IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i4p1156-d319832.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mismatches in Suppliers’ and Demanders’ Cognition, Willingness and Behavior with Respect to Ecological Protection of Cultivated Land: Evidence from Caidian District, Wuhan, China

Author

Listed:
  • Siyu Zhang

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Weiyan Hu

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Jiaojiao Zhang

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Mengran Li

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Qingying Zhu

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

Abstract

Cultivated land systems have an enormous ecological function value with respect to water conversation, nutrient circulation and climate regulation. The people’s cognition, willingness and behavior may prove to be pivotal in ecologically protecting cultivated land. The purpose of this paper is to explore suppliers’ and demanders’ cognition, willingness and behavior with respect to the ecological protection of cultivated land. The second-order structural equation model was employed, and a five-point Likert scale was designed. Based on data obtained from a questionnaire surveyed on a sample of 460 (farming and no-farming households) from Caidian district, Wuhan, China, the results show that within/between suppliers and demanders, there are mismatches in willingness as well as behavior to ecologically protect cultivated land. In the suppliers group and in the demanders group, there are mismatches with respect to the interactive mechanism of cognition, willingness and behavior in the ecological protection of cultivated land. Three factors, subjective norms, attitude toward behavior, and perceived behavior control, affect willingness and behavior with respect to protection differently between the suppliers and the demanders. The “intermediary” effects of willingness and behavior in the ecological protection of cultivated land only appear in the demanders model, and are not significant in the suppliers model. In addition, another finding was that farmers’ behavior as suppliers and demanders of ecological protection of cultivated land were mismatched. The article contributes firstly to exploring the ecological protection of cultivated land from the perspective of suppliers’ and demanders’ subjective psychology. Farmers with “dual roles” as suppliers and demanders should pay more attention to the ecological protection of cultivated land. Their cognition and skills in the ecological protection of cultivated land are in need of improvement. It is also necessary to bridge the gap between suppliers and demanders; access to the knowledge of the ecological value of cultivated land will incentivize their behavior with respect to the ecological protection of cultivated land.

