IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i4p682-d1618717.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional Differences in Agricultural Carbon Emissions in China: Measurement, Decomposition, and Influencing Factors

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Huang

    (Business School, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464000, China
    Business School, Research Institute of the Economic and Social Development in the Dabie Mountains, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464000, China)

  • Hongyang Lu

    (Business School, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464000, China)

  • Minzhe Du

    (School of Economics and Management, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

Abstract

As one of the major sources of carbon emissions, the significant spatial disparities in agricultural carbon emissions (ACE) pose a serious challenge to coordinated regional carbon reduction efforts. In order to precisely identify the sources of these ACE differences, this study estimates the ACE of China from 2005 to 2020 across four main emission sources and applies the bidimensional decomposition method of the Gini coefficient to measure and decompose their spatial disparities. Finally, the key factors driving ACE disparities are analyzed using the Quadratic Assignment Procedure (QAP). The results show that China’s total ACE initially declined, followed by an upward trend over the study period. Spatially, emissions were higher in eastern regions compared to western regions, and higher in southern regions compared to northern regions. The differences in paddy field emissions between the central and western regions were identified as the primary contributor to east–west disparities, while differences in agricultural materials emissions between northern and southern regions were the dominant source of north–south disparities. Furthermore, regional differences in agricultural development levels and mechanization capacity were found to be the strongest drivers of spatial ACE disparities. This study provides empirical evidence for formulating region-specific and source-targeted carbon reduction policies. Our findings highlight the importance of addressing regional imbalances, particularly in paddy field management and agricultural material usage, to promote more coordinated and sustainable agricultural carbon reduction across China.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Huang & Hongyang Lu & Minzhe Du, 2025. "Regional Differences in Agricultural Carbon Emissions in China: Measurement, Decomposition, and Influencing Factors," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:682-:d:1618717
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/682/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/682/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guofeng Wang & Maolin Liao & Jie Jiang, 2020. "Research on Agricultural Carbon Emissions and Regional Carbon Emissions Reduction Strategies in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Lin, Boqiang & Xu, Bin, 2018. "Factors affecting CO2 emissions in China's agriculture sector: A quantile regression," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 15-27.
    3. Mauro Mussini, 2013. "A matrix approach to the Gini index decomposition by subgroup and by income source," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(17), pages 2457-2468, June.
    4. Xu, Bin & Lin, Boqiang, 2017. "Factors affecting CO2 emissions in China’s agriculture sector: Evidence from geographically weighted regression model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 404-414.
    5. Stephane Mussard, 2004. "The bidimensional decomposition of the Gini ratio. A case study: Italy," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(8), pages 503-505.
    6. Malte Meinshausen & Nicolai Meinshausen & William Hare & Sarah C. B. Raper & Katja Frieler & Reto Knutti & David J. Frame & Myles R. Allen, 2009. "Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C," Nature, Nature, vol. 458(7242), pages 1158-1162, April.
    7. Hu, Ruifa & Cai, Yaqing & Chen, Kevin Z. & Huang, Jikun, 2012. "Effects of inclusive public agricultural extension service: Results from a policy reform experiment in western China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 962-974.
    8. Zhao, Rongqin & Liu, Ying & Tian, Mengmeng & Ding, Minglei & Cao, Lianhai & Zhang, Zhanping & Chuai, Xiaowei & Xiao, Liangang & Yao, Lunguang, 2018. "Impacts of water and land resources exploitation on agricultural carbon emissions: The water-land-energy-carbon nexus," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 480-492.
