IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i9p2178-d1641497.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Common Reed and Plant-Based Biowaste from Households

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Czubaszek

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45A Str., 15-351 Bialystok, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45A Str., 15-351 Bialystok, Poland)

Abstract

Organic wastes from households, private gardens, the maintenance of urban greenery, and active nature conservation measures are often difficult to manage. This lignocellulosic biomass may be suitable for anaerobic digestion (AD). However, the mono-digestion of plant material, such as waste from active conservation measures for wetlands, results in a low methane (CH 4 ) yield. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of using common reed silage for co-digestion with plant-based biowaste from households. The specific methane yield (SMY) was determined in biochemical methane potential (BMP) tests performed on biowaste, reed silage, and combinations of reed silage with 10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% of biowaste on a fresh weight basis. The lowest SMY was observed for the mono-digestion of reed silage (160.40 ± 4.09 NL kg VS −1 ), while biowaste had the highest CH 4 yield (284.03 ± 7.03 NL kg VS −1 ). The subsequent addition of biowaste enhanced CH 4 production from 158.57 ± 7.88 NL kg VS −1 (10% of biowaste) to 233.28 ± 11.91 NL kg VS −1 (90% of biowaste). A key advantage of biogas production is its role in reducing CO 2 emissions into the atmosphere, which result from the use of conventional fuels for energy generation. The avoided CO 2 emissions generated in electricity and heat production range between 378.62 kgCO 2 t TS −1 and 676.36 kgCO 2 t TS −1 depending on the reed silage-to-biowaste ratio used for biogas production. This study reveals that reed silage is not an optimal feedstock for biogas production, and its share in co-digestion with biowaste should not exceed 10% of the total input to the biogas plant.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Czubaszek & Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek, 2025. "Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Common Reed and Plant-Based Biowaste from Households," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-20, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:2178-:d:1641497
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/9/2178/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/9/2178/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nagy, Gábor, 2024. "The application and treatment of freshwater macrophytes as potential biogas base materials: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    2. Franco Cotana & Gianluca Cavalaglio & Anna Laura Pisello & Mattia Gelosia & David Ingles & Enrico Pompili, 2015. "Sustainable Ethanol Production from Common Reed ( Phragmites australis ) through Simultaneuos Saccharification and Fermentation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Kaparaju, Prasad & Rintala, Jukka, 2005. "Anaerobic co-digestion of potato tuber and its industrial by-products with pig manure," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 175-188.
    4. López-González, D. & Avalos-Ramirez, A. & Giroir-Fendler, A. & Godbout, S. & Fernandez-Lopez, M. & Sanchez-Silva, L. & Valverde, J.L., 2015. "Combustion kinetic study of woody and herbaceous crops by thermal analysis coupled to mass spectrometry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1626-1635.
    5. Bogusława Waliszewska & Mieczysław Grzelak & Eliza Gaweł & Agnieszka Spek-Dźwigała & Agnieszka Sieradzka & Wojciech Czekała, 2021. "Chemical Characteristics of Selected Grass Species from Polish Meadows and Their Potential Utilization for Energy Generation Purposes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Robert Czubaszek & Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek & Wendelin Wichtmann & Piotr Banaszuk, 2021. "Specific Methane Yield of Wetland Biomass in Dry and Wet Fermentation Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Robert Czubaszek & Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek & Piotr Banaszuk & Grzegorz Zając & Martin J. Wassen, 2023. "Grass from Road Verges as a Substrate for Biogas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-23, June.
    8. Andreja Škorjanc & Darko Goričanec & Danijela Urbancl, 2024. "Assessing Energy Potential and Chemical Composition of Food Waste Thermodynamic Conversion Products: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-14, April.
    9. Jay N. Meegoda & Brian Li & Kush Patel & Lily B. Wang, 2018. "A Review of the Processes, Parameters, and Optimization of Anaerobic Digestion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, October.
    10. Li, Wanwu & Khalid, Habiba & Zhu, Zhe & Zhang, Ruihong & Liu, Guangqing & Chen, Chang & Thorin, Eva, 2018. "Methane production through anaerobic digestion: Participation and digestion characteristics of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 1219-1228.
    11. Kurtis Baute & Laura L. Van Eerd & Darren E. Robinson & Peter H. Sikkema & Maryam Mushtaq & Brandon H. Gilroyed, 2018. "Comparing the Biomass Yield and Biogas Potential of Phragmites australis with Miscanthus x giganteus and Panicum virgatum Grown in Canada," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, August.
