IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i15p4177-d1719093.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Economic Effects of the Green Transition of the Greek Economy: An Input–Output Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Theocharis Marinos

    (Institute for Environmental Research & Sustainable Development, National Observatory of Athens, 15236 Athens, Greece)

  • Maria Markaki

    (Department of Management Science & Technology, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 72100 Agios Nikolaos, Greece)

  • Yannis Sarafidis

    (Institute for Environmental Research & Sustainable Development, National Observatory of Athens, 15236 Athens, Greece)

  • Elena Georgopoulou

    (Institute for Environmental Research & Sustainable Development, National Observatory of Athens, 15236 Athens, Greece)

  • Sevastianos Mirasgedis

    (Institute for Environmental Research & Sustainable Development, National Observatory of Athens, 15236 Athens, Greece)

Abstract

Decarbonization of the Greek economy requires significant investments in clean technologies. This will boost demand for goods and services and will create multiplier effects on output value added and employment, though reliance on imported technologies might increase the trade deficit. This study employs input–output analysis to estimate the direct, indirect, and multiplier effects of green transition investments on Greek output, value added, employment, and imports across five-year intervals from 2025 to 2050. Two scenarios are considered: the former is based on the National Energy and Climate Plan (NECP), driven by a large-scale exploitation of RES and technologies promoting electrification of final demand, while the latter (developed in the context of the CLEVER project) prioritizes energy sufficiency and efficiency interventions to reduce final energy demand. In the NECP scenario, GDP increases by 3–10% (relative to 2023), and employment increases by 4–11%. The CLEVER scenario yields smaller direct effects—owing to lower investment levels—but larger induced impacts, since energy savings boost household disposable income. The consideration of three sub-scenarios adopting different levels of import-substitution rates in key manufacturing sectors exhibits pronounced divergence, indicating that targeted industrial policies can significantly amplify the domestic economic benefits of the green transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Theocharis Marinos & Maria Markaki & Yannis Sarafidis & Elena Georgopoulou & Sevastianos Mirasgedis, 2025. "The Economic Effects of the Green Transition of the Greek Economy: An Input–Output Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-45, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:15:p:4177-:d:1719093
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/15/4177/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/15/4177/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dvořák, Petr & Martinát, Stanislav & der Horst, Dan Van & Frantál, Bohumil & Turečková, Kamila, 2017. "Renewable energy investment and job creation; a cross-sectoral assessment for the Czech Republic with reference to EU benchmarks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 360-368.
    2. Zell-Ziegler, Carina & Thema, Johannes & Best, Benjamin & Wiese, Frauke & Lage, Jonas & Schmidt, Annika & Toulouse, Edouard & Stagl, Sigrid, 2021. "Enough? The role of sufficiency in European energy and climate plans," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    3. Felix Creutzig & Joyashree Roy & William F. Lamb & Inês M. L. Azevedo & Wändi Bruine de Bruin & Holger Dalkmann & Oreane Y. Edelenbosch & Frank W. Geels & Arnulf Grubler & Cameron Hepburn & Edgar G. H, 2018. "Towards demand-side solutions for mitigating climate change," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(4), pages 260-263, April.
    4. Alyousef, Mohammed & Belaid, Fateh & Almubarak, Norah & Almulhim, Tarifa, 2025. "Mapping Saudi Arabia's low emissions transition path by 2060: An input-output analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    5. Maria Markaki & Stelios Papadakis & Anna Putnová, 2021. "A Modern Industrial Policy for the Czech Republic: Optimizing the Structure of Production," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(23), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Tomislav Gelo & Nika Šimurina & Jurica Šimurina, 2021. "The Economic Impact of Investment in Renewables in Croatia by 2030," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Cai, Mattia & Cusumano, Niccolò & Lorenzoni, Arturo & Pontoni, Federico, 2017. "A comprehensive ex-post assessment of RES deployment in Italy: Jobs, value added and import leakages," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 234-245.
    8. C. Oliveira Henriques & S. Sousa, 2023. "A Review on Economic Input-Output Analysis in the Environmental Assessment of Electricity Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-26, March.
