IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i19p12469-d929935.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pharmacoepidemiological Research on N-Nitrosodimethylamine-Contaminated Ranitidine Use and Long-Term Cancer Risk: A Population-Based Longitudinal Cohort Study

Author

Listed:
  • Chun-Hsiang Wang

    (Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Tainan Municipal Hospital (Managed by Show Chwan Medical Care Corporation), Tainan 701033, Taiwan
    Department of Optometry, Chung Hwa Medical University, Tainan 701033, Taiwan)

  • I-I Chen

    (Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Tainan Municipal Hospital (Managed by Show Chwan Medical Care Corporation), Tainan 701033, Taiwan
    These author contributed equally to this work.)

  • Chung-Hung Chen

    (Department of Gastroenterology, Chang Bing Show Chwan Memorial Hopital, Changhua 505029, Taiwan
    These author contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yuan-Tsung Tseng

    (Committee of Medical Research, Tainan Municipal Hospital (Managed by Show Chwan Medical Care Corporation), Tainan 701033, Taiwan)

Abstract

N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), a carcinogenic chemical, has recently been identified in ranitidine. We conducted a population-based study to explore ranitidine use and cancer emergence over time. Using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, a population-based cohort study was conducted. A total of 55,110 eligible patients who received ranitidine between January 2000 and December 2018 were enrolled in the treated cohort. We conducted a 1:1 propensity-score-matching procedure to match the ranitidine-treated group with the ranitidine-untreated group and famotidine controls for a longitudinal study. The association of ranitidine exposure with cancer outcomes was assessed. A multivariable Cox regression analysis that compared cancer risk with the untreated groups revealed that ranitidine increased the risk of liver (hazard ratio (HR): 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09–1.36, p < 0.001), lung (HR: 1.17, CI: 1.05–1.31, p = 0.005), gastric (HR: 1.26, CI: 1.05–1.52, p = 0.012), and pancreatic cancers (HR 1.35, CI: 1.03–1.77, p = 0.030). Our real-world observational study strongly supports the pathogenic role of NDMA contamination, given that long-term ranitidine use is associated with a higher likelihood of liver cancer development in ranitidine users compared with the control groups of non-ranitidine users treated with famotidine or proton-pump inhibitors.

