Author
Listed:
- Luca Migliari
(Department of Mechanical, Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Cagliari, 09123 Cagliari, Italy)
- Daniele Cocco
(Department of Mechanical, Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Cagliari, 09123 Cagliari, Italy)
- Mario Petrollese
(Department of Mechanical, Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Cagliari, 09123 Cagliari, Italy)
Abstract
Despite the growing application of storage for curtailment mitigation, its cost-effectiveness remains uncertain. This study evaluates the Levelized Cost of Storage, which also represents an implicit threshold revenue, for Lithium-ion Battery Energy Storage Systems deployed for photovoltaic curtailment mitigation. Specifically, the LCOS is assessed—using a mathematical simulation model—for various curtailment scenarios defined by maximum levels (10–40%), hourly profiles (upper limit and proportional), and growth rates (2, 5, and 10 years) at three storage system capacities (0.33, 0.50, 0.67 h) and two European locations (Cagliari and Berlin). The results indicate that the LCOS of batteries deployed for curtailment mitigation is, on average, comparable to that of systems used for bulk energy storage applications (155–320 EUR/MWh) in Cagliari (180–410 EUR/MWh). In contrast, in Berlin, the lower and more variable photovoltaic generation results in significantly higher LCOS values (200–750 EUR/MWh). For both locations, the lowest LCOS values (180 EUR/MWh for Cagliari and 200 EUR/MWh for Berlin), obtained for very high curtailment levels (40%), are significantly above average electricity prices (108 EUR/MWh for Cagliari and 78 EUR/MWh for Berlin), suggesting that BESSs for curtailment mitigation are competitive in the day-ahead market only if their electricity is sold at a significantly higher price. This is particularly true for lower curtailment levels. Indeed, for a curtailment level of 10% reached in 5 years, the LCOS for a 0.5 h BESS capacity is approximately 255 EUR/MWh in Cagliari and 460 EUR/MWh in Berlin. The study further highlights that the curtailment scenario significantly affects the Levelized Cost of Storage, with the upper limit hourly profile being more conservative.
Suggested Citation
Luca Migliari & Daniele Cocco & Mario Petrollese, 2025.
"Levelized Cost of Storage (LCOS) of Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) Deployed for Photovoltaic Curtailment Mitigation,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-17, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:14:p:3602-:d:1697260
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:14:p:3602-:d:1697260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.