IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jforec/v4y2022i2p29-537d831332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating Path Choice Models through Floating Car Data

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Comi

    (Department of Enterprise Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy)

  • Antonio Polimeni

    (Department of Engineering, University of Messina, 98166 Messina, Italy)

Abstract

The path choice models play a key role in transportation engineering, especially when coupled with an assignment procedure allowing link flows to be obtained. Their implementation could be complex and resource-consuming. In particular, such a task consists of several stages, including (1) the collection of a large set of data from surveys to infer users’ path choices and (2) the definition of a model able to reproduce users’ choice behaviors. Nowadays, stage (1) can be improved using floating car data (FCD), which allow one to obtain a reliable dataset of paths. In relation to stage (2), different structures of models are available; however, a compromise has to be found between the model’s ability to reproduce the observed paths (including the ability to forecast the future path choices) and its applicability in real contexts (in addition to guaranteeing the robustness of the assignment procedure). Therefore, the aim of this paper is to explore the opportunities offered by FCD to calibrate a path/route choice model to be included in a general procedure for scenario assessment. The proposed methodology is applied to passenger and freight transport case studies. Significant results are obtained showing the opportunities offered by FCD in supporting path choice simulation. Moreover, the characteristics of the model make it easily applicable and exportable to other contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Comi & Antonio Polimeni, 2022. "Estimating Path Choice Models through Floating Car Data," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-13, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jforec:v:4:y:2022:i:2:p:29-537:d:831332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9394/4/2/29/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9394/4/2/29/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ennio Cascetta, 2009. "Transportation Systems Analysis," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, Springer, number 978-0-387-75857-2, June.
    2. Broach, Joseph & Dill, Jennifer & Gliebe, John, 2012. "Where do cyclists ride? A route choice model developed with revealed preference GPS data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1730-1740.
    3. Guido Gentile, 2018. "New Formulations of the Stochastic User Equilibrium with Logit Route Choice as an Extension of the Deterministic Model," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 1531-1547, December.
    4. Katrien Ramaekers & Sofie Reumers & Geert Wets & Mario Cools, 2013. "Modelling Route Choice Decisions of Car Travellers Using Combined GPS and Diary Data," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 351-372, September.
    5. Sheffi, Yosef & Powell, Warren, 1981. "A comparison of stochastic and deterministic traffic assignment over congested networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 53-64, February.
    6. Antonio Comi & Antonio Polimeni, 2020. "Assessing the Potential of Short Sea Shipping and the Benefits in Terms of External Costs: Application to the Mediterranean Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-17, July.
    7. Ta, Na & Zhao, Ying & Chai, Yanwei, 2016. "Built environment, peak hours and route choice efficiency: An investigation of commuting efficiency using GPS data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 161-170.
    8. Henn, Vincent & Ottomanelli, Michele, 2006. "Handling uncertainty in route choice models: From probabilistic to possibilistic approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(3), pages 1526-1538, December.
    9. Arslan, Turan & Khisty, Jotin, 2006. "A rational approach to handling fuzzy perceptions in route choice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(2), pages 571-583, January.
    10. Quattrone, Agata & Vitetta, Antonino, 2011. "Random and fuzzy utility models for road route choice," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1126-1139.
    11. Antonello Ignazio Croce & Giuseppe Musolino & Corrado Rindone & Antonino Vitetta, 2020. "Route and Path Choices of Freight Vehicles: A Case Study with Floating Car Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    12. Duncan, Lawrence Christopher & Watling, David Paul & Connors, Richard Dominic & Rasmussen, Thomas Kjær & Nielsen, Otto Anker, 2020. "Path Size Logit route choice models: Issues with current models, a new internally consistent approach, and parameter estimation on a large-scale network with GPS data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 1-40.
    13. Di Gangi, Massimo & Vitetta, Antonino, 2021. "Quantum utility and random utility model for path choice modelling: Specification and aggregate calibration from traffic counts," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    14. Du, Jianhe & Aultman-Hall, Lisa, 2007. "Increasing the accuracy of trip rate information from passive multi-day GPS travel datasets: Automatic trip end identification issues," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 220-232, March.
    15. Ruan, Minyan & Lin, Jie (Jane) & Kawamura, Kazuya, 2012. "Modeling urban commercial vehicle daily tour chaining," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 1169-1184.
