IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i6p863-d1415559.html

Impacts of Cropland Utilization Patterns on the Sustainable Use Efficiency of Cropland Based on the Human–Land Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Xinyu Hu

    (School of Geomatics, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin 123000, China
    Chinese Academy of Surveying and Mapping, Beijing 100039, China)

  • Chun Dong

    (Chinese Academy of Surveying and Mapping, Beijing 100039, China)

  • Yu Zhang

    (Chinese Academy of Surveying and Mapping, Beijing 100039, China)

Abstract

Confronted with China’s burgeoning population and finite arable land resources, the enhancement of sustainable arable land efficiency is of paramount importance. This study, grounded in the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), introduces a robust framework for assessing sustainable arable land use. Utilizing the Sustainable Utilization of Arable Land (SUA) indicator system, the DGA–Super-SBM model, the Malmquist–Luenberger production index, and the TO–Fisher–OSM algorithm, we evaluated the efficiency of sustainable utilization of arable land (ESUA) in 52 prefecture-level cities within China’s major grain-producing regions of the Yellow and Huaihai Seas. We analyzed the cropland utilization patterns from 2010 to 2020, examining the influence of these patterns on sustainable utilization efficiency. Our findings indicate that between 2010 and 2020, the arable land usage in these regions exhibited minimal transformation, primarily shifting towards construction land and conversely from grassland and water systems. Notably, the ESUA of arable land demonstrated an upward trend, characterized by pronounced spatial clustering, enduring high efficiency in the northern regions, and a significant surge in the southern sectors. The declining ESUA (D-ESUA) trend was general but increased in half of the cities. The change in the center of gravity of ESUA correlated with the north–south movement of the proportion of cultivated land area, the turn-in rate, and the turn-out rate, yet moved in the opposite direction to that of cultivated land density and yield per unit area. Variables such as the replanting index, cropland density, yield per unit area, and cropland turn-in rate significantly affected ESUA. These findings offer a scientific basis and decision-making support for optimizing the utilization pattern of arable land and achieving a rational allocation of arable land resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinyu Hu & Chun Dong & Yu Zhang, 2024. "Impacts of Cropland Utilization Patterns on the Sustainable Use Efficiency of Cropland Based on the Human–Land Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-27, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:863-:d:1415559
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/863/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/863/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gosme, Marie & Suffert, Frédéric & Jeuffroy, Marie-Hélène, 2010. "Intensive versus low-input cropping systems: What is the optimal partitioning of agricultural area in order to reduce pesticide use while maintaining productivity?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 110-116, February.
    2. Junxiao Wang & Xiaorui Wang & Shenglu Zhou & Shaohua Wu & Yan Zhu & Chunfeng Lu, 2016. "Optimization of Sample Points for Monitoring Arable Land Quality by Simulated Annealing while Considering Spatial Variations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-12, September.
    3. Aparicio, Juan & Santin, Daniel, 2018. "A note on measuring group performance over time with pseudo-panels," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(1), pages 227-235.
    4. Yifeng Hou & Yaning Chen & Zhi Li & Yang Wang, 2023. "Changes in Land Use Pattern and Structure under the Rapid Urbanization of the Tarim River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Tone, Kaoru, 2002. "A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 32-41, November.
    6. Caves, Douglas W & Christensen, Laurits R & Diewert, W Erwin, 1982. "The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output, and Productivity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(6), pages 1393-1414, November.
    7. Mingjia Chi & Qinyang Guo & Lincheng Mi & Guofeng Wang & Weiming Song, 2022. "Spatial Distribution of Agricultural Eco-Efficiency and Agriculture High-Quality Development in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Ziyi Zhang & Juntao Du & Zhiyang Shen & Hassan El Asraoui & Malin Song, 2024. "Effects of modern agricultural demonstration zones on cropland utilization efficiency: An empirical study based on county pilot," Post-Print hal-04552705, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yilong Li & Zongheng Xu & Hongchen Ye & Jianjiao Bai & Xirui Dai & Yun Zeng, 2025. "Comparative Analysis of Particle Size Characteristics of Calcareous Soils Under Cultivated and Natural Conditions Based on Fractal Theory," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Lu Han & Yanbo Qu & Shufeng Liang & Luyan Shi & Min Zhang & Haiyan Jia, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Differentiation of Land Ecological Security and Optimization Based on GeoSOS-FLUS Model: A Case Study of the Yellow River Delta in China Toward Sustainability," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Lin Tan & Qinyu Cui & Lan Chen & Lan Wang, 2024. "An Exploratory Study on Spatial Governance Toward Urban–Rural Integration: Theoretical Analysis with Case Demonstration," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-23, November.
