IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v226y2018icp1219-1228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methane production through anaerobic digestion: Participation and digestion characteristics of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Wanwu
  • Khalid, Habiba
  • Zhu, Zhe
  • Zhang, Ruihong
  • Liu, Guangqing
  • Chen, Chang
  • Thorin, Eva

Abstract

Lignocellulosic biomass is the most abundant natural resource with high biomethane potential. However, complex structure of lignocellulosic biomass has hampered the efficient utilization of this bioresource. Previous studies have investigated the overall anaerobic digestion performance of lignocellulosic biomass, but the individual participation of each lignocellulosic component during anaerobic digestion remained unclear. Thus, this study investigated the methane production characteristics of cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin and their mixtures along with the microbial communities involved in anaerobic digestion. The results showed that the biomethane potential of cellulose was higher than that of hemicellulose; however, hemicellulose was hydrolysed more quickly than cellulose, while lignin was very difficult to be digested. The higher concentrations of acetic, n-butyric and n-valeric acids hydrolysed from the hemicellulose resulted in a lower pH and more severe inhibition on methane production than that of cellulose, and the methanogenesis gradually recovered after pH adjustment. The co-digestion of cellulose and hemicellulose increased the methane yield and biodegradability compared to mono-digestions. The addition of lignin to cellulose brought more significant decrease in the methane yield of cellulose than that of hemicellulose. Substrate-related bacteria such as Clostridium sensu stricto, Lutaonella, Cloacibacillus and Christensenella showed higher relative abundance in cellulose digestate, and sugar-fermenting bacteria such as Saccharofermentans, Petrimonas and Levilinea were more rich in the digestate of hemicellulose. Moreover, methanogenic Methanospirillum and Methanothrix likely contributed to the methane production of cellulose, while aciduric methanogens from Methanobrevibacter, Methanomassiliicoccus, Methanobacterium and Methanoculleus contributed to that of hemicellulose. This study provides a deeper understanding of the mechanism in the bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass during anaerobic digestion.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Wanwu & Khalid, Habiba & Zhu, Zhe & Zhang, Ruihong & Liu, Guangqing & Chen, Chang & Thorin, Eva, 2018. "Methane production through anaerobic digestion: Participation and digestion characteristics of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 1219-1228.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:226:y:2018:i:c:p:1219-1228
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261918307657
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.055?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chandra, R. & Takeuchi, H. & Hasegawa, T., 2012. "Methane production from lignocellulosic agricultural crop wastes: A review in context to second generation of biofuel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 1462-1476.
    2. Feng, Qunjie & Lin, Yunqin, 2017. "Integrated processes of anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis for higher bioenergy recovery from lignocellulosic biomass: A brief review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1272-1287.
    3. Mustafa, Ahmed M. & Poulsen, Tjalfe G. & Sheng, Kuichuan, 2016. "Fungal pretreatment of rice straw with Pleurotus ostreatus and Trichoderma reesei to enhance methane production under solid-state anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 661-671.
    4. Hamelin, Lorie & Naroznova, Irina & Wenzel, Henrik, 2014. "Environmental consequences of different carbon alternatives for increased manure-based biogas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 774-782.
    5. Hijazi, O. & Munro, S. & Zerhusen, B. & Effenberger, M., 2016. "Review of life cycle assessment for biogas production in Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1291-1300.
    6. Liu, Xuyi & Zhang, Shun & Bae, Junghan, 2017. "The nexus of renewable energy-agriculture-environment in BRICS," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 489-496.
    7. Lemmer, Andreas & Merkle, Wolfgang & Baer, Katharina & Graf, Frank, 2017. "Effects of high-pressure anaerobic digestion up to 30 bar on pH-value, production kinetics and specific methane yield," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 659-667.
    8. Salman, Chaudhary Awais & Schwede, Sebastian & Thorin, Eva & Yan, Jinyue, 2017. "Enhancing biomethane production by integrating pyrolysis and anaerobic digestion processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1074-1083.
