IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i14p2440-d861888.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing an Enterprise Diagnostic Index System Based on Interval-Valued Hesitant Fuzzy Clustering

Author

Listed:
  • Tian Chen

    (School of Economics and Management, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan 523808, China
    School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China)

  • Shiyao Li

    (School of Economics and Management, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan 523808, China
    School of Management and Economics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, No. 68, Wenchang Road, Yieryi Street, Kunming 650093, China)

  • Chun-Ming Yang

    (School of Economics and Management, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan 523808, China)

  • Wenting Deng

    (School of Economics and Management, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan 523808, China
    School of Management and Economics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, No. 68, Wenchang Road, Yieryi Street, Kunming 650093, China)

Abstract

Global economic integration drives the development of dynamic competition. In a dynamic competitive environment, the ever-changing customer demands and technology directly affect the leadership of the core competence of enterprises. Therefore, assessing the performance of enterprises in a timely manner is necessary to adjust business activities and completely adapt to new changes. Enterprise diagnosis is a scientific tool for judging the development status of enterprises, and building a scientific and rational index system is the key to enterprise diagnosis. Considering the large number of enterprise diagnostic indicators and the high similarity among indicators, this study proposes a selection method for enterprise diagnostic indicators based on interval-valued hesitant fuzzy clustering by comparing the existing indicator systems. First, enterprise organizations are considered as the starting point. Through the key analysis of relevant indicators of domestic and foreign enterprise diagnosis, enterprise diagnosis candidate indicators are constructed from three aspects, namely enterprise performance, employee health, and social benefit. In view of the ambiguity and inconsistency of expert judgment, this study proposes an interval-valued hesitant fuzzy set based on the characteristics of hesitant fuzzy sets and interval-valued evaluation. For improving the interval-valued hesitant fuzzy entropy function, an interval-valued hesitant fuzzy similarity measurement formula considering information features is designed to avoid the problem of data length and improve the degree of identification among indicators. Then, the similarity, equivalence, and truncation matrices are constructed, and the interval-valued hesitant fuzzy clustering method is used to eliminate redundant indicators with repeated information. The availability of the proposed method is illustrated via an example, and the key indicators in the enterprise diagnostic index system are found. Finally, the advantages of the proposed method are discussed using comparative analysis with existing methods. A rational and comprehensive enterprise diagnostic index system was constructed. The system can be used as a scientific basis for diagnosing the development of enterprises and providing an objective and effective reference.