    16. Castillo, Enrique & Menéndez, José María & Jiménez, Pilar & Rivas, Ana, 2008. "Closed form expressions for choice probabilities in the Weibull case," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 373-380, May.
    17. Frejinger, E. & Bierlaire, M., 2007. "Capturing correlation with subnetworks in route choice models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 363-378, March.
    18. Eui-Hwan Chung & Amer Shalaby, 2005. "A Trip Reconstruction Tool for GPS-based Personal Travel Surveys," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(5), pages 381-401, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammad Nurul Hassan & Taha Hossein Rashidi & Neema Nassir, 2021. "Consideration of different travel strategies and choice set sizes in transit path choice modelling," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 723-746, April.
    2. Chen, Anthony & Pravinvongvuth, Surachet & Xu, Xiangdong & Ryu, Seungkyu & Chootinan, Piya, 2012. "Examining the scaling effect and overlapping problem in logit-based stochastic user equilibrium models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1343-1358.
    3. Xu, Xiangdong & Chen, Anthony & Kitthamkesorn, Songyot & Yang, Hai & Lo, Hong K., 2015. "Modeling absolute and relative cost differences in stochastic user equilibrium problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P3), pages 686-703.
    4. Chen, Cynthia & Gong, Hongmian & Lawson, Catherine & Bialostozky, Evan, 2010. "Evaluating the feasibility of a passive travel survey collection in a complex urban environment: Lessons learned from the New York City case study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 44(10), pages 830-840, December.
    5. Du, Muqing & Tan, Heqing & Chen, Anthony, 2021. "A faster path-based algorithm with Barzilai-Borwein step size for solving stochastic traffic equilibrium models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 982-999.
    6. Paolo Delle Site, 2017. "On the Equivalence Between SUE and Fixed-Point States of Day-to-Day Assignment Processes with Serially-Correlated Route Choice," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 935-962, September.
    7. Xie, J. & Wong, S.C. & Zhan, S. & Lo, S.M. & Chen, Anthony, 2020. "Train schedule optimization based on schedule-based stochastic passenger assignment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    8. Liu, Haoxiang & Szeto, W.Y. & Long, Jiancheng, 2019. "Bike network design problem with a path-size logit-based equilibrium constraint: Formulation, global optimization, and matheuristic," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 284-307.
    9. Tao Feng & Harry J.P. Timmermans, 2016. "Comparison of advanced imputation algorithms for detection of transportation mode and activity episode using GPS data," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 180-194, March.
    10. Francesco Russo & Antonio Comi, 2021. "Sustainable Urban Delivery: The Learning Process of Path Costs Enhanced by Information and Communication Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-13, November.
    11. Austin Knies & Jorge Lorca & Emerson Melo, 2020. "A Recursive Logit Model with Choice Aversion and Its Application to Transportation Networks," Papers 2010.02398, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2021.
    12. Kitthamkesorn, Songyot & Chen, Anthony & Ryu, Seungkyu & Opasanon, Sathaporn, 2024. "Maximum capture problem based on paired combinatorial weibit model to determine park-and-ride facility locations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    13. Fiore Tinessa & Vittorio Marzano & Andrea Papola, 2021. "Choice probabilities and correlations in closed-form route choice models: specifications and drawbacks," Papers 2110.07224, arXiv.org.
    14. Scott, Darren M. & Lu, Wei & Brown, Matthew J., 2021. "Route choice of bike share users: Leveraging GPS data to derive choice sets," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    15. Li, Dawei & Feng, Siqi & Song, Yuchen & Lai, Xinjun & Bekhor, Shlomo, 2023. "Asymmetric closed-form route choice models: Formulations and comparative applications," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    16. Jun Li & Xinjun Lai, 2019. "Modelling travellers’ route choice behaviours with the concept of equivalent impedance," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 233-262, February.
    17. Łukawska, Mirosława & Paulsen, Mads & Rasmussen, Thomas Kjær & Jensen, Anders Fjendbo & Nielsen, Otto Anker, 2023. "A joint bicycle route choice model for various cycling frequencies and trip distances based on a large crowdsourced GPS dataset," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    18. Tinessa, Fiore, 2021. "Closed-form random utility models with mixture distributions of random utilities: Exploring finite mixtures of qGEV models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 262-288.
    19. Gingerich, Kevin & Maoh, Hanna, 2019. "The role of airport proximity on warehouse location and associated truck trips: Evidence from Toronto, Ontario," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 97-109.
    20. Dalumpines, Ron & Scott, Darren M., 2017. "Determinants of route choice behavior: A comparison of shop versus work trips using the Potential Path Area - Gateway (PPAG) algorithm and Path-Size Logit," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 59-68.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jforec:v:4:y:2022:i:2:p:29-537:d:831332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.