IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v17y2024i8p361-d1456624.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Food Delivery Riders’ Perception of Fairness on Organizational Identification in the Digital Economy: Based on the Intermediary Perspective of Organizational Trust in the Context of Digital Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Tong

    (Chakrabongse Bhuvanarth International Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies (CBIS), Rajamangala University of Technology Tawan-OK, Bangkok 10400, Thailand)

  • Chonlavit Sutunyarak

    (Chakrabongse Bhuvanarth International Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies (CBIS), Rajamangala University of Technology Tawan-OK, Bangkok 10400, Thailand)

Abstract

With the rapid rise in the gig economy driven by advancements in digital technology and financial technology, this study focuses on the work experiences and psychological perceptions of food delivery riders in platform-based employment. This study used a sample of food delivery riders from 19 cities in China (such as Shanghai, Beijing, Guangzhou, etc.) and multiple delivery platforms (such as Meituan, Ele.me) to collect data through a combination of online and offline questionnaires. The impact relationship between perceived fairness, organizational trust, and organizational identity of food delivery riders was examined through factor analysis, structural equation modeling, and mediation effect modeling. The results of the survey and statistical analysis indicate that fairness perception and its dimensions (distributive fairness, procedural fairness, and interactional fairness) significantly influence riders’ organizational identification, with organizational trust serving as a critical mediating factor. The integration of digital technology has substantially enhanced the operational efficiency of platform-based employment by enabling real-time tracking, transparent communication, and data-driven decision-making. Innovations in financial technology, such as digital payment systems and financial management tools, offer riders safer and more convenient compensation methods, thereby contributing to their financial stability and fostering trust in the platform. The establishment of trust alleviates the riders’ concerns regarding compensation stability and bolsters their optimistic attitudes toward accessing platform resources and meeting their needs. This study provides significant insights and recommendations for leveraging digital technology and financial technology to improve the relationship and operational efficiency between riders and platform enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Tong & Chonlavit Sutunyarak, 2024. "The Impact of Food Delivery Riders’ Perception of Fairness on Organizational Identification in the Digital Economy: Based on the Intermediary Perspective of Organizational Trust in the Context of Digi," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-22, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:8:p:361-:d:1456624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/8/361/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/8/361/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon Lloyd D. Restubog & Matthew J. Hornsey & Prashant Bordia & Sarah R. Esposo, 2008. "Effects of Psychological Contract Breach on Organizational Citizenship Behaviour: Insights from the Group Value Model," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(8), pages 1377-1400, December.
    2. Hongchun Wang & Xue Liu & Haibin Luo & Bing Ma & Shanshi Liu, 2016. "Linking Procedural Justice with Employees Work Outcomes in China: The Mediating Role of Job Security," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 125(1), pages 77-88, January.
    3. Li, Ying & Liu, Zhen & Qin, Kuiyuan & Cui, Jiayu & Zeng, Xiaoyu & Ji, Ming & Lan, Jijun & You, Xuqun & Li, Yuan, 2021. "Organizational trust and safety operation behavior in airline pilots: The mediating effects of organizational identification and organizational commitment," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    4. Dash, Ganesh & Paul, Justin, 2021. "CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kusa, Rafał & Suder, Marcin & Duda, Joanna, 2023. "Impact of greening on performance in the hospitality industry: Moderating effect of flexibility and inter-organizational cooperation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    2. Rehman, Anisur & Behera, Rajat Kumar & Islam, Md Saiful & Elahi, Yasir Arafat & Abbasi, Faraz Ahmad & Imtiaz, Asma, 2024. "Drivers of metaverse adoption for enhancing marketing capabilities of retail SMEs," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    3. Morais, Ana Catarina & Ishida, Akira & Matsuda, Ruriko, 2024. "Ethical food consumption drivers in Japan. A S–O-R framework application using PLS-SEM with a MGA assessment based on clustering," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    4. Kautish, Pradeep & Paço, Arminda & Thaichon, Park, 2022. "Sustainable consumption and plastic packaging: Relationships among product involvement, perceived marketplace influence and choice behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    5. Chih-Ting Shih & Cheng-Chen Lin, 2014. "From good friends to good soldiers: A psychological contract perspective," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 309-326, March.
