pages 500-510.
    7. Xu, Zirui & Li, Ying & Li, Feifan, 2024. "Electric vehicle supply chain under dual-credit and subsidy policies: Technology innovation, infrastructure construction and coordination," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    8. Yue Tan & Chunxiang Guo, 2019. "Research on Two-Way Logistics Operation with Uncertain Recycling Quality in Government Multi-Policy Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Pazoki, Mostafa & Samarghandi, Hamed, 2020. "Take-back regulation: Remanufacturing or Eco-design?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    10. Xianliang Shi & Genzhu Li & Ciwei Dong & Yefei Yang, 2020. "Value Co-Creation Behavior in Green Supply Chains: An Empirical Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-26, July.
    11. Ji, Jingna & Li, Tao & Yang, Lei, 2023. "Pricing and carbon reduction strategies for vertically differentiated firms under Cap-and-Trade regulation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    12. Cong Wang & Zongbao Zou & Shidao Geng, 2021. "Green Technology Investment in a Decentralized Supply Chain under Demand Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-25, March.
    13. Bian, Junsong & Zhao, Xuan, 2020. "Tax or subsidy? An analysis of environmental policies in supply chains with retail competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 901-914.
    14. Yang, Lei & Hu, Yijuan & Huang, Lijuan, 2020. "Collecting mode selection in a remanufacturing supply chain under cap-and-trade regulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(2), pages 480-496.
    15. Liang Shen & Fei Lin & T. C. E. Cheng, 2022. "Low-Carbon Transition Models of High Carbon Supply Chains under the Mixed Carbon Cap-and-Trade and Carbon Tax Policy in the Carbon Neutrality Era," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-21, September.
    16. Yu, Min & Cruz, Jose M. & Li, Dong & Masoumi, Amir H., 2022. "A multiperiod competitive supply chain framework with environmental policies and investments in sustainable operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(1), pages 112-123.
    17. Dou, Guowei & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "Does implementing trade-in and green technology together benefit the environment?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(2), pages 517-533.
    18. Rongjiang Cai & Tao Zhang & Xi Wang & Qiaoran Jia & Shufang Zhao & Nana Liu & Xiaoguang Wang, 2024. "Evolutionary Game and Simulation Analysis of New-Energy Vehicle Promotion in China Based on Reward and Punishment Mechanisms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-24, September.
    19. Zolfagharinia, Hossein & Zangiabadi, Maryam & Hafezi, Maryam, 2023. "How much is enough? Government subsidies in supporting green product development," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(3), pages 1316-1333.
    20. Shuang Ma & Linda L. Zhang, 2024. "Optimizing joint operations decision-making involving substitute products: a Stackelberg game model and nested PSO," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 343(1), pages 373-399, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:14:p:2262-:d:1700727. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.