IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i8p1493-d1204293.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Virtual Land and Water Flows and Driving Factors Related to Livestock Products Trade in China

Author

Listed:
  • Meina Zhou

    (College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, 3 Taicheng Road, Yangling 712100, China)

  • Junying Wang

    (College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, 3 Taicheng Road, Yangling 712100, China)

  • Hao Ji

    (College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, 3 Taicheng Road, Yangling 712100, China)

Abstract

Agricultural trade, which involves the exchange of virtual water and land resources, can effectively regulate the allocation of resources among countries while enhancing the well-being of resource-rich and resource-poor nations. China’s animal products trade market concentration is greater, and the livestock industry consumes more water than other agricultural sectors. In order to alleviate the pressure on China’s domestic water and land resources and to ensure that Chinese residents have access to animal products, this article examines the trade situation and drivers of virtual water and land resources related to Chinese animal products trade. This study used the heat equivalent method to measure the virtual water and land flows of the import and export of beef, pork, and mutton from 1992 to 2018, which is followed by the gravity model to investigate the factors impacting China’s flow of virtual land and water related to livestock products trade. We found that the economic development and the agricultural resources of exporters, as well as China’s agricultural employment rates, have a stable beneficial impact on China’s livestock imports. The population of importing nations, China’s cultivated land area, and the livestock production index of importers and exporters have a positive impact on the export of livestock products from China. Our results remain robust following a series of additional tests.

