IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i10p1788-d941572.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction of the Spatial Pattern of Carbon Emissions Based on Simulation of Land Use Change under Different Scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Zhenhua Wu

    (Business School, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Linghui Zhou

    (Business School, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Yabei Wang

    (Institute of Information Technology, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

Abstract

Land use is an important factor in the change of carbon emissions, and predicting the spatial pattern of carbon emissions under different land use scenarios is of great significance to respond to the “double carbon” target of China. Based on the land use data of Nanjing city, Jiangsu Province, China in 2010, 2015 and 2020, this study used the Conversion of Land Use and its Effects at Small regional extent (CLUE-S) model to simulate the land use change pattern in 2030 under multiple scenarios, and predicted the carbon emissions of each subzone based on the simulation results. It also provides a carbon balance zoning from an economic and ecological point of view and proposes strategies tailored to each district. The results show that: (1) in 2030, under the ecological conservation scenario, ecological land all shows different degrees of increase, while under the cultivated land conservation scenario, construction land only increased by 1.47%. This indicates that the ecological and cultivated land protection perspectives can effectively curb the expansion of construction land. (2) The growth rate of carbon emissions in Nanjing from 2010–2030 decreased from 16.65–3.7%. This indicates that carbon emissions continue to rise, but the trend of growth is slowing down. (3) The spatial carbon emissions in Nanjing show an overall higher level in the north and lower in the center; the large expansion of building land and the concentration of industrial industries are the main reasons for the large increase in carbon emissions. Under the ecological protection scenario, the carbon emissions of Lishui, Pukou and Qixia districts were 11.05 × 10 4 t, 19.437 × 10 4 t and 10.211 × 10 4 t lower than those under the natural growth scenario, mainly because these three districts have more ecological land and the ecological protection effect is more significant. Under the cultivated land conservation scenario, the growth rate of carbon emissions slows down significantly. This indicates that the future structure of carbon emissions in Nanjing will vary significantly, and that ecological protection and arable land conservation play an important role in reducing carbon emissions. This study shows that it is difficult to reduce emissions in a concerted manner. Therefore, for different districts, differentiated land use optimization measures should be developed according to local conditions, and ecological protection and cultivated land protection scenarios should both be taken into account.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhenhua Wu & Linghui Zhou & Yabei Wang, 2022. "Prediction of the Spatial Pattern of Carbon Emissions Based on Simulation of Land Use Change under Different Scenarios," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:1788-:d:941572
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/10/1788/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/10/1788/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Verburg & Bas Eickhout & Hans Meijl, 2008. "A multi-scale, multi-model approach for analyzing the future dynamics of European land use," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 42(1), pages 57-77, March.
    2. Bo Huang & Xiangping Hu & Geir-Arne Fuglstad & Xu Zhou & Wenwu Zhao & Francesco Cherubini, 2020. "Predominant regional biophysical cooling from recent land cover changes in Europe," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Xia, Chuyu & Chen, Bin, 2020. "Urban land-carbon nexus based on ecological network analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    4. Hequ Huang & Jia Zhou, 2022. "Study on the Spatial and Temporal Differentiation Pattern of Carbon Emission and Carbon Compensation in China’s Provincial Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mengyuan Guo & Hong Zhang & Yan Cui & Xiaoyu Zhang & Yong Liu, 2022. "Uncovering Stakeholders’ Participation to Better Understand Land Use Change Using Multi-Agent Modeling Approach: An Example of the Coal Mining Area of Shanxi, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Xiaoping Li & Sai Hu & Lifu Jiang & Bing Han & Jie Li & Xuan Wei, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis of the Research (2000–2020) on Land-Use Carbon Emissions Based on CiteSpace," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jia Peng & Xianli Hu & Xinyue Fan & Kai Wang & Hao Gong, 2023. "The Impact of the Green Economy on Carbon Emission Intensity: Comparisons, Challenges, and Mitigating Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Xinhui Feng & Yan Li & Lu Zhang & Chuyu Xia & Er Yu & Jiayu Yang, 2022. "Carbon Metabolism in Urban “Production–Living–Ecological” Space Based on Ecological Network Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Alvaro Calzadilla & Katrin Rehdanz & Richard Betts & Pete Falloon & Andy Wiltshire & Richard Tol, 2013. "Climate change impacts on global agriculture," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 120(1), pages 357-374, September.
