IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i9p2178-d1641497.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Common Reed and Plant-Based Biowaste from Households

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Czubaszek

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45A Str., 15-351 Bialystok, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45A Str., 15-351 Bialystok, Poland)

Abstract

Organic wastes from households, private gardens, the maintenance of urban greenery, and active nature conservation measures are often difficult to manage. This lignocellulosic biomass may be suitable for anaerobic digestion (AD). However, the mono-digestion of plant material, such as waste from active conservation measures for wetlands, results in a low methane (CH 4 ) yield. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of using common reed silage for co-digestion with plant-based biowaste from households. The specific methane yield (SMY) was determined in biochemical methane potential (BMP) tests performed on biowaste, reed silage, and combinations of reed silage with 10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% of biowaste on a fresh weight basis. The lowest SMY was observed for the mono-digestion of reed silage (160.40 ± 4.09 NL kg VS −1 ), while biowaste had the highest CH 4 yield (284.03 ± 7.03 NL kg VS −1 ). The subsequent addition of biowaste enhanced CH 4 production from 158.57 ± 7.88 NL kg VS −1 (10% of biowaste) to 233.28 ± 11.91 NL kg VS −1 (90% of biowaste). A key advantage of biogas production is its role in reducing CO 2 emissions into the atmosphere, which result from the use of conventional fuels for energy generation. The avoided CO 2 emissions generated in electricity and heat production range between 378.62 kgCO 2 t TS −1 and 676.36 kgCO 2 t TS −1 depending on the reed silage-to-biowaste ratio used for biogas production. This study reveals that reed silage is not an optimal feedstock for biogas production, and its share in co-digestion with biowaste should not exceed 10% of the total input to the biogas plant.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Czubaszek & Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek, 2025. "Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Common Reed and Plant-Based Biowaste from Households," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-20, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:2178-:d:1641497
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/9/2178/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/9/2178/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Czubaszek & Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek & Piotr Banaszuk & Grzegorz Zając & Martin J. Wassen, 2023. "Grass from Road Verges as a Substrate for Biogas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Nagy, Gábor, 2024. "The application and treatment of freshwater macrophytes as potential biogas base materials: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    3. Franco Cotana & Gianluca Cavalaglio & Anna Laura Pisello & Mattia Gelosia & David Ingles & Enrico Pompili, 2015. "Sustainable Ethanol Production from Common Reed ( Phragmites australis ) through Simultaneuos Saccharification and Fermentation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-15, September.
    4. Andreja Škorjanc & Darko Goričanec & Danijela Urbancl, 2024. "Assessing Energy Potential and Chemical Composition of Food Waste Thermodynamic Conversion Products: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-14, April.
    5. Jay N. Meegoda & Brian Li & Kush Patel & Lily B. Wang, 2018. "A Review of the Processes, Parameters, and Optimization of Anaerobic Digestion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Kaparaju, Prasad & Rintala, Jukka, 2005. "Anaerobic co-digestion of potato tuber and its industrial by-products with pig manure," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 175-188.
    7. López-González, D. & Avalos-Ramirez, A. & Giroir-Fendler, A. & Godbout, S. & Fernandez-Lopez, M. & Sanchez-Silva, L. & Valverde, J.L., 2015. "Combustion kinetic study of woody and herbaceous crops by thermal analysis coupled to mass spectrometry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1626-1635.
    8. Bogusława Waliszewska & Mieczysław Grzelak & Eliza Gaweł & Agnieszka Spek-Dźwigała & Agnieszka Sieradzka & Wojciech Czekała, 2021. "Chemical Characteristics of Selected Grass Species from Polish Meadows and Their Potential Utilization for Energy Generation Purposes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    9. Robert Czubaszek & Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek & Wendelin Wichtmann & Piotr Banaszuk, 2021. "Specific Methane Yield of Wetland Biomass in Dry and Wet Fermentation Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Li, Wanwu & Khalid, Habiba & Zhu, Zhe & Zhang, Ruihong & Liu, Guangqing & Chen, Chang & Thorin, Eva, 2018. "Methane production through anaerobic digestion: Participation and digestion characteristics of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 1219-1228.
    11. Kurtis Baute & Laura L. Van Eerd & Darren E. Robinson & Peter H. Sikkema & Maryam Mushtaq & Brandon H. Gilroyed, 2018. "Comparing the Biomass Yield and Biogas Potential of Phragmites australis with Miscanthus x giganteus and Panicum virgatum Grown in Canada," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, August.