    9. Minzhe Du & Jorge Antunes & Peter Wanke & Zhongfei Chen, 2022. "Ecological efficiency assessment under the construction of low-carbon city: a perspective of green technology innovation," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(9), pages 1727-1752, July.
    10. Chen, Zhe & Sarkar, Apurbo & Rahman, Airin & Li, Xiaojing & Xia, Xianli, 2022. "Exploring the drivers of green agricultural development (GAD) in China: A spatial association network structure approaches," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou Zhou & Jianqiang Duan & Shaoqing Geng & Ran Li, 2023. "Spatial Network and Driving Factors of Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-26, July.
    2. Yujie Huang & Yang Su & Ruiliang Li & Haiqing He & Haiyan Liu & Feng Li & Qin Shu, 2019. "Study of the Spatio-Temporal Differentiation of Factors Influencing Carbon Emission of the Planting Industry in Arid and Vulnerable Areas in Northwest China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Opoku, Eric Evans Osei & Aluko, Olufemi Adewale, 2021. "Heterogeneous effects of industrialization on the environment: Evidence from panel quantile regression," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 174-184.
    4. Zhongrui Sun & Xianhong Cheng & Yumei Zhuang & Yong Sun, 2024. "Spatial correlation network structure characteristics of carbon emission efficiency and its influencing factors at city level in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 5335-5366, February.
    5. Antunes, Jorge & Tan, Yong & Wanke, Peter & Jabbour, Charbel Jose Chiappetta, 2023. "Impact of R&D and innovation in Chinese road transportation sustainability performance: A novel trigonometric envelopment analysis for ideal solutions (TEA-IS)," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    6. Xu, Bin & Luo, Yuemei & Xu, Renjing & Chen, Jianbao, 2021. "Exploring the driving forces of distributed energy resources in China: Using a semiparametric regression model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    7. Jurkatis, Simon & Strehl, Wolfgang, 2014. "Gini decompositions and Gini elasticities: On measuring the importance of income sources and population subgroups for income inequality," Discussion Papers 2014/22, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    8. Zhou, Yiqi & Zou, Shan & Duan, Weili & Chen, Yaning & Takara, Kaoru & Di, Yanfeng, 2022. "Analysis of energy carbon emissions from agroecosystems in Tarim River Basin, China: A pathway to achieve carbon neutrality," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    9. Ogwang Tomson, 2016. "The Marginal Effects in Subgroup Decomposition of the Gini Index," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 32(3), pages 733-745, September.
    10. Fankhauser, Samuel & Hepburn, Cameron, 2010. "Designing carbon markets. Part I: Carbon markets in time," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 4363-4370, August.
    11. van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. & Botzen, W.J.W., 2015. "Monetary valuation of the social cost of CO2 emissions: A critical survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 33-46.
    12. Simon Levin & Anastasios Xepapadeas, 2021. "On the Coevolution of Economic and Ecological Systems," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 13(1), pages 355-377, October.
    13. Kriegler, Elmar, 2011. "Comment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 594-596, July.
    14. Sam Fankhauser & Cameron Hepburn, 2009. "Carbon markets in space and time," GRI Working Papers 3, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    15. Weth, Mark A. & Baltzer, Markus & Bertram, Christoph & Hilaire, Jérôme & Johnston, Craig, 2024. "The scenario-based equity price impact induced by greenhouse gas emissions," Discussion Papers 30/2024, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    16. Stéphane Mussard & Kuan Xu, 2006. "Multidimensional Decomposition of the Sen Index: Some Further Thoughts," Cahiers de recherche 06-08, Departement d'économique de l'École de gestion à l'Université de Sherbrooke.
    17. Shixiong Song & Siyuan Zhao & Ye Zhang & Yongxi Ma, 2023. "Carbon Emissions from Agricultural Inputs in China over the Past Three Decades," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-12, April.
    18. van der Ploeg, Frederick & Rezai, Armon, 2017. "Cumulative emissions, unburnable fossil fuel, and the optimal carbon tax," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 216-222.
    19. Waldemar Karpa & Antonio Grginović, 2021. "(Not So) Stranded: The Case of Coal in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    20. Xu, Bin & Lin, Boqiang, 2018. "Do we really understand the development of China's new energy industry?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 733-745.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:682-:d:1618717. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.