    4. Changchang Liu & Chuxiong Deng & Zhongwu Li & Yaojun Liu & Shuyuan Wang, 2022. "Optimization of Spatial Pattern of Land Use: Progress, Frontiers, and Prospects," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Banerjee, Onil & Crossman, Neville & Vargas, Renato & Brander, Luke & Verburg, Peter & Cicowiez, Martin & Hauck, Jennifer & McKenzie, Emily, 2020. "Global socio-economic impacts of changes in natural capital and ecosystem services: State of play and new modeling approaches," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    6. Changqing Sun & Yulong Bao & Battsengel Vandansambuu & Yuhai Bao, 2022. "Simulation and Prediction of Land Use/Cover Changes Based on CLUE-S and CA-Markov Models: A Case Study of a Typical Pastoral Area in Mongolia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, November.
    7. Qun'ou Jiang & Yuwei Cheng & Qiutong Jin & Xiangzheng Deng & Yuanjing Qi, 2015. "Simulation of Forestland Dynamics in a Typical Deforestation and Afforestation Area under Climate Scenarios," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-26, September.
    8. Marta Jurchescu & Florina Grecu, 2015. "Modelling the occurrence of gullies at two spatial scales in the Olteţ Drainage Basin (Romania)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(1), pages 255-289, November.
    9. Sohl, Terry L. & Wimberly, Michael C. & Radeloff, Volker C. & Theobald, David M. & Sleeter, Benjamin M., 2016. "Divergent projections of future land use in the United States arising from different models and scenarios," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 337(C), pages 281-297.
    10. Calzadilla, Alvaro & Zhu, Tingju & Rehdanz, Katrin & Tol, Richard S.J. & Ringler, Claudia, 2013. "Economywide impacts of climate change on agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 150-165.
    11. Neumann, Kathleen & Stehfest, Elke & Verburg, Peter H. & Siebert, Stefan & Müller, Christoph & Veldkamp, Tom, 2011. "Exploring global irrigation patterns: A multilevel modelling approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(9), pages 703-713.
    12. Holger Cammerer & Annegret Thieken & Peter Verburg, 2013. "Spatio-temporal dynamics in the flood exposure due to land use changes in the Alpine Lech Valley in Tyrol (Austria)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 68(3), pages 1243-1270, September.
    13. Jean-Sauveur Ay & Raja Chakir & Luc Doyen & Frédéric Jiguet & Paul Leadley, 2014. "Integrated models, scenarios and dynamics of climate, land use and common birds," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 126(1), pages 13-30, September.
    14. Jincai Zhao & Qianqian Liu, 2021. "Examining the Driving Factors of Urban Residential Carbon Intensity Using the LMDI Method: Evidence from China’s County-Level Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-18, April.
    15. Eda Ustaoglu & Carlo Lavalle, 2017. "Examining lag effects between industrial land development and regional economic changes: The Netherlands experience," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-34, September.
    16. Yongchao Qu & Jian Zhang & Chongyuan Xu & Yichao Gao & Shanwen Zheng & Meiling Xia, 2022. "Analysis of Spatial Carbon Metabolism by ENA: A Case Study of Tongzhou District, Beijing," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, September.
    17. Groot, Jeroen C.J. & Rossing, Walter a.H. & Tichit, Muriel & Turpin, Nadine & Jellema, André & Baudry, Jacques & Verburg, Peter & Doyen, Luc & van de Ven, Gerrie, 2009. "On the contribution of modelling to multifunctional agriculture: learning from comparisons," MPRA Paper 65467, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Ciaian, Pavel & Ratinger, Tomáš, 2009. "Income Distribution Effects of EU Rural Development Policies: The Case of Farm Investment Support," Conference papers 331905, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    19. Diogo, V. & Koomen, E. & Kuhlman, T., 2015. "An economic theory-based explanatory model of agricultural land-use patterns: The Netherlands as a case study," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1-16.
    20. Hui Wen & Yi Li & Zirong Li & Xiaoxue Cai & Fengxia Wang, 2022. "Spatial Differentiation of Carbon Budgets and Carbon Balance Zoning in China Based on the Land Use Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:1788-:d:941572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.