IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i4p843-d1633328.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Silviculture Promotes Sustainability in Nothofagus antarctica Secondary Forests of Northern Patagonia, Argentina: A Multicriteria Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Matías G. Goldenberg

    (Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural, Universidad Nacional de Río Negro (UNRN), San Carlos de Bariloche 8400, Río Negro, Argentina
    Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), San Carlos de Bariloche 8400, Río Negro, Argentina)

  • Claudia Huaylla

    (Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural, Universidad Nacional de Río Negro (UNRN), San Carlos de Bariloche 8400, Río Negro, Argentina
    Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), San Carlos de Bariloche 8400, Río Negro, Argentina)

  • Facundo J. Oddi

    (Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural, Universidad Nacional de Río Negro (UNRN), San Carlos de Bariloche 8400, Río Negro, Argentina
    Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), San Carlos de Bariloche 8400, Río Negro, Argentina)

  • Juan I. Agüero

    (Cátedra de Botánica General, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad de Buenos Aires 1417, Buenos Aires, Argentina)

  • Marcos E. Nacif

    (Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural, Universidad Nacional de Río Negro (UNRN), San Carlos de Bariloche 8400, Río Negro, Argentina
    Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), San Carlos de Bariloche 8400, Río Negro, Argentina)

  • Guillermo J. Martínez Pastur

    (Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Bernardo Houssay 200, Ushuaia 9410, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina)

  • Lucas A. Garibaldi

    (Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural, Universidad Nacional de Río Negro (UNRN), San Carlos de Bariloche 8400, Río Negro, Argentina
    Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), San Carlos de Bariloche 8400, Río Negro, Argentina)

Abstract

Despite the growing recognition of sustainability in forest management, comprehensive multi-criteria evaluations of silvicultural practices remain scarce, particularly in Patagonia. In this study, we applied a multi-criteria decision analysis to evaluate the sustainability of different strip-cutting intensities in secondary Nothofagus antarctica forests in Northern Patagonia, Argentina. The performance of four management alternatives was assessed: no cutting, low cutting intensity, medium cutting intensity, and high cutting intensity. These alternatives were evaluated across 11 indicators of nature’s contributions to people. Indicator values were estimated from previous research across three contrasting sites, complemented by expert surveys to estimate weights and target values for each indicator. The results indicate that the key indicators included those associated with firewood harvesting, fire and invasions prevention, and timber species plantation performance. Medium cutting intensity consistently emerged as the most sustainable option across all sites, models, and scenarios. In contrast, no cutting performed poorly across most sites, models, and scenarios. These findings underscore the importance of integrating diverse ecological and socioeconomic indicators into forest management planning. The promotion of medium cutting intensity has the potential to enhance sustainability in N. antarctica forests, thereby contributing to the development of resilient and multifunctional landscapes in Northern Patagonia.

