IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i9p2198-d165177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing the Biomass Yield and Biogas Potential of Phragmites australis with Miscanthus x giganteus and Panicum virgatum Grown in Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Kurtis Baute

    (School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, 120 Main Street East, Ridgetown, ON N0P 2C0, Canada)

  • Laura L. Van Eerd

    (School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, 120 Main Street East, Ridgetown, ON N0P 2C0, Canada)

  • Darren E. Robinson

    (Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, 120 Main Street East, Ridgetown, ON N0P 2C0, Canada)

  • Peter H. Sikkema

    (Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, 120 Main Street East, Ridgetown, ON N0P 2C0, Canada)

  • Maryam Mushtaq

    (School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, 120 Main Street East, Ridgetown, ON N0P 2C0, Canada)

  • Brandon H. Gilroyed

    (School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, 120 Main Street East, Ridgetown, ON N0P 2C0, Canada)

Abstract

The production of bioenergy from plant biomass has the potential to reduce fossil fuel use. The number of biogas facilities around the world has risen dramatically, increasing demand for feedstocks. In this study the invasive perennial grass Phragmites australis was evaluated as a biogas feedstock in comparison with Miscanthus x giganteus and Panicum virgatum . Results from three field sites for each species demonstrated that biomass yields for P. australis averaged approximately 1.82 ± 0.9 kg dry matter (DM) m −2 , comparable to that of M. x giganteus . Yield of P. australis was greater than P. virgatum , which ranged from 0.49 ± 0.06 to 0.69 ± 0.07 kg DM m −2 in July and October, respectively. In mesophilic bench-top digester experiments, methane yields were greater for July-harvested material than for October, ranging from 172.4 ± 15.3 to 229.8 ± 15.2 L CH 4 kg −1 volatile solids (VS) for all perennial grasses. Methane yields per hectare were highest for October-harvested M. x giganteus , followed by July-harvested M. x giganteus and P. australis , whereas methane yield from P. virgatum at both harvest times was lower than the other two species. These results suggest that P. australis is not an economically viable biogas feedstock without pre-treatment to improve methane yield.

