IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i8p1658-d1725592.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing Agricultural Sustainability Through Land Use Changes Under the CAP Framework Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Northern Greece

Author

Listed:
  • Evgenia Lialia

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Angelos Prentzas

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Anna Tafidou

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Christina Moulogianni

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Asimina Kouriati

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Eleni Dimitriadou

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Christina Kleisiari

    (Agricultural Economics and Consumer Behavior Lab, University of Thessaly, 38446 Volos, Greece)

  • Thomas Bournaris

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

Abstract

This research investigates the implementation of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) within the framework of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) for the period of 2023–2027, focusing on optimizing agricultural sustainability and profitability in Northern Greece. Using data from three farmer groups across Central and Western Macedonia, the study explores the application of MCDA models within three distinct case studies: the first optimizes a farm system focused on input minimization (Loudias), while the second and third (Ryakio and Agia Paraskevi) adopt a more comprehensive approach to farm management. More specifically, the first case focused on maximizing gross margin, minimizing variable costs, and reducing fertilizer use without targeting a reduction in water usage. By contrast, the second case study adopted a holistic approach to farm management, integrating water conservation in the Ryakio farmer group. The third included the requirement to keep arable land fallow in the Agia Paraskevi farmer group, reflecting the CAP’s new mandates. The results indicate that MCDA facilitates strategic crop selection and land changes that significantly enhance farm management efficiency and sustainability. The optimization led to more significant percentage increases in gross margin for the second (Ryakio) and third (Agia Paraskevi) case studies compared to the first, with the Agia Paraskevi group showing the most substantial improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Evgenia Lialia & Angelos Prentzas & Anna Tafidou & Christina Moulogianni & Asimina Kouriati & Eleni Dimitriadou & Christina Kleisiari & Thomas Bournaris, 2025. "Optimizing Agricultural Sustainability Through Land Use Changes Under the CAP Framework Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Northern Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:8:p:1658-:d:1725592
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/8/1658/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/8/1658/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carlos Romero & Francisco Amador & Antonio Barco, 1987. "Multiple Objectives in Agricultural Planning: A Compromise Programming Application," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 69(1), pages 78-86.
    2. Galioto, Francesco & Nino, Pasquale, 2023. "Investigating the reasons behind the choice to promote crop diversification practices through the new CAP reform in Europe," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    3. Sumpsi, JoseMaria & Amador, Francisco & Romero, Carlos, 1997. "On farmers' objectives: A multi-criteria approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 64-71, January.
    4. M J López-Baldovin & C Gutiérrez-Martin & J Berbel, 2006. "Multicriteria and multiperiod programming for scenario analysis in Guadalquivir river irrigated farming," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(5), pages 499-509, May.
    5. Christina Moulogianni & Thomas Bournaris, 2021. "Assessing the Impacts of Rural Development Plan Measures on the Sustainability of Agricultural Holdings Using a PMP Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-13, April.
    6. Stefano Bruzzese & Simone Blanc & Silvia Novelli & Filippo Brun, 2023. "A Multicriteria Analysis to Support Natural Resource Governance: The Case of Chestnut Forests," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-13, March.
    7. Hayashi, Kiyotada, 2000. "Multicriteria analysis for agricultural resource management: A critical survey and future perspectives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 486-500, April.
    8. Hongyun Zheng & Wanglin Ma & Quan He, 2024. "Climate-smart agricultural practices for enhanced farm productivity, income, resilience, and greenhouse gas mitigation: a comprehensive review," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 1-38, April.
    9. Romero, Carlos & Rehman, Tahir, 1987. "Natural Resource Management and the Use of Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Techniques: A Review," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 14(1), pages 61-89.
    10. Christina Moulogianni, 2022. "Comparison of Selected Mathematical Programming Models Used for Sustainable Land and Farm Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