Suggested Citation

  • Tian Chen & Shiyao Li & Chun-Ming Yang & Wenting Deng, 2022. "Developing an Enterprise Diagnostic Index System Based on Interval-Valued Hesitant Fuzzy Clustering," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(14), pages 1-22, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:14:p:2440-:d:861888
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/14/2440/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/14/2440/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Campbell Quick & Marilyn Macik‐Frey & Cary L. Cooper, 2007. "Managerial Dimensions of Organizational Health: The Healthy Leader at Work," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 189-205, March.
    2. P. L. Yu, 1973. "A Class of Solutions for Group Decision Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(8), pages 936-946, April.
    3. Joshi, Deepa & Kumar, Sanjay, 2016. "Interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy Choquet integral based TOPSIS method for multi-criteria group decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(1), pages 183-191.
    4. Ping Wang & Jie Wang & Guiwu Wei & Cun Wei, 2019. "Similarity Measures of q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Sets Based on Cosine Function and Their Applications," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Shuang Ren & Guiyao Tang & Susan Jackson, 2018. "Green human resource management research in emergence: A review and future directions," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 769-803, September.
    6. R. Krishankumar & K. S. Ravichandran & M. Ifjaz Ahmed & Samarjit Kar & Xindong Peng, 2019. "Interval-Valued Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Set Based Muirhead Mean for Multi-Attribute Group Decision-Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Nesrin Alptekin, 2014. "Comparison of Turkey and European Union Countries’ Health Indicators by Using Fuzzy Clustering Analysis," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 4(10), pages 68-74, October.
    8. Chiranjibe Jana & G. Muhiuddin & Madhumangal Pal & D. Al-Kadi, 2021. "Intuitionistic Fuzzy Dombi Hybrid Decision-Making Method and Their Applications to Enterprise Financial Performance Evaluation," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-14, July.
    9. Laura Schons & Maria Steinmeier, 2016. "Walk the Talk? How Symbolic and Substantive CSR Actions Affect Firm Performance Depending on Stakeholder Proximity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(6), pages 358-372, November.
    10. Lv, Chang & Zhang, Chaoyong & Lian, Kunlei & Ren, Yaping & Meng, Leilei, 2022. "A two-echelon fuzzy clustering based heuristic for large-scale bike sharing repositioning problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 54-75.
    11. Wildgaard, Lorna, 2016. "A critical cluster analysis of 44 indicators of author-level performance," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 1055-1078.
    12. Lee, Chang Hwan & Rhee, Byong-Duk, 2011. "Trade credit for supply chain coordination," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(1), pages 136-146, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexey V. Yakovlev & Vladimir V. Alekseev & Maria V. Volchikhina & Sergey V. Petrenko, 2022. "A Combinatorial Model for Determining Information Loss in Organizational and Technical Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-12, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wan, Shuping & Wang, Feng & Dong, Jiuying, 2017. "Additive consistent interval-valued Atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation and likelihood comparison algorithm based group decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(2), pages 571-582.
    2. Richa Chaudhary, 2019. "Green human resource management and job pursuit intention: Examining the underlying processes," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 929-937, July.
    3. Shuli Liu & Xinwang Liu, 2016. "A Sample Survey Based Linguistic MADM Method with Prospect Theory for Online Shopping Problems," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 749-774, July.
    4. Milad Zamanifar & Seyed Mohammad Seyedhoseyni, 2017. "Recovery planning model for roadways network after natural hazards," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(2), pages 699-716, June.
    5. Omer F. Baris, 2018. "Timing effect in bargaining and ex ante efficiency of the relative utilitarian solution," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 84(4), pages 547-556, June.
    6. Chen, Lisa Y. & Wang, Tien-Chin, 2009. "Optimizing partners' choice in IS/IT outsourcing projects: The strategic decision of fuzzy VIKOR," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 233-242, July.
    7. Yuanyuan Zhang & Zhe Ouyang, 2021. "Doing well by doing good: How corporate environmental responsibility influences corporate financial performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 54-63, January.
    8. Al-Shaer, Habiba & Uyar, Ali & Kuzey, Cemil & Karaman, Abdullah S., 2023. "Do shareholders punish or reward excessive CSR engagement? Moderating effect of cash flow and firm growth," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    9. Dheeraj Kumar Joshi & Ismat Beg & Sanjay Kumar, 2018. "Hesitant Probabilistic Fuzzy Linguistic Sets with Applications in Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Uyar, Ali & Lodh, Suman & Nandy, Monomita & Kuzey, Cemil & Karaman, Abdullah S., 2023. "Tradeoff between corporate investment and CSR: The moderating effect of financial slack, workforce slack, and board gender diversity," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    11. Domenech, B. & Ferrer-Martí, L. & Pastor, R., 2015. "Hierarchical methodology to optimize the design of stand-alone electrification systems for rural communities considering technical and social criteria," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 182-196.
    12. Hisham Alidrisi, 2021. "An Innovative Job Evaluation Approach Using the VIKOR Algorithm," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-19, June.
    13. Roberto Cervelló Royo & Fernando García García & Francisco Guijarro-Martínez & Ismael Moya-Clemente, 2011. "Housing Ranking: a model of equilibrium between buyers and sellers expectations," ERSA conference papers ersa11p314, European Regional Science Association.
    14. Büsing, Christina & Goetzmann, Kai-Simon & Matuschke, Jannik & Stiller, Sebastian, 2017. "Reference points and approximation algorithms in multicriteria discrete optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 829-840.
    15. Ali Uyar & Simone Pizzi & Fabio Caputo & Cemil Kuzey & Abdullah S. Karaman, 2022. "Do shareholders reward or punish risky firms due to CSR reporting and assurance?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(5), pages 1596-1620, July.
    16. repec:idn:jimfjn:v:4:y:2018:i:1j:p:1-22 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Wei Li & Weining Li & Veikko Seppänen & Timo Koivumäki, 2022. "How and when does perceived greenwashing affect employees' job performance? Evidence from China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1722-1735, September.
    18. Serafim Opricovic, 2009. "A Compromise Solution in Water Resources Planning," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(8), pages 1549-1561, June.
    19. Janssen, Sander & van Ittersum, Martin K., 2007. "Assessing farm innovations and responses to policies: A review of bio-economic farm models," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 622-636, June.
    20. Büyüközkan, Gülçin & Ruan, Da, 2008. "Evaluation of software development projects using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 77(5), pages 464-475.
    21. Mou, W.M. & Wong, W.-K. & McAleer, M.J., 2018. "Financial Credit Risk and Core Enterprise Supply Chains," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2018-27, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:14:p:2440-:d:861888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.