IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i6p289-d1662378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Board Characteristics Promote Corporate Social Responsibility? An Empirical Analysis for European Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Abdelaziz Hakimi

    (V.P.N.C Lab and Faculty of Law, Economics, and Management of Jendouba, University of Jendouba, Jendouba 8100, Tunisia)

  • Hichem Saidi

    (Department of Economics, College of Business, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 13318, Saudi Arabia)

  • Soufiene Tabessi

    (V.P.N.C Lab and Faculty of Law, Economics, and Management of Jendouba, University of Jendouba, Jendouba 8100, Tunisia)

Abstract

In recent years, businesses have faced increasing pressure from consumers, investors, and regulators to prioritize sustainability, ethics, and transparency. Consequently, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is growing and companies are integrating CSR into their core strategies to enhance long-term value and align with societal expectations. Board characteristics significantly influence CSR outcomes. With boards that actively support and oversee CSR initiatives, sustainable practices would be supported. Hence, studying the relationship between board composition and CSR is very useful. The purpose of this paper is to check whether board characteristics affect CSR for European firms. To achieve this goal, we used a large sample of 1376 listed companies located in 23 European countries from 2014 to 2023. The System Generalized Method of Moment (SGMM) was performed as an econometric approach. Overall, the empirical results show that board-related variables, such as board size, duality, independent investors, gender diversity, culture diversity, and board-specific skills significantly influence ESG performance. In contrast, variables that reflect firm specifics such as firm size and profitability do not have a significant impact on CSR performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdelaziz Hakimi & Hichem Saidi & Soufiene Tabessi, 2025. "Do Board Characteristics Promote Corporate Social Responsibility? An Empirical Analysis for European Companies," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-22, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:6:p:289-:d:1662378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/6/289/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/6/289/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Flannery, Mark J. & Hankins, Kristine Watson, 2013. "Estimating dynamic panel models in corporate finance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 1-19.
    2. Bo Wang & Yang Yang, 2025. "The Impact of Female Board Representation on Corporate Environmental, Social and Governance Performance: A Dual Perspective Based on Institutional Environment and Market Competition," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 3802-3813, May.
    3. Ahamed, M. Mostak & Mallick, Sushanta K., 2019. "Is financial inclusion good for bank stability? International evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 403-427.
    4. Teixeira, Aurora A.C. & Queirós, Anabela S.S., 2016. "Economic growth, human capital and structural change: A dynamic panel data analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1636-1648.
    5. Nguyen, Linh Thi My & Nguyen, Phong Thanh, 2023. "The board profiles that promote environmental, social, and governance disclosure–Evidence from S&P 500 firms," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PA).
    6. Mohammad Bassam Abu Qa’dan & Mishiel Said Suwaidan, 2018. "Board composition, ownership structure and corporate social responsibility disclosure: the case of Jordan," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(1), pages 28-46, October.
    7. Yasir Shahab & Chengang Ye, 2018. "Corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate governance: empirical insights on neo-institutional framework from China," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(2), pages 87-103, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aluchna, Maria & Roszkowska-Menkes, Maria & Kamiński, Bogumił & Bosek-Rak, Dominika, 2022. "Do institutional investors encourage firm to social disclosure? The stakeholder salience perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 674-682.
    2. Shakhatreh Hisham Jadallah Mansour & Salman Asma & Aldrou Khaled Khalaf Abed Rabbo & Comite Ubaldo & Alazzam Farouq Ahmad Faleh, 2023. "Analyzing the Relationship Between Inventory Policies and CSR Practices: Case of Jordanian Companies," Economics, Sciendo, vol. 11(s1), pages 141-163, December.
    3. Gutiérrez-Romero, Roxana & Ahamed, Mostak, 2021. "COVID-19 response needs to broaden financial inclusion to curb the rise in poverty," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    4. Marco Botta & Luca Colombo, 2016. "Macroeconomic and Institutional Determinants of Capital Structure Decisions," DISCE - Working Papers del Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza def038, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    5. Kaiyuan Yang & Xiaoyan Huo & Ruyi Li & Stavros Sindakis & Sakshi Aggarwal, 2024. "Analyzing Corporate Governance Model with Chinese Characteristics and Accounting Information Disclosure: a Quasi-natural Experimental Study Based on a Special Institutional Arrangement," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 9841-9865, June.
    6. Kazuki Onji & John P. Tang, 2015. "A nation without a corporate income tax: Evidence from nineteenth century Japan," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 15-12, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics.
    7. Emna Trabelsi, 2016. "Transparency on inflation of OECD countries? An Application of LSDVC Estimator on a dynamic Panel Model," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 36(2), pages 1095-1126.
    8. Qian Wang & Duowen Wu & Lina Yan, 2021. "Effect of positive tone in MD&A disclosure on capital structure adjustment speed: evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(4), pages 5809-5845, December.
    9. Naima Chrid & Sami Saafi & Mohamed Chakroun, 2021. "Export Upgrading and Economic Growth: a Panel Cointegration and Causality Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(2), pages 811-841, June.
    10. Shaukat, Badiea & Zhu, Qigui & Khan, M. Ijaz, 2019. "Real interest rate and economic growth: A statistical exploration for transitory economies," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 534(C).
    11. Lips, Johannes, 2018. "Debt and the Oil Industry - Analysis on the Firm and Production Level," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181504, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    12. Mohammed Jatoro Arebo & Filmon Hadaro Hando & Andualem Goshu Mekonnen, 2025. "A Multidimensional Financial Inclusion Index for Ethiopia," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2025(1), pages 98-136.
    13. Alam, Ashraful & Uddin, Moshfique & Yazdifar, Hassan & Shafique, Sujana & Lartey, Theophilus, 2020. "R&D investment, firm performance and moderating role of system and safeguard: Evidence from emerging markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 94-105.
    14. Serigne Bassirou Lo & Lassana Cissokho, 2023. "Financial development, institutions and industrialization in sub‐Saharan Africa," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 35(2), pages 152-164, June.
    15. Lu, Weijie & Niu, Geng & Zhou, Yang, 2021. "Individualism and financial inclusion," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 268-288.
    16. Hu, Yue & Liu, Chang & Peng, Jiangang, 2021. "Financial inclusion and agricultural total factor productivity growth in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 68-82.
    17. Chen, Jiun-Lin & Sanger, Gary C. & Song, Wei-Ling, 2019. "The relationship insurance role of financial conglomerates: Evidence from earnings announcements," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 505-527.
    18. Muhammad, Tufail & Ni, Guohua & Chen, Zhenling & Mallek, Sabrine & Dudek, Marek & Mentel, Grzegorz, 2024. "Addressing resource curse: How mineral resources influence industrial structure dynamics of the BRI 57 oil-exporting countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    19. Bakkar, Yassine & De Jonghe, Olivier & Tarazi, Amine, 2023. "Does banks’ systemic importance affect their capital structure and balance sheet adjustment processes?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    20. Dang, Viet Anh & Kim, Minjoo & Shin, Yongcheol, 2014. "Asymmetric adjustment toward optimal capital structure: Evidence from a crisis," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 226-242.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:6:p:289-:d:1662378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.