    9. Gözkün, Kübra Atik & Orhangazi, Özgür, 2025. "Green transition for Turkey: Growth, employment, and trade deficit effects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    10. Jenniches, Simon, 2018. "Assessing the regional economic impacts of renewable energy sources – A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 35-51.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramos, Carmen & García, Ana Salomé & Moreno, Blanca & Díaz, Guzmán, 2019. "Small-scale renewable power technologies are an alternative to reach a sustainable economic growth: Evidence from Spain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 13-25.
    2. Grzegorz Ślusarz & Dariusz Twaróg & Barbara Gołębiewska & Marek Cierpiał-Wolan & Jarosław Gołębiewski & Philipp Plutecki, 2023. "The Role of Biogas Potential in Building the Energy Independence of the Three Seas Initiative Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-23, January.
    3. Ortega-Izquierdo, Margarita & Río, Pablo del, 2020. "An analysis of the socioeconomic and environmental benefits of wind energy deployment in Europe," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 1067-1080.
    4. Luigi Aldieri & Jonas Grafström & Kristoffer Sundström & Concetto Paolo Vinci, 2019. "Wind Power and Job Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    5. Yuru Guan & Jin Yan & Yuli Shan & Yannan Zhou & Ye Hang & Ruoqi Li & Yu Liu & Binyuan Liu & Qingyun Nie & Benedikt Bruckner & Kuishuang Feng & Klaus Hubacek, 2023. "Burden of the global energy price crisis on households," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 8(3), pages 304-316, March.
    6. Nasser Alghamdi & Patrick James & AbuBakr Bahaj, 2025. "Vision and Reality: An Assessment of Saudi Arabia’s In-Country Capacity to Deliver on Its Solar Ambitions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Castro, Damaris & Bleys, Brent, 2023. "Do people think they have enough? A subjective income sufficiency assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    8. Khadijah Iddrisu & Isaac Ofoeda & Joshua Yindenaba Abor, 2023. "Inward foreign direct investment and inclusiveness of growth: will renewable energy consumption make a difference?," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 367-388, July.
    9. Lei, Mingyu & Cai, Wenjia & Liu, Wenling & Wang, Can, 2022. "The heterogeneity in energy consumption patterns and home appliance purchasing preferences across urban households in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    10. Agnieszka Brelik & Piotr Nowaczyk & Katarzyna Cheba, 2023. "The Economic Importance of Offshore Wind Energy Development in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-23, November.
    11. Paul Wolfram & Stephanie Weber & Kenneth Gillingham & Edgar G. Hertwich, 2021. "Pricing indirect emissions accelerates low—carbon transition of US light vehicle sector," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-8, December.
    12. Carroll, James & Denny, Eleanor & Lyons, Ronan C. & Petrov, Ivan, 2024. "Better energy cost information changes household property investment decisions: Evidence from a nationwide experiment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    13. Dugan, Anna & Mayer, Jakob & Thaller, Annina & Bachner, Gabriel & Steininger, Karl W., 2022. "Developing policy packages for low-carbon passenger transport: A mixed methods analysis of trade-offs and synergies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    14. Lema, Rasmus & Bhamidipati, Padmasai Lakshmi & Gregersen, Cecilia & Hansen, Ulrich Elmer & Kirchherr, Julian, 2021. "China’s investments in renewable energy in Africa: Creating co-benefits or just cashing-in?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    15. Lichtin, Florian & Smith, E. Keith & Axhausen, Kay W. & Bernauer, Thomas, 2024. "“How much should public transport services be expanded, and who should pay? Experimental evidence from Switzerland”," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 64-74.
    16. Bauer, Jan M. & Aarestrup, Simon C. & Hansen, Pelle G. & Reisch, Lucia A., 2022. "Nudging more sustainable grocery purchases: Behavioural innovations in a supermarket setting," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    17. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Lipson, Matthew M. & Chard, Rose, 2019. "Temporality, vulnerability, and energy justice in household low carbon innovations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 495-504.
    18. Park, Joungho & Kang, Sungho & Kim, Sunwoo & Kim, Hana & Kim, Sang-Kyung & Lee, Jay H., 2024. "Optimizing green hydrogen systems: Balancing economic viability and reliability in the face of supply-demand volatility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 368(C).
    19. Zapata, Oscar, 2022. "Renewable Energy and Community Development," OSF Preprints tk59y, Center for Open Science.
    20. Iwona Bąk & Anna Spoz & Magdalena Zioło & Marek Dylewski, 2021. "Dynamic Analysis of the Similarity of Objects in Research on the Use of Renewable Energy Resources in European Union Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:15:p:4177-:d:1719093. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.