IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i13p3010-d1188434.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study to Identify Long-Term Care Insurance Using Advanced Intelligent RST Hybrid Models with Two-Stage Performance Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • You-Shyang Chen

    (College of Management, National Chin-Yi University of Technology, Taichung 411030, Taiwan)

  • Ying-Hsun Hung

    (Department of Finance, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung 413310, Taiwan)

  • Yu-Sheng Lin

    (Executive Doctoral Business Administration, Danphine University of Business, CEDEX 16, 75775 Paris, France)

Abstract

With the motivation of long-term care 2.0 plans, forecasting models to identify potential customers of long-term care insurance (LTCI) are an important and interesting issue. From the limited literature, most past researchers emphasize traditional statistics techniques to address this issue; however, these are lacking in some areas. For example, intelligent hybrid models for LTCI are lacking, performance measurement of components for hybrid models is lacking, and research results for interpretative capacities are lacking, resulting in a black box scenario and difficulty in making decisions, and the gap between identifying potential customers and constructing hybrid models is unbridged. To solve the shortcomings mentioned above, this study proposes some advanced intelligent single and hybrid models; the study object is LTCI customers. The proposed hybrid models were used on the experimental dataset collected from real insurance data and possess the following advantages: (1) The feature selection technique was used to simplify variables for the purpose of improving model performance. (2) The performance of hybrid models was evaluated against some machine learning methods, including rough set theory, decision trees, multilayer perceptron, support vector machine, genetic algorithm, random forest, logistic regression, and naive Bayes, and sensitivity analysis was performed in terms of accuracy, coverage, rules number, and standard deviation. (3) We used the C4.5 algorithm of decision trees and the LEM2 algorithm of rough sets to extract and provide valuably comprehensible decisional rules as decision-making references for the interested parties for their varied benefits. (4) We used post hoc testing to verify the significant difference in groups. Conclusively, this study effectively identifies potential customers for their key attributes and creates a decision rule set of knowledge for use as a reference when solving practical problems by forming a structured solution. This study is a new trial in the LTCI application field and realizes novel creative application values. Such a hybrid model is rarely seen in identifying LTCI potential customers; thus, the study has sufficient application contribution and managerial benefits to attract much concern from the interested parties.

