IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v13y2025i3p174-d1747936.html

Bank Risk-Taking During COVID-19: The Role of Private and Public Ownership in GCC

Author

Listed:
  • Abdullah Aldousari

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth SY23 3FL, UK)

  • Ahmed Mohammed

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth SY23 3FL, UK)

  • Sarah Lindop

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth SY23 3FL, UK)

Abstract

This study explores the ownership–risk relationship in the GCC emerging economies during the COVID-19 pandemic, examining 44 commercial banks classified as private and publicly owned banks. The two-stage least squares (2SLS) method is employed to identify endogeneity issues, with robustness checks using panel data techniques. We analyzed the ownership–risk relationship, including non-linear and interaction effects. The results reveal that public ownership exhibits an inverted U-shaped relationship with NPLs, where moderate public concentration increases credit risk, while high public control marginally reduces it. Private ownership is linked to higher risk once bank-specific characteristics are controlled, reflecting riskier lending driven by profitability motives. We show that public banks demonstrate resilience due to stable deposits and implicit backing, whereas private banks are more vulnerable to systemic shocks. The impact of ownership structure on credit risk is context-dependent, reflecting heterogeneous ownership objectives in the GCC.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdullah Aldousari & Ahmed Mohammed & Sarah Lindop, 2025. "Bank Risk-Taking During COVID-19: The Role of Private and Public Ownership in GCC," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:174-:d:1747936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/3/174/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/3/174/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haque, Faizul & Brown, Kym, 2017. "Bank ownership, regulation and efficiency: Perspectives from the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 273-293.
    2. Laeven, Luc & Levine, Ross, 2009. "Bank governance, regulation and risk taking," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 259-275, August.
    3. Thorsten Beck & Ross Levine & Alexey Levkov, 2010. "Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 65(5), pages 1637-1667, October.
    4. Alexei Karas & Koen Schoors & Laurent Weill, 2010. "Are private banks more efficient than public banks?," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 18(1), pages 209-244, January.
    5. Allen N. Berger & Astrid A. Dick, 2007. "Entry into Banking Markets and the Early-Mover Advantage," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 39(4), pages 775-807, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Said-Nour Samake, 2022. "Prudential Regulation and Bank Efficiency : Evidence from WAEMU Zone," Working Papers hal-03540209, HAL.
    2. Beck, Thorsten & De Jonghe, Olivier & Schepens, Glenn, 2013. "Bank competition and stability: Cross-country heterogeneity," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 218-244.
    3. Cheng, Junguo & Wang, Lei & He, Jing, 2023. "Political promotion incentives and banking supervision: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    4. Goetz, Martin, 2016. "Competition and bank stability," CFS Working Paper Series 559, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    5. Olivier De Jonghe & Mustafa Disli & Koen Schoors, 2012. "Corporate Governance, Opaque Bank Activities, and Risk/Return Efficiency: Pre- and Post-Crisis Evidence from Turkey," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 41(1), pages 51-80, April.
    6. Ferdaous Bahri & Taher Hamza, 2020. "The Impact of Market Power on Bank Risk-Taking: an Empirical Investigation," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(3), pages 1198-1233, September.
    7. Manthos D. Delis & Iftekhar Hasan & Pantelis Kazakis, 2014. "Bank Regulations and Income Inequality: Empirical Evidence," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 18(5), pages 1811-1846.
    8. Zhang, Xing & Li, Fengchao & Ortiz, Jaime, 2021. "Internal risk governance and external capital regulation affecting bank risk-taking and performance: Evidence from P.R. China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 276-292.
    9. Miroslav Mateev & Ahmad Sahyouni, 2026. "Corporate governance mechanisms in the banking industry: is there any interplay between ownership concentration and market competition?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 30(1), pages 93-154, March.
    10. Al-Shboul, Mohammad & Maghyereh, Aktham & Hassan, Abul & Molyneux, Phillip, 2020. "Political risk and bank stability in the Middle East and North Africa region," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    11. Bayeh, Antonio & Bitar, Mohammad & Burlacu, Radu & Walker, Thomas, 2021. "Competition, securitization, and efficiency in US banks," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 553-576.
    12. Miroslav Mateev, 2019. "Regulation and ownership effect on banks performance: New Evidence from the MENA region," Proceedings of Economics and Finance Conferences 8911196, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    13. Salma Louati & Younes Boujelbene, 2021. "Basel Regulations and Banks’ Risk-efficiency Nexus: Evidence from Dynamic Simultaneous-equation Models," Journal of African Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 578-602, October.
    14. Abu-Abbas, Bassam M. & Hassan, Mostafa K., 2024. "Readability and banks’ risk-taking behavior: Evidence from GCC," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PA).
    15. Cristian Barra & Nazzareno Ruggiero, 2022. "Bank-specific factors and credit risk: evidence from Italian banks in different local markets," Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(3), pages 316-350, October.
    16. Huang, Yichu & Fang, Feifei & Fan, Yaoyao & Ly, Kim Cuong, 2024. "Do ‘Lehman Sisters’ work in China? Women on boards and bank risk," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    17. Martin R. Goetz, 2012. "Bank diversification, market structure and bank risk taking: theory and evidence from U.S. commercial banks," Supervisory Research and Analysis Working Papers QAU12-2, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    18. Liang, Lien-Wen & Dash Altankhuyag, 2019. "Impact of Banking Supervision on the Cost-Efficiency of Banks: A Study of Five Developing Asian Countries," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(2), pages 213-231, February.
    19. Li, Yongkui & Du, Qixuan & Chao, Xiangrui & Gao, Xiang, 2024. "Macro-prudential policy, digital transformations and banks’ risk-taking," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    20. Hela Kallel & Salah Ben Hamad & Mohamed Triki, 2019. "Modeling the efficiency of Tunisian and Moroccan banks using the SFA approach," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 68(5), pages 879-902, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:174-:d:1747936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.