Suggested Citation

  • Meina Zhou & Junying Wang & Hao Ji, 2023. "Virtual Land and Water Flows and Driving Factors Related to Livestock Products Trade in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:8:p:1493-:d:1204293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/8/1493/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/8/1493/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xia, Wenjun & Chen, Xiaohong & Song, Chao & Pérez-Carrera, Alejo, 2022. "Driving factors of virtual water in international grain trade: A study for belt and road countries," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    2. Pinelopi K. Goldberg & Nina Pavcnik, 2016. "The Effects of Trade Policy," NBER Working Papers 21957, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Huang, Hsin & von Lampe, Martin & van Tongeren, Frank, 2011. "Climate change and trade in agriculture," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(S1), pages 9-13.
    4. Pfaffermayr, Michael, 2021. "Confidence intervals for the trade cost parameters of cross-section gravity models," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    5. Ryo Kohsaka & Satomi Kohyama, 2022. "State of the Art Review on Land-Use Policy: Changes in Forests, Agricultural Lands and Renewable Energy of Japan," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-13, April.
    6. Wurtenberger, Laura & Koellner, Thomas & Binder, Claudia R., 2006. "Virtual land use and agricultural trade: Estimating environmental and socio-economic impacts," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(4), pages 679-697, June.
    7. Kastner, Thomas & Kastner, Michael & Nonhebel, Sanderine, 2011. "Tracing distant environmental impacts of agricultural products from a consumer perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(6), pages 1032-1040, April.
    8. Chapagain, A.K. & Hoekstra, A.Y. & Savenije, H.H.G. & Gautam, R., 2006. "The water footprint of cotton consumption: An assessment of the impact of worldwide consumption of cotton products on the water resources in the cotton producing countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 186-203, November.
    9. Fugazza, Marco & Nicita, Alessandro, 2013. "The direct and relative effects of preferential market access," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 357-368.
    10. Nhan Thanh Thi Hoang & Hoan Quang Truong & Chung Van Dong, 2020. "Determinants of Trade Between Taiwan and ASEAN Countries: A PPML Estimator Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    11. Duarte, Rosa & Pinilla, Vicente & Serrano, Ana, 2019. "Long Term Drivers of Global Virtual Water Trade: A Trade Gravity Approach for 1965–2010," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 318-326.
    12. Delbourg, Esther & Dinar, Shlomi, 2020. "The globalization of virtual water flows: Explaining trade patterns of a scarce resource," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    13. Tian, Qingsong & Yu, Yan & Xu, Yueyan & Li, Chongguang & Liu, Nianjie, 2023. "Patterns and driving factors of agricultural virtual water imports in China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    14. Ik Kim & Kyung-shin Kim, 2019. "Estimation of Water Footprint for Major Agricultural and Livestock Products in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Golden Odey & Bashir Adelodun & Qudus Adeyi & Akinsoji Adisa Hammed & Salau Rahmon Abiodun & Kyung Sook Choi, 2024. "Quantifying Resource Nexus: Virtual Water Flows, Water Stress Indices, and Unsustainable Import Fraction in South Korea’s Grain Trade Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-19, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tian, Qingsong & Yu, Yan & Xu, Yueyan & Li, Chongguang & Liu, Nianjie, 2023. "Patterns and driving factors of agricultural virtual water imports in China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    2. Han, Mengyao & Chen, Guoqian, 2018. "Global arable land transfers embodied in Mainland China’s foreign trade," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 521-534.
    3. Xiaolin Chen & Xiaojie Liu & Litao Liu & Yali Zhang & Jinhua Guo & Jing Huang & Meijun Zhou & Yang Zhao & Liang Wu & Lun Yang & Fei Lun, 2018. "Domestic Wheat Trade and Its Associated Virtual Cropland Flow in China, 2010–2015," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Xia, Wenjun & Chen, Xiaohong & Song, Chao & Pérez-Carrera, Alejo, 2022. "Driving factors of virtual water in international grain trade: A study for belt and road countries," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    5. Candau, Fabien & Regnacq, Charles & Schlick, Julie, 2022. "Climate change, comparative advantage and the water capability to produce agricultural goods," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    6. Yawson, David O., 2021. "Estimating virtual land use under future conditions: Application of a food balance approach using the UK," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    7. Delbourg, Esther & Dinar, Shlomi, 2020. "The globalization of virtual water flows: Explaining trade patterns of a scarce resource," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    8. Henders, Sabine & Ostwald, Madelene, 2014. "Accounting methods for international land-related leakage and distant deforestation drivers," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 21-28.
    9. Han, M.Y. & Chen, G.Q. & Dunford, M., 2019. "Land use balance for urban economy: A multi-scale and multi-type perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 323-333.
    10. Chung, Yessica C.Y. & Lee, Tsung-Chen, 2020. "Tele-connecting urban food consumption to land use at multiple spatial scales: A case study of beef in Taiwan," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    11. Bruckner, Martin & Fischer, Günther & Tramberend, Sylvia & Giljum, Stefan, 2015. "Measuring telecouplings in the global land system: A review and comparative evaluation of land footprint accounting methods," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 11-21.
    12. Fabien Candau & Charles Regnacq & Julie Schlick, 2022. "Climate Change, Comparative Advantage and the Water Capability to Produce Agricultural Goods," Working Papers hal-03671521, HAL.
    13. Lakatos, Csilla & Laborde, David & Martin, Will, 2019. "The Incidence of Tariffs," Conference papers 333060, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    14. Bahar, Dany & Rosenow, Samuel & Stein, Ernesto & Wagner, Rodrigo, 2019. "Export take-offs and acceleration: Unpacking cross-sector linkages in the evolution of comparative advantage," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 48-60.
    15. Picarelli, Nathalie, 2016. "Who really benefits from export processing zones? Evidence from Nicaraguan municipalities," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 318-332.
    16. Bloom, Nicholas & Bunn, Philip & Chen, Scarlet & Mizen, Paul & Smietanka, Pawel & Thwaites, Gregory, 2019. "The impact of Brexit on UK firms," Bank of England working papers 818, Bank of England.
    17. Stefania Lovo & Gonzalo Varela, 2022. "Internationally Linked Firms and Productivity in Pakistan: A Look at the Top End of the Distribution," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(10), pages 2110-2131, October.
    18. Kastner, Thomas & Kastner, Michael & Nonhebel, Sanderine, 2011. "Tracing distant environmental impacts of agricultural products from a consumer perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(6), pages 1032-1040, April.
    19. Frensch, Richard & Fidrmuc, Jarko & Rindler, Michael, 2023. "Topography, borders, and trade across Europe," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 816-832.
    20. Ignacio Cazcarro & Rosa Duarte & Miguel Martín-Retortillo & Vicente Pinilla & Ana Serrano, 2015. "How Sustainable is the Increase in the Water Footprint of the Spanish Agricultural Sector? A Provincial Analysis between 1955 and 2005–2010," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-26, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:8:p:1493-:d:1204293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.