IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i12p3174-d1680567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biogas Production from Organic Waste in the Forestry and Agricultural Context: Challenges and Solutions for a Sustainable Future

Author

Listed:
  • Luisa Patricia Uranga-Valencia

    (Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas y Forestales, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Km 2.5 Carretera a Rosales, Campus Delicias, Delicias C.P. 33000, Chihuahua, Mexico)

  • Sandra Pérez-Álvarez

    (Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas y Forestales, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Km 2.5 Carretera a Rosales, Campus Delicias, Delicias C.P. 33000, Chihuahua, Mexico)

  • Rosalío Gabriel-Parra

    (División de Estudios de Postgrado, Instituto de Estudios Ambientales, Universidad de la Sierra Juárez, Cam. a la Universidad S/N, Ixtlán de Juárez C.P. 68725, Oaxaca, Mexico)

  • Jesús Alicia Chávez-Medina

    (Departamento de Biotecnología, Instituto Politécnico Nacional-CIIDIR Unidad Sinaloa, Juan de Dios Bátiz Paredes No. 250, Guasave C.P. 81101, Sinaloa, Mexico)

  • Marco Antonio Magallanes-Tapia

    (Departamento de Biotecnología, Instituto Politécnico Nacional-CIIDIR Unidad Sinaloa, Juan de Dios Bátiz Paredes No. 250, Guasave C.P. 81101, Sinaloa, Mexico)

  • Esteban Sánchez-Chávez

    (Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo AC, Unidad Delicias, Cd., Delicias C.P. 33089, Chihuahua, Mexico)

  • Ezequiel Muñoz-Márquez

    (Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo AC, Unidad Delicias, Cd., Delicias C.P. 33089, Chihuahua, Mexico)

  • Samuel Alberto García-García

    (Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas y Forestales, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Km 2.5 Carretera a Rosales, Campus Delicias, Delicias C.P. 33000, Chihuahua, Mexico)

  • Joel Rascón-Solano

    (Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas y Forestales, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Km 2.5 Carretera a Rosales, Campus Delicias, Delicias C.P. 33000, Chihuahua, Mexico)

  • Luis Ubaldo Castruita-Esparza

    (Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas y Forestales, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Km 2.5 Carretera a Rosales, Campus Delicias, Delicias C.P. 33000, Chihuahua, Mexico)

Abstract

Biogas produced from agricultural and forestry waste is emerging as a strategic and multifunctional solution to address climate change, inefficient waste management, and the need for renewable energy by transforming large volumes of biomass. Global estimates indicate that approximately 1.3 billion tons of waste is produced each year for these sectors; this waste is processed through anaerobic digestion, allowing it to be transformed into energy and biofertilizers. This reduces greenhouse gas emissions by up to 90%, promotes rural development, improves biodiversity, and prevents environmental risks, such as forest fires. However, despite its high global technical potential, which is estimated at 8000 TWh per year, its use remains limited as a result of its high initial costs, low efficiency in relation to lignocellulosic waste, and weak regulatory frameworks, especially in countries like Mexico, which use less than 5% of their available biomass. In response, emerging technologies, such as co-digestion with microalgae, integrated biorefineries, and artificial intelligence tools, are opening up new avenues for overcoming these barriers under a comprehensive approach that combines science, technology, and community participation. Therefore, biogas is positioned as a key pillar for a circular, fair, and resilient bioeconomy, promoting energy security and advancing toward a just and environmentally responsible future.

