IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v16y2023i2p125-d1069427.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Capabilities and Reputation Risks Towards Firm Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Noraznira Abd Razak

    (Risk and Insurance Department, Faculty of Business and Management, University Technology MARA, Malacca Main Campus, Alor Gajah 78000, Malacca, Malaysia)

  • Najihah Hanisah Marmaya

    (Management Department, Faculty of Business, Economy and Accountancy, University Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu 88400, Sabah, Malaysia)

  • Mohd Zailani Othman

    (Management Department, Faculty of Business and Management, University Technology MARA, Malacca City Campus, Malacca City 75300, Malacca, Malaysia)

  • Idris Osman

    (Human Resource Department, Faculty of Business and Management, University Technology MARA, Malacca City Campus, Malacca City 75300, Malacca, Malaysia)

  • Suhailah Kassim

    (Human Resource Department, Faculty of Business and Management, University Technology MARA, Malacca City Campus, Malacca City 75300, Malacca, Malaysia)

  • Fatin Aqilah Maskuri

    (Human Resource Department, Faculty of Business and Management, University Technology MARA, Malacca City Campus, Malacca City 75300, Malacca, Malaysia)

  • Nik Kutina Mat Tahir

    (Head, Risk Management, Islamic Banking and Finance Institute Malaysia (IBFIM), Kuala Lumpur 50480, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)

