IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i7p3008-d1107251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Low- and High-Fidelity Aerodynamic Simulations of Box Wing Kites for Airborne Wind Energy Applications

Author

Listed:
  • Dylan Eijkelhof

    (Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2629 HS Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Gabriel Buendía

    (Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2629 HS Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Roland Schmehl

    (Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2629 HS Delft, The Netherlands)

Abstract

High aerodynamic efficiency is a key design driver for airborne wind energy systems as it strongly affects the achievable energy output. Conventional fixed-wing systems generally use aerofoils with a high thickness-to-chord ratio to achieve high efficiency and wing loading. The box wing concept suits thinner aerofoils as the load distribution can be changed with a lower wing span and structural reinforcements between the upper and lower wings. This paper presents an open-source toolchain for reliable aerodynamic simulations of parameterized box wing configurations, automating the design, meshing, and simulation setup processes. The aerodynamic tools include the steady 3D panel method solver APAME and the CFD-solver OpenFOAM, which use a steady Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes approach with k- ω SST turbulence model. The finite-volume mesh for the CFD-solver is generated automatically with Pointwise using eight physical design parameters, five aerofoil profiles and mesh refinement specifications. The panel method provided accurate and fast results in the linear lift region. For higher angles of attack, CFD simulations with high- to medium-quality meshes were required to obtain good agreement with measured lift and drag coefficients. The CFD simulations showed that the upper wing stall lagged behind the lower wing, increasing the stall angle of attack compared to conventional fixed-wing kites. In addition, the wing tip boundary layer separation was delayed compared to the wing root for the straight rectangular box wing. Choosing the design point and operational envelope wisely can enhance the aerodynamic performance of airborne wind energy kites, which are generally operated at a large angle of attack to maximise the wing loading and tether force, and through that, the power output of the system.

Suggested Citation

  • Dylan Eijkelhof & Gabriel Buendía & Roland Schmehl, 2023. "Low- and High-Fidelity Aerodynamic Simulations of Box Wing Kites for Airborne Wind Energy Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:7:p:3008-:d:1107251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/7/3008/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/7/3008/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bauer, Florian & Kennel, Ralph M. & Hackl, Christoph M. & Campagnolo, Filippo & Patt, Michael & Schmehl, Roland, 2018. "Drag power kite with very high lift coefficient," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 290-305.
    2. Eijkelhof, Dylan & Schmehl, Roland, 2022. "Six-degrees-of-freedom simulation model for future multi-megawatt airborne wind energy systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 137-150.
    3. Watson, Simon & Moro, Alberto & Reis, Vera & Baniotopoulos, Charalampos & Barth, Stephan & Bartoli, Gianni & Bauer, Florian & Boelman, Elisa & Bosse, Dennis & Cherubini, Antonello & Croce, Alessandro , 2019. "Future emerging technologies in the wind power sector: A European perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Malz, E.C. & Hedenus, F. & Göransson, L. & Verendel, V. & Gros, S., 2020. "Drag-mode airborne wind energy vs. wind turbines: An analysis of power production, variability and geography," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Deirdre O’Donnell & Jimmy Murphy & Vikram Pakrashi, 2020. "Damage Monitoring of a Catenary Moored Spar Platform for Renewable Energy Devices," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Jochem De Schutter & Rachel Leuthold & Thilo Bronnenmeyer & Elena Malz & Sebastien Gros & Moritz Diehl, 2023. "AWEbox : An Optimal Control Framework for Single- and Multi-Aircraft Airborne Wind Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-32, February.
    4. Arabgolarcheh, Alireza & Rouhollahi, Amirhossein & Benini, Ernesto, 2023. "Analysis of middle-to-far wake behind floating offshore wind turbines in the presence of multiple platform motions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 546-560.
    5. Nelson, Sarah & Allwood, Julian M., 2021. "The technological and social timelines of climate mitigation: Lessons from 12 past transitions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    6. Niels Pynaert & Thomas Haas & Jolan Wauters & Guillaume Crevecoeur & Joris Degroote, 2023. "Wing Deformation of an Airborne Wind Energy System in Crosswind Flight Using High-Fidelity Fluid–Structure Interaction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, January.
    7. Li, Mingxin & Jiang, Xiaoli & Carroll, James & Negenborn, Rudy R., 2022. "A multi-objective maintenance strategy optimization framework for offshore wind farms considering uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    8. Jiang, Zhiyu & Yang, Limin & Gao, Zhen & Moan, Torgeir, 2022. "Integrated dynamic analysis of a spar floating wind turbine with a hydraulic drivetrain," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1), pages 608-623.
    9. Lu, Jintao & Rong, Dan & Lev, Benjamin & Liang, Mengshang & Zhang, Chong & Gao, Yangyang, 2023. "Constraints affecting the promotion of waste incineration power generation project in China: A perspective of improved technology acceptance model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PB).
    10. Geng, D. & Evans, S. & Kishita, Y., 2023. "The identification and classification of energy waste for efficient energy supervision in manufacturing factories," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    11. Yessica Arellano-Prieto & Elvia Chavez-Panduro & Pierluigi Salvo Rossi & Francesco Finotti, 2022. "Energy Storage Solutions for Offshore Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-34, August.
    12. Volkan Salma & Roland Schmehl, 2023. "Operation Approval for Commercial Airborne Wind Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-23, April.
    13. Jafarzadeh Ghoushchi, Saeid & Manjili, Sobhan & Mardani, Abbas & Saraji, Mahyar Kamali, 2021. "An extended new approach for forecasting short-term wind power using modified fuzzy wavelet neural network: A case study in wind power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    14. Kumar, K. Ravi & Dashora, Kavya & Krishnan, Naveen & Sanyal, S. & Chandra, Hukum & Dharmaraja, S. & Kumari, Vandita, 2021. "Feasibility assessment of renewable energy resources for tea plantation and industry in India - A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    15. Rishikesh Joshi & Michiel Kruijff & Roland Schmehl, 2023. "Value-Driven System Design of Utility-Scale Airborne Wind Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-19, February.
    16. Bórawski, Piotr & Bełdycka-Bórawska, Aneta & Jankowski, Krzysztof Jóżef & Dubis, Bogdan & Dunn, James W., 2020. "Development of wind energy market in the European Union," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 691-700.
    17. Helena Schmidt & Gerdien de Vries & Reint Jan Renes & Roland Schmehl, 2022. "The Social Acceptance of Airborne Wind Energy: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, February.
    18. Gilmore, Nicholas & Koskinen, Ilpo & van Gennip, Domenique & Paget, Greta & Burr, Patrick A. & Obbard, Edward G. & Daiyan, Rahman & Sproul, Alistair & Kay, Merlinde & Lennon, Alison & Konstantinou, Ge, 2022. "Clean energy futures: An Australian based foresight study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    19. Trevisi, Filippo & Gaunaa, Mac & McWilliam, Michael, 2020. "Unified engineering models for the performance and cost of Ground-Gen and Fly-Gen crosswind Airborne Wind Energy Systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 893-907.
    20. Jelle A. W. Poland & Roland Schmehl, 2023. "Modelling Aero-Structural Deformation of Flexible Membrane Kites," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-24, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:7:p:3008-:d:1107251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.