IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v4y2011i3p458-474d11614.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Latest Developments in Numerical Wind Synopsis Prediction Using the RIAM-COMPACT ® CFD Model—Design Wind Speed Evaluation and Wind Risk (Terrain-Induced Turbulence) Diagnostics in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Takanori Uchida

    (Research Institute for Applied Mechanics (RIAM), Kyushu University, 6-1 Kasuga-koen, Kasuga-City, Fukuoka, 816-8580, Japan)

  • Yuji Ohya

    (Research Institute for Applied Mechanics (RIAM), Kyushu University, 6-1 Kasuga-koen, Kasuga-City, Fukuoka, 816-8580, Japan)

Abstract

Because a significant portion of the topography in Japan is characterized by steep, complex terrain, which results in a complex spatial distribution of wind speed, great care is necessary for selecting a site for the construction of Wind Turbine Generators (WTGs). We have developed a CFD model for unsteady flow called Research Institute for Applied Mechanics, Kyushu University, COMputational Prediction of Airflow over Complex Terrain (RIAM-COMPACT ® ). The RIAM-COMPACT ® CFD model is based on Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) technique. The computational domain of RIAM-COMPACT ® can extend from several meters to several kilometers, and RIAM-COMPACT ® can predict airflow and gas diffusion over complex terrains with high accuracy. First, the present paper proposes a technique for evaluating the deployment location of WTGs. Next, wind simulation of an actual wind farm was executed using the high resolution elevation data. As a result, an appropriate point and an inappropriate point for locating WTGs were shown based on the numerical results obtained. This cause was found to be a topographical irregularity in front of WTGs.

Suggested Citation

  • Takanori Uchida & Yuji Ohya, 2011. "Latest Developments in Numerical Wind Synopsis Prediction Using the RIAM-COMPACT ® CFD Model—Design Wind Speed Evaluation and Wind Risk (Terrain-Induced Turbulence) Diagnostics in Japan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:4:y:2011:i:3:p:458-474:d:11614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/4/3/458/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/4/3/458/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee, Shun-Chung & Shih, Li-Hsing, 2010. "Renewable energy policy evaluation using real option model -- The case of Taiwan," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(Supplemen), pages 67-78, September.
    2. Jonathon Sumner & Christophe Sibuet Watters & Christian Masson, 2010. "CFD in Wind Energy: The Virtual, Multiscale Wind Tunnel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 3(5), pages 1-25, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Takanori Uchida, 2018. "LES Investigation of Terrain-Induced Turbulence in Complex Terrain and Economic Effects of Wind Turbine Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Takanori Uchida, 2018. "Numerical Investigation of Terrain-Induced Turbulence in Complex Terrain by Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) Technique," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Takanori Uchida, 2018. "Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach to Predict the Actual Wind Speed over Complex Terrain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jungmin An & Dong-Kwan Kim & Jinyeong Lee & Sung-Kwan Joo, 2021. "Least Squares Monte Carlo Simulation-Based Decision-Making Method for Photovoltaic Investment in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Mo, Jian-Lei & Agnolucci, Paolo & Jiang, Mao-Rong & Fan, Ying, 2016. "The impact of Chinese carbon emission trading scheme (ETS) on low carbon energy (LCE) investment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 271-283.
    3. Moon, Yongma & Baran, Mesut, 2018. "Economic analysis of a residential PV system from the timing perspective: A real option model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 783-795.
    4. Mei, Bin & Wetzstein, Michael, 2017. "Burning wood pellets for US electricity generation? A regime switching analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 434-441.
    5. Zhang, M.M. & Wang, Qunwei & Zhou, Dequn & Ding, H., 2019. "Evaluating uncertain investment decisions in low-carbon transition toward renewable energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 1049-1060.
    6. Zhang, M.M. & Zhou, D.Q. & Zhou, P. & Chen, H.T., 2017. "Optimal design of subsidy to stimulate renewable energy investments: The case of China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 873-883.
    7. Romanic, Djordje & Parvu, Dan & Refan, Maryam & Hangan, Horia, 2018. "Wind and tornado climatologies and wind resource modelling for a modern development situated in “Tornado Alley”," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 97-112.
    8. Shaohui Li & Xuejin Sun & Riwei Zhang & Chuanliang Zhang, 2019. "A Feasibility Study of Simulating the Micro-Scale Wind Field for Wind Energy Applications by NWP/CFD Model with Improved Coupling Method and Data Assimilation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-19, July.
    9. Díaz, Guzmán & Moreno, Blanca & Coto, José & Gómez-Aleixandre, Javier, 2015. "Valuation of wind power distributed generation by using Longstaff–Schwartz option pricing method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 223-233.
    10. Toja-Silva, Francisco & Lopez-Garcia, Oscar & Peralta, Carlos & Navarro, Jorge & Cruz, Ignacio, 2016. "An empirical–heuristic optimization of the building-roof geometry for urban wind energy exploitation on high-rise buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 769-794.
    11. Park, Taeil & Kim, Changyoon & Kim, Hyoungkwan, 2014. "A real option-based model to valuate CDM projects under uncertain energy policies for emission trading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 288-296.
    12. Gorupec Natalia & Brehmer Nataliia & Tiberius Victor & Kraus Sascha, 2022. "Tackling uncertain future scenarios with real options: A review and research framework," The Irish Journal of Management, Sciendo, vol. 41(1), pages 69-88, July.
    13. Wen, Tao & Lu, Lin & He, Weifeng & Min, Yunran, 2020. "Fundamentals and applications of CFD technology on analyzing falling film heat and mass exchangers: A comprehensive review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    14. Takanori Uchida & Kenichiro Sugitani, 2020. "Numerical and Experimental Study of Topographic Speed-Up Effects in Complex Terrain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-38, July.
    15. Li, Yihua & Tseng, Chung-Li & Hu, Guiping, 2015. "Is now a good time for Iowa to invest in cellulosic biofuels? A real options approach considering construction lead times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 97-107.
    16. Alcorta, Peio & Espinosa, Maria Paz & Pizarro-Irizar, Cristina, 2023. "Who bears the risk? Incentives for renewable electricity under strategic interaction between regulator and investors," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    17. Ofori, Charles Gyamfi & Bokpin, Godfred Alufar & Aboagye, Anthony Q.Q. & Afful-Dadzie, Anthony, 2021. "A real options approach to investment timing decisions in utility-scale renewable energy in Ghana," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    18. Maeda, Mansaku & Watts, David, 2019. "The unnoticed impact of long-term cost information on wind farms’ economic value in the USA. – A real option analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C), pages 540-547.
    19. Yang, Xiaolei & He, Lingyun & Xia, Yufei & Chen, Yufeng, 2019. "Effect of government subsidies on renewable energy investments: The threshold effect," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 156-166.
    20. Lin, Boqiang & Wesseh, Presley K., 2013. "Valuing Chinese feed-in tariffs program for solar power generation: A real options analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 474-482.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:4:y:2011:i:3:p:458-474:d:11614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.