IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i10p5208-d554366.html

Performance of Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis of Emergency System in COVID-19 Pandemic. An Extensive Narrative Review

Author

Listed:
  • Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez

    (Faculty of Sports Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Tajo Street, s/n, 28670 Madrid, Spain
    Grupo de Investigación en Cultura, Educación y Sociedad, Universidad de la Costa, Barranquilla 080002, Colombia
    Studies Centre in Applied Combat (CESCA), 45007 Toledo, Spain)

  • Eduardo Navarro-Jiménez

    (Grupo de investigacion en Microbiologia y Biotecnologia (IMB), Universidad Libre, Barranquilla 08002, Colombia)

  • Pablo Ruisoto

    (Department of Health Sciences, Public University of Navarre, 31006 Pamplona, Spain)

  • Athanasios A. Dalamitros

    (Laboratory of Evaluation of Human Biological Performance, School of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Ana Isabel Beltran-Velasco

    (Education Department, Universidad Antonio de Nebrija, 28240 Madrid, Spain)

  • Alberto Hormeño-Holgado

    (Studies Centre in Applied Combat (CESCA), 45007 Toledo, Spain)

  • Carmen Cecilia Laborde-Cárdenas

    (Vicerrectoría De Investigación e Innovación, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Barranquilla 080005, Colombia)

  • Jose Francisco Tornero-Aguilera

    (Faculty of Sports Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Tajo Street, s/n, 28670 Madrid, Spain
    Studies Centre in Applied Combat (CESCA), 45007 Toledo, Spain)

