IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i5p774-d1655431.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Framework for Developing Awareness Interventions: A Case of Mobile Bullying

Author

Listed:
  • Portia Mathimbi

    (Department of Information Systems, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town 7700, South Africa)

Abstract

Cyberbullying is a pervasive social issue that has gained increasing attention due to its serious consequences, such as cyberbullicide, which is suicide resulting from cyberbullying. Researchers have called for various interventions and the involvement of multiple stakeholders, including psychologists and law enforcement agencies, to address the problem. Recent studies have shown that the majority of cyberbullying incidents occur on mobile devices, referred to as mobile bullying. Therefore, there is a need to focus intervention efforts on mobile bullying, which is a subset of cyberbullying. The objective of this study was to develop a framework that could guide the creation of an awareness intervention aimed at raising awareness of mobile bullying. Although several meta-analyses have been conducted over the years on intervention effectiveness. There is a gap from the lack of frameworks and requirements to guide the development of awareness interventions. As such, a PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) systematic literature review was conducted to identify the theories that could inform the development of such an intervention. Based on the review, a theoretical framework was developed that incorporated the basic elements identified as guiding principles for the development of awareness interventions. In the same way, theory, specifically SAT was used to inform the development of an instrumental framework for designing context-sensitive awareness interventions, incorporating the basic elements that practitioners can use to develop context-sensitive awareness interventions. The findings from the study indicate that the social context, which encompasses the social issue at hand; available media content; the proximal and distal environments; and the choice of awareness tool, which is informed by the marketing mix (i.e., price, product, people, promotion, and place), affect the reach or distribution of the intervention. The theoretical framework contributes to the body of knowledge on the subject, while the instrumental framework provides a practical approach to building customizable interventions that can be tailored to specific contexts and available resources for awareness.