Suggested Citation

  • Luisa Patricia Uranga-Valencia & Sandra Pérez-Álvarez & Rosalío Gabriel-Parra & Jesús Alicia Chávez-Medina & Marco Antonio Magallanes-Tapia & Esteban Sánchez-Chávez & Ezequiel Muñoz-Márquez & Samuel A, 2025. "Biogas Production from Organic Waste in the Forestry and Agricultural Context: Challenges and Solutions for a Sustainable Future," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-23, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:12:p:3174-:d:1680567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/12/3174/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/12/3174/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Walekhwa, Peter N. & Mugisha, Johnny & Drake, Lars, 2009. "Biogas energy from family-sized digesters in Uganda: Critical factors and policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(7), pages 2754-2762, July.
    2. Yemei Li & Yuanyuan Ren & Jiayuan Ji & Yu-You Li & Takuro Kobayashi, 2023. "Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors for Municipal Wastewater Treatment, Sewage Sludge Digestion and Biogas Upgrading: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Mutungwazi, Asheal & Mukumba, Patrick & Makaka, Golden, 2018. "Biogas digester types installed in South Africa: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 172-180.
    4. Uusitalo, V. & Havukainen, J. & Manninen, K. & Höhn, J. & Lehtonen, E. & Rasi, S. & Soukka, R. & Horttanainen, M., 2014. "Carbon footprint of selected biomass to biogas production chains and GHG reduction potential in transportation use," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 90-98.
    5. Wang, Zixin & Wang, Tengfei & Si, Buchun & Watson, Jamison & Zhang, Yuanhui, 2021. "Accelerating anaerobic digestion for methane production: Potential role of direct interspecies electron transfer," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Solomon E. Uhunamure & Nthaduleni S. Nethengwe & David Tinarwo, 2021. "Development of a Comprehensive Conceptual Framework for Biogas Technology Adoption in South Africa," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Patrick Mukumba & Shylet Y. Chivanga, 2023. "An Overview of Renewable Energy Technologies in the Eastern Cape Province in South Africa and the Rural Households’ Energy Poverty Coping Strategies," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, March.
    3. Sharvini, Siva Raman & Noor, Zainura Zainon & Chong, Chun Shiong & Stringer, Lindsay C & Glew, David, 2020. "Energy generation from palm oil mill effluent: A life cycle assessment of two biogas technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    4. Thomson Kalinda, 2022. "An Assessment of the Challenges affecting Smallholder Farmers in Adopting Biogas Technology in Zambia," Energy and Environment Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(1), pages 1-48, June.
    5. Maes, Wouter H. & Verbist, Bruno, 2012. "Increasing the sustainability of household cooking in developing countries: Policy implications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 4204-4221.
    6. Tang, Shuai & Wang, Zixin & Lu, Haifeng & Si, Buchun & Wang, Chaoyuan & Jiang, Weizhong, 2023. "Design of stage-separated anaerobic digestion: Principles, applications, and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    7. Wang, Jiongke & Tang, Xiaoyu & Yang, Hongnan & Zhao, Qi & Wang, Heng & Deng, Liangwei & Wang, Wenguo, 2024. "Fixing collapsed dry anaerobic digestion system of kitchen waste caused by severe VFAs accumulation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PA).
    8. Grima-Olmedo, C. & Ramírez-Gómez, Á. & Alcalde-Cartagena, R., 2014. "Energetic performance of landfill and digester biogas in a domestic cooker," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 301-308.
    9. Sun, Dingqiang & Bai, Junfei & Qiu, Huanguang & Cai, Yaqing, 2014. "Impact of government subsidies on household biogas use in rural China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 748-756.
    10. He, Pan & Veronesi, Marcella, 2017. "Personality traits and renewable energy technology adoption: A policy case study from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 472-479.
    11. Arthur, Richard & Baidoo, Martina Francisca & Antwi, Edward, 2011. "Biogas as a potential renewable energy source: A Ghanaian case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 1510-1516.
    12. Francis Kemausuor & Muyiwa S. Adaramola & John Morken, 2018. "A Review of Commercial Biogas Systems and Lessons for Africa," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, November.
    13. Jha, Priyanka & Schmidt, Stefan, 2021. "State of biofuel development in sub-Saharan Africa: How far sustainable?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    14. Zhang, Zexi & Ding, Ke & Ma, Xiaojun & Tang, Shuai & Wang, Zixin & Lu, Haifeng & Jiang, Weizhong & Si, Buchun, 2023. "Hydrodynamic design of down-flow packed bed reactor regulated the biohydrogen production and microbial enrichment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    15. Talevi, Marta & Pattanayak, Subhrendu K. & Das, Ipsita & Lewis, Jessica J. & Singha, Ashok K., 2022. "Speaking from experience: Preferences for cooking with biogas in rural India," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    16. Auburger, Sebastian & Jacobs, Anna & Märländer, Bernward & Bahrs, Enno, 2016. "Economic optimization of feedstock mix for energy production with biogas technology in Germany with a special focus on sugar beets – Effects on greenhouse gas emissions and energy balances," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 1-11.
    17. Smith, Jo U. & Fischer, Anke & Hallett, Paul D. & Homans, Hilary Y. & Smith, Pete & Abdul-Salam, Yakubu & Emmerling, Hanna H. & Phimister, Euan, 2015. "Sustainable use of organic resources for bioenergy, food and water provision in rural Sub-Saharan Africa," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 903-917.
    18. Patel, Gulam Husain & Horttanainen, Mika & Kokko, Marika & Yörüklü, Hulya Civelek & Havukainen, Jouni, 2025. "Environmental performance of biomethanation based on life cycle assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    19. Sisi Que & Liang Wang & Kwame Awuah-Offei & Wei Yang & Hui Jiang, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility: Understanding the Mining Stakeholder with a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-12, April.
    20. Syed M Amir & Yonggong Liu & Ashfaq A Shah & Umer Khayyam & Zafar Mahmood, 2020. "Empirical study on influencing factors of biogas technology adoption in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan," Energy & Environment, , vol. 31(2), pages 308-329, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:12:p:3174-:d:1680567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.