    11. Asimina Kouriati & Anna Tafidou & Evgenia Lialia & Angelos Prentzas & Christina Moulogianni & Eleni Dimitriadou & Thomas Bournaris, 2024. "A Multicriteria Decision Analysis Model for Optimal Land Uses: Guiding Farmers under the New European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy (2023–2027)," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asimina Kouriati & Anna Tafidou & Evgenia Lialia & Angelos Prentzas & Christina Moulogianni & Eleni Dimitriadou & Thomas Bournaris, 2024. "A Multicriteria Decision Analysis Model for Optimal Land Uses: Guiding Farmers under the New European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy (2023–2027)," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Luis Diaz-Balteiro & Carlos Iglesias-Merchan & Carlos Romero & Silvestre García de Jalón, 2020. "The Sustainable Management of Land and Fisheries Resources Using Multicriteria Techniques: A Meta-Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Hajkowicz, Stefan & Higgins, Andrew, 2008. "A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(1), pages 255-265, January.
    4. Stefan A. Hajkowicz, 2012. "For the Greater Good? A Test for Strategic Bias in Group Environmental Decisions," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 331-344, May.
    5. Pérez-Blanco, C.D. & Gutiérrez-Martín, C., 2017. "Buy me a river: Use of multi-attribute non-linear utility functions to address overcompensation in agricultural water buyback," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 6-20.
    6. Stefan Hajkowicz & Kerry Collins, 2007. "A Review of Multiple Criteria Analysis for Water Resource Planning and Management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 21(9), pages 1553-1566, September.
    7. Gomez-Limon, Jose Antonio & Berbel, Julio & Arriaza Balmón, Manuel, 2005. "MCDM Farm System Analysis for Public Management of Irrigated Agriculture," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24676, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Christina Moulogianni, 2022. "Comparison of Selected Mathematical Programming Models Used for Sustainable Land and Farm Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Ananda, Jayanath & Herath, Gamini, 2009. "A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(10), pages 2535-2548, August.
    10. Hayashi, Kiyotada, 2000. "Multicriteria analysis for agricultural resource management: A critical survey and future perspectives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 486-500, April.
    11. Tipparat Pongthanapanich, 2003. "Review of Mathematical Programming for Coastal Land Use Optimization," Working Papers 52/2003, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Sociology, Environmental and Business Economics.
    12. Gamper, C.D. & Turcanu, C., 2007. "On the governmental use of multi-criteria analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 298-307, April.
    13. Huang, Shiyang & Hu, Guiping & Chennault, Carrie & Su, Liu & Brandes, Elke & Heaton, Emily & Schulte, Lisa & Wang, Lizhi & Tyndall, John, 2016. "Agent-based modeling of bioenergy crop adoption and farmer decision-making," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 1188-1201.
    14. Majid Ebrahimi & Hamid Nejadsoleymani & Mohammad Reza Mansouri Daneshvar, 2019. "Land suitability map and ecological carrying capacity for the recognition of touristic zones in the Kalat region, Iran: a multi-criteria analysis based on AHP and GIS," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 697-718, October.
    15. Zanakis, Stelios H. & Mandakovic, Tomislav & Gupta, Sushil K. & Sahay, Sundeep & Hong, Sungwan, 1995. "A review of program evaluation and fund allocation methods within the service and government sectors," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 59-79, March.
    16. Abele Kuipers & Agata Malak-Rawlikowska & Aldona Stalgienė & Anita Ule & Marija Klopčič, 2021. "European Dairy Farmers’ Perceptions and Responses towards Development Strategies in Years of Turbulent Market and Policy Changes," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, March.
    17. Riesgo, Laura & Gómez-Limón, José A., 2005. "Multi-Criteria Policy Scenarios Analysis for Public Management of Irrigated Agriculture," 89th Seminar, February 2-5, 2005, Parma, Italy 239276, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Mallawaarachchi, T. & Walker, P. A. & Young, M. D. & Smyth, R. E. & Lynch, H. S. & Dudgeon, G., 1996. "GIS-based integrated modelling systems for natural resource management," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 169-189.
    19. Rohmer, S.U.K. & Gerdessen, J.C. & Claassen, G.D.H., 2019. "Sustainable supply chain design in the food system with dietary considerations: A multi-objective analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 1149-1164.
    20. Lakshminarayan, P. G. & Atwood, J. D. & Johnson, Stanley R. & Sposito, V. A., 1991. "Compromise Solution for Economic-Environmental Decisions in Agriculture," Staff General Research Papers Archive 375, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:8:p:1658-:d:1725592. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.