    12. Franziska Eller & Per Magnus Ehde & Claudia Oehmke & Linjing Ren & Hans Brix & Brian K. Sorrell & Stefan E. B. Weisner, 2020. "Biomethane Yield from Different European Phragmites australis Genotypes, Compared with Other Herbaceous Wetland Species Grown at Different Fertilization Regimes," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-14, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Czubaszek & Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek & Wendelin Wichtmann & Grzegorz Zając & Piotr Banaszuk, 2023. "Common Reed and Maize Silage Co-Digestion as a Pathway towards Sustainable Biogas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Robert Czubaszek & Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek & Wendelin Wichtmann & Piotr Banaszuk, 2021. "Specific Methane Yield of Wetland Biomass in Dry and Wet Fermentation Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    3. van der Berg, David J. & Teke, George Mbella & Görgens, Johann F. & van Rensburg, Eugéne, 2024. "Predicting commercial-scale anaerobic digestion using biomethane potential," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    4. Manju Dhakad Tanwar & Felipe Andrade Torres & Ali Mubarak Alqahtani & Pankaj Kumar Tanwar & Yashas Bhand & Omid Doustdar, 2023. "Promising Bioalcohols for Low-Emission Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-22, January.
    5. Yi, Honghong & Yang, Zhongyu & Tang, Xiaolong & Zhao, Shunzheng & Gao, Fengyu & Wang, Jiangen & Huang, Yonghai & Yang, Kun & Shi, Yiran & Xie, Xizhou, 2018. "Variations of apparent activation energy based on thermodynamics analysis of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks including pyrolysis and combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 782-798.
    6. Anna M. Hansson & Eja Pedersen & Niklas P. E. Karlsson & Stefan E. B. Weisner, 2023. "Barriers and drivers for sustainable business model innovation based on a radical farmland change scenario," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 8083-8106, August.
    7. Luis G. Cortés & J. Barbancho & D. F. Larios & J. D. Marin-Batista & A. F. Mohedano & C. Portilla & M. A. de la Rubia, 2022. "Full-Scale Digesters: Model Predictive Control with Online Kinetic Parameter Identification Strategy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-23, November.
    8. Azim Baibagyssov & Niels Thevs & Sabir Nurtazin & Rainer Waldhardt & Volker Beckmann & Ruslan Salmurzauly, 2020. "Biomass Resources of Phragmites australis in Kazakhstan: Historical Developments, Utilization, and Prospects," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-25, June.
    9. Tae-Bong Kim & Jun-Hyeong Lee & Young-Man Yoon, 2024. "Residence Time Reduction in Anaerobic Reactors: Investigating the Economic Benefits of Magnetite-Induced Direct Interspecies Electron Transfer Mechanism," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-13, January.
    10. Alberto Benato & Alarico Macor, 2019. "Italian Biogas Plants: Trend, Subsidies, Cost, Biogas Composition and Engine Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-31, March.
    11. Shubham Dilip Sarode & Deepak Kumar & Divya Mathias & David McNeill & Prasad Kaparaju, 2023. "Anaerobic Digestion of Spoiled Maize, Lucerne and Barley Silage Mixture with and without Cow Manure: Methane Yields and Kinetic Studies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-20, August.
    12. Musaab O. El-Faroug & Fuwu Yan & Maji Luo & Richard Fiifi Turkson, 2016. "Spark Ignition Engine Combustion, Performance and Emission Products from Hydrous Ethanol and Its Blends with Gasoline," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-24, November.
    13. Marco De Sanctis & Valerio Guido Altieri & Emanuele Barca & Luigi di Bitonto & Francesco Tedeschi & Claudio Di Iaconi, 2024. "Comparison Among Thermal Pre-Treatments’ Effectiveness in Increasing Anaerobic Digestibility of Organic Fraction in Municipal Solid Wastes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Robert Czubaszek & Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek & Piotr Banaszuk & Grzegorz Zając & Martin J. Wassen, 2023. "Grass from Road Verges as a Substrate for Biogas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-23, June.
    15. Maria Salud Camilleri-Rumbau & Kelly Briceño & Lene Fjerbæk Søtoft & Knud Villy Christensen & Maria Cinta Roda-Serrat & Massimiliano Errico & Birgir Norddahl, 2021. "Treatment of Manure and Digestate Liquid Fractions Using Membranes: Opportunities and Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-30, March.
    16. Parascanu, M.M. & Sandoval-Salas, F. & Soreanu, G. & Valverde, J.L. & Sanchez-Silva, L., 2017. "Valorization of Mexican biomasses through pyrolysis, combustion and gasification processes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 509-522.
    17. Yongping Li & Jiaoning Zhu & Yun Tang & Xiangyuan Shi & Sumera Anwar & Juanling Wang & Li Gao & Jingxuan Zhang, 2023. "Impact of Varying Mass Concentrations of Ammonia Nitrogen on Biogas Production and System Stability of Anaerobic Fermentation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, August.
    18. Shuhei Matsuda & Takahiro Yamato & Yoshiyuki Mochizuki & Yoshinori Sekiguchi & Takashi Ohtsuki, 2020. "Batch-Mode Analysis of Thermophilic Methanogenic Microbial Community Changes in the Overacidification Stage in Beverage Waste Treatment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-13, October.
    19. Babak Mokhtarani & Jafar Zanganeh & Behdad Moghtaderi, 2025. "A Review on Biohydrogen Production Through Dark Fermentation, Process Parameters and Simulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-24, February.
    20. Wei En Tan & Peng Yen Liew & Lian See Tan & Kok Sin Woon & Nor Erniza Mohammad Rozali & Wai Shin Ho & Jamian NorRuwaida, 2022. "Life Cycle Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis for Anaerobic Digestion as Cow Manure Management System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:2178-:d:1641497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.