    6. Chien, Yu-Shyun & Lu, Chung-Cheng, 2025. "Investigating users’ intention to re-use shared electric scooters through a combined behavioral model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 533-544.
    7. Andi Amran Asriadi & Muslim Salam & Rahmawaty Andi Nadja & Letty Fudjaja & Didi Rukmana & Muhammad Hatta Jamil & Muhammad Arsyad & Rahmadanih & Rafiqah Maulidiyah, 2024. "Determinants of Farmer Participation and Development of Shallot Farming in Search of Effective Farm Management Practices: Evidence Grounded in Structural Equation Modeling Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-30, July.
    8. Sangryeong Lee & Soo-Kyoung Lee & Jin-Woo Park, 2024. "The Effect of Service Quality and Sustainability Practices on Brand Equity: The Case of Korean Air Passengers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-20, May.
    9. Mohammadi, Zohreh & Kašpar, Jan & Tahri, Meryem & Sherstiuk, Maryna, 2024. "Assessing citizens' willingness for participatory forest management planning: A case study in the Czech Republic," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    10. Chopdar, Prasanta Kr & Paul, Justin & Prodanova, Jana, 2022. "Mobile shoppers’ response to Covid-19 phobia, pessimism and smartphone addiction: Does social influence matter?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    11. Hongyi Sun & Bingqian Zhang & Wenbin Ni, 2022. "A Hybrid Model Based on SEM and Fuzzy TOPSIS for Supplier Selection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-19, September.
    12. Dogra, Nikhil & Adil, Mohd & Sadiq, Mohd & Dash, Ganesh & Paul, Justin, 2023. "Unraveling customer repurchase intention in OFDL context: An investigation using a hybrid technique of SEM and fsQCA," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    13. Shuaib Ahmed Soomro & Faisal Qamar & Slim Hadoussa & Yasir Mansoor Kundi, 2025. "Digital transformation and electronic performance: exploring the relationship between fairness perception, organizational identification, and individual performance," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 1297-1316, May.
    14. Alfiero, Simona & Battisti, Enrico & Ηadjielias, Elias, 2022. "Black box technology, usage-based insurance, and prediction of purchase behavior: Evidence from the auto insurance sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    15. Fosso Wamba, Samuel & Queiroz, Maciel M. & Trinchera, Laura, 2024. "The role of artificial intelligence-enabled dynamic capability on environmental performance: The mediation effect of a data-driven culture in France and the USA," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    16. repec:iim:iimawp:13106 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Nashirah Abu Bakar & Sofian Rosbi, 2025. "Exploring Consumer Purchasing Decision towards Halal Food Products among University Students in Malaysia using 4P Marketing Mix Theory," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(2), pages 3219-3230, February.
    18. Shahid, Shadma & Adil, Mohd & Sadiq, Mohd & Dash, Ganesh, 2024. "Why do consumers consume masstige products? A cross-cultural investigation through the lens of self-determination theory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    19. Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr & Appiah, Michael & Karim, Sitara & Yarovaya, Larisa, 2023. "What abates environmental efficiency in African economies? Exploring the influence of infrastructure, industrialization, and innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PB).
    20. Crespo, Cátia Fernandes & Crespo, Nuno Fernandes & Silva, Susana C., 2025. "Unveiling the power of supplier-country image on B2B customers' perceptions: Beyond the product’s beauty," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(3).
    21. Yihan Huang & Daehwan Kim, 2023. "How Does Service Quality Improve Consumer Loyalty in Sports Fitness Centers? The Moderating Role of Sport Involvement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-24, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:8:p:361-:d:1456624. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.