Suggested Citation

  • Kurtis Baute & Laura L. Van Eerd & Darren E. Robinson & Peter H. Sikkema & Maryam Mushtaq & Brandon H. Gilroyed, 2018. "Comparing the Biomass Yield and Biogas Potential of Phragmites australis with Miscanthus x giganteus and Panicum virgatum Grown in Canada," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:9:p:2198-:d:165177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/9/2198/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/9/2198/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kumari, Dolly & Singh, Radhika, 2018. "Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes for biofuel production: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 877-891.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert Czubaszek & Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek & Wendelin Wichtmann & Grzegorz Zając & Piotr Banaszuk, 2023. "Common Reed and Maize Silage Co-Digestion as a Pathway towards Sustainable Biogas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Moritz von Cossel & Anja Mangold & Yasir Iqbal & Iris Lewandowski, 2019. "Methane Yield Potential of Miscanthus ( Miscanthus × giganteus (Greef et Deuter)) Established under Maize ( Zea mays L.)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Alberto Benato & Alarico Macor, 2019. "Italian Biogas Plants: Trend, Subsidies, Cost, Biogas Composition and Engine Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-31, March.
    4. Franziska Eller & Per Magnus Ehde & Claudia Oehmke & Linjing Ren & Hans Brix & Brian K. Sorrell & Stefan E. B. Weisner, 2020. "Biomethane Yield from Different European Phragmites australis Genotypes, Compared with Other Herbaceous Wetland Species Grown at Different Fertilization Regimes," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-14, May.
    5. Spyridon Achinas & Johan Horjus & Vasileios Achinas & Gerrit Jan Willem Euverink, 2019. "A PESTLE Analysis of Biofuels Energy Industry in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Yichen & Wang, Yue & Fu, Xing & Li, Qiuxing & Wang, Wenli & Hu, Changwei, 2021. "Effect of MgCl2 solution pretreatment on pubescens conversion at room temperature," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 287-298.
    2. Ebrahimian, Farinaz & Karimi, Keikhosro & Angelidaki, Irini, 2022. "Coproduction of hydrogen, butanol, butanediol, ethanol, and biogas from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste using bacterial cocultivation followed by anaerobic digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 552-560.
    3. Merve Nazli Borand & Asli Isler Kaya & Filiz Karaosmanoglu, 2020. "Saccharification Yield through Enzymatic Hydrolysis of the Steam-Exploded Pinewood," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-12, September.
    4. Anu, & Kumar, Anil & Rapoport, Alexander & Kunze, Gotthard & Kumar, Sanjeev & Singh, Davender & Singh, Bijender, 2020. "Multifarious pretreatment strategies for the lignocellulosic substrates for the generation of renewable and sustainable biofuels: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 1228-1252.
    5. Pinto, T. & Flores-Alsina, X. & Gernaey, K.V. & Junicke, H., 2021. "Alone or together? A review on pure and mixed microbial cultures for butanol production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    6. Patel, Sanjay K.S. & Das, Devashish & Kim, Sun Chang & Cho, Byung-Kwan & Kalia, Vipin Chandra & Lee, Jung-Kul, 2021. "Integrating strategies for sustainable conversion of waste biomass into dark-fermentative hydrogen and value-added products," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    7. Suhaiza Zailani & Mohammad Iranmanesh & Sunghyup Sean Hyun & Mohd Helmi Ali, 2019. "Applying the Theory of Consumption Values to Explain Drivers’ Willingness to Pay for Biofuels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, January.
    8. Gigel Paraschiv & Georgiana Moiceanu & Gheorghe Voicu & Mihai Chitoiu & Petru Cardei & Mirela Nicoleta Dinca & Paula Tudor, 2021. "Optimization Issues of a Hammer Mill Working Process Using Statistical Modelling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    9. Yu, Yan & Wu, Jie & Ren, Xueyong & Lau, Anthony & Rezaei, Hamid & Takada, Masatsugu & Bi, Xiaotao & Sokhansanj, Shahabbadine, 2022. "Steam explosion of lignocellulosic biomass for multiple advanced bioenergy processes: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    10. Wu, Bo & Wang, Yan-Wei & Dai, Yong-Hua & Song, Chao & Zhu, Qi-Li & Qin, Han & Tan, Fu-Rong & Chen, Han-Cheng & Dai, Li-Chun & Hu, Guo-Quan & He, Ming-Xiong, 2021. "Current status and future prospective of bio-ethanol industry in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    11. Shaghaleh, Hiba & Xu, Xu & Liu, He & Wang, Shifa & Alhaj Hamoud, Yousef & Dong, Fuhao & Luo, Jinyue, 2019. "The effect of atmospheric pressure plasma pretreatment with various gases on the structural characteristics and chemical composition of wheat straw and applications to enzymatic hydrolysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 195-210.
    12. Zhang, Changwei & Chen, Huidong & Pang, Siyu & Su, Changsheng & Lv, Meng & An, Na & Wang, Kua & Cai, Di & Qin, Peiyong, 2020. "Importance of redefinition of corn stover harvest time to enhancing non-food bio-ethanol production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1444-1450.
    13. Martin J. Taylor & Hassan A. Alabdrabalameer & Vasiliki Skoulou, 2019. "Choosing Physical, Physicochemical and Chemical Methods of Pre-Treating Lignocellulosic Wastes to Repurpose into Solid Fuels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-27, June.
    14. Zabed, Hossain M. & Akter, Suely & Yun, Junhua & Zhang, Guoyan & Awad, Faisal N. & Qi, Xianghui & Sahu, J.N., 2019. "Recent advances in biological pretreatment of microalgae and lignocellulosic biomass for biofuel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 105-128.
    15. Rezania, Shahabaldin & Oryani, Bahareh & Cho, Jinwoo & Talaiekhozani, Amirreza & Sabbagh, Farzaneh & Hashemi, Beshare & Rupani, Parveen Fatemeh & Mohammadi, Ali Akbar, 2020. "Different pretreatment technologies of lignocellulosic biomass for bioethanol production: An overview," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    16. Likang Deng & Jun Li, 2021. "Thread Rolling: An Efficient Mechanical Pretreatment for Corn Stover Saccharification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-9, January.
    17. Basak, Bikram & Jeon, Byong-Hun & Kim, Tae Hyun & Lee, Jae-Cheol & Chatterjee, Pradip Kumar & Lim, Hankwon, 2020. "Dark fermentative hydrogen production from pretreated lignocellulosic biomass: Effects of inhibitory byproducts and recent trends in mitigation strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    18. Yuan, Xinchuan & Chen, Xiangxue & Shen, Guannan & Chen, Sitong & Yu, Jianming & Zhai, Rui & Xu, Zhaoxian & Jin, Mingjie, 2022. "Densifying lignocellulosic biomass with sulfuric acid provides a durable feedstock with high digestibility and high fermentability for cellulosic ethanol production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 377-389.
    19. Ma, Shuaishuai & Li, Yuling & Li, Jingxue & Yu, Xiaona & Cui, Zongjun & Yuan, Xufeng & Zhu, Wanbin & Wang, Hongliang, 2022. "Features of single and combined technologies for lignocellulose pretreatment to enhance biomethane production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    20. Magdalena Lebiocka & Agnieszka Montusiewicz & Sylwia Pasieczna-Patkowska & Sławomir Gułkowski, 2021. "Mature Landfill Leachate as a Medium for Hydrodynamic Cavitation of Brewery Spent Grain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-14, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:9:p:2198-:d:165177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.