IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i18p11188-d908202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

College Students’ Distractions from Learning Caused by Multitasking in Online vs. Face-to-Face Classes: A Case Study at a Public University in Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Kamer Ainur Aivaz

    (Department of Economics, Ovidius University of Constanta, 900527 Constanta, Romania)

  • Daniel Teodorescu

    (Department of Educational Leadership, School of Education, Clark Atlanta University, Atlanta, GA 30314, USA)

Abstract

This study compared Romanian college students’ off-task use of digital devices in online courses with their digital distractions in face-to-face courses. Students taking both online and face-to-face courses completed surveys assessing off-task use of technology in each delivery mode, extent to which such use constitutes a distraction, and instructor policies for curbing use of digital devices in class. Off-task use of digital devices was significantly greater in online than face-to-face courses. Students were twice as likely to state that they were distracted by multitasking in online than in face-to-face classes. They also indicated that instructors in online classes were less likely than their face-to-face instructors to have a policy on the use of digital devices for off-task purposes during class. Study participants were more lenient toward the use of digital devices in online than in in-person classes and were less bothered by multitasking and classmates’ off-task use of digital devices in online than in face-to-face classes. The results of this study have implications for instructors in online classes. By improving instructional design and pedagogical methods and creating opportunities for more interaction during the class, online instructors might be able to increase student motivation and lower multitasking behaviors.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamer Ainur Aivaz & Daniel Teodorescu, 2022. "College Students’ Distractions from Learning Caused by Multitasking in Online vs. Face-to-Face Classes: A Case Study at a Public University in Romania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-16, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11188-:d:908202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11188/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11188/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beland, Louis-Philippe & Murphy, Richard, 2016. "Ill Communication: Technology, distraction & student performance," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 61-76.
    2. Kamer-Ainur Aivaz & Daniel Teodorescu, 2022. "The Impact of the Coronavirus Pandemic on Medical Education: A Case Study at a Public University in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Andrew Lepp & Jacob E. Barkley & Aryn C. Karpinski & Shweta Singh, 2019. "College Students’ Multitasking Behavior in Online Versus Face-to-Face Courses," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440188, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alina Iorga Pisica & Tudor Edu & Rodica Milena Zaharia & Razvan Zaharia, 2023. "Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Pros and Cons from the Perspectives of Academics," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Anca-Maria Ionescu & Monica-Iulia Stănescu & Kamer-Ainur Aivaz, 2022. "Factors Favoring the Level of Knowledge in Writing European Funds for Sports Structures," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 90-98, Decembrie.
    3. Constantin ILIE & Margareta ILIE & Ionut ANTOHI, 2022. "Data Management in Unemployment and Education in the Field of B&A for Women," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 3, pages 60-68.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Bergman, 2020. "Nudging Technology Use: Descriptive and Experimental Evidence from School Information Systems," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 15(4), pages 623-647, Fall.
    2. Sana Sadiq & Khadija Anasse & Najib Slimani, 2022. "The impact of mobile phones on high school students: connecting the research dots," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 30(1), pages 252-270, April.
    3. Hall, Caroline & Lundin, Martin & Sibbmark, Kristina, 2019. "A laptop for every child? The impact of ICT on educational outcomes," Working Paper Series 2019:26, IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.
    4. Patterson, Richard W. & Patterson, Robert M., 2017. "Computers and productivity: Evidence from laptop use in the college classroom," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 66-79.
    5. Amez, Simon & Vujić, Sunčica & De Marez, Lieven & Baert, Stijn, 2019. "Smartphone Use and Academic Performance: First Evidence from Longitudinal Data," GLO Discussion Paper Series 438, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    6. Simon Amez & Stijn Baert, 2019. "Smartphone Use and Academic Performance: a Literature Review," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 19/982, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    7. repec:thr:techub:10030:y:2022:i:1:p:252-270 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Stijn Baert & Sunčica Vujić & Simon Amez & Matteo Claeskens & Thomas Daman & Arno Maeckelberghe & Eddy Omey & Lieven De Marez, 2020. "Smartphone Use and Academic Performance: Correlation or Causal Relationship?," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(1), pages 22-46, February.
    9. Alina Iorga Pisica & Tudor Edu & Rodica Milena Zaharia & Razvan Zaharia, 2023. "Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Pros and Cons from the Perspectives of Academics," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-13, May.
    10. Po-Chi Kao, 2023. "The Interrelationship of Loneliness, Smartphone Addiction, Sleep Quality, and Students’ Attention in English as a Foreign Language Class," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-15, February.
    11. Prieto-Latorre, Claudia & Lopez-Agudo, Luis Alejandro & Luque, Mariano & Marcenaro-Gutierrez, Oscar David, 2022. "The ideal use of the internet and academic success: Finding a balance between competences and knowledge using interval multiobjective programming," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    12. Kessel, Dany & Hardardottir, Hulda Lif & Tyrefors, Björn, 2020. "The impact of banning mobile phones in Swedish secondary schools," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    13. AIVAZ Kamer-Ainur & TEODORESCU Daniel, 2023. "Advantages And Disadvantages Of Using Devices During In-Person Courses. Case Study At A Public University In Romania," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 18(2), pages 24-36, August.
    14. Mihai Curelaru & Versavia Curelaru & Mioara Cristea, 2022. "Students’ Perceptions of Online Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-21, July.
    15. Adrian Chadi & Mario Mechtel & Vanessa Mertins, 2022. "Smartphone bans and workplace performance," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(1), pages 287-317, February.
    16. Claire Dorris & Karen Winter & Liam O'Hare & Edda Tandi Lwoga, 2021. "PROTOCOL: A systematic review of mobile device use in the primary school classroom and its impact on pupil literacy and numeracy attainment," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), June.
    17. Carter, Susan Payne & Greenberg, Kyle & Walker, Michael S., 2017. "The impact of computer usage on academic performance: Evidence from a randomized trial at the United States Military Academy," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 118-132.
    18. Xuemei Zhu & Qian Gong & Qi Wang & Yongjie He & Ziqi Sun & Feifei Liu, 2023. "Analysis of Students’ Online Learning Engagement during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of a SPOC-Based Geography Education Undergraduate Course," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, March.
    19. Hugo M. Mialon & Erik T. Nesson, 2020. "The Association Between Mobile Phones And The Risk Of Brain Cancer Mortality: A 25‐Year Cross‐Country Analysis," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 38(2), pages 258-269, April.
    20. Markus Stauff, 2016. "Taming Distraction: The Second Screen Assemblage, Television and the Classroom," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 185-198.
    21. Gladys Merma-Molina & Diego Gavilán-Martín & Juan-Francisco Álvarez-Herrero, 2021. "Education for Sustainable Development: The Impact of the Values in Mobile Phone Addiction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11188-:d:908202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.