IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v9y2020i12p495-d457115.html

Estimating the Impact of Urban Planning Concepts on Reducing the Urban Sprawl of Ulaanbaatar City Using Certain Spatial Indicators

Author

Listed:
  • Bolormaa Batsuuri

    (Department of Geography, School of Arts and Sciences, National University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar 14200, Mongolia)

  • Christine Fürst

    (Department of Sustainable Landscape Development, Institute for Geosciences and Geography, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Von-Seckendorff-Platz 4, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany)

  • Buyandelger Myagmarsuren

    (Department of Land Management, School of Agroecology, Mongolian University of Life Sciences, Ulaanbaatar 17024, Mongolia)

Abstract

The urban sprawl process of Ulaanbaatar has changed dramatically due to population growth. Ulaanbaatar city land management master plan defined the settlement zone area suitable for living as 33,698 ha. However, due to unrestricted urban sprawl caused by the exponential growth of the city’s population, the settlement zone area reached 39,235 ha, which exceeds the limit by 5537 ha. In order to tackle this issue, several urban planning concepts were developed to be implemented within Ulaanbaatar city urban planning framework. It is, in any case, problematic to choose a single planning concept due to the fact that neither measurements nor analyses are being made of the respective spatial indicators in urban planning assumptions that are taking urban form into consideration. One of the prerequisites for identifying an optimal concept in urban planning is an assessment of urban form, and measuring the impacts against its spatial data. This study uses 1990–2020 satellite image data to investigate the urban form of Ulaanbaatar with a future action plan. Using remote sensing and GIS technology, Ulaanbaatar city sprawl was analyzed for defining urban form, and consequent results were obtained by comparatively measuring the impacts of monocentric, polycentric, and compact city concepts on city sprawl by applying spatial indicators that have been used in the world’s major cities. The study results show that the compact city concept is the optimal solution to reduce uncontrolled city sprawl based on a technical point of view. This will lower Ulaanbaatar’s sprawl threefold and compress the urban settlement area down from 39,235 ha to 12,479 ha.

