IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i5p232-d1643458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring New Aspects of Corporate Dividend Policy: Case of an Emerging Nation

Author

Listed:
  • Biswajit Ghose

    (Department of Commerce, Tezpur University, Napaam 784028, Assam, India)

  • Pankaj Kumar Tyagi

    (University Institute of Tourism and Hospitality Management, Chandigarh University, Mohali 140413, Punjab, India)

  • Parikshit Sharma

    (Faculty of Management, Jagran Lakecity University, Bhopal 462044, Madhya Pradesh, India)

  • Nivaj Gogoi

    (Department of Finance, Kaliabor College, Kaliabor 782137, Assam, India)

  • Premendra Kumar Singh

    (Centre for Distance and Online Education, Sharda University, Greater Noida 201310, Uttar Pradesh, India)

  • Yeshi Ngima

    (Department of Commerce, Tezpur University, Napaam 784028, Assam, India)

  • Asokan Vasudevan

    (Faculty of Business and Communications, INTI International University, Nilai 71800, Malaysia)

  • Kiran Gope

    (Department of Management, Mizoram University, Aizawl 796004, Mizoram, India)

Abstract

The present study focuses on how various firm characteristics influence their dividend payout policies. The study finds empirical evidence with regard to primarily two aspects of corporate dividend decisions—dividend increase and decrease, whose exploration is inadequate in the past literature. The random effect logistic regression has been considered in order to analyze the panel dataset from 2001–2002 to 2021–2022 including 3739 listed Indian firms. The empirical models are formatted based on the relevant dividend-related theories in the Indian context such as the residual theory, transaction cost theory, signalling theory, etc. Further, additional tests are conducted regarding the robustness of the reported results. The empirical results document that firm size, profitability, promoter holdings, cash holdings, and life cycle have a favourable influence on the propensity of both increasing and decreasing dividend payouts. In contrast, earnings volatility, leverage, and free cash flow reduce firms’ tendency to increase and decrease dividend payments. These results indicate that higher liquidity and ownership concentration provide firms with greater financial flexibility to adjust their dividend policies as per their prevailing opportunities. The findings of the study offer insightful information about how to arrange dividend policies with firm-specific traits which will be helpful for managers and investors to make better decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Biswajit Ghose & Pankaj Kumar Tyagi & Parikshit Sharma & Nivaj Gogoi & Premendra Kumar Singh & Yeshi Ngima & Asokan Vasudevan & Kiran Gope, 2025. "Exploring New Aspects of Corporate Dividend Policy: Case of an Emerging Nation," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-20, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:232-:d:1643458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/5/232/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/5/232/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Imran Yousaf & Shoaib Ali & Arshad Hassan, 2019. "Effect of family control on corporate dividend policy of firms in Pakistan," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 5(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Adhikari, Binay K. & Agrawal, Anup, 2018. "Peer influence on payout policies," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 615-637.
    3. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    4. Krieger, Kevin & Mauck, Nathan & Pruitt, Stephen W., 2021. "The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on dividends," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Shaolin & Cheng, Ho Cheung & Wang, Jianli & Yick, Ho Yin, 2025. "The performance of ESG portfolios: Evidence from the Chinese market under COVID-19," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    2. Do, Hung X. & Nguyen, Lily & Nguyen, Nhut H. & Nguyen, Quan M.P., 2022. "LGBT policy, investor trading behavior, and return comovement," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 457-483.
    3. Lei Xu & Qian Liu & Bin Li & Chen Ma, 2022. "Fintech business and firm access to bank loans," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(4), pages 4381-4421, December.
    4. Cave, Joshua & Lancheros, Sandra, 2024. "Local peer influence on dividend payout decisions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    5. Feng, Yumei & Pei, Hongxin & Pan, Yuying & Ho, Kung-Cheng, 2025. "Impact of fund cliques on corporate cash dividends: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(PA).
    6. Che Johari, Edie Erman & Chronopoulos, Dimitris K. & Scholtens, Bert & Sobiech, Anna L. & Wilson, John O.S., 2020. "Deposit insurance and bank dividend policy," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    7. Ye, Dezhu & Deng, Jie & Liu, Yi & Szewczyk, Samuel H. & Chen, Xiao, 2019. "Does board gender diversity increase dividend payouts? Analysis of global evidence," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1-26.
    8. Beylem Çelik & Gökhan Özer & Abdullah Kürşat Merter, 2023. "The Effect of Ownership Structure on Financial Reporting Timeliness: An Implementation on Borsa Istanbul," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    9. Akindayomi, Akinloye & Amin, Md Ruhul, 2022. "Does business strategy affect dividend payout policies?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 531-550.
    10. Claire Economidou & Dimitrios Gounopoulos & Dimitrios Konstantios & Emmanuel Tsiritakis, 2023. "Is sustainability rating material to the market?," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 52(1), pages 127-179, March.
    11. Sakawa, Hideaki & Watanabel, Naoki & Uchida, Konari, 2024. "Do bank ties influence stock repurchases in a bank-based financial system during financial distress? A pre-registered report," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    12. Vincent Molly & Anneleen Michiels, 2022. "Dividend decisions in family businesses: A systematic review and research agenda," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 992-1026, September.
    13. Mohammed T. Abusharbeh, 2024. "Technology-Profitability Paradox in Banking Sector: Evidence from Palestine," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 14855-14873, September.
    14. Yeon‐Koo Che & Kathryn E. Spier, 2008. "Strategic judgment proofing," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 39(4), pages 926-948, December.
    15. Hasan, Iftekhar & Lozano-Vivas, Ana, 2002. "Organizational Form and Expense Preference: Spanish Experience," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 135-150, April.
    16. Fabbri, Daniela & Menichini, Anna Maria C., 2016. "The commitment problem of secured lending," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(3), pages 561-584.
    17. Xueyan Dong & Jingyu Gao & Sunny Li Sun & Kangtao Ye, 2021. "Doing extreme by doing good," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 291-315, March.
    18. Khémiri, Wafa & Noubbigh, Hédi, 2020. "Size-threshold effect in debt-firm performance nexus in the sub-Saharan region: A Panel Smooth Transition Regression approach," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 335-344.
    19. Shaikh, Ibrahim A. & O'Brien, Jonathan Paul & Peters, Lois, 2018. "Inside directors and the underinvestment of financial slack towards R&D-intensity in high-technology firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 192-201.
    20. Calcagno, R. & Renneboog, L.D.R., 2004. "Capital Structure and Managerial Compensation : The Effects of Renumeration Seniority," Discussion Paper 2004-120, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:232-:d:1643458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.