    9. Rahul Datta & Aditi Kelkar & Divyashri Baraniya & Ali Molaei & Amitava Moulick & Ram Swaroop Meena & Pavel Formanek, 2017. "Enzymatic Degradation of Lignin in Soil: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chettaphong Phuttaro & Alissara Reungsang & Piyarat Boonsawang & Sumate Chaiprapat, 2019. "Integrative Effects of Sonication and Particle Size on Biomethanation of Tropical Grass Pennisetum purpureum Using Superior Diverse Inocula Cultures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Robert Czubaszek & Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek & Wendelin Wichtmann & Piotr Banaszuk, 2021. "Specific Methane Yield of Wetland Biomass in Dry and Wet Fermentation Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Aixa Kari Gállego Bravo & Daniel Alejandro Salcedo Serrano & Gloria López Jiménez & Khemlal Nirmalkar & Selvasankar Murugesan & Jaime García-Mena & María Eugenia Gutiérrez Castillo & Luis Raúl Tovar G, 2019. "Microbial Profile of the Leachate from Mexico City’s Bordo Poniente Composting Plant: An Inoculum to Digest Organic Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Robert Czubaszek & Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek & Piotr Banaszuk & Grzegorz Zając & Martin J. Wassen, 2023. "Grass from Road Verges as a Substrate for Biogas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-23, June.
    5. Achinas, Spyridon & Willem Euverink, Gerrit Jan, 2020. "Rambling facets of manure-based biogas production in Europe: A briefing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    6. Zamri, M.F.M.A. & Hasmady, Saiful & Akhiar, Afifi & Ideris, Fazril & Shamsuddin, A.H. & Mofijur, M. & Fattah, I. M. Rizwanul & Mahlia, T.M.I., 2021. "A comprehensive review on anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    7. Ma, Shuaishuai & Wang, Hongliang & Li, Jingxue & Fu, Yu & Zhu, Wanbin, 2019. "Methane production performances of different compositions in lignocellulosic biomass through anaerobic digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    8. René Heller & Christina Brandhorst & Benedikt Hülsemann & Andreas Lemmer & Hans Oechsner, 2023. "Comparison of Different Mechanical Pretreatment Methods for the Anaerobic Digestion of Landscape Management Grass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-26, December.
    9. Ma, Shuaishuai & Wang, Hongliang & Li, Longrui & Gu, Xiaohui & Zhu, Wanbin, 2021. "Enhanced biomethane production from corn straw by a novel anaerobic digestion strategy with mechanochemical pretreatment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    10. Sha, Hao & Zhao, Bo & Yang, Yuyi & Zhang, Yanhui & Zheng, Pengfei & Cao, Shengxian & Wang, Qing & Wang, Gong, 2023. "Enhanced anaerobic digestion of corn stover using magnetized cellulase combined with Ni-graphite coating," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    11. Gandhi, Bhushan P. & Otite, Saanu Victoria & Fofie, Esther A. & Lag-Brotons, Alfonso José & Ezemonye, Lawrence I. & Semple, Kirk T. & Martin, Alastair D., 2022. "Kinetic investigations into the effect of inoculum to substrate ratio on batch anaerobic digestion of simulated food waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 311-321.
    12. Meneses-Quelal, W.O. & Velázquez-Martí, B. & Gaibor-Chávez, J. & Niño-Ruiz, Z., 2021. "Biochemical potential of methane (BMP) of camelid waste and the Andean region agricultural crops," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 406-415.
    13. de Rossi, Eduardo & Tavares, Maria Herminia Ferreira & Teleken, Joel Gustavo & Cremonez, Paulo André & Christ, Divair & Gomes, Simone Damasceno & Bariccatti, Reinaldo Aparecido, 2022. "Production of biogas by microorganisms with saccharine sorghum straw as substrate with or without alkaline and citric pretreatment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 617-626.
