IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2022i1p646-d1019875.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinical Outcomes Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Co-Infection with Rhinovirus and Adenovirus in Adults—A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study

Author

Listed:
  • Quynh-Lam Tran

    (Infectious Diseases Division, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, USA
    Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH 03755, USA)

  • Gregorio Benitez

    (Infectious Diseases Division, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, USA)

  • Fadi Shehadeh

    (Infectious Diseases Division, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, USA
    School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece)

  • Matthew Kaczynski

    (Infectious Diseases Division, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, USA)

  • Eleftherios Mylonakis

    (Infectious Diseases Division, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, USA)

Abstract

(1) Background: Respiratory co-infections with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and other viruses are common, but data on clinical outcomes and laboratory biomarkers indicative of disease severity are limited. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes and laboratory biomarkers of patients with SARS-CoV-2 alone to those of patients with SARS-CoV-2 and either rhinovirus or adenovirus. (2) Methods: Hospitalized patients co-infected with SARS-CoV-2 and rhinovirus and patients co-infected with SARS-CoV-2 and adenovirus were matched to patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 alone. Outcomes of interest were the cumulative incidences of mechanical ventilation use, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, 30-day all-cause mortality, and 30-day all-cause readmission from the day of discharge. We also assessed differences in laboratory biomarkers from the day of specimen collection. (3) Results: Patients co-infected with SARS-CoV-2 and rhinovirus, compared with patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, had significantly greater 30-day all-cause mortality (8/23 (34.8%) vs. 8/69 (11.6%), p = 0.02). Additionally, median alanine transaminase (13 IU/L vs. 24 IU/L, p = 0.03), aspartate transaminase (25 IU/L vs. 36 IU/L, p = 0.04), and C-reactive protein (34.86 mg/L vs. 94.68 mg/L, p = 0.02) on day of specimen collection were significantly lower in patients co-infected with SARS-CoV-2 and rhinovirus in comparison to patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 alone. Clinical outcomes and laboratory markers did not differ significantly between patients with SARS-CoV-2 and adenovirus co-infection and patients with SARS-CoV-2 mono-infection. (4) Conclusion: SARS-CoV-2 and rhinovirus co-infection, compared with SARS-CoV-2 mono-infection alone, is positively associated with 30-day all-cause mortality among hospitalized patients. However, our lack of significant findings in our analysis of patients with SARS-CoV-2 and adenovirus co-infection may suggest that SARS-CoV-2 co-infections have variable significance, and further study is warranted.

Suggested Citation

  • Quynh-Lam Tran & Gregorio Benitez & Fadi Shehadeh & Matthew Kaczynski & Eleftherios Mylonakis, 2022. "Clinical Outcomes Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Co-Infection with Rhinovirus and Adenovirus in Adults—A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:646-:d:1019875
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/646/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/646/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ho, Daniel & Imai, Kosuke & King, Gary & Stuart, Elizabeth A., 2011. "MatchIt: Nonparametric Preprocessing for Parametric Causal Inference," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 42(i08).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meyer, Maximilian & Hulke, Carolin & Kamwi, Jonathan & Kolem, Hannah & Börner, Jan, 2022. "Spatially heterogeneous effects of collective action on environmental dependence in Namibia’s Zambezi region," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    2. Chervier, Colas & Le Velly, Gwenolé & Ezzine-de-Blas, Driss, 2019. "When the Implementation of Payments for Biodiversity Conservation Leads to Motivation Crowding-out: A Case Study From the Cardamoms Forests, Cambodia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 499-510.
    3. Mansaray, Alhassan & Coleman, Simeon & Ataullah, Ali & Sirichand, Kavita, 2021. "Residual government ownership in public-private partnership projects," Journal of Government and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(C).
    4. Moritz Flubacher & George Sheldon & Adrian Müller, 2015. "Comparison of the Economic Performance between Organic and Conventional Dairy Farms in the Swiss Mountain Region Using Matching and Stochastic Frontier Analysis," Journal of Socio-Economics in Agriculture (Until 2015: Yearbook of Socioeconomics in Agriculture), Swiss Society for Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, vol. 7(1), pages 76-84.
    5. Ferentinos, Konstantinos & Gibberd, Alex & Guin, Benjamin, 2021. "Climate policy and transition risk in the housing market," Bank of England working papers 918, Bank of England.
    6. Altman, Micah & Fox, John & Jackman, Simon & Zeileis, Achim, 2011. "An Introduction to the Special Volume on "Political Methodology"," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 42(i01).
    7. Marcos-Martinez, Raymundo & Measham, Thomas G. & Fleming-Muñoz, David A., 2019. "Economic impacts of early unconventional gas mining: Lessons from the coal seam gas industry in New South Wales, Australia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 338-346.
    8. Carazza, Luís & Silveira Neto, Raul da Mota, 2021. "Evaluating the Regional Expansion of Brazil’s Federal System of Vocational and Technological Education," Revista Brasileira de Estudos Regionais e Urbanos, Associação Brasileira de Estudos Regionais e Urbanos (ABER), vol. 15(2), pages 212-246.
    9. Rigdon, Joseph & Berkowitz, Seth A. & Seligman, Hilary K. & Basu, Sanjay, 2017. "Re-evaluating associations between the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participation and body mass index in the context of unmeasured confounders," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 112-124.
    10. Wang-Ly, Nathan & Newell, Ben R., 2022. "Allowing early access to retirement savings: Lessons from Australia," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 716-733.
    11. Finocchiaro Castro, Massimo & Guccio, Calogero & Rizzo, Ilde, 2023. "How "one-size-fits-all" public works contract does it better? An assessment of infrastructure provision in Italy," EconStor Preprints 270729, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    12. Lo, A. W.-T. & Houston, D., 2018. "How do compact, accessible, and walkable communities promote gender equality in spatial behavior?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 42-54.
    13. Dai, Ziyi & Liu, Haobing & Rodgers, Michael O. & Guensler, Randall, 2022. "Electric vehicle market potential and associated energy and emissions reduction benefits," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    14. Petros Andrikopoulos & Judith Aron-Wisnewsky & Rima Chakaroun & Antonis Myridakis & Sofia K. Forslund & Trine Nielsen & Solia Adriouch & Bridget Holmes & Julien Chilloux & Sara Vieira-Silva & Gwen Fal, 2023. "Evidence of a causal and modifiable relationship between kidney function and circulating trimethylamine N-oxide," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Stjepan Srhoj & Michael Lapinski & Janette Walde, 2019. "Size matters? Impact evaluation of business development grants on SME performance," Working Papers 2019-14, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    16. Kim, Ja Young & Bartholomew, Keith & Ewing, Reid, 2020. "Another one rides the bus? The connections between bus stop amenities, bus ridership, and ADA paratransit demand," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 280-288.
    17. Auliz-Ortiz, Daniel Martín & Arroyo-Rodríguez, Víctor & Mendoza, Eduardo & Martínez-Ramos, Miguel, 2023. "Are there trade-offs between conservation and development caused by Mexican protected areas?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    18. Gerike, Regine & Gehlert, Tina & Leisch, Friedrich, 2015. "Time use in travel surveys and time use surveys – Two sides of the same coin?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 4-24.
    19. Celia Bilbao & Luis Valdés, 2016. "Evaluation of the profitability of quality labels in rural tourism accommodation: a hedonic approach using propensity score matching," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(34), pages 3253-3263, July.
    20. Dong, Hongwei, 2021. "Evaluating the impacts of transit-oriented developments (TODs) on household transportation expenditures in California," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:646-:d:1019875. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.