IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i17p8928-d621373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Are the Restraint Practices, Preferences, and Experiences When Australian Parents Travel with Their Children in a Rideshare Vehicle?

Author

Listed:
  • Sjaan Koppel

    (Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne 3800, Australia)

  • Sujanie Peiris

    (Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne 3800, Australia)

  • Mohammed Aburumman

    (Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne 3800, Australia)

  • Chernyse W. R. Wong

    (Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne 3800, Australia)

  • Justin M. Owens

    (Division of Vehicle, Driver and Safety Systems, Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA)

  • Katie N. Womack

    (Center for Transportation Safety, Texas A&M Transportation Institute, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the preferences, experiences and restraint practices of Australian parents travelling with their children in rideshare vehicles. Six hundred and thirty-one participants completed an online survey (M = 39.2 years, SD = 10.5, Range = 18.0–70.0 years; Female: 63.4%). Most participants (59.1%) reported that they had not travelled in a rideshare vehicle with their youngest child (M = 7.2 years, SD = 5.2, Range = 0.0–17.0 years; Male: 54.2%). Participants who reported that they have travelled with their youngest child in a rideshare vehicle tended to: be younger, identify as male, have completed an Undergraduate or Postgraduate degree, reside in the Australian Capital Territory, earning a higher yearly household income, and were involved in an at-fault crash in the past two years. In addition, these participants were: less likely to have a ‘younger’ youngest child, less likely to ‘always’ wear a seatbelt while travelling in their private motor vehicle, and also less likely to ‘always’ restrain their child in an appropriate restraint while travelling in their private motor vehicle. Prohibitive reasons for not travelling in a rideshare vehicle included: cost (29.3%), concerns over driver safety (27.5%), concerns over travelling with children in a rideshare service (24.8%), or inconvenience (24.3%). Participants who reported that they had travelled in a rideshare vehicle with their youngest child reported lower rates of appropriate restraint use within the rideshare vehicle (57.3%) than when travelling in their private motor vehicle (85.6%). Reasons associated with inappropriate restraint use within the rideshare vehicle included: unavailability of a child restraint (39.6%), travelling a short distance (33.0%), were not required to use one in this situation (33.0%), or the parent did not have a restraint with them (26.4%). Given the increasing popularity of rideshare services in Australia, and globally, the urgent adaption of rideshare-specific policy, legislation, education, and design in relation to child restraint requirements is needed to ensure the safety of child occupants.

Suggested Citation

  • Sjaan Koppel & Sujanie Peiris & Mohammed Aburumman & Chernyse W. R. Wong & Justin M. Owens & Katie N. Womack, 2021. "What Are the Restraint Practices, Preferences, and Experiences When Australian Parents Travel with Their Children in a Rideshare Vehicle?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-16, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:17:p:8928-:d:621373
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/17/8928/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/17/8928/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Catherine C. McDonald & Erin Kennedy & Linda Fleisher & Mark R. Zonfrillo, 2018. "Situational Use of Child Restraint Systems and Carpooling Behaviors in Parents and Caregivers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-11, August.
    2. Jessica Lynn Peck, 2017. "New York City Drunk Driving After Uber," Working Papers 13, City University of New York Graduate Center, Ph.D. Program in Economics.
    3. repec:cdl:itsdav:qt82w2z91j is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mosquera, Roberto, 2024. "Stuck in traffic: Measuring congestion externalities with negative supply shocks," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    2. María Flor & Armando Ortuño & Begoña Guirao & Jairo Casares, 2021. "Analysis of the Impact of Ride-Hailing Services on Motor Vehicles Crashes in Madrid," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Angela K. Dills & Sean E. Mulholland, 2018. "Ride‐Sharing, Fatal Crashes, and Crime," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 84(4), pages 965-991, April.
    4. Zhou, You, 2020. "Ride-sharing, alcohol consumption, and drunk driving," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    5. Hall, Jonathan D. & Palsson, Craig & Price, Joseph, 2018. "Is Uber a substitute or complement for public transit?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 36-50.
    6. Reynolds-Pearson, Alyssa J. & Hyman, Michael R., 2020. "Why consumers’ ‘New power’ will change marketing," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 14-21.
    7. Teltser, Keith & Lennon, Conor & Burgdorf, Jacob, 2021. "Do ridesharing services increase alcohol consumption?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    8. Thorsten Heilker & Gernot Sieg, 2017. "A duopoly of transportation network companies and traditional radio-taxi dispatch service agencies," Working Papers 24, Institute of Transport Economics, University of Muenster.
    9. Thais Rangel & Juan Nicolas Gonzalez & Juan Gomez & Fernando Romero & Jose Manuel Vassallo, 2022. "Exploring ride-hailing fares: an empirical analysis of the case of Madrid," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 373-393, April.
    10. Pamela Murray-Tuite & Jason C. Anderson & Paranjyoti Lahkar & Kathleen Hancock, 2021. "Travel choices in alcohol-related situations in Virginia," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 1-44, February.
    11. Thanapong Champahom & Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao & Woraanong Thotongkam & Pornsiri Jongkol & Porntip Rodpon & Vatanavongs Ratanavaraha, 2023. "Investigating Parents’ Attitudes towards the Use of Child Restraint Systems by Comparing Non-Users and User Parents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, February.
    12. Carson Young, 2019. "Putting the Law in Its Place: Business Ethics and the Assumption that Illegal Implies Unethical," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(1), pages 35-51, November.
    13. Kirk, David S. & Cavalli, Nicolo & Brazil, Noli, 2020. "The implications of ridehailing for risky driving and road accident injuries and fatalities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    14. María Flor & Armando Ortuño & Begoña Guirao, 2022. "Does the Implementation of Ride-Hailing Services Affect Urban Road Safety? The Experience of Madrid," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-18, March.
    15. Xiatian Wu & Don MacKenzie, 2022. "The evolution, usage and trip patterns of taxis & ridesourcing services: evidence from 2001, 2009 & 2017 US National Household Travel Survey," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 293-311, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:17:p:8928-:d:621373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.