IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v9y2020i11p428-d438761.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Land Regulation and Heterogeneity of Housing Conditions of Inter-Provincial Migrants in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yuting Cao

    (College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, No.105 West 3rd Ring Road North, Beijing 100048, China)

  • Ran Liu

    (College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, No.105 West 3rd Ring Road North, Beijing 100048, China)

  • Wei Qi

    (Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Jin Wen

    (College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, No.105 West 3rd Ring Road North, Beijing 100048, China)

Abstract

The relation between urban land regulation and migrants’ access to decent housing is a fascinating topic in developing countries. Land-use conflicts emerge when entrepreneurial pursuits (for example, the exchange value of land) affect the fortunes of low-wage migrant workers using the destination city to settle down (through the use value of land). Land-use disputes and housing opportunity inequality (between the “land scarcity with migrant explosion” areas and the “land-abundant but migration-inactive” areas) is apparent across different kinds of cities. This article reviews the relationship between China’s urban land supply and regulation system and the migrant housing-condition problem. Our spatial analysis attests to the areal variance of migrant housing conditions (overcrowding and shortages of basic amenities such as toilet and kitchen facilities) across 301 Chinese cities. The analysis results explain the relationship between the inferior housing conditions in the coastal metropolises and the strict management of land uses in China’s first-tier cities. Using micro household data from the national 1% population sampling survey (National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2015), this research provides a vivid case study at a large national scale to compare migrant housing amenity across different cities. This empirical study can advance understanding of the land-use disputes (exchange value vs. use value of urban land), which are an important structural root of housing inequality among different kinds of host cities (not merely among migrant workers themselves or across neighborhood scales). This macro-level variance of land demand, supply, and the regulation system proves the key challenge to achieving social harmony. Beyond a top-down land and housing system in China today, some more bottom-up and participatory migrant housing supply means (such as informal housing schemes such as “urban villages”) could be another way to address the above housing challenge. In this sense, we have mapped the migrants’ housing conditions in the Chinese top-down and marketization context, which can be contrasted with the informal and participatory housing supply in some other country contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuting Cao & Ran Liu & Wei Qi & Jin Wen, 2020. "Urban Land Regulation and Heterogeneity of Housing Conditions of Inter-Provincial Migrants in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:9:y:2020:i:11:p:428-:d:438761
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/11/428/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/11/428/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Albert Saiz, 2008. "On Local Housing Supply Elasticity," ERES eres2008_241, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    2. Matej Buzinkai & František Škvrnda, 2014. "The development of the Chinese household registration system and its influence on the current economic development of the country," Society and Economy, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 36(2), pages 199-215, June.
    3. Weiping Wu, 2004. "Sources of Migrant Housing Disadvantage in Urban China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(7), pages 1285-1304, July.
    4. Paciorek, Andrew & Sinai, Todd, 2012. "Does home owning smooth the variability of future housing consumption?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 244-257.
    5. Zai Liang & Zhongdong Ma, 2004. "China's Floating Population: New Evidence from the 2000 Census," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 30(3), pages 467-488, September.
    6. Edward Glaeser & Joseph Gyourko, 2018. "The Economic Implications of Housing Supply," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 32(1), pages 3-30, Winter.
    7. Warnock, Veronica Cacdac & Warnock, Francis E., 2008. "Markets and housing finance," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 239-251, September.
    8. Christine Wen & Jeremy L. Wallace, 2019. "Toward Human-Centered Urbanization? Housing Ownership and Access to Social Insurance Among Migrant Households in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-14, June.
    9. María Mercedes Di Virgilio, 2017. "Housing policy in Argentina: reflections on a decade of progressive social policy," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 314-325, April.
    10. John M. Quigley & Steven Raphael, 2004. "Is Housing Unaffordable? Why Isn't It More Affordable?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 18(1), pages 191-214, Winter.
    11. Sheng Li & Lanlan Wang & Kuo-Liang Chang, 2018. "Do internal migrants suffer from housing extreme overcrowding in urban China?," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(5), pages 708-733, July.
    12. Fulong Wu & Jie Chen & Fenghua Pan & Nick Gallent & Fangzhu Zhang, 2020. "Assetization: The Chinese Path to Housing Financialization," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(5), pages 1483-1499, September.
    13. Héctor M. Posada & Ana I. Moreno-Monroy, 2019. "Informal employment and informal housing in Latin America: facts, theory and ideas for a unified framework," Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, Armand Colin, vol. 0(2), pages 213-237.
    14. Geng Niu & Guochang Zhao, 2018. "Living condition among China’s rural–urban migrants: recent dynamics and the inland–coastal differential," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 476-493, April.
    15. Glaeser, Edward L. & Gyourko, Joseph & Saiz, Albert, 2008. "Housing supply and housing bubbles," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 198-217, September.
    16. Lishuo Shi & Wen Chen & Jiaqi Xu & Li Ling, 2020. "Trends and Characteristics of Inter-Provincial Migrants in Mainland China and Its Relation with Economic Factors: A Panel Data Analysis from 2011 to 2016," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-23, January.