Abstract

The effects of firm-specific resources on firm performance has been a quest of many and widely studied worldwide. In today’s business environment, arguments suggesting the relative importance of firm-specific resources in explaining firm performance variation are said to be of the greatest influence on the study of firm behavior. On the other hand, firms with strong, positive reputations can attract and retain crucial talent and often have loyal customers likely to buy a broader range of products and services. It can lead to higher sales generated by satisfied customers and their referrals and can potentially raise capital and share price, and improve the firm performance. An empirical study such as this attempts to investigate the combinations of resources of the firm and focus on reputational risk management concerning firm performance. As such, this study involves variables partially adopted from Donabedian Theory, such as intangible resources, namely capability as an exogenous construct towards endogenous construct and firm performance, as well as proposing a mediation model to analyze the mediated relationship of reputational risk in accelerating the relationship between capabilities and firm performance. This study applies variance-based structural equation modeling via Smart PLS to a sample of 161 listed firms in Malaysia as respondents. A judgment purposive sampling technique has been adopted as the respondents are derived from listed firms under Malaysian Bourse. Overall, the findings of this study reveal how firms may gain competitive advantages in terms of their reputation and eventually be able to sustain their firm’s performances by implementing an integrative model of intangible resources such as capabilities and in their routines and processes within the firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Noraznira Abd Razak & Najihah Hanisah Marmaya & Mohd Zailani Othman & Idris Osman & Suhailah Kassim & Fatin Aqilah Maskuri & Nik Kutina Mat Tahir, 2023. "Capabilities and Reputation Risks Towards Firm Performance," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-11, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:16:y:2023:i:2:p:125-:d:1069427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/16/2/125/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/16/2/125/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gautam Ray & Jay B. Barney & Waleed A. Muhanna, 2004. "Capabilities, business processes, and competitive advantage: choosing the dependent variable in empirical tests of the resource‐based view," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 23-37, January.
    2. David G. Hoopes & Tammy L. Madsen & Gordon Walker, 2003. "Guest editors' introduction to the special issue: why is there a resource‐based view? Toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(10), pages 889-902, October.
    3. Murphy, Gregory B. & Trailer, Jeff W. & Hill, Robert C., 1996. "Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 15-23, May.
    4. Barakat, Ahmed & Ashby, Simon & Fenn, Paul & Bryce, Cormac, 2019. "Operational risk and reputation in financial institutions: Does media tone make a difference?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 1-24.
    5. Yiannis E. Spanos & Spyros Lioukas, 2001. "An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: contrasting Porter's competitive strategy framework and the resource‐based perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(10), pages 907-934, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cengiz Kastan & Akin Marsap, 2018. "Effects Of Open Innovation And Value Network On Competitive Advantage In Design Management: A Model Proposal," Eurasian Journal of Business and Management, Eurasian Publications, vol. 6(4), pages 35-43.
    2. Sujit Sur & Carol-Ann Sirsly, 2013. "What’s in a name? Decomposing corporate reputation to assess the relative impact of temporal, firm and industry level factors," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(4), pages 1047-1072, November.
    3. Sahay, Arvind, 2013. "A Customer Oriented Approach To Identifying Competitive Advantage," IIMA Working Papers WP2013-05-08, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    4. Heimeriks, K. & Duysters, G.M. & Vanhaverbeke, W.P.M., 2004. "The evolution of alliance capabilities," Working Papers 04.20, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies.
    5. John Mugambwa Serumaga-Zake & John Andrew van der Poll, 2021. "Addressing the Impact of Fourth Industrial Revolution on South African Manufacturing Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-31, October.
    6. Hasyim & Sahyar & Mahmud, 2017. "Isolating Mechanism as a Mean to Improve Performance of SMEs," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3A), pages 594-612.
    7. Papazoglou, Michalis E. & Spanos, Yiannis E., 2021. "“Influential knowledge and financial performance: The role of time and rivals’ absorptive capacity”," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    8. Galbreath, Jeremy & Galvin, Peter, 2008. "Firm factors, industry structure and performance variation: New empirical evidence to a classic debate," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 109-117, February.
    9. Tomás F. Espino-Rodríguez, 2016. "How hotels compete on the basis of competitive priorities and their relationship with infrastructural and structural decisions," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 10(4), pages 737-773, December.
    10. Linus Chesoli Wekesa & Jackson Maalu & James Gathungu & Gituro Wainaina, 2023. "Mediating Effect of Competitive Strategy Between Entrepreneur Characteristics and the Performance of Non-timber Forest Product SMEs in Kenya," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(4), pages 4293-4317, December.
    11. C. Chet Miller & Nathan T. Washburn & William H. Glick, 2013. "PERSPECTIVE—The Myth of Firm Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 948-964, June.
    12. Rifat Kamasak, PhD, 2014. "Another Attempt to look inside the “Black Box†of Performance Creation: A Case Study Approach," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 4(7), pages 1-16, July.
    13. Adoli Hebron Litsulitsa & Dr. Patricia Kungu & Dr. David Kiiru, 2024. "The Mediating Influence of Leadership Style within the Nexus of Organizational Agility and Performance Outcomes in Public Universities in Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(8), pages 331-357, August.
    14. Henri, Jean-Francois, 2006. "Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 529-558, August.
    15. M. à ngeles López-Cabarcos & Sérgio Göttling-Oliveira-Monteiro & Paula Vázquez-Rodríguez, 2015. "Organizational Capabilities and Profitability," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(4), pages 21582440156, November.
    16. Perren, Lew, 2013. "Strategic discourses of ‘competitive advantage’: Comparing social representation of causation in academia and practice," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 235-246.
    17. Rifat Kamasak, PhD, 2014. "Another Attempt to look inside the “Black Box†of Performance Creation: A Case Study Approach," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 4(7), pages 1-16, July.
    18. Aliasghar, Omid & Haar, Jarrod, 2023. "Open innovation: Are absorptive and desorptive capabilities complementary?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(2).
    19. Nikolaos Theriou & Dimitrios Maditinos & Georgios N. Theriou, 2017. "Management Control Systems and Strategy: A Resource based Perspective. Evidence from Greece," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), Democritus University of Thrace (DUTH), Kavala Campus, Greece, vol. 10(2), pages 35-47, June.
    20. Tedjo Soelaksono & Achmad Sudiro & Mintarti Rahayu & Sudjatno Sudjatno, 2018. "The Influence of Capability Managerial on Competitiveness of the Company through the Planning Strategy, Investment, Innovation and Performance of the Company (a Study on Corporate Manufacturing Indust," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 8(2), pages 22-32.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:16:y:2023:i:2:p:125-:d:1069427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.