Suggested Citation

  • Chun-Hsiang Wang & I-I Chen & Chung-Hung Chen & Yuan-Tsung Tseng, 2022. "Pharmacoepidemiological Research on N-Nitrosodimethylamine-Contaminated Ranitidine Use and Long-Term Cancer Risk: A Population-Based Longitudinal Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-16, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12469-:d:929935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12469/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12469/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alberto Abadie & Jann Spiess, 2022. "Robust Post-Matching Inference," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 117(538), pages 983-995, April.
    2. Masao Iwagami & Ryosuke Kumazawa & Yoshihisa Miyamoto & Yuri Ito & Miho Ishimaru & Kojiro Morita & Shota Hamada & Nanako Tamiya & Hideo Yasunaga, 2021. "Risk of Cancer in Association with Ranitidine and Nizatidine vs Other H2 Blockers: Analysis of the Japan Medical Data Center Claims Database 2005–2018," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 361-371, March.
    3. Peikes, Deborah N. & Moreno, Lorenzo & Orzol, Sean Michael, 2008. "Propensity Score Matching: A Note of Caution for Evaluators of Social Programs," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 62, pages 222-231, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ashimwe, Olive, 2016. "An Economic Analysis Of Impact Of Weather Index-Based Crop Insurance On Household Income In Huye District Of Rwanda," Research Theses 265675, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    2. McLaughlin, Joanne Song, 2017. "Does Communist party membership pay? Estimating the economic returns to party membership in the labor market in China," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 963-983.
    3. Deborah Peikes & Grace Anglin & Erin Fries Taylor & Stacy Dale & Ann O'Malley & Arkadipta Ghosh & Kaylyn Swankoski & Lara Converse & Rosalind Keith & Mariel Finucane & Jesse Crosson & Anne Mutti & Tho, "undated". "Evaluation of the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative: Third Annual Report," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 70714de1cb3d4620a5957f68d, Mathematica Policy Research.
    4. Eriksen, Tine L. Mundbjerg & Gaulke, Amanda P. & Skipper, Niels & Svensson, Jannet & Thingholm, Peter, 2023. "Educational consequences of a sibling's disability: Evidence from type 1 diabetes," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    5. Heinrich, Carolyn J. & Mueser, Peter R. & Troske, Kenneth & Jeon, Kyung-Seong & Kahvecioglu, Daver C., 2009. "New Estimates of Public Employment and Training Program Net Impacts: A Nonexperimental Evaluation of the Workforce Investment Act Program," IZA Discussion Papers 4569, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Dechezleprêtre, Antoine & Nachtigall, Daniel & Venmans, Frank, 2023. "The joint impact of the European Union emissions trading system on carbon emissions and economic performance," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    7. Kenneth Fortson & Natalya Verbitsky-Savitz & Emma Kopa & Philip Gleason, 2012. "Using an Experimental Evaluation of Charter Schools to Test Whether Nonexperimental Comparison Group Methods Can Replicate Experimental Impact Estimates," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 27f871b5b7b94f3a80278a593, Mathematica Policy Research.
    8. repec:mpr:mprres:6698 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Roth, Jonathan & Sant’Anna, Pedro H.C. & Bilinski, Alyssa & Poe, John, 2023. "What’s trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 2218-2244.
    10. Zafar E. Nazarov, 2016. "Can Benefits and Work Incentives Counseling be a Path to Future Economic Self-Sufficiency for Individuals with Disabilities?," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 211-234, June.
    11. Kenneth Fortson & Philip Gleason & Emma Kopa & Natalya Verbitsky-Savitz, "undated". "Horseshoes, Hand Grenades, and Treatment Effects? Reassessing Bias in Nonexperimental Estimators," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 1c24988cd5454dd3be51fbc2c, Mathematica Policy Research.
    12. repec:mpr:mprres:7443 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Deborah Peikes & Erin Fries Taylor & Stacy Dale & Ann O'Malley & Arkadipta Ghosh & Grace Anglin & Kaylyn Swankoski & Aparajita Zutshi & Lara Converse & Randall Brown, "undated". "Evaluation of the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative: Second Annual Report," Mathematica Policy Research Reports ba9f7ec1dc504e4abe15302c2, Mathematica Policy Research.
    14. Elert, Niklas & Andersson, Fredrik W. & Wennberg, Karl, 2015. "The impact of entrepreneurship education in high school on long-term entrepreneurial performance," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 209-223.
    15. Arefeh Nasri & Carlos Carrion & Lei Zhang & Babak Baghaei, 2020. "Using propensity score matching technique to address self-selection in transit-oriented development (TOD) areas," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 359-371, February.
    16. Christina Clark Tuttle & Bing-ru Teh & Ira Nichols-Barrer & Brian P. Gill & Philip Gleason, "undated". "Student Characteristics and Achievement in 22 KIPP Middle Schools," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 69064a347d534ffa8947d7b6e, Mathematica Policy Research.
    17. Fortson, Kenneth & Gleason, Philip & Kopa, Emma & Verbitsky-Savitz, Natalya, 2015. "Horseshoes, hand grenades, and treatment effects? Reassessing whether nonexperimental estimators are biased," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 100-113.
    18. Glazer Amanda K. & Pimentel Samuel D., 2023. "Robust inference for matching under rolling enrollment," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, January.
    19. Bing-ru Teh & Moria McCullough & Brian P. Gill, "undated". "Student Achievement in New York City Middle Schools Affiliated with Achievement First and Uncommon Schools," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 9b7646f5c8ae4067840b186c5, Mathematica Policy Research.
    20. Mohebalian, Phillip M. & Aguilar, Francisco X., 2016. "Additionality and design of forest conservation programs: Insights from Ecuador's Socio Bosque Program," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 103-114.
    21. Peter Z. Schochet & Ronald D'Amico & Jillian Berk & Nathan Wozny, "undated". "Methodological Notes Regarding the Impact Analysis," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 0b22093bbd87457c9ae4125d0, Mathematica Policy Research.
    22. Elmar Gerum & Sascha H. Mölls & Chunqian Shen, 2018. "Corporate governance, capital market orientation and firm performance: empirical evidence for large publicly traded German corporations," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 88(2), pages 203-252, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12469-:d:929935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.