Abstract

The actual coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to the limit of emergency systems worldwide, leading to the collapse of health systems, police, first responders, as well as other areas. Various ways of dealing with this world crisis have been proposed from many aspects, with fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis being a method that can be applied to a wide range of emergency systems and professional groups, aiming to confront several associated issues and challenges. The purpose of this critical review was to discuss the basic principles, present current applications during the first pandemic wave, and propose future implications of this methodology. For this purpose, both primary sources, such as scientific articles, and secondary ones, such as bibliographic indexes, web pages, and databases, were used. The main search engines were PubMed, SciELO, and Google Scholar. The method was a systematic literature review of the available literature regarding the performance of the fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis of emergency systems in the COVID-19 pandemic. The results of this study highlight the importance of the fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis method as a beneficial tool for healthcare workers and first responders’ emergency professionals to face this pandemic as well as to manage the created uncertainty and its related risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez & Eduardo Navarro-Jiménez & Pablo Ruisoto & Athanasios A. Dalamitros & Ana Isabel Beltran-Velasco & Alberto Hormeño-Holgado & Carmen Cecilia Laborde-Cárdenas & Jose Fran, 2021. "Performance of Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis of Emergency System in COVID-19 Pandemic. An Extensive Narrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-12, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:10:p:5208-:d:554366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/10/5208/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/10/5208/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gabriele Giorgi & Luigi Isaia Lecca & Federico Alessio & Georgia Libera Finstad & Giorgia Bondanini & Lucrezia Ginevra Lulli & Giulio Arcangeli & Nicola Mucci, 2020. "COVID-19-Related Mental Health Effects in the Workplace: A Narrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Wang, Jiang-Jiang & Jing, You-Yin & Zhang, Chun-Fa & Zhao, Jun-Hong, 2009. "Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(9), pages 2263-2278, December.
    3. Ertugrul Karsak, E. & Tolga, Ethem, 2001. "Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making procedure for evaluating advanced manufacturing system investments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 49-64, January.
    4. Dragan Pamučar & Mališa Žižović & Dragan Marinković & Dragan Doljanica & Saša Virijević Jovanović & Pavle Brzaković, 2020. "Development of a Multi-Criteria Model for Sustainable Reorganization of a Healthcare System in an Emergency Situation Caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-25, September.
    5. Liang, Fuqi & Brunelli, Matteo & Rezaei, Jafar, 2020. "Consistency issues in the best worst method: Measurements and thresholds," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    6. Rezaei, Jafar, 2016. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 126-130.
    7. Chou, Tzy-Yuan & Chou, Seng-cho T. & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2006. "Evaluating IT/IS investments: A fuzzy multi-criteria decision model approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(3), pages 1026-1046, September.
    8. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Profiroiu, Constantin Marius & Profiroiu, Alina Georgiana & Constantin, Daniela-Luminția & Nica, Ionuț & Delcea, Camelia & Brişcariu, Maria Roxana, 2025. "Assessing regional economic Performance: Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making and panel regression approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    2. Fausto Famà & Roberto Lo Giudice & Gaetano Di Vita & João Paulo Mendes Tribst & Giorgio Lo Giudice & Alessandro Sindoni, 2021. "COVID-19 and the Impact on the Cranio-Oro-Facial Trauma Care in Italy: An Epidemiological Retrospective Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-9, July.
    3. Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez & Marina Begoña Martínez-González & Juan Camilo Benitez-Agudelo & Eduardo Navarro-Jiménez & Ana Isabel Beltran-Velasco & Pablo Ruisoto & Esperanza Diaz Arroyo & Carmen C, 2021. "The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Mental Disorders. A Critical Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-25, September.
    4. Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez & Eduardo Navarro-Jiménez & Juan Antonio Simón-Sanjurjo & Ana Isabel Beltran-Velasco & Carmen Cecilia Laborde-Cárdenas & Juan Camilo Benitez-Agudelo & Álvaro Bustamante-, 2022. "Mis–Dis Information in COVID-19 Health Crisis: A Narrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-24, April.
    5. Alvaro Bustamante-Sanchez & Bella Esperanza Villegas-Mora & Ismael Martínez-Guardado & Jose Francisco Tornero-Aguilera & Luca Paolo Ardigò & Hadi Nobari & Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez, 2022. "Physical Activity and Nutritional Pattern Related to Maturation and Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez & Laura Redondo-Flórez & Alejandro Rubio-Zarapuz & Ismael Martínez-Guardado & Eduardo Navarro-Jiménez & José Francisco Tornero-Aguilera, 2022. "Nutritional and Exercise Interventions in Cancer-Related Cachexia: An Extensive Narrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-27, April.
    7. Marina B. Martínez-González & Diana Carolina Pérez-Pedraza & Judys Alfaro-Álvarez & Claudia Reyes-Cervantes & María González-Malabet & Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez, 2021. "Women Facing Psychological Abuse: How Do They Respond to Maternal Identity Humiliation and Body Shaming?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junnan Wu & Xin Liu & Dianqi Pan & Yichen Zhang & Jiquan Zhang & Kai Ke, 2023. "Research on Safety Evaluation of Municipal Sewage Treatment Plant Based on Improved Best-Worst Method and Fuzzy Comprehensive Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Corrente, Salvatore & Greco, Salvatore & Rezaei, Jafar, 2024. "Better decisions with less cognitive load: The Parsimonious BWM," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    3. Dragan Pamučar & Fatih Ecer & Goran Cirovic & Melfi A. Arlasheedi, 2020. "Application of Improved Best Worst Method (BWM) in Real-World Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Madjid Tavana & Mehdi Soltanifar & Francisco J. Santos-Arteaga, 2023. "Analytical hierarchy process: revolution and evolution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(2), pages 879-907, July.
    5. Wu, Qun & Liu, Xinwang & Zhou, Ligang & Qin, Jindong & Rezaei, Jafar, 2024. "An analytical framework for the best–worst method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    6. Kheybari, Siamak & Javdanmehr, Mahsa & Rezaie, Fariba Mahdi & Rezaei, Jafar, 2021. "Corn cultivation location selection for bioethanol production: An application of BWM and extended PROMETHEE II," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    7. Mangu, Sriram & Kadali, B. Raghuram & Subbarao, Saladi S.V. & Lin, Jen-Jia, 2025. "Evaluation of transit-oriented development based on 9D’s approach in developing countries context," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 138-151.
    8. Siamak Kheybari & Mohammad Reza Mehrpour & Paul Bauer & Alessio Ishizaka, 2024. "How Can Risk-Averse and Risk-Taking Approaches be Considered in a Group Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Problem?," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 883-909, August.
    9. Le Ngo Ngoc Thu & Long Van Hoang & Quynh Manh Doan & Nguyen Tan Huynh, 2024. "The performance model of logistic distribution centers: Quality function deployment based on the Best-Worst Method," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(10), pages 1-21, October.
    10. Yejun Xu & Dayong Wang, 2024. "Some methods to derive the priority weights from the best–worst method matrix and weight efficiency test in view of incomplete pairwise comparison matrix," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 31-62, March.
    11. Vafadarnikjoo, Amin & Chalvatzis, Konstantinos & Botelho, Tiago & Maliszewski, Konrad, 2025. "Risk assessment of the UK electricity supply network: A preference-based decision support method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 264(PB).
    12. Cavallo, Bice & Ishizaka, Alessio, 2025. "A comparative study on precision of direct evaluations, the Pairwise Comparisons Method and the Best-Worst Method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    13. Madjid Tavana & Shahryar Sorooshian & Meysam Sarvarizadehkouhpaye & Hassan Mina, 2025. "A novel fuzzy general best–worst method for considering diversity and inclusion in supplier selection programs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 353(1), pages 281-320, October.
    14. Jettarat Janmontree & Aditya Shinde & Hartmut Zadek & Sebastian Trojahn & Kasin Ransikarbum, 2025. "A Strategic Hydrogen Supplier Assessment Using a Hybrid MCDA Framework with a Game Theory-Driven Criteria Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-27, July.
    15. Sisto, Roberta & Fernández-Portillo, Luis A. & Yazdani, Morteza & Estepa-Mohedano, Lorenzo & Torkayesh, Ali Ebadi, 2022. "Strategic planning of rural areas: Integrating participatory backcasting and multiple criteria decision analysis tools," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    16. Danish Farooq & Sarbast Moslem & Arshad Jamal & Farhan Muhammad Butt & Yahya Almarhabi & Rana Faisal Tufail & Meshal Almoshaogeh, 2021. "Assessment of Significant Factors Affecting Frequent Lane-Changing Related to Road Safety: An Integrated Approach of the AHP–BWM Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-17, October.
    17. Luis A. Fernández-Portillo & Lorenzo Estepa-Mohedano & Gülay Demir, 2025. "The use of continuous visual aid in the Best–Worst Method: an experiment with organic farmers in Paraguay," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(8), pages 18559-18589, August.
    18. Kheybari, Siamak & Kazemi, Mostafa & Rezaei, Jafar, 2019. "Bioethanol facility location selection using best-worst method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 612-623.
    19. Maghsoud Amiri & Mohammad Hashemi-Tabatabaei & Mohammad Ghahremanloo & Mehdi Keshavarz-Ghorabaee & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Arturas Kaklauskas, 2021. "Evaluating Life Cycle of Buildings Using an Integrated Approach Based on Quantitative-Qualitative and Simplified Best-Worst Methods (QQM-SBWM)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-28, April.
    20. Aziz Naghizadeh Vardin & Ramin Ansari & Mohammad Khalilzadeh & Jurgita Antucheviciene & Romualdas Bausys, 2021. "An Integrated Decision Support Model Based on BWM and Fuzzy-VIKOR Techniques for Contractor Selection in Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-28, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:10:p:5208-:d:554366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.