IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i10p2610-d1658728.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Improved Tiered Electricity Pricing Scheme Considering Energy Saving and Carbon Reduction, Cross-Subsidy Handling, and User Demands

Author

Listed:
  • Siqiang Liu

    (School of Economics & Management, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha 410004, China
    Electricity Price Research Center, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha 410004, China)

  • Wei Ye

    (School of Economics & Management, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha 410004, China
    Electricity Price Research Center, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha 410004, China)

  • Yongfei Wu

    (School of Economics & Management, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha 410004, China
    Electricity Price Research Center, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha 410004, China)

  • Ze Ye

    (School of Economics & Management, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha 410004, China
    Electricity Price Research Center, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha 410004, China)

Abstract

The electric power industry is not only facing the pressure from the reduction of industrial and commercial electricity prices to stimulate the significant growth of demand, but also facing the increasingly serious pressure of unreasonable consumption caused by cross-subsidies; the cross-subsidy mitigation effect and energy-saving effect of the current tiered electricity price policy have basically disappeared. This article examines the main variables that affect the electricity demand and carbon emissions in order to develop a better tiered electricity pricing scheme that can effectively manage cross-subsidies in electricity prices while simultaneously saving energy and lowering carbon emissions. The China Statistical Yearbook’s electricity balance sheets for 2013–2020 are used in this article, along with pertinent data from the State Grid Corporation of China and the China Statistical Yearbook for 2006–2016. It builds an electricity demand model for classified users by using the time series analysis method and multiple statistical regression method. The variables are then subjected to a Granger causality test and a cointegration test in this article. The analysis shows that the adjustment of the electricity price policy has a significant impact on energy-saving and carbon reduction, and for residential electricity consumption, the income variable is the main factor affecting the electricity demand. We take residents’ affordability as the constraint condition for dividing the range of electricity and determining the beneficiary group, take the carbon emission responsibility target and the cross-subsidy degree alleviation target as constraints in determining the tiered price difference, propose an improvement scheme for the tiered electricity price, and carry out the sensitivity analysis of the influence between the parameters. The results show that the optimization improves the precision of the cross-subsidy treatment and significantly improves the effects of energy conservation and emission reduction.