    17. repec:arz:wpaper:eres2008-241 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Dimitris Christelis & Dimitris Georgarakos & Tullio Jappelli & Maarten van Rooij, 2020. "Consumption Uncertainty and Precautionary Saving," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 102(1), pages 148-161, March.
    19. Ivo Imparato & Jeff Ruster, 2003. "Slum Upgrading and Participation : Lessons from Latin America," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 15133, April.
    20. Joseph Gyourko & Edward L. Glaeser, 2008. "Rethinking Federal Housing Policy," Books, American Enterprise Institute, number 50499, September.
    21. Julia Verdouw, 2016. "The invisible houses: re-thinking and designing low-cost housing in developing countries," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 752-753, September.
    22. Chengdong Yi & Youqin Huang, 2014. "Housing Consumption and Housing Inequality in Chinese Cities During the First Decade of the Twenty-First Century," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 291-311, March.
    23. Pan, Jiun-Nan & Huang, Jr-Tsung & Chiang, Tsun-Feng, 2015. "Empirical study of the local government deficit, land finance and real estate markets in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 57-67.
    24. Rosa Elena Donoso, 2017. "A Review of "The invisible houses: Rethinking and designing low-cost housing in developing countries", By Gonzalo Lizarralde," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 457-459, July.
    25. María Mercedes Di Virgilio, 2017. "Housing policy in Argentina: reflections on a decade of progressive social policy," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 314-325, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li Tao & Xiaoyan Lei & Wentan Guo & Victor Jing Li & Min Cheng, 2022. "To Settle Down, or Not? Evaluating the Policy Effects of Talent Housing in Shanghai, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Jiale Zhou & Xiaofen Yu & Xizan Jin & Nuannuan Mao, 2021. "Government Competition, Land Supply Structure and Semi-Urbanization in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-29, December.
    3. Laura Serrano & Antonio Sianes & Antonio Ariza-Montes, 2020. "Understanding the Implementation of Airbnb in Urban Contexts: Towards a Categorization of European Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-21, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuting Cao & Ran Liu & Wei Qi & Jin Wen, 2020. "Spatial Heterogeneity of Housing Space Consumption in Urban China: Locals vs. Inter-and Intra-Provincial Migrants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-26, June.
    2. Juan Ming & Jiachun Liu & Zicheng Wang, 2020. "Does the Homeownership Gap Between Rural–Urban Migrants and Urban–Urban Migrants in China Vary by Income?," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, November.
    3. Murray, Cameron K., 2020. "Time is money: How landbanking constrains housing supply," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    4. Christian Dustmann & Bernd Fitzenberger & Markus Zimmermann, 2022. "Housing Expenditure and Income Inequality," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 132(645), pages 1709-1736.
    5. repec:osf:osfxxx:hym43_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Julia Gabriele Harten & Annette M Kim & J Cressica Brazier, 2021. "Real and fake data in Shanghai’s informal rental housing market: Groundtruthing data scraped from the internet," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(9), pages 1831-1845, July.
    7. Li, Keyang & Qin, Yu & Wu, Jing, 2020. "Recent housing affordability in urban China: A comprehensive overview," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    8. Sun, Nan & Yang, Fan, 2021. "Impacts of internal migration experience on health among middle-aged and older adults—Evidence from China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    9. Michael Ball, 2011. "Planning Delay and the Responsiveness of English Housing Supply," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(2), pages 349-362, February.
    10. John I. Carruthers & Gordon F. Mulligan, 2013. "Through the Crisis," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 27(2), pages 124-143, May.
    11. Paciorek, Andrew, 2013. "Supply constraints and housing market dynamics," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 11-26.
    12. Guangyuan Feng & Xiaopu Bi & Jingxiang Zhang & Tianhan Cheng, 2025. "Spatial Differentiation Mechanism of Urban Housing Prices from the Perspective of Amenity: A Case Study of Nanjing," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-12, May.
    13. Alla Koblyakova & Larisa Fleishman & Orly Furman, 2022. "Accuracy of Households’ Dwelling Valuations, Housing Demand and Mortgage Decisions: Israeli Case," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 48-74, July.
    14. Clémence Tricaud, 2019. "Better alone? Evidence on the costs of intermunicipal cooperation," Economics Working Paper from Condorcet Center for political Economy at CREM-CNRS 2019-12-ccr, Condorcet Center for political Economy.
    15. Knut Are Aastveit & Bruno Albuquerque & André K. Anundsen, 2023. "Changing Supply Elasticities and Regional Housing Booms," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 55(7), pages 1749-1783, October.
    16. Edward Glaeser & Joseph Gyourko, 2018. "The Economic Implications of Housing Supply," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 32(1), pages 3-30, Winter.
    17. Alfredo Palacios & Julia Gabosi & Caitlin Williams & Carlos Rojas-Roque, 2021. "Social vulnerability, exposure to environmental risk factors and accessibility to healthcare services: Evidence for 2,000+ slums and informal settlements in Argentina," Asociación Argentina de Economía Política: Working Papers 4502, Asociación Argentina de Economía Política.
    18. Pablo Santiago Serrati, 2024. "School and residential segregation in the reproduction of urban segregation: A case study in Buenos Aires," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(2), pages 313-330, February.
    19. Martin, Carolin & Schmitt, Noemi & Westerhoff, Frank, 2022. "Housing Markets, Expectation Formation And Interest Rates," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(2), pages 491-532, March.
    20. Büchler, Simon & Ehrlich, Maximilian v. & Schöni, Olivier, 2021. "The amplifying effect of capitalization rates on housing supply," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    21. Bao, Te & Hommes, Cars, 2019. "When speculators meet suppliers: Positive versus negative feedback in experimental housing markets," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-1.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:9:y:2020:i:11:p:428-:d:438761. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.