    14. Sun, Hui & Wang, Enzhen & Li, Xiang & Cui, Xian & Guo, Jianbin & Dong, Renjie, 2021. "Potential biomethane production from crop residues in China: Contributions to carbon neutrality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    15. Oliva, A. & Tan, L.C. & Papirio, S. & Esposito, G. & Lens, P.N.L., 2021. "Effect of methanol-organosolv pretreatment on anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic materials," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1000-1012.
    16. Timo Steinbrecher & Fabian Bonk & Marvin Scherzinger & Oliver Lüdtke & Martin Kaltschmitt, 2022. "Fractionation of Lignocellulosic Fibrous Straw Digestate by Combined Hydrothermal and Enzymatic Treatment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-27, August.
    17. Liu, Jin & Smith, Stephen R., 2020. "A multi-level biogas model to optimise the energy balance of full-scale sewage sludge conventional and THP anaerobic digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 756-766.
    18. Shamurad, Burhan & Sallis, Paul & Petropoulos, Evangelos & Tabraiz, Shamas & Ospina, Carolina & Leary, Peter & Dolfing, Jan & Gray, Neil, 2020. "Stable biogas production from single-stage anaerobic digestion of food waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    19. Zhao, Bo & Zheng, Pengfei & Yang, Yuyi & Sha, Hao & Cao, Shengxian & Wang, Gong & Zhang, Yanhui, 2022. "Enhanced anaerobic digestion under medium temperature conditions: Augmentation effect of magnetic field and composites formed by titanium dioxide on the foamed nickel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    20. Li, Yeqing & Jing, Zhangmu & Pan, Junting & Luo, Gang & Feng, Lu & Jiang, Hao & Zhou, Hongjun & Xu, Quan & Lu, Yanjuan & Liu, Hongbin, 2022. "Multi-omics joint analysis of the effect of temperature on microbial communities, metabolism, and genetics in full-scale biogas reactors with food waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    21. Tess Herman & Emily Nungesser & Kimberley E. Miller & Sarah C. Davis, 2022. "Comparative Fuel Yield from Anaerobic Digestion of Emerging Waste in Food and Brewery Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, February.
    22. Lee, Eun Seo & Park, Seon Yeong & Kim, Chang Gyun, 2023. "Feasibility test anaerobically enhancing methane yield under the injection of hydrogen and carbon dioxide," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 761-768.
    23. Ciro Vasmara & Stefania Galletti & Stefano Cianchetta & Enrico Ceotto, 2023. "Advancements in Giant Reed ( Arundo donax L.) Biomass Pre-Treatments for Biogas Production: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-21, January.
    24. Susanne Theuerl & Johanna Klang & Annette Prochnow, 2019. "Process Disturbances in Agricultural Biogas Production—Causes, Mechanisms and Effects on the Biogas Microbiome: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yazan, Devrim Murat & Fraccascia, Luca & Mes, Martijn & Zijm, Henk, 2018. "Cooperation in manure-based biogas production networks: An agent-based modeling approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 820-833.
    2. Bacenetti, Jacopo & Sala, Cesare & Fusi, Alessandra & Fiala, Marco, 2016. "Agricultural anaerobic digestion plants: What LCA studies pointed out and what can be done to make them more environmentally sustainable," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 669-686.
    3. Kim, Jung-Hun & Oh, Jeong-Ik & Tsang, Yiu Fai & Park, Young-Kwon & Lee, Jechan & Kwon, Eilhann E., 2020. "CO2-assisted catalytic pyrolysis of digestate with steel slag," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    4. Freitas, F.F. & Furtado, A.C. & Piñas, J.A.V. & Venturini, O.J. & Barros, R.M. & Lora, E.E.S., 2022. "Holistic Life Cycle Assessment of a biogas-based electricity generation plant in a pig farm considering co-digestion and an additive," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    5. Eggemann, Lea & Rau, Florian & Stolten, Detlef, 2023. "The ecological potential of manure utilisation in small-scale biogas plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    6. Gao, Mingxue & Wang, Danmeng & Wang, Hui & Wang, Xiaojiao & Feng, Yongzhong, 2019. "Biogas potential, utilization and countermeasures in agricultural provinces: A case study of biogas development in Henan Province, China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 191-200.
