IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i17p9013-d622738.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Real-Time Effects of Payer Restrictions on Reproductive Healthcare: A Qualitative Analysis of Cost-Related Barriers and Their Consequences among U.S. Abortion Seekers on Reddit

Author

Listed:
  • Jenny A. Higgins

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53715, USA
    Collaborative for Reproductive Equity (CORE), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Medical Sciences Center 4245, Madison, WI 53706, USA)

  • Madison Lands

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53715, USA
    Collaborative for Reproductive Equity (CORE), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Medical Sciences Center 4245, Madison, WI 53706, USA)

  • Taryn M. Valley

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53715, USA
    Collaborative for Reproductive Equity (CORE), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Medical Sciences Center 4245, Madison, WI 53706, USA
    Department of Anthropology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA)

  • Emma Carpenter

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53715, USA
    Presidential Management Fellows Program, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Washington, DC 20415, USA)

  • Laura Jacques

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53715, USA
    Collaborative for Reproductive Equity (CORE), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Medical Sciences Center 4245, Madison, WI 53706, USA)

Abstract

Objective: The Hyde Amendment and related policies limit or prohibit Medicaid coverage of abortion services in the United States. Most research on cost-related abortion barriers relies on clinic-based samples, but people who desire abortions may never make it to a healthcare center. To examine a novel, pre-abortion population, we analyzed a unique qualitative dataset of posts from Reddit, a widely used social media platform increasingly leveraged by researchers, to assess financial obstacles among anonymous posters considering abortion. Methods: In February 2020, we used Python to web-scrape the 250 most recent posts that mentioned abortion, removing all identifying information and usernames. After transferring all posts into NVivo, a qualitative software package, the team identified all datapoints related to cost. Three qualitatively trained evaluators established and applied codes, reaching saturation after 194 posts. The research team used a descriptive qualitative approach, using both inductive and deductive elements, to identify and analyze themes related to financial barriers. Results: We documented multiple cost-related deterrents, including lack of funds for both the procedure and attendant travel costs, inability to afford desired abortion modality (i.e., medication or surgical), and for some, consideration of self-managed abortion options due to cost barriers. Conclusions: Findings from this study underscore the centrality of cost barriers and third-party payer restrictions to stymying reproductive health access in the United States. Results may contribute to the growing evidence base and building political momentum focused on repealing the Hyde Amendment.

Suggested Citation

  • Jenny A. Higgins & Madison Lands & Taryn M. Valley & Emma Carpenter & Laura Jacques, 2021. "Real-Time Effects of Payer Restrictions on Reproductive Healthcare: A Qualitative Analysis of Cost-Related Barriers and Their Consequences among U.S. Abortion Seekers on Reddit," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-11, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:17:p:9013-:d:622738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/17/9013/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/17/9013/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joanna Venator & Jason Fletcher, 2021. "Undue Burden Beyond Texas: An Analysis of Abortion Clinic Closures, Births, and Abortions in Wisconsin," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(3), pages 774-813, June.
    2. Sarah C M Roberts & Nancy F Berglas & Katrina Kimport, 2020. "Complex situations: Economic insecurity, mental health, and substance use among pregnant women who consider – but do not have – abortions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Rachel K Jones & Jenna Jerman, 2017. "Characteristics and Circumstances of U.S. Women Who Obtain Very Early and Second-Trimester Abortions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Doris W. Chiu & Ava Braccia & Rachel K. Jones, 2024. "Characteristics and Circumstances of Adolescents Obtaining Abortions in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(4), pages 1-16, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caterina Muratori, 2021. "The Impact of Abortion Access on Violence Against Women," Economics Discussion Papers em-dp2021-03, Department of Economics, University of Reading.
    2. Clarke, Damian & Mühlrad, Hanna, 2021. "Abortion laws and women’s health," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    3. Myers, Caitlin Knowles, 2021. "Cooling off or Burdened? The Effects of Mandatory Waiting Periods on Abortions and Births," IZA Discussion Papers 14434, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Altındağ, Onur & Joyce, Theodore, 2022. "Another day, another visit: Impact of Arkansas’ mandatory waiting period for women seeking an abortion by demographic groups," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    5. Martha J. Bailey & Lea Bart & Vanessa Wanner Lang, 2022. "The Missing Baby Bust: The Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic for Contraceptive Use, Pregnancy, and Childbirth Among Low-Income Women," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(4), pages 1549-1569, August.
    6. Gábor Hajdu & Tamás Hajdu, 2021. "The long-term impact of restricted access to abortion on children’s socioeconomic outcomes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-14, March.
    7. Martin Andersen & Sylvia Bryan & David Slusky, 2020. "COVID-19 Restrictions Reduced Abortion Clinic Visits, Even in Blue States," NBER Working Papers 28058, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Myers, Caitlin Knowles, 2021. "Measuring the Burden: The Effect of Travel Distance on Abortions and Births," IZA Discussion Papers 14556, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Caitlin Myers, 2024. "Forecasts for a post‐Roe America: The effects of increased travel distance on abortions and births," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(1), pages 39-62, January.
    10. Sarah Miller & Laura R. Wherry & Diana Greene Foster, 2023. "The Economic Consequences of Being Denied an Abortion," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 15(1), pages 394-437, February.
    11. Dench, Daniel & Pineda-Torres, Mayra & Myers, Caitlin Knowles, 2023. "The Effects of the Dobbs Decision on Fertility," IZA Discussion Papers 16608, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    12. Bethany G. Everett & Jessica N. Sanders & Jenny A. Higgins, 2023. "Abortion Policy Context in Adolescence and Men’s Future Educational Achievement," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 42(3), pages 1-20, June.
    13. Hall, Andrea, 2023. "Negative supply shocks and delayed health care: evidence from Pennsylvania abortion clinics," MPRA Paper 119872, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Andersen, Martin & Bryan, Sylvia & Slusky, David, 2020. "COVID-19 Surgical Abortion Restriction Did Not Reduce Visits to Abortion Clinics," IZA Discussion Papers 13832, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:17:p:9013-:d:622738. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.