Suggested Citation

  • Siqiang Liu & Wei Ye & Yongfei Wu & Ze Ye, 2025. "An Improved Tiered Electricity Pricing Scheme Considering Energy Saving and Carbon Reduction, Cross-Subsidy Handling, and User Demands," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-26, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:10:p:2610-:d:1658728
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/10/2610/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/10/2610/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Damari, Yuval & Kissinger, Meidad, 2018. "An integrated analysis of households' electricity consumption in Israel," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 51-58.
    2. Balarama, Hemawathy & Islam, Asad & Kim, Jun Sung & Wang, Liang Choon, 2020. "Price elasticities of residential electricity demand: Estimates from household panel data in Bangladesh," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    3. Bhattacharyya, Ranajoy & Ganguly, Amrita, 2017. "Cross subsidy removal in electricity pricing in India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 181-190.
    4. Gunkel, Philipp Andreas & Bergaentzlé, Claire-Marie & Keles, Dogan & Scheller, Fabian & Jacobsen, Henrik Klinge, 2023. "Grid tariff designs to address electrification and their allocative impacts," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    5. Hung, Ming-Feng & Huang, Tai-Hsin, 2015. "Dynamic demand for residential electricity in Taiwan under seasonality and increasing-block pricing," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 168-177.
    6. Peter M. Schwarz, Nathan Duma, and Ercument Camadan, 2023. "Compensating Solar Prosumers Using Buy-All, Sell-All as an Alternative to Net Metering and Net Purchasing: Total Use, Rebound, and Cross Subsidization," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    7. Burke, Paul J. & Kurniawati, Sandra, 2018. "Electricity subsidy reform in Indonesia: Demand-side effects on electricity use," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 410-421.
    8. Schultz, P. Wesley & Estrada, Mica & Schmitt, Joseph & Sokoloski, Rebecca & Silva-Send, Nilmini, 2015. "Using in-home displays to provide smart meter feedback about household electricity consumption: A randomized control trial comparing kilowatts, cost, and social norms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 351-358.
    9. Hancevic, Pedro Ignacio & Lopez-Aguilar, Javier Alejandro, 2019. "Energy efficiency programs in the context of increasing block tariffs: The case of residential electricity in Mexico," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 320-331.
    10. Cardenas, Helena & Whittington, Dale, 2019. "The consequences of increasing block tariffs on the distribution of residential electricity subsidies in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 783-795.
    11. Unruh, G. C. & Moomaw, W. R., 1998. "An alternative analysis of apparent EKC-type transitions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 221-229, May.
    12. Peter M. Schwarz & Nathan Duma & Ercument Camadan, 2023. "Compensating Solar Prosumers Using Buy-All, Sell-All as an Alternative to Net Metering and Net Purchasing: Total Use, Rebound, and Cross Subsidization," The Energy Journal, , vol. 44(1), pages 143-174, January.
    13. Baker, Keith J. & Rylatt, R. Mark, 2008. "Improving the prediction of UK domestic energy-demand using annual consumption-data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(6), pages 475-482, June.
    14. Bartusch, Cajsa & Odlare, Monica & Wallin, Fredrik & Wester, Lars, 2012. "Exploring variance in residential electricity consumption: Household features and building properties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 637-643.
    15. Burney, Nadeem A., 1995. "Socioeconomic development and electricity consumption A cross-country analysis using the random coefficient method," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 185-195, July.
    16. Li, Chuang & Yang, Xiaofan & Wang, Liping, 2025. "Public energy conservation behavior and the impact of tiered pricing: Based on water, electricity and gas consumption measurements in typical urban households in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ayertey, Winfred & Sharifi, Ayyoob & Yoshida, Yuichiro, 2024. "The impact of increase in block pricing on electricity demand responsiveness: Evidence from Ghana," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    2. Syed Hasan & Odmaa Narantungalag, & Martin Berka, 2022. "The intended and unintended consequences of large electricity subsidies: evidence from Mongolia," Discussion Papers 2202, School of Economics and Finance, Massey University, New Zealand.
    3. Zheng Fang & Thai‐Ha Le & Jiang Yu & Manyi Fan, 2025. "Evaluating Causal Effects of Increasing Block Pricing Policy on Residential Electricity Consumption in China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(3), pages 1661-1676, April.
    4. Pu, Lei & Wang, Xiuhui & Tan, Zhongfu & Wang, Huaqing & Yang, JiaCheng & Wu, Jing, 2020. "Is China's electricity price cross-subsidy policy reasonable? Comparative analysis of eastern, central, and western regions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    5. Xie, Li & Huang, Zhisheng, 2025. "Electricity price cross-subsidies and enterprises’ green total factor productivity: Empirical evidence from Chinese industrial listed enterprises," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    6. Huebner, Gesche & Shipworth, David & Hamilton, Ian & Chalabi, Zaid & Oreszczyn, Tadj, 2016. "Understanding electricity consumption: A comparative contribution of building factors, socio-demographics, appliances, behaviours and attitudes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 692-702.
    7. Michael Chesser & Jim Hanly & Damien Cassells & Nikolaos Apergis, 2019. "Household Energy Consumption: A Study of Micro Renewable Energy Systems in Ireland," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 50(2), pages 265-280.
    8. Cansino, José M. & Dugo, Víctor & Gálvez-Ruiz, David & Román-Collado, Rocío, 2023. "What drove electricity consumption in the residential sector during the SARS-CoV-2 confinement? A special focus on university students in southern Spain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    9. Lee, Soo-Jin & Song, Seung-Yeong, 2022. "Time-series analysis of the effects of building and household features on residential end-use energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    10. Ahmed Gassar, Abdo Abdullah & Yun, Geun Young & Kim, Sumin, 2019. "Data-driven approach to prediction of residential energy consumption at urban scales in London," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    11. Li, Lanlan & Yuan, Xiaomeng & Li, Jingjing & Li, Ke, 2024. "Assessing the effect of increasing block tariffs for residential natural gas in Hefei City, China," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    12. Lin, Boqiang & Wang, Yao, 2020. "Analyzing the elasticity and subsidy to reform the residential electricity tariffs in China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 189-206.
    13. Стародубцева А. Е., 2020. "Перекрестное Субсидирование Как Мера Социальной Поддержки Населения: Международный Опыт Государственного Управления На Рынке Электроэнергии И Мощности," Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления // Public administration issues, НИУ ВШЭ, issue 2, pages 114-144.
    14. Castro Pérez, José E. & Flores, Daniel, 2023. "The effect of retail price regulation on the wholesale price of electricity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    15. Jones, Rory V. & Fuertes, Alba & Lomas, Kevin J., 2015. "The socio-economic, dwelling and appliance related factors affecting electricity consumption in domestic buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 901-917.
    16. Proskuryakova, Liliana & Starodubtseva, Alena & Bianco, Vincenzo, 2020. "Modelling a household tariff for reducing sectoral cross-subsidies in the Russian power market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    17. Balarama, Hemawathy & Islam, Asad & Kim, Jun Sung & Wang, Liang Choon, 2020. "Price elasticities of residential electricity demand: Estimates from household panel data in Bangladesh," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    18. Wu, Wei & Zhang, Naishan & Hu, Yingying & Zhou, Dengli & Long, Houyin, 2023. "Crossing the cross-subsidy: Evidence from China's electricity sector," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    19. Kaika, Dimitra & Zervas, Efthimios, 2013. "The environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) theory. Part B: Critical issues," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1403-1411.
    20. Korrakot Phomsoda & Nattapong Puttanapong & Mongkut Piantanakulchai, 2021. "Economic Impacts of Thailand’s Biofuel Subsidy Reallocation Using a Dynamic Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:10:p:2610-:d:1658728. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.