IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i20p7514-d428653.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Batch-Mode Analysis of Thermophilic Methanogenic Microbial Community Changes in the Overacidification Stage in Beverage Waste Treatment

Author

Listed:
  • Shuhei Matsuda

    (Graduate School of Medicine, Engineering and Agricultural Sciences, University of Yamanashi, Kofu, Yamanashi 400-8510, Japan)

  • Takahiro Yamato

    (Graduate School of Medicine, Engineering and Agricultural Sciences, University of Yamanashi, Kofu, Yamanashi 400-8510, Japan)

  • Yoshiyuki Mochizuki

    (Iwata Chemical Co. Ltd., Iwata, Shizuoka 438-0078, Japan)

  • Yoshinori Sekiguchi

    (Iwata Chemical Co. Ltd., Iwata, Shizuoka 438-0078, Japan)

  • Takashi Ohtsuki

    (Graduate School of Medicine, Engineering and Agricultural Sciences, University of Yamanashi, Kofu, Yamanashi 400-8510, Japan)

Abstract

Biogasification by methane fermentation is an important and effective way to utilize beverage wastes. Beverage wastes are good feedstocks for methane fermentation because of their richness in sugars and proteins, although overacidification and inhibition of methane production caused by high substrate loading often become problematic. This study investigated changes in microbial communities in the overacidification state of the thermophilic methane fermentation process with beverage waste by establishing a simulated batch culture. We assessed 20 mL-scale batch cultures using a simulant beverage waste mixture (SBWM) with different amounts of addition; high cumulative methane production was achieved by adding 5 mL of SBWM (11358 mg—chemical oxygen demand—COD/L of organic loading), and overacidification was observed by adding 10 mL of SBWM (22715 mg—COD/L of organic loading). The results of 16S rRNA amplicon sequence analysis using nanopore sequencer suggested that Coprothermobacter proteolyticus , Defluviitoga tunisiensis , Acetomicrobium mobile , and Thermosediminibacter oceani were predominantly involved in hydrolysis/acidogenesis/acetogenesis processes, whereas Methanothrix soehngenii was the major acetotrophic methane producer. A comparison of microbial population between the methane-producing cultures and overacidification cultures revealed characteristic population changes especially in some minor species under 0.2% of population. We concluded that careful monitoring of population changes of the minor species is a potential indicator for prediction of overacidification.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuhei Matsuda & Takahiro Yamato & Yoshiyuki Mochizuki & Yoshinori Sekiguchi & Takashi Ohtsuki, 2020. "Batch-Mode Analysis of Thermophilic Methanogenic Microbial Community Changes in the Overacidification Stage in Beverage Waste Treatment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:20:p:7514-:d:428653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7514/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7514/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jay N. Meegoda & Brian Li & Kush Patel & Lily B. Wang, 2018. "A Review of the Processes, Parameters, and Optimization of Anaerobic Digestion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luis G. Cortés & J. Barbancho & D. F. Larios & J. D. Marin-Batista & A. F. Mohedano & C. Portilla & M. A. de la Rubia, 2022. "Full-Scale Digesters: Model Predictive Control with Online Kinetic Parameter Identification Strategy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Tae-Bong Kim & Jun-Hyeong Lee & Young-Man Yoon, 2024. "Residence Time Reduction in Anaerobic Reactors: Investigating the Economic Benefits of Magnetite-Induced Direct Interspecies Electron Transfer Mechanism," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-13, January.
    3. Maria Salud Camilleri-Rumbau & Kelly Briceño & Lene Fjerbæk Søtoft & Knud Villy Christensen & Maria Cinta Roda-Serrat & Massimiliano Errico & Birgir Norddahl, 2021. "Treatment of Manure and Digestate Liquid Fractions Using Membranes: Opportunities and Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-30, March.
    4. Yongping Li & Jiaoning Zhu & Yun Tang & Xiangyuan Shi & Sumera Anwar & Juanling Wang & Li Gao & Jingxuan Zhang, 2023. "Impact of Varying Mass Concentrations of Ammonia Nitrogen on Biogas Production and System Stability of Anaerobic Fermentation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, August.