Suggested Citation

  • Siyu Zhang & Weiyan Hu & Jiaojiao Zhang & Mengran Li & Qingying Zhu, 2020. "Mismatches in Suppliers’ and Demanders’ Cognition, Willingness and Behavior with Respect to Ecological Protection of Cultivated Land: Evidence from Caidian District, Wuhan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-15, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:4:p:1156-:d:319832
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1156/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1156/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Costanza, Robert & Fisher, Brendan & Ali, Saleem & Beer, Caroline & Bond, Lynne & Boumans, Roelof & Danigelis, Nicholas L. & Dickinson, Jennifer & Elliott, Carolyn & Farley, Joshua & Gayer, Diane Elli, 2007. "Quality of life: An approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 267-276, March.
    2. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    3. Dongxiao Gu & Jingjing Guo & Changyong Liang & Wenxing Lu & Shuping Zhao & Bing Liu & Tianyue Long, 2019. "Social Media-Based Health Management Systems and Sustained Health Engagement: TPB Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Han, Heesup & Hsu, Li-Tzang (Jane) & Sheu, Chwen, 2010. "Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior to green hotel choice: Testing the effect of environmental friendly activities," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 325-334.
    5. Sipan Li & Qunxi Gong & Shaolei Yang, 2019. "Analysis of the Agricultural Economy and Agricultural Pollution Using the Decoupling Index in Chengdu, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-11, October.
    6. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    7. Xavier C. C. Fung & Amir H. Pakpour & Ya-Ke Wu & Chia-Wei Fan & Chung-Ying Lin & Hector W. H. Tsang, 2019. "Psychosocial Variables Related to Weight-Related Self-Stigma in Physical Activity among Young Adults across Weight Status," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-11, December.
    8. Quintal, Vanessa Ann & Lee, Julie Anne & Soutar, Geoffrey N., 2010. "Risk, uncertainty and the theory of planned behavior: A tourism example," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 797-805.
    9. Shi, Tian, 2002. "Ecological agriculture in China: bridging the gap between rhetoric and practice of sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 359-368, September.
    10. Wolff, S. & Schulp, C.J.E. & Kastner, T & Verburg, P.H., 2017. "Quantifying Spatial Variation in Ecosystem Services Demand: A Global Mapping Approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 14-29.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lin Meng & Wentao Si, 2022. "Pro-Environmental Behavior: Examining the Role of Ecological Value Cognition, Environmental Attitude, and Place Attachment among Rural Farmers in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-24, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jun Hwan Kim & Hyun Cheol Lee, 2019. "Understanding the Repurchase Intention of Premium Economy Passengers Using an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Mohd Azhar & Ruksar Ali & Sheeba Hamid & Mohd Junaid Akhtar & Mohd Nayyer Rahman, 2022. "Demystifying the effect of social media eWOM on revisit intention post-COVID-19: an extension of theory of planned behavior," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Azhar, Mohd & Hamid, Sheeba & Akhtar, Mohd Junaid & Subhan, Mohammad, 2022. "Delineating the Influence of Social Media Use on Sustainable Rural Tourism: An Application of TPB with Place Emotion," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, Cinturs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 10(4), pages 292-312.
    4. Bo-Kyeong Kim & Kyoung-Ok Kim, 2020. "Relationship between Viewing Motivation, Presence, Viewing Satisfaction, and Attitude toward Tourism Destinations Based on TV Travel Reality Variety Programs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-13, June.
    5. Dionysis Skarmeas & Constantinos N. Leonidou & Charalampos Saridakis & Giuseppe Musarra, 2020. "Pathways to Civic Engagement with Big Social Issues: An Integrated Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 261-285, June.
    6. Lin, Li-Pin (Lynn) & Yu, Chia-Yuan & Chang, Fu-Chen, 2018. "Determinants of CSER practices for reducing greenhouse gas emissions: From the perspectives of administrative managers in tour operators," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 1-12.
    7. Wang, Jie & Ritchie, Brent W., 2012. "Understanding accommodation managers’ crisis planning intention: An application of the theory of planned behaviour," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 1057-1067.
    8. Mohd Azhar & Sehar Nafees & Sujood & Sheeba Hamid, 2023. "Understanding post-pandemic travel intention toward rural destinations by expanding the theory of planned behavior (TPB)," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Quintal, Vanessa Ann & Thomas, Ben & Phau, Ian, 2015. "Incorporating the winescape into the theory of planned behaviour: Examining ‘new world’ wineries," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 596-609.
    10. Timothy Jung & M. Claudia tom Dieck & Hyunae Lee & Namho Chung, 2020. "Relationships among Beliefs, Attitudes, Time Resources, Subjective Norms, and Intentions to Use Wearable Augmented Reality in Art Galleries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    11. Reny Nadlifatin & Shu-Chiang Lin & Yulia Puspa Rachmaniati & Satria Fadil Persada & Mohammad Razif, 2016. "A Pro-Environmental Reasoned Action Model for Measuring Citizens’ Intentions regarding Ecolabel Product Usage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-10, November.
    12. Saeed Pahlevan Sharif & Paolo Mura, 2019. "Narratives on Facebook: the impact of user-generated content on visiting attitudes, visiting intention and perceptions of destination risk," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 139-163, June.
    13. Patel, Jayesh D. & Trivedi, Rohit H. & Yagnik, Arpan, 2020. "Self-identity and internal environmental locus of control: Comparing their influences on green purchase intentions in high-context versus low-context cultures," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    14. Mustafa H. Al Shamaileh & Ahmad Salih Mheidi Alnaser, 2018. "Measuring Customer Satisfaction with the Influence of Islamic Attributes of Destination in Jordan," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(2), pages 33-39, June.
    15. Perri, Cecilia & Giglio, Carlo & Corvello, Vincenzo, 2020. "Smart users for smart technologies: Investigating the intention to adopt smart energy consumption behaviors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    16. Sheng-Hsiung Chang & Ching-Hsien Chou, 2018. "Consumer Intention toward Bringing Your Own Shopping Bags in Taiwan: An Application of Ethics Perspective and Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, May.
    17. Li, Zhengda & Zheng, Chengxin & Liu, Aimin & Yang, Yang & Yuan, Xiaoling, 2022. "Environmental taxes, green subsidies, and cleaner production willingness: Evidence from China's publicly traded companies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    18. Aliperti, Giuseppe & Cruz, Ana Maria, 2019. "Investigating tourists' risk information processing," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    19. Bao, Haijun & Xu, Yueling & Zhang, Wenyu & Zhang, Shuai, 2020. "Has the monetary resettlement compensation policy hindered the two-way flow of resources between urban and rural areas?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    20. Shu-Chiang Lin & Reny Nadlifatin & Anis Rahmawati Amna & Satria Fadil Persada & Mohammad Razif, 2017. "Investigating Citizen Behavior Intention on Mandatory and Voluntary Pro-Environmental Programs through a Pro-Environmental Planned Behavior Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-15, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:4:p:1156-:d:319832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.