Suggested Citation

  • Portia Mathimbi, 2025. "A Framework for Developing Awareness Interventions: A Case of Mobile Bullying," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(5), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:5:p:774-:d:1655431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/5/774/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/5/774/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pu Shen, 2002. "Market timing strategies that worked," Research Working Paper RWP 02-01, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
    2. Anna Sorrentino & Francesco Sulla & Margherita Santamato & Annarosa Cipriano & Stefania Cella, 2023. "The Long-Term Efficacy and Sustainability of the Tabby Improved Prevention and Intervention Program in Reducing Cyberbullying and Cybervictimization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(8), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Campbell, Marilyn & Xu, Jenny, 2022. "Children and adolescents’ understanding of traditional and cyberbullying," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    4. Bowen Xiao & Natasha Parent & Takara Bond & Johanna Sam & Jennifer Shapka, 2024. "Developmental Trajectories of Cyber-Aggression among Early Adolescents in Canada: The Impact of Aggression, Gender, and Time Spent Online," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(4), pages 1-14, April.
    5. Silvia Gabrielli & Silvia Rizzi & Sara Carbone & Enrico Maria Piras, 2021. "School Interventions for Bullying–Cyberbullying Prevention in Adolescents: Insights from the UPRIGHT and CREEP Projects," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-13, November.
    6. Andrew Atkeson & Patrick J. Kehoe, 2002. "The transition to a new economy after the Second Industrial Revolution," Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue Nov.
    7. Kathryn Shaw, 2004. "The Human Resources Revolution: Is It a Productivity Driver?," NBER Chapters, in: Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 4, pages 69-114, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Sofia Buelga & Javier Postigo & Belén Martínez-Ferrer & María-Jesús Cava & Jessica Ortega-Barón, 2020. "Cyberbullying among Adolescents: Psychometric Properties of the CYB-AGS Cyber-Aggressor Scale," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-15, April.
    9. B. Nyagadza & R. Pashapa & A. Chare & G. Mazuruse & P. K. Hove, 2022. "Digital technologies, Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) & Global Value Chains (GVCs) nexus with emerging economies’ future industrial innovation dynamics," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 2014654-201, December.
    10. Michelle F. Wright, 2023. "Adolescent Cyberbullies’ Attributions: Longitudinal Linkages to Cyberbullying Perpetration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(12), pages 1-12, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Norazlinda Hj Mohammad & Norena Abdul Karim Zamri & Nurbarirah Ahmad & Liza Marziana Mohammad & Aidah Alias & Farihan Zahari & Wan Aisyah Amni Wan Mohamad Saferdin, 2025. "Interactive Video and Toolkit Innovations for Regulating Cyberbullying and Protecting Mental Health," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(3), pages 2825-2840, March.
    2. Ahn, Sanghoon, 2003. "Technology Upgrading with Learning Cost," CEI Working Paper Series 2003-21, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    3. Eliasson, Gunnar & Johansson, Dan & Taymaz, Erol, 2004. "Simulating the New Economy," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 289-314, September.
    4. Boyan Jovanovic & Peter L. Rousseau, 2008. "Mergers as Reallocation," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 90(4), pages 765-776, November.
    5. BOWERS Dominique & MATLALA Ntswaki & BERHADIEN Moegamat & UMETOR Henry & GONGXEKA Thabo, 2024. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management And Disruptive Theory: A Bibliometric Review," Management of Sustainable Development, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 16(1), pages 11-23, June.
    6. Rodolfo E. Manuelli & Ananth Seshadri, 2014. "Frictionless Technology Diffusion: The Case of Tractors," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(4), pages 1368-1391, April.
    7. Howell, Bronwyn & Obren, Mark, 2003. "Telecommunications Usage in New Zealand: 1993-2003," Working Paper Series 3886, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    8. repec:vuw:vuwscr:18983 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Ángel Denche-Zamorano & Sabina Barrios-Fernandez & Carmen Galán-Arroyo & Sebastián Sánchez-González & Felipe Montalva-Valenzuela & Antonio Castillo-Paredes & Jorge Rojo-Ramos & Pedro R. Olivares, 2022. "Science Mapping: A Bibliometric Analysis on Cyberbullying and the Psychological Dimensions of the Self," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Hornstein, Andreas & Krusell, Per & Violante, Giovanni L., 2005. "The Effects of Technical Change on Labor Market Inequalities," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 20, pages 1275-1370, Elsevier.
    11. Rui Tang & Pishi Xiu & Haoxiang Dong, 2025. "Research on Digital Transformation Driving the High-Quality Development of Cultural and Tourism Enterprises—Evidence Based on Listed Cultural and Tourism Companies," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 478-500, March.
    12. Thomas Cooley & Ramon Marimon & Vincenzo Quadrini, 2004. "Aggregate Consequences of Limited Contract Enforceability," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 112(4), pages 817-847, August.
    13. Jesús Rodríguez-Molina & José-Fernán Martínez & Pedro Castillejo & Gregorio Rubio, 2017. "Development of Middleware Applied to Microgrids by Means of an Open Source Enterprise Service Bus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-50, February.
    14. XingYu Fu & JinHong Du & YiFeng Guo & MingWen Liu & Tao Dong & XiuWen Duan, 2018. "A Machine Learning Framework for Stock Selection," Papers 1806.01743, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2018.
    15. Meena Madhavan & Mohammed Ali Sharafuddin & Sutee Wangtueai, 2024. "Impact of Industry 5.0 Readiness on Sustainable Business Growth of Marine Food Processing SMEs in Thailand," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-26, May.
    16. Hongliang, Li & Zeren, Zhang & Haoran, Miao, 2024. "The impact of digital transformation on enterprise export resilience: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    17. Chen, Kaiji & Song, Zheng, 2013. "Financial frictions on capital allocation: A transmission mechanism of TFP fluctuations," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(6), pages 683-703.
    18. Lubo? P?tor & Pietro Veronesi, 2009. "Technological Revolutions and Stock Prices," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(4), pages 1451-1483, September.
    19. Kaiji Chen & Zheng Song & Yikai Wang, 2010. "Precautionary corporate liquidity," IEW - Working Papers 465, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
    20. Raymond Robertson & Hongyang Di & Drusilla Brown & Rajeev Dehejia, 2016. "Working Conditions, Work Outcomes, and Policy in Asian Developing Countries," ADB Economics Working Paper Series 497, Asian Development Bank.
    21. Xu, Yanan & Sun, Yaowu & Zhou, Yiting, 2024. "Unpacking the intellectual structure and evolution trend of general-purpose technologies development in innovation studies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:5:p:774-:d:1655431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.