Author
Listed:
- Vafadarnikjoo, Amin
- Chalvatzis, Konstantinos
- Botelho, Tiago
- Maliszewski, Konrad
Abstract
The resilience and reliability of essential infrastructures, such as power grids, are critical for the smooth functioning of societies. With the rapid diffusion of electric vehicles (EVs), reliance on a stable and reliable electric power supply has significantly increased. This necessitates a comprehensive risk analysis framework to understand the reliability of electric power supply systems. Identifying crucial macro-level risks involves a certain degree of uncertainty and requires expert preference elicitation. It is also prominent for a reliable preference elicitation model to appropriately handle the subjective judgments of decision makers (DMs). In this study, a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) perspective is adopted by integrating a spanning trees enumeration (STE) method with the best-worst method (BWM) to capture the hesitancy and uncertainty of DMs in identifying the most crucial risks in the UK electricity supply network system. This approach considers the existence of more than one possible best (i.e., the most favorable) or worst (i.e., the least favorable) criterion in the model. To validate the proposed STE-BWM model, a set of Monte Carlo simulations and a real-world application are implemented coupled with comparative and sensitivity analyses. The simulations are conducted under various defined numerical experiments, and the results indicate a satisfactory success rate of STE (i.e., 65.80 %) in identifying the unique best or worst criterion in various experiments. The applicability of the proposed STE-BWM is shown in a case study of the UK electricity supply network risk assessment.
Suggested Citation
Vafadarnikjoo, Amin & Chalvatzis, Konstantinos & Botelho, Tiago & Maliszewski, Konrad, 2025.
"Risk assessment of the UK electricity supply network: A preference-based decision support method,"
Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 264(PB).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:reensy:v:264:y:2025:i:pb:s0951832025006398
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111439
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:264:y:2025:i:pb:s0951832025006398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.