    5. Wei En Tan & Peng Yen Liew & Lian See Tan & Kok Sin Woon & Nor Erniza Mohammad Rozali & Wai Shin Ho & Jamian NorRuwaida, 2022. "Life Cycle Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis for Anaerobic Digestion as Cow Manure Management System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Arthur Chevalier & Philippe Evon & Florian Monlau & Virginie Vandenbossche & Cecilia Sambusiti, 2023. "Twin-Screw Extrusion Mechanical Pretreatment for Enhancing Biomethane Production from Agro-Industrial, Agricultural and Catch Crop Biomasses," Waste, MDPI, vol. 1(2), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Guoqin Xu & Junlin Ji & Zhanyao Zheng & Hongchuan Song & Hong Yang & Jing Liu & Fang Yin & Wudi Zhang & Shumei Hao, 2023. "Performance and Energy Utilization Efficiency of an Expanded Granular Sludge Bed Reactor in the Treatment of Cassava Alcohol Wastewater," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-15, November.
    8. Magdalena Zdeb & Marta Bis & Artur Przywara, 2023. "Multi-Criteria Analysis of the Influence of Lignocellulosic Biomass Pretreatment Techniques on Methane Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, January.
    9. Harjinder Kaur & Raghava R. Kommalapati, 2023. "Process Optimization and Biomethane Recovery from Anaerobic Digestion of Agro-Industry Wastes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-14, September.
    10. Oluwafunmilayo Abiola Aworanti & Oluseye Omotoso Agbede & Samuel Enahoro Agarry & Ayobami Olu Ajani & Oyetola Ogunkunle & Opeyeolu Timothy Laseinde & S. M. Ashrafur Rahman & Islam Md Rizwanul Fattah, 2023. "Decoding Anaerobic Digestion: A Holistic Analysis of Biomass Waste Technology, Process Kinetics, and Operational Variables," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-36, April.
    11. S. Bhuvaneshwari & Hiroshan Hettiarachchi & Jay N. Meegoda, 2019. "Crop Residue Burning in India: Policy Challenges and Potential Solutions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-19, March.
    12. Tsigkou, Konstantina & Sventzouri, Eirini & Zafiri, Constantina & Kornaros, Michael, 2023. "Digestate recirculation rate optimization for the enhancement of hydrogen production: The case of disposable nappies and fruit/vegetable waste valorization in a mesophilic two-stage anaerobic digestio," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    13. Anouk F. Duque & Riccardo Campo & Angeles Val del Rio & Catarina L. Amorim, 2021. "Wastewater Valorization: Practice around the World at Pilot- and Full-Scale," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-28, September.
    14. Marcin Zieliński & Joanna Kazimierowicz & Marcin Dębowski, 2022. "Advantages and Limitations of Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment—Technological Basics, Development Directions, and Technological Innovations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-39, December.
    15. Oumaima Chaib & Nicolas Abatzoglou & Inès Esma Achouri, 2024. "Lignocellulosic Biomass Valorisation by Coupling Steam Explosion Treatment and Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-12, January.
    16. Tirthankar Mukherjee & Eric Trably & Prasad Kaparaju, 2023. "Critical Assessment of Hydrogen and Methane Production from 1G and 2G Sugarcane Processing Wastes Using One-Stage and Two-Stage Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-22, June.
    17. Jongkeun Lee & Do-yoon Ryu & Kye Hwan Jang & Jong Wook Lee & Daegi Kim, 2022. "Influence of Different Pretreatment Methods and Conditions on the Anaerobic Digestion Efficiency of Spent Mushroom Substrate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-10, November.
    18. Francesco Calise & Francesco Liberato Cappiello & Luca Cimmino & Marialuisa Napolitano & Maria Vicidomini, 2023. "Dynamic Simulation and Thermoeconomic Analysis of a Novel Hybrid Solar System for Biomethane Production by the Organic Fraction of Municipal Wastes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-23, March.
    19. Seung Gu Shin & Su In Kim & Seokhwan Hwang, 2022. "Startup of Demo-Scale Anaerobic Digestion Plant Treating Food Waste Leachate: Process Instability and Recovery," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-10, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:20:p:7514-:d:428653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.