Suggested Citation

  • Bolormaa Batsuuri & Christine Fürst & Buyandelger Myagmarsuren, 2020. "Estimating the Impact of Urban Planning Concepts on Reducing the Urban Sprawl of Ulaanbaatar City Using Certain Spatial Indicators," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:9:y:2020:i:12:p:495-:d:457115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/12/495/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/12/495/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Myagmartseren Purevtseren & Bazarkhand Tsegmid & Myagmarjav Indra & Munkhnaran Sugar, 2018. "The Fractal Geometry of Urban Land Use: The Case of Ulaanbaatar City, Mongolia," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Purevtseren Myagmartseren & Myagmarsuren Buyandelger & S. Anders Brandt, 2017. "Implications of a Spatial Multicriteria Decision Analysis for Urban Development in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-16, February.
    3. Hariklia D. Skilodimou & George D. Bathrellos & Efterpi Koskeridou & Konstantinos Soukis & Dimitrios Rozos, 2018. "Physical and Anthropogenic Factors Related to Landslide Activity in the Northern Peloponnese, Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Fujita, Masahisa & Ogawa, Hideaki, 1982. "Multiple equilibria and structural transition of non-monocentric urban configurations," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 161-196, May.
    5. George D. Bathrellos & Hariklia D. Skilodimou, 2019. "Land Use Planning for Natural Hazards," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-4, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sowińska-Świerkosz, Barbara & Soszyński, Dawid, 2022. "Spatial indicators as a tool to support the decision-making process in relation to different goals of rural planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Mashi, Sani Abubakar & Abdullahi, Shuaibu Abba & Jenkwe, Elizabeth Dorsuu, 2025. "The multidimensional lens of urban sprawl: Spatiotemporal dynamics and governance in Abuja, Nigeria," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    3. Galmandakh Boldbaatar & Gantulga Gombodorj & Dorligjav Donorov & Robert Andriambololonaharisoamalala & Myagmarjav Indra & Myagmartseren Purevtseren, 2024. "Land suitability analysis in monocentric post-socialist city: Case of Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(8), pages 1-20, August.
    4. Muhammad Salem & Arghadeep Bose & Bashar Bashir & Debanjan Basak & Subham Roy & Indrajit R. Chowdhury & Abdullah Alsalman & Naoki Tsurusaki, 2021. "Urban Expansion Simulation Based on Various Driving Factors Using a Logistic Regression Model: Delhi as a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hariklia D. Skilodimou & George D. Bathrellos, 2021. "Natural and Technological Hazards in Urban Areas: Assessment, Planning and Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-5, July.
    2. Dimitrios E. Alexakis & George D. Bathrellos & Hariklia D. Skilodimou & Dimitra E. Gamvroula, 2021. "Spatial Distribution and Evaluation of Arsenic and Zinc Content in the Soil of a Karst Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Jagadish Kundu & Kripamoy Sarkar & Ebrahim Ghaderpour & Gabriele Scarascia Mugnozza & Paolo Mazzanti, 2023. "A GIS-Based Kinematic Analysis for Jointed Rock Slope Stability: An Application to Himalayan Slopes," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-27, February.
    4. Hariklia D. Skilodimou & George D. Bathrellos & Dimitrios E. Alexakis, 2021. "Flood Hazard Assessment Mapping in Burned and Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Mona Jabbari & Fernando Fonseca & Rui Ramos, 2021. "Accessibility and Connectivity Criteria for Assessing Walkability: An Application in Qazvin, Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Yukiko SAITO, 2013. "Role of Hub Firms in Geographical Transaction Network," Discussion papers 13080, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    7. Ivan Muñiz & Anna Galindo & Miguel Angel García, 2005. "Descentralisation, Integration and polycentrism in Barcelona," Working Papers wpdea0512, Department of Applied Economics at Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona.
    8. Renato Vieira & Eduardo Haddad, 2012. "An Accessibility Index for the Metropolitan Region of São Paulo," TD NEREUS 15-2012, Núcleo de Economia Regional e Urbana da Universidade de São Paulo (NEREUS).
    9. Duranton, Gilles & Puga, Diego, 2014. "The Growth of Cities," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 5, pages 781-853, Elsevier.
    10. GUILLAIN, Rachel & HURIOT, Jean-Marie, 1999. "How information shapes cities: theory and facts," LATEC - Document de travail - Economie (1991-2003) 1999-05, LATEC, Laboratoire d'Analyse et des Techniques EConomiques, CNRS UMR 5118, Université de Bourgogne.
    11. McMillen, Daniel P. & Smith, Stefani C., 2003. "The number of subcenters in large urban areas," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 321-338, May.
    12. Berliant, Marcus & Wang, Ping, 2008. "Urban growth and subcenter formation: A trolley ride from the Staples Center to Disneyland and the Rose Bowl," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 679-693, March.
    13. Pierre Dessemontet & Vincent Kaufmann & Christophe Jemelin, 2010. "Switzerland as a Single Metropolitan Area? A Study of its Commuting Network," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(13), pages 2785-2802, November.
    14. Chunil Kim & Choongik Choi, 2019. "Towards Sustainable Urban Spatial Structure: Does Decentralization Reduce Commuting Times?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-28, February.
    15. Vicente Romero de à vila Serrano, 2019. "The Intrametropolitan Geography of Knowledge-Intensive Business Services (KIBS): A Comparative Analysis of Six European and U.S. City-Regions," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 33(4), pages 279-295, November.
    16. Raian Kudashev & Pierre M. Picard, 2025. "Floorspace price discontinuities and taxation in cross-border commuting areas," DEM Discussion Paper Series 25-16, Department of Economics at the University of Luxembourg.
    17. Fujita, Masahisa & Thisse, Jacques-François, 2009. "New Economic Geography: An appraisal on the occasion of Paul Krugman's 2008 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 109-119, March.
    18. Anthony J. Venables, 2025. "Location choice when the number of jobs matters: Matching in spatial equilibrium," CEP Discussion Papers dp2087, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    19. Gaigné, Carl & Riou, Stéphane & Thisse, Jacques-François, 2016. "How to make the metropolitan area work? Neither big government, nor laissez-faire," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 100-113.
    20. Bertaud, Alain & Brueckner, Jan K., 2005. "Analyzing building-height restrictions: predicted impacts and welfare costs," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 109-125, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:9:y:2020:i:12:p:495-:d:457115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.