Suggested Citation

  • You-Shyang Chen & Ying-Hsun Hung & Yu-Sheng Lin, 2023. "A Study to Identify Long-Term Care Insurance Using Advanced Intelligent RST Hybrid Models with Two-Stage Performance Evaluation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-34, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:13:p:3010-:d:1188434
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/13/3010/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/13/3010/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jie Yan & Sheng Zeng & Bijiang Tian & Yuanwen Cao & Wenchen Yang & Feng Zhu, 2023. "Relationship between Highway Geometric Characteristics and Accident Risk: A Multilayer Perceptron Model (MLP) Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Ghaddar, Bissan & Naoum-Sawaya, Joe, 2018. "High dimensional data classification and feature selection using support vector machines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(3), pages 993-1004.
    3. Yang, Yunfeng & Chen, Guohua & Reniers, Genserik, 2020. "Vulnerability assessment of atmospheric storage tanks to floods based on logistic regression," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    4. Herbert Woratschek & Chris Horbel & Bastian Popp, 2020. "Determining customer satisfaction and loyalty from a value co-creation perspective," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(11-12), pages 777-799, July.
    5. Shi, Hon-Yi & Yeh, Shu-Chuan Jennifer & Chou, Hsueh-Chih & Wang, Wen Chun, 2023. "Long-term care insurance purchase decisions of registered nurses: Deep learning versus logistic regression models," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    6. Ravi Kumar, P. & Ravi, V., 2007. "Bankruptcy prediction in banks and firms via statistical and intelligent techniques - A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(1), pages 1-28, July.
    7. Sheth, Jagdish & Kellstadt, Charles H., 2021. "Next frontiers of research in data driven marketing: Will techniques keep up with data tsunami?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 780-784.
    8. Eva Boj del Val & M. Mercè Claramunt Bielsa & Xavier Varea Soler, 2020. "Role of Private Long-Term Care Insurance in Financial Sustainability for an Aging Society," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    9. Kuan-Min Wang & Yuan-Ming Lee, 2023. "Are life insurance futures a safe haven during COVID-19?," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-27, December.
    10. Fung, Derrick W.H. & Wei, Pengyu & Yang, Charles C., 2023. "State subsidized reinsurance programs: Impacts on efficiency, premiums, and expenses of the U.S. health insurance markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 941-954.
    11. Shah, Denish & Murthi, B.P.S., 2021. "Marketing in a data-driven digital world: Implications for the role and scope of marketing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 772-779.
    12. Pätäri, Eero & Karell, Ville & Luukka, Pasi & Yeomans, Julian S, 2018. "Comparison of the multicriteria decision-making methods for equity portfolio selection: The U.S. evidence," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(2), pages 655-672.
    13. Zhongfeng Qin & Qiqi Li, 2023. "An uncertain support vector machine with imprecise observations," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 611-629, December.
    14. Dominguez, Roberto & Cannella, Salvatore & Ponte, Borja & Framinan, Jose M., 2020. "On the dynamics of closed-loop supply chains under remanufacturing lead time variability," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Treiblmaier, Horst & Petrozhitskaya, Elena, 2023. "Is it time for marketing to reappraise B2C relationship management? The emergence of a new loyalty paradigm through blockchain technology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    2. Blasco-Arcas, Lorena & Lee, Hsin-Hsuan Meg & Kastanakis, Minas N. & Alcañiz, Mariano & Reyes-Menendez, Ana, 2022. "The role of consumer data in marketing: A research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 436-452.
    3. Zhou, Fanyin & Fu, Lijun & Li, Zhiyong & Xu, Jiawei, 2022. "The recurrence of financial distress: A survival analysis," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1100-1115.
    4. Liu, Wenjie & Liu, Wei & Shen, Ningning & Xu, Zhitao & Xie, Naiming & Chen, Jian & Zhou, Huiyu, 2022. "Pricing and collection decisions of a closed-loop supply chain with fuzzy demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    5. Baumöhl, Eduard & Iwasaki, Ichiro & Kočenda, Evžen, 2019. "Institutions and determinants of firm survival in European emerging markets," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 431-453.
    6. Fethi, Meryem Duygun & Pasiouras, Fotios, 2010. "Assessing bank efficiency and performance with operational research and artificial intelligence techniques: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(2), pages 189-198, July.
    7. Andrea C. Hupman, 2022. "Cutoff Threshold Decisions for Classification Algorithms with Risk Aversion," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 63-78, March.
    8. Le, Hong Hanh & Viviani, Jean-Laurent, 2018. "Predicting bank failure: An improvement by implementing a machine-learning approach to classical financial ratios," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 16-25.
    9. Lin, Fengyi & Yeh, Ching Chiang & Lee, Meng Yuan, 2013. "A Hybrid Business Failure Prediction Model Using Locally Linear Embedding And Support Vector Machines," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(1), pages 82-97, March.
    10. Li, Hui & Sun, Jie, 2009. "Hybridizing principles of the Electre method with case-based reasoning for data mining: Electre-CBR-I and Electre-CBR-II," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 214-224, August.
    11. Rahimikia, Eghbal & Mohammadi, Shapour & Rahmani, Teymur & Ghazanfari, Mehdi, 2017. "Detecting corporate tax evasion using a hybrid intelligent system: A case study of Iran," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 1-17.
    12. Serrano-Cinca, Carlos & Gutiérrez-Nieto, Begoña & Bernate-Valbuena, Martha, 2019. "The use of accounting anomalies indicators to predict business failure," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 353-375.
    13. Fatima Alali & Silvia Romero, 2013. "Characteristics of failed U.S. commercial banks: an exploratory study," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 53(4), pages 1149-1174, December.
    14. Carlos Serrano-Cinca & Yolanda Fuertes-Call鮠 & Bego uti鲲ez-Nieto & Beatriz Cuellar-Fernᮤez, 2014. "Path modelling to bankruptcy: causes and symptoms of the banking crisis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(31), pages 3798-3811, November.
    15. Mousavi, Mohammad M. & Ouenniche, Jamal & Xu, Bing, 2015. "Performance evaluation of bankruptcy prediction models: An orientation-free super-efficiency DEA-based framework," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 64-75.
    16. Ahmad, Farhan & Bask, Anu & Laari, Sini & Robinson, Craig V., 2023. "Business management perspectives on the circular economy: Present state and future directions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    17. Õie Renata Siimon & Oliver Lukason, 2021. "A Decision Support System for Corporate Tax Arrears Prediction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-23, July.
    18. Robaina-Calderín, Lorena & Martín-Santana, Josefa D. & Melián-Alzola, Lucía, 2023. "Prosocial customer in the public sector: A PLS-SEM analysis applied to blood donation (active donors)," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    19. Hyunjung Nam & Won Gyun No & Youngsu Lee, 2017. "Are Commercial Financial Databases Reliable? New Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-23, August.
    20. Misuri, Alessio & Ricci, Federica & Sorichetti, Riccardo & Cozzani, Valerio, 2023. "The Effect of Safety Barrier Degradation on the Severity of Primary Natech Scenarios," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:13:p:3010-:d:1188434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.