    12. Franziska Eller & Per Magnus Ehde & Claudia Oehmke & Linjing Ren & Hans Brix & Brian K. Sorrell & Stefan E. B. Weisner, 2020. "Biomethane Yield from Different European Phragmites australis Genotypes, Compared with Other Herbaceous Wetland Species Grown at Different Fertilization Regimes," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-14, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Czubaszek & Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek & Wendelin Wichtmann & Grzegorz Zając & Piotr Banaszuk, 2023. "Common Reed and Maize Silage Co-Digestion as a Pathway towards Sustainable Biogas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Robert Czubaszek & Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek & Wendelin Wichtmann & Piotr Banaszuk, 2021. "Specific Methane Yield of Wetland Biomass in Dry and Wet Fermentation Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Oliva, Armando & Papirio, Stefano & Pirozzi, Francesco & Esposito, Giovanni & Lens, Piet N.L., 2025. "Inoculum dependence of methane formation from lignocellulosic biowastes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    4. Yi, Honghong & Yang, Zhongyu & Tang, Xiaolong & Zhao, Shunzheng & Gao, Fengyu & Wang, Jiangen & Huang, Yonghai & Yang, Kun & Shi, Yiran & Xie, Xizhou, 2018. "Variations of apparent activation energy based on thermodynamics analysis of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks including pyrolysis and combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 782-798.
    5. Anna M. Hansson & Eja Pedersen & Niklas P. E. Karlsson & Stefan E. B. Weisner, 2023. "Barriers and drivers for sustainable business model innovation based on a radical farmland change scenario," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 8083-8106, August.
    6. Luis G. Cortés & J. Barbancho & D. F. Larios & J. D. Marin-Batista & A. F. Mohedano & C. Portilla & M. A. de la Rubia, 2022. "Full-Scale Digesters: Model Predictive Control with Online Kinetic Parameter Identification Strategy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-23, November.
    7. Shubham Dilip Sarode & Deepak Kumar & Divya Mathias & David McNeill & Prasad Kaparaju, 2023. "Anaerobic Digestion of Spoiled Maize, Lucerne and Barley Silage Mixture with and without Cow Manure: Methane Yields and Kinetic Studies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Marco De Sanctis & Valerio Guido Altieri & Emanuele Barca & Luigi di Bitonto & Francesco Tedeschi & Claudio Di Iaconi, 2024. "Comparison Among Thermal Pre-Treatments’ Effectiveness in Increasing Anaerobic Digestibility of Organic Fraction in Municipal Solid Wastes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Maria Salud Camilleri-Rumbau & Kelly Briceño & Lene Fjerbæk Søtoft & Knud Villy Christensen & Maria Cinta Roda-Serrat & Massimiliano Errico & Birgir Norddahl, 2021. "Treatment of Manure and Digestate Liquid Fractions Using Membranes: Opportunities and Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-30, March.
    10. Yongping Li & Jiaoning Zhu & Yun Tang & Xiangyuan Shi & Sumera Anwar & Juanling Wang & Li Gao & Jingxuan Zhang, 2023. "Impact of Varying Mass Concentrations of Ammonia Nitrogen on Biogas Production and System Stability of Anaerobic Fermentation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, August.
    11. Shuhei Matsuda & Takahiro Yamato & Yoshiyuki Mochizuki & Yoshinori Sekiguchi & Takashi Ohtsuki, 2020. "Batch-Mode Analysis of Thermophilic Methanogenic Microbial Community Changes in the Overacidification Stage in Beverage Waste Treatment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-13, October.
    12. Sun, Hui & Wang, Enzhen & Li, Xiang & Cui, Xian & Guo, Jianbin & Dong, Renjie, 2021. "Potential biomethane production from crop residues in China: Contributions to carbon neutrality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    13. Cerrillo, Míriam & Guivernau, Miriam & Burgos, Laura & Riau, Victor & Bonmatí, August, 2025. "Nano zerovalent iron boosts methane content in biogas and reshapes microbial communities in long-term anaerobic digestion of pig slurry," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    14. Panupon Trairat & Sakda Somkun & Tanakorn Kaewchum & Tawat Suriwong & Pisit Maneechot & Teerapon Panpho & Wikarn Wansungnern & Sathit Banthuek & Bongkot Prasit & Tanongkiat Kiatsiriroat, 2023. "Grid Integration of Livestock Biogas Using Self-Excited Induction Generator and Spark-Ignition Engine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-23, June.
    15. Arthur Chevalier & Philippe Evon & Florian Monlau & Virginie Vandenbossche & Cecilia Sambusiti, 2023. "Twin-Screw Extrusion Mechanical Pretreatment for Enhancing Biomethane Production from Agro-Industrial, Agricultural and Catch Crop Biomasses," Waste, MDPI, vol. 1(2), pages 1-18, May.
    16. Jadwiga Wyszkowska & Agata Borowik & Magdalena Zaborowska & Jan Kucharski, 2023. "Calorific Value of Zea mays Biomass Derived from Soil Contaminated with Chromium (VI) Disrupting the Soil’s Biochemical Properties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-19, April.
    17. Sukriti Singh & Nehil Shreyash & Venkateswara R. Kode & Xianghong Qian & S. Ranil Wickramasinghe, 2024. "Review of Separation and Purification of Biobased Derivatives Produced from Food Waste for Industrial Use," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 905-928, June.
    18. Magdalena Zdeb & Marta Bis & Artur Przywara, 2023. "Multi-Criteria Analysis of the Influence of Lignocellulosic Biomass Pretreatment Techniques on Methane Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, January.
    19. Joisleen Ramírez & Euclides Deago & Arthur Mc Carty James Rivas, 2024. "Effect of Biochar on Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Untreated Sewage Sludge with Municipal Organic Waste under Mesophilic Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-18, May.
    20. Linda Schroedter & Roland Schneider & Lisa Remus & Joachim Venus, 2020. "L-(+)-Lactic Acid from Reed: Comparing Various Resources for the Nutrient Provision of B. coagulans," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-13, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:2178-:d:1641497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.