IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/tjssrr/2018p175-180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing the Production Program of a Small Innovative Chemical Enterprise in the Face of Changing Demand

Author

Listed:
  • I. L. Beilin*

    (Kazan Federal University, Institute of Management, Economics and Finance)

  • V. V. Khomenko

    (Kazan Federal University, Institute of Management, Economics and Finance)

  • N. M. Yakupova

    (Kazan Federal University, Institute of Management, Economics and Finance)

  • E. I. Kadochnikova

    (Kazan Federal University, Institute of Management, Economics and Finance)

  • D. D. Aleeva

    (Kazan Federal University, Institute of Management, Economics and Finance)

Abstract

The article examines the economic problems of innovative enterprises, taking into account the cyclical nature of their development, which are characterized by models of increasing profits with the least losses. As the main method, additive convolution is used with equally important and weighted demand for an innovative product. The estimation of the economically optimal volume of products is presented. The research is complex and can have an impact on social, environmental and other performance indicators of the production sector of the economy. The process of globalization has led to the emergence of a complex network of relationships in the business environment. In a free market economy, this means an increased complexity and uncertainty of factors affecting the financial position of the entities. At present, many features of the finance and economics of innovative enterprises are unclear, which makes it difficult to analyze using traditional methods of economic and mathematical modeling. Forecasting the bankruptcy of business and consumers is also inaccurate and ambiguous, as many internal and external factors influence this process. Even a simple statement that an enterprise or a consumer is at risk of bankruptcy should be considered inaccurate and in fact, rarely in an economic reality there are entities that can be considered bankrupt 100%. It is almost impossible to accurately determine the degree of threat of bankruptcy using traditional statistical methods, such as multidimensional discriminant analysis. When the value of the discriminant function is less than the threshold value, it is considered that the enterprise is exposed to the risk of bankruptcy. Given the cyclical nature of the development of an innovative enterprise, it seems necessary to define ambiguous concepts, such as "high risk of bankruptcy" or "low risk of bankruptcy." We need approaches that can be used not only to predict the level of risk, but also to determine the degree of positive financial position of the analyzed enterprise, for example, "High Solvency" or "Average Solvency", depending on changes in the production program.

Suggested Citation

  • I. L. Beilin* & V. V. Khomenko & N. M. Yakupova & E. I. Kadochnikova & D. D. Aleeva, 2018. "Managing the Production Program of a Small Innovative Chemical Enterprise in the Face of Changing Demand," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 175-180:5.
    • Handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:175-180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/spi5.40.175.180.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/7/special_issue/12-2018/5/4
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Balcaen, Sofie & Ooghe, Hubert, 2006. "35 years of studies on business failure: an overview of the classic statistical methodologies and their related problems," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 63-93.
    2. Ravi Kumar, P. & Ravi, V., 2007. "Bankruptcy prediction in banks and firms via statistical and intelligent techniques - A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(1), pages 1-28, July.
    3. Ji, Tingting, 2004. "Consumer Credit Delinquency And Bankruptcy Forecasting Using Advanced Econometrc Modeling," MPRA Paper 3187, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van der Heijden, Hans, 2022. "Predicting industry sectors from financial statements: An illustration of machine learning in accounting research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(5).
    2. Zhou, Fanyin & Fu, Lijun & Li, Zhiyong & Xu, Jiawei, 2022. "The recurrence of financial distress: A survival analysis," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1100-1115.
    3. Liang, Deron & Lu, Chia-Chi & Tsai, Chih-Fong & Shih, Guan-An, 2016. "Financial ratios and corporate governance indicators in bankruptcy prediction: A comprehensive study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(2), pages 561-572.
    4. Boratyńska, Katarzyna & Grzegorzewska, Emilia, 2018. "Bankruptcy prediction in the agribusiness sector: Lessons from quantitative and qualitative approaches," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 175-181.
    5. Michael Filletti & Aaron Grech, 2020. "Using News Articles and Financial Data to predict the likelihood of bankruptcy," Papers 2003.13414, arXiv.org.
    6. Serrano-Cinca, Carlos & Gutiérrez-Nieto, Begoña & Bernate-Valbuena, Martha, 2019. "The use of accounting anomalies indicators to predict business failure," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 353-375.
    7. Mousavi, Mohammad M. & Ouenniche, Jamal & Xu, Bing, 2015. "Performance evaluation of bankruptcy prediction models: An orientation-free super-efficiency DEA-based framework," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 64-75.
    8. Õie Renata Siimon & Oliver Lukason, 2021. "A Decision Support System for Corporate Tax Arrears Prediction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-23, July.
    9. Hyunjung Nam & Won Gyun No & Youngsu Lee, 2017. "Are Commercial Financial Databases Reliable? New Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-23, August.
    10. De Bock, Koen W. & Coussement, Kristof & Lessmann, Stefan, 2020. "Cost-sensitive business failure prediction when misclassification costs are uncertain: A heterogeneous ensemble selection approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(2), pages 612-630.
    11. David Veganzones, 2022. "Corporate failure prediction using threshold‐based models," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(5), pages 956-979, August.
    12. Kumar, Rahul & Deb, Soumya Guha & Mukherjee, Shubhadeep, 2020. "Do words reveal the latent truth? Identifying communication patterns of corporate losers," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(C).
    13. Mohammad Mahdi Mousavi & Jamal Ouenniche & Kaoru Tone, 2023. "A dynamic performance evaluation of distress prediction models," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(4), pages 756-784, July.
    14. Douglas, Ella & Lont, David & Scott, Tom, 2014. "Finance company failure in New Zealand during 2006–2009: Predictable failures?," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 277-295.
    15. repec:ctc:sdimse:dime19_03 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. du Jardin, Philippe, 2015. "Bankruptcy prediction using terminal failure processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 286-303.
    17. Zeineb Affes & Rania Hentati-Kaffel, 2016. "Predicting US banks bankruptcy: logit versus Canonical Discriminant analysis," Post-Print halshs-01281948, HAL.
    18. Yin Shi & Xiaoni Li, 2021. "Determinants of financial distress in the European air transport industry: The moderating effect of being a flag-carrier," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-17, November.
    19. Citterio, Alberto, 2024. "Bank failure prediction models: Review and outlook," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    20. Alessandra Amendola & Marialuisa Restaino & Luca Sensini, 2010. "Variabile Selection in Forecasting Models for Corporate Bankruptcy," Working Papers 3_216, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Statistiche, Università degli Studi di Salerno.
    21. Ioannis Tsolas, 2015. "Firm credit risk evaluation: a series two-stage DEA modeling framework," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 233(1), pages 483-500, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:175-180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=7&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.