IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jfinte/v3y2024i1p4-65d1323305.html

Willingness to Use Algorithms Varies with Social Information on Weak vs. Strong Adoption: An Experimental Study on Algorithm Aversion

Author

Listed:
  • Jan René Judek

    (Faculty of Business, Ostfalia University of Applied Sciences, Siegfried-Ehlers-Str. 1, D-38440 Wolfsburg, Germany)

Abstract

The process of decision-making is increasingly supported by algorithms in a wide variety of contexts. However, the phenomenon of algorithm aversion conflicts with the development of the technological potential that algorithms bring with them. Economic agents tend to base their decisions on those of other economic agents. Therefore, this experimental approach examines the willingness to use an algorithm when making stock price forecasts when information about the prior adoption of an algorithm is provided. It is found that decision makers are more likely to use an algorithm if the majority of preceding economic agents have also used it. Willingness to use an algorithm varies with social information about prior weak or strong adoption. In addition, the affinity for technological interaction of the economic agents shows an effect on decision behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan René Judek, 2024. "Willingness to Use Algorithms Varies with Social Information on Weak vs. Strong Adoption: An Experimental Study on Algorithm Aversion," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-11, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jfinte:v:3:y:2024:i:1:p:4-65:d:1323305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2674-1032/3/1/4/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2674-1032/3/1/4/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baddeley, M. & Burke, C. & Schultz, W. & Tobler, P., 2012. "Herding in Financial Behaviour: A Behavioural and Neuroeconomic Analysis of Individual Differences," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1225, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    2. Berkeley J. Dietvorst & Joseph P. Simmons & Cade Massey, 2018. "Overcoming Algorithm Aversion: People Will Use Imperfect Algorithms If They Can (Even Slightly) Modify Them," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(3), pages 1155-1170, March.
    3. Devenow, Andrea & Welch, Ivo, 1996. "Rational herding in financial economics," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(3-5), pages 603-615, April.
    4. Filiz, Ibrahim & Judek, Jan René & Lorenz, Marco & Spiwoks, Markus, 2021. "Reducing algorithm aversion through experience," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    5. Efendić, Emir & Van de Calseyde, Philippe P.F.M. & Evans, Anthony M., 2020. "Slow response times undermine trust in algorithmic (but not human) predictions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 103-114.
    6. Mahmud, Hasan & Islam, A.K.M. Najmul & Ahmed, Syed Ishtiaque & Smolander, Kari, 2022. "What influences algorithmic decision-making? A systematic literature review on algorithm aversion," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zulia Gubaydullina & Jan René Judek & Marco Lorenz & Markus Spiwoks, 2022. "Comparing Different Kinds of Influence on an Algorithm in Its Forecasting Process and Their Impact on Algorithm Aversion," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Ivanova-Stenzel, Radosveta & Tolksdorf, Michel, 2024. "Measuring preferences for algorithms — How willing are people to cede control to algorithms?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    3. Alexia GAUDEUL & Caterina GIANNETTI, 2023. "Trade-offs in the design of financial algorithms," Discussion Papers 2023/288, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
    4. Mahmud, Hasan & Islam, A.K.M. Najmul & Mitra, Ranjan Kumar, 2023. "What drives managers towards algorithm aversion and how to overcome it? Mitigating the impact of innovation resistance through technology readiness," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    5. Chugunova, Marina & Sele, Daniela, 2022. "We and It: An interdisciplinary review of the experimental evidence on how humans interact with machines," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    6. Ivanova-Stenzel, Radosveta & Tolksdorf, Michel, 2023. "Measuring Preferences for Algorithms - Are people really algorithm averse after seeing the algorithm perform?," VfS Annual Conference 2023 (Regensburg): Growth and the "sociale Frage" 277692, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    7. Yongping Bao & Ludwig Danwitz & Fabian Dvorak & Sebastian Fehrler & Lars Hornuf & Hsuan Yu Lin & Bettina von Helversen, 2022. "Similarity and Consistency in Algorithm-Guided Exploration," CESifo Working Paper Series 10188, CESifo.
    8. Samuel N. Kirshner, 2025. "Psychological Distance and Algorithm Aversion: Congruency and Advisor Confidence," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(2-3), pages 74-91, June.
    9. Mahmud, Hasan & Islam, A.K.M. Najmul & Ahmed, Syed Ishtiaque & Smolander, Kari, 2022. "What influences algorithmic decision-making? A systematic literature review on algorithm aversion," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    10. Chacon, Alvaro & Kausel, Edgar E. & Reyes, Tomas & Trautmann, Stefan, 2025. "Preventing algorithm aversion: People are willing to use algorithms with a learning label," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    11. Zehnle, Meike & Hildebrand, Christian & Valenzuela, Ana, 2025. "Not all AI is created equal: A meta-analysis revealing drivers of AI resistance across markets, methods, and time," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 729-751.
    12. Wang, Xun & Rodrigues, Vasco Sanchez & Demir, Emrah & Sarkis, Joseph, 2024. "Algorithm aversion during disruptions: The case of safety stock," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    13. Scott Schanke & Gordon Burtch & Gautam Ray, 2026. "Digital Lyrebirds: Experimental Evidence That Voice-Based Deep Fakes Influence Trust," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(1), pages 386-405, January.
    14. Radosveta Ivanova-Stenzel & Michel Tolksdorf, 2025. "Delegating in the Age of AI: Preferences for Decision Autonomy," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 558, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    15. Filiz, Ibrahim & Judek, Jan René & Lorenz, Marco & Spiwoks, Markus, 2021. "Reducing algorithm aversion through experience," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    16. Clare Snyder & Samantha Keppler & Stephen Leider, 2026. "Algorithm Reliance: Fast and Slow," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(1), pages 368-385, January.
    17. Gehrlein, Jonas & Miebs, Grzegorz & Brunelli, Matteo & Kadziński, Miłosz, 2023. "An active preference learning approach to aid the selection of validators in blockchain environments," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    18. Ben Greiner & Philipp Grünwald & Thomas Lindner & Georg Lintner & Martin Wiernsperger, 2026. "Incentives, Framing, and Reliance on Algorithmic Advice: An Experimental Study," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(1), pages 302-322, January.
    19. Jesse C. Bockstedt & Joseph R. Buckman, 2026. "Humans’ Use of AI Assistance: The Effect of Loss Aversion on Willingness to Delegate Decisions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(1), pages 323-342, January.
    20. Brice Corgnet, 2023. "The Algo Taming Effect: Mitigating Negative Reactions to Unfavorable Work Decisions," Working Papers 2302, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Etienne (GATE Lyon St-Etienne), Université de Lyon.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jfinte:v:3:y:2024:i:1:p:4-65:d:1323305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.