    4. Jiaqi Zhang & Yannan Liu & Rongrong Zhang & Jiaqi Fan & Zhiming Dai & Hui Liang, 2025. "Research on the Spatiotemporal Evolution Characteristics and Driving Factors of Cropland in Tanzania from 1990 to 2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Weijuan Li & Jinyong Guo & Tian Xie, 2025. "Impact of Non-Agricultural Labor Transfer on the Ecological Efficiency of Cultivated Land: Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    6. Henggang Zhang & Chenhui Zhu & Tianyu Jiao & Kaiyue Luo & Xu Ma & Mingyu Wang, 2024. "Analysis of the Trends and Driving Factors of Cultivated Land Utilization Efficiency in Henan Province from 2000 to 2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-32, December.
    7. Yu Zou & Feng Xu & Yingrui Chen, 2025. "Disturbance and Response Strategies of Carbon Sinks in Forest Land Due to Land Use Change: Taking Liushahe Town of Ningxiang as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, July.
    8. Bing-Bing Zhou & Jingyuan Liu & Xiaoke Wang, 2025. "Advancing Sustainability Through Land-Related Approaches: Insights from NRC (1999) and a Bold Call to Action," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-11, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Xiang & Grifell-Tatjé, Emili & Fu, Tsu-Tan, 2023. "A profit difference decomposition model for measuring group performance: an application to Chinese and Taiwanese commercial banks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    2. Afsharian, Mohsen & Ahn, Heinz & Harms, Sören Guntram, 2019. "Performance comparison of management groups under centralised management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 845-854.
    3. Sun, Yu & Yang, Feng & Wang, Dawei & Ang, Sheng, 2023. "Efficiency evaluation for higher education institutions in China considering unbalanced regional development: A meta-frontier Super-SBM model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    4. Liu, Fuh-Hwa Franklin & Wang, Peng-hsiang, 2008. "DEA Malmquist productivity measure: Taiwanese semiconductor companies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 367-379, March.
    5. Sun, Chuanwang & Xu, Shuai & Xu, Mengjie, 2023. "What causes green efficiency losses in Chinese agriculture? A perspective based on input redundancy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    6. Shilin Ye & Xinhua Qi & Yecheng Xu, 2020. "Analyzing the relative efficiency of China’s Yangtze River port system," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(4), pages 640-660, December.
    7. Ahn, Young-Hyo & Min, Hokey, 2014. "Evaluating the multi-period operating efficiency of international airports using data envelopment analysis and the Malmquist productivity index," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 12-22.
    8. Nocera Alves Junior, Paulo & Costa Melo, Isotilia & de Moraes Santos, Rodrigo & da Rocha, Fernando Vinícius & Caixeta-Filho, José Vicente, 2022. "How did COVID-19 affect green-fuel supply chain? - A performance analysis of Brazilian ethanol sector," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    9. Yuanying Chi & Situo Xu & Xiaolei Yang & Jialin Li & Xufeng Zhang & Yahui Chen, 2023. "Research on Beijing Manufacturing Green-Oriented Transition Path under “Double Carbon” Goal-Based on the GML-SD Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, May.
    10. Aparicio, Juan & Ortiz, Lidia & Santín, Daniel, 2021. "Comparing group performance over time through the Luenberger productivity indicator: An application to school ownership in European countries," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(2), pages 651-672.
    11. Yanchun Wang & Suchang Yang & Fayyaz Ahmad & Abbas Ali Chandio, 2025. "Agricultural eco-efficiency and sustainable agricultural development influential factors and heterogeneities: Exclusive evidence from Chinese cities," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(12), pages 30035-30059, December.
    12. Mengchao Yao & Yihua Zhang, 2021. "Evaluation and Optimization of Urban Land-Use Efficiency: A Case Study in Sichuan Province of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    13. Irena Lacka & Lukasz Brzezicki, 2021. "The Efficiency and Productivity Evaluation of National Innovation Systems in Europe," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 471-496.
    14. Miguel Alves Pereira & Giovanna D’Inverno & Ana Santos Camanho, 2025. "Learning mobility in European higher education: How has the Union’s flagship initiative progressed?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 351(2), pages 1589-1619, August.
    15. Tsui, Wai Hong Kan & Gilbey, Andrew & Balli, Hatice Ozer, 2014. "Estimating airport efficiency of New Zealand airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 78-86.
    16. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special3:p:471-496 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Thi-Nham Le & Chia-Nan Wang, 2017. "The Integrated Approach for Sustainable Performance Evaluation in Value Chain of Vietnam Textile and Apparel Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-21, March.
    18. Aparicio, Juan & Santín, Daniel, 2024. "Global and local technical changes: A new decomposition of the Malmquist productivity index using virtual units," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    19. Jiangfeng Hu & Zhao Wang & Yuehan Lian & Qinghua Huang, 2018. "Environmental Regulation, Foreign Direct Investment and Green Technological Progress—Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Industries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-14, January.
    20. Zhong, Kaijun & Lei, Yalin & Zhao, Jun & Jiang, Yong, 2025. "How to enhance China's total-factor energy efficiency via digital-real economy integration: New evidence from dynamic QCA analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    21. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2015. "Efficiency of the banking system in Vietnam under financial liberalization," OSF Preprints qsf6d, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:863-:d:1415559. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.