Suggested Citation

  • Matías G. Goldenberg & Claudia Huaylla & Facundo J. Oddi & Juan I. Agüero & Marcos E. Nacif & Guillermo J. Martínez Pastur & Lucas A. Garibaldi, 2025. "Silviculture Promotes Sustainability in Nothofagus antarctica Secondary Forests of Northern Patagonia, Argentina: A Multicriteria Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:843-:d:1633328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/843/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/843/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gianfranco Fabbio & Paolo Cantiani & Fabrizio Ferretti & Umberto Di Salvatore & Giada Bertini & Claudia Becagli & Ugo Chiavetta & Maurizio Marchi & Luca Salvati, 2018. "Sustainable Land Management, Adaptive Silviculture, and New Forest Challenges: Evidence from a Latitudinal Gradient in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Diaz-Balteiro, Luis & Romero, Carlos, 2004. "In search of a natural systems sustainability index," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 401-405, July.
    3. Morales, Juan Manuel & Mermoz, Mónica & Gowda, Juan Haridas & Kitzberger, Thomas, 2015. "A stochastic fire spread model for north Patagonia based on fire occurrence maps," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 300(C), pages 73-80.
    4. Ananda, Jayanath & Herath, Gamini, 2009. "A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(10), pages 2535-2548, August.
    5. Romero, Carlos, 2001. "Extended lexicographic goal programming: a unifying approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 63-71, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amelia Bilbao-Terol & Mariano Jiménez & Mar Arenas-Parra, 2016. "A group decision making model based on goal programming with fuzzy hierarchy: an application to regional forest planning," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 245(1), pages 137-162, October.
    2. Corrado Battisti, 2018. "Preparing students for the operational environmental career: an integrated project-based road map for academic programs," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 8(4), pages 573-583, December.
    3. Alessio D’Auria & Pasquale De Toro & Nicola Fierro & Elisa Montone, 2018. "Integration between GIS and Multi-Criteria Analysis for Ecosystem Services Assessment: A Methodological Proposal for the National Park of Cilento, Vallo di Diano and Alburni (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-25, September.
    4. Martín-García, Jaime & Gómez-Limón, José A. & Arriaza, Manuel, 2024. "Conversion to organic farming: Does it change the economic and environmental performance of fruit farms?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    5. Víctor Pérez & Alain Hernández & Flor Guerrero & María Amparo León & Christian Luiz Silva & Rafael Caballero, 2016. "Sustainability Ranking for Cuban Tourist Destinations Based on Composite Indexes," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 129(1), pages 425-444, October.
    6. Regina Márcia Longo & Alessandra Leite da Silva & Admilson Irio Ribeiro & Raissa Caroline Gomes & Fabricio Camillo Sperandio & Adélia N. Nunes, 2024. "Evaluating the Environmental Quality of Forest Remnants Using Landscape Metrics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-19, February.
    7. J González-Pachón & C Romero, 2006. "An analytical framework for aggregating multiattribute utility functions," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(10), pages 1241-1247, October.
    8. Rohmer, S.U.K. & Gerdessen, J.C. & Claassen, G.D.H., 2019. "Sustainable supply chain design in the food system with dietary considerations: A multi-objective analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 1149-1164.
    9. Ernest Reig‐Martínez & José A. Gómez‐Limón & Andrés J. Picazo‐Tadeo, 2011. "Ranking farms with a composite indicator of sustainability," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 42(5), pages 561-575, September.
    10. Jacinto González-Pachón & Carlos Romero, 2007. "Inferring consensus weights from pairwise comparison matrices without suitable properties," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 123-132, October.
    11. Boukherroub, Tasseda & LeBel, Luc & Ruiz, Angel, 2017. "A framework for sustainable forest resource allocation: A Canadian case study," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PB), pages 224-235.
    12. Shima Rezaiian Kafshgari & Mohammad Mahdi Paydar & Saeed Emami, 2025. "Sustainable agritourism supply chain considering water consumption: a bi-objective mathematical model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 6709-6732, March.
    13. Jones, Dylan & Jimenez, Mariano, 2013. "Incorporating additional meta-objectives into the extended lexicographic goal programming framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(2), pages 343-349.
    14. Aliakbar Hasani & Majid Eskandarpour & Dylan Jones, 2025. "Health care network design with multiple objectives and stakeholders," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 346(2), pages 1027-1062, March.
    15. Zhou, P. & Ang, B.W. & Poh, K.L., 2006. "Comparing aggregating methods for constructing the composite environmental index: An objective measure," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 305-311, September.
    16. Andonegi, Aitor & Garmendia, Eneko & Aldezabal, Arantza, 2021. "Social multi-criteria evaluation for managing biodiversity conservation conflicts," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    17. Arif Wismadi & Mark Zuidgeest & Mark Brussel & Martin Maarseveen, 2014. "Spatial Preference Modelling for equitable infrastructure provision: an application of Sen’s Capability Approach," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 19-48, January.
    18. repec:sae:envval:v:25:y:2016:i:6:p:633-637 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Michalopoulos, T. & Hogeveen, H. & Heuvelink, E. & Oude Lansink, A.G.J.M., 2013. "Public multi-criteria assessment for societal concerns and gradual labelling," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 97-108.
    20. Esther Reith & Elizabeth Gosling & Thomas Knoke & Carola Paul, 2020. "How Much Agroforestry Is Needed to Achieve Multifunctional Landscapes at the Forest Frontier?—Coupling Expert Opinion with Robust Goal Programming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-27, July.
    21. Michael B. Wironen & Robert V. Bartlett & Jon D. Erickson, 2019. "Deliberation and the Promise of a Deeply Democratic Sustainability Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:843-:d:1633328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.