IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i6p289-d1662378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Board Characteristics Promote Corporate Social Responsibility? An Empirical Analysis for European Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Abdelaziz Hakimi

    (V.P.N.C Lab and Faculty of Law, Economics, and Management of Jendouba, University of Jendouba, Jendouba 8100, Tunisia)

  • Hichem Saidi

    (Department of Economics, College of Business, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 13318, Saudi Arabia)

  • Soufiene Tabessi

    (V.P.N.C Lab and Faculty of Law, Economics, and Management of Jendouba, University of Jendouba, Jendouba 8100, Tunisia)

Abstract

In recent years, businesses have faced increasing pressure from consumers, investors, and regulators to prioritize sustainability, ethics, and transparency. Consequently, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is growing and companies are integrating CSR into their core strategies to enhance long-term value and align with societal expectations. Board characteristics significantly influence CSR outcomes. With boards that actively support and oversee CSR initiatives, sustainable practices would be supported. Hence, studying the relationship between board composition and CSR is very useful. The purpose of this paper is to check whether board characteristics affect CSR for European firms. To achieve this goal, we used a large sample of 1376 listed companies located in 23 European countries from 2014 to 2023. The System Generalized Method of Moment (SGMM) was performed as an econometric approach. Overall, the empirical results show that board-related variables, such as board size, duality, independent investors, gender diversity, culture diversity, and board-specific skills significantly influence ESG performance. In contrast, variables that reflect firm specifics such as firm size and profitability do not have a significant impact on CSR performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdelaziz Hakimi & Hichem Saidi & Soufiene Tabessi, 2025. "Do Board Characteristics Promote Corporate Social Responsibility? An Empirical Analysis for European Companies," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-22, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:6:p:289-:d:1662378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/6/289/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/6/289/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Flannery, Mark J. & Hankins, Kristine Watson, 2013. "Estimating dynamic panel models in corporate finance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 1-19.
    2. Ahamed, M. Mostak & Mallick, Sushanta K., 2019. "Is financial inclusion good for bank stability? International evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 403-427.
    3. Nguyen, Linh Thi My & Nguyen, Phong Thanh, 2023. "The board profiles that promote environmental, social, and governance disclosure–Evidence from S&P 500 firms," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PA).
    4. Yasir Shahab & Chengang Ye, 2018. "Corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate governance: empirical insights on neo-institutional framework from China," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(2), pages 87-103, May.
    5. Bo Wang & Yang Yang, 2025. "The Impact of Female Board Representation on Corporate Environmental, Social and Governance Performance: A Dual Perspective Based on Institutional Environment and Market Competition," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 3802-3813, May.
    6. Teixeira, Aurora A.C. & Queirós, Anabela S.S., 2016. "Economic growth, human capital and structural change: A dynamic panel data analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1636-1648.
    7. Mohammad Bassam Abu Qa’dan & Mishiel Said Suwaidan, 2018. "Board composition, ownership structure and corporate social responsibility disclosure: the case of Jordan," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(1), pages 28-46, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shakhatreh Hisham Jadallah Mansour & Salman Asma & Aldrou Khaled Khalaf Abed Rabbo & Comite Ubaldo & Alazzam Farouq Ahmad Faleh, 2023. "Analyzing the Relationship Between Inventory Policies and CSR Practices: Case of Jordanian Companies," Economics, Sciendo, vol. 11(s1), pages 141-163, December.
    2. Aluchna, Maria & Roszkowska-Menkes, Maria & Kamiński, Bogumił & Bosek-Rak, Dominika, 2022. "Do institutional investors encourage firm to social disclosure? The stakeholder salience perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 674-682.
    3. Gutiérrez-Romero, Roxana & Ahamed, Mostak, 2021. "COVID-19 response needs to broaden financial inclusion to curb the rise in poverty," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    4. Kazuki Onji & John P. Tang, 2015. "A nation without a corporate income tax: Evidence from nineteenth century Japan," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 15-12, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics.
    5. Emna Trabelsi, 2016. "Transparency on inflation of OECD countries? An Application of LSDVC Estimator on a dynamic Panel Model," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 36(2), pages 1095-1126.
    6. Qian Wang & Duowen Wu & Lina Yan, 2021. "Effect of positive tone in MD&A disclosure on capital structure adjustment speed: evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(4), pages 5809-5845, December.
    7. Lips, Johannes, 2018. "Debt and the Oil Industry - Analysis on the Firm and Production Level," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181504, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    8. Alam, Ashraful & Uddin, Moshfique & Yazdifar, Hassan & Shafique, Sujana & Lartey, Theophilus, 2020. "R&D investment, firm performance and moderating role of system and safeguard: Evidence from emerging markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 94-105.
    9. Muhammad, Tufail & Ni, Guohua & Chen, Zhenling & Mallek, Sabrine & Dudek, Marek & Mentel, Grzegorz, 2024. "Addressing resource curse: How mineral resources influence industrial structure dynamics of the BRI 57 oil-exporting countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    10. Ajanaku, B.A. & Collins, A.R., 2021. "Economic growth and deforestation in African countries: Is the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis applicable?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    11. Osada Takeshi & Onji Kazuki & Vera David, 2017. "Banks Restructuring Sonata: How Capital Injection Triggered Labor Force Rejuvenation in Japanese Banks," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 17(2), pages 1-25, April.
    12. Barra, Cristian & Papaccio, Anna & Ruggiero, Nazzareno, 2024. "The interaction between corruption, bank cost efficiency and economic development in Italy," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 48(3).
    13. Aurang Zeb & Irfan Ullah & Amjad Iqbal & Mohib Ur Rahman & Shahab Aziz, 2024. "CEO’s Science and Engineering Background and Green Innovation: Evidence From China," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(1), pages 21582440241, February.
    14. Sanhua Sheng & Hua Li & Weijun He & Thomas Stephen Ramsey & Liang Yuan, 2023. "The effect of property rights and staff structure on the labor productivity, evidence of university spin-offs in Hubei Province, China," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(5), pages 1855-1865, October.
    15. Shanika Thathsarani & Wei Jianguo & Mona Alariqi, 2023. "How Do Demand, Supply, and Institutional Factors Influence SME Financial Inclusion: A Developing Country Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    16. Symitsi, Efthymia & Stamolampros, Panagiotis & Daskalakis, George & Korfiatis, Nikolaos, 2021. "The informational value of employee online reviews," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(2), pages 605-619.
    17. Seyed Alireza Athari, 2022. "Financial Inclusion, Political Risk, and Banking Sector Stability: Evidence from Different Geographical Regions," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 42(1), pages 99-108.
    18. Hayder M. Kareem Al-Duhaidahawi & Jing Zhang & Mustafa S. Abdulreza & Sinan Abdullah Harjan & Sayyed Sadaqat Hussain Shah, 2019. "The Role of Financial Inclusion and Competitive Advantage: Evidence from Iraqi Islamic Banks," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 9(3), pages 193-199.
    19. Hornstein, Abigail S., 2014. "The impact of local governance institutions on foreign market listings: The case of Chinese firms," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 46-67.
    20. Ameen Qasem & Shaker Dahan AL-Duais & Wan Nordin Wan-Hussin & Hasan Mohamad Bamahros & Abdulsalam Alquhaif & Murad Thomran, 2022. "Institutional Ownership Types and ESG Reporting: The Case of Saudi Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:6:p:289-:d:1662378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.