    7. Cheng, F. & Brewer, C.E., 2021. "Conversion of protein-rich lignocellulosic wastes to bio-energy: Review and recommendations for hydrolysis + fermentation and anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    8. Torri, Cristian & Pambieri, Giampiero & Gualandi, Chiara & Piraccini, Maurizio & Rombolà, Alessandro G. & Fabbri, Daniele, 2020. "Evaluation of the potential performance of hyphenated pyrolysis-anaerobic digestion (Py-AD) process for carbon negative fuels from woody biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1190-1199.
    9. Tayibi, S. & Monlau, F. & Bargaz, A. & Jimenez, R. & Barakat, A., 2021. "Synergy of anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis processes for sustainable waste management: A critical review and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    10. Budzianowski, Wojciech M. & Postawa, Karol, 2017. "Renewable energy from biogas with reduced carbon dioxide footprint: Implications of applying different plant configurations and operating pressures," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P2), pages 852-868.
    11. Song, Jinghui & Wang, Ying & Zhang, Siqi & Song, Yanling & Xue, Shengrong & Liu, Le & Lvy, Xingang & Wang, Xiaojiao & Yang, Gaihe, 2021. "Coupling biochar with anaerobic digestion in a circular economy perspective: A promising way to promote sustainable energy, environment and agriculture development in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    12. Hamelin, Lorie & Møller, Henrik Bjarne & Jørgensen, Uffe, 2021. "Harnessing the full potential of biomethane towards tomorrow's bioeconomy: A national case study coupling sustainable agricultural intensification, emerging biogas technologies and energy system analy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    13. Tsapekos, P. & Kougias, P.G. & Treu, L. & Campanaro, S. & Angelidaki, I., 2017. "Process performance and comparative metagenomic analysis during co-digestion of manure and lignocellulosic biomass for biogas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 126-135.
    14. Mariana Ferdeș & Mirela Nicoleta Dincă & Georgiana Moiceanu & Bianca Ștefania Zăbavă & Gigel Paraschiv, 2020. "Microorganisms and Enzymes Used in the Biological Pretreatment of the Substrate to Enhance Biogas Production: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-26, September.
    15. Deng, Chen & Lin, Richen & Kang, Xihui & Wu, Benteng & O’Shea, Richard & Murphy, Jerry D., 2020. "Improving gaseous biofuel yield from seaweed through a cascading circular bioenergy system integrating anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    16. Tonini, Davide & Vadenbo, Carl & Astrup, Thomas Fruergaard, 2017. "Priority of domestic biomass resources for energy: Importance of national environmental targets in a climate perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 295-309.
    17. Ezeilo, Uchenna R. & Wahab, Roswanira Abdul & Mahat, Naji Arafat, 2020. "Optimization studies on cellulase and xylanase production by Rhizopus oryzae UC2 using raw oil palm frond leaves as substrate under solid state fermentation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1301-1312.
    18. Mohd Yasin, Nazlina Haiza & Maeda, Toshinari & Hu, Anyi & Yu, Chang-Ping & Wood, Thomas K., 2015. "CO2 sequestration by methanogens in activated sludge for methane production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 426-434.
    19. Yang, Yuhan & Wang, Tiancheng & Hu, Hongyun & Yao, Dingding & Zou, Chan & Xu, Kai & Li, Xian & Yao, Hong, 2021. "Influence of partial components removal on pyrolysis behavior of lignocellulosic biowaste in molten salts," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 616-625.
    20. Henrik B. Møller & Peter Sørensen & Jørgen E. Olesen & Søren O. Petersen & Tavs Nyord & Sven G. Sommer, 2022. "Agricultural Biogas Production—Climate and Environmental Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-24, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:226:y:2018:i:c:p:1219-1228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.