IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i14p3631-d384501.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Damage Monitoring of a Catenary Moored Spar Platform for Renewable Energy Devices

Author

Listed:
  • Deirdre O’Donnell

    (Dynamical Systems and Risk Laboratory, School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
    Marine and Science Foundation Ireland Centre Marine & Renewable Energy Ireland (MaREI), University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
    The Energy Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland)

  • Jimmy Murphy

    (MaREI Centre, Beaufort Building, University College Cork, Haubowline Road, Ringaskiddy, Co., Cork P43 C573, Ireland)

  • Vikram Pakrashi

    (Dynamical Systems and Risk Laboratory, School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
    Marine and Science Foundation Ireland Centre Marine & Renewable Energy Ireland (MaREI), University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
    The Energy Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland)

Abstract

Structural performance of renewable energy device platforms is central to their power generation in a reliable and competitive manner. However, there is a gap in research in the conceptual and experimental stages of such devices at lower technological readiness levels in terms of understanding of their structural responses. Uncertainties around knowledge related to damage conditions of such structures are under-researched and experimental investigations into the monitoring of performance of such structures are significantly needed. This research addresses this need and investigates various damage conditions in a scaled catenary moored spar platform in an ocean wave basin, exposed to typical wave conditions for the west coast of Ireland. A comparison of the monitored structural responses was carried out with respect to the undamaged experimental model. It was observed that while free decay tests were not useful to distinguish between various damage levels, a characterisation of the distribution of the responses can be relevant in identifying damages or significant structural changes. The work contributes to the much-needed experimental evidence base around structural health monitoring of renewable energy device platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Deirdre O’Donnell & Jimmy Murphy & Vikram Pakrashi, 2020. "Damage Monitoring of a Catenary Moored Spar Platform for Renewable Energy Devices," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-22, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:14:p:3631-:d:384501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/14/3631/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/14/3631/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chiang, Amy C. & Keoleian, Gregory A. & Moore, Michael R. & Kelly, Jarod C., 2016. "Investment cost and view damage cost of siting an offshore wind farm: A spatial analysis of Lake Michigan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA), pages 966-976.
    2. Dong, Wenbin & Moan, Torgeir & Gao, Zhen, 2012. "Fatigue reliability analysis of the jacket support structure for offshore wind turbine considering the effect of corrosion and inspection," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 11-27.
    3. O’Kelly-Lynch, Patrick & Long, Cian & McAuliffe, Fiona Devoy & Murphy, Jimmy & Pakrashi, Vikram, 2020. "Structural design implications of combining a point absorber with a wind turbine monopile for the east and west coast of Ireland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Martinez-Luengo, Maria & Kolios, Athanasios & Wang, Lin, 2016. "Structural health monitoring of offshore wind turbines: A review through the Statistical Pattern Recognition Paradigm," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 91-105.
    5. Topham, Eva & McMillan, David, 2017. "Sustainable decommissioning of an offshore wind farm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(PB), pages 470-480.
    6. Leimeister, Mareike & Kolios, Athanasios, 2018. "A review of reliability-based methods for risk analysis and their application in the offshore wind industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1065-1076.
    7. O'Leary, Kieran & Pakrashi, Vikram & Kelliher, Denis, 2019. "Optimization of composite material tower for offshore wind turbine structures," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 928-942.
    8. Watson, Simon & Moro, Alberto & Reis, Vera & Baniotopoulos, Charalampos & Barth, Stephan & Bartoli, Gianni & Bauer, Florian & Boelman, Elisa & Bosse, Dennis & Cherubini, Antonello & Croce, Alessandro , 2019. "Future emerging technologies in the wind power sector: A European perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dimitri V. Val, 2023. "Reliability of Marine Energy Converters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-4, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cevasco, D. & Koukoura, S. & Kolios, A.J., 2021. "Reliability, availability, maintainability data review for the identification of trends in offshore wind energy applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    2. Manisha Sawant & Sameer Thakare & A. Prabhakara Rao & Andrés E. Feijóo-Lorenzo & Neeraj Dhanraj Bokde, 2021. "A Review on State-of-the-Art Reviews in Wind-Turbine- and Wind-Farm-Related Topics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-30, April.
    3. Li, He & Diaz, H. & Guedes Soares, C., 2021. "A developed failure mode and effect analysis for floating offshore wind turbine support structures," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 133-145.
    4. Koukoura, Sofia & Scheu, Matti Niclas & Kolios, Athanasios, 2021. "Influence of extended potential-to-functional failure intervals through condition monitoring systems on offshore wind turbine availability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    5. Arcos Jiménez, Alfredo & Gómez Muñoz, Carlos Quiterio & García Márquez, Fausto Pedro, 2019. "Dirt and mud detection and diagnosis on a wind turbine blade employing guided waves and supervised learning classifiers," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 2-12.
    6. Wang, L. & Kolios, A. & Liu, X. & Venetsanos, D. & Rui, C., 2022. "Reliability of offshore wind turbine support structures: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    7. Ramon Varghese & Vikram Pakrashi & Subhamoy Bhattacharya, 2022. "A Compendium of Formulae for Natural Frequencies of Offshore Wind Turbine Structures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-31, April.
    8. Chen, Yisu & Wu, Di & Yu, Yuguo & Gao, Wei, 2021. "Do cyclone impacts really matter for the long-term performance of an offshore wind turbine?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 184-201.
    9. uit het Broek, Michiel A.J. & Veldman, Jasper & Fazi, Stefano & Greijdanus, Roy, 2019. "Evaluating resource sharing for offshore wind farm maintenance: The case of jack-up vessels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 619-632.
    10. Shittu, Abdulhakim Adeoye & Mehmanparast, Ali & Hart, Phil & Kolios, Athanasios, 2021. "Comparative study between S-N and fracture mechanics approach on reliability assessment of offshore wind turbine jacket foundations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    11. Judge, Frances & McAuliffe, Fiona Devoy & Sperstad, Iver Bakken & Chester, Rachel & Flannery, Brian & Lynch, Katie & Murphy, Jimmy, 2019. "A lifecycle financial analysis model for offshore wind farms," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 370-383.
    12. Irawan, Chandra Ade & Jones, Dylan & Hofman, Peter S. & Zhang, Lina, 2023. "Integrated strategic energy mix and energy generation planning with multiple sustainability criteria and hierarchical stakeholders," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(2), pages 864-883.
    13. Francisco Haces-Fernandez, 2020. "GoWInD: Wind Energy Spatiotemporal Assessment and Characterization of End-of-Life Activities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    14. Anne P. M. Velenturf & Phil Purnell, 2017. "Resource Recovery from Waste: Restoring the Balance between Resource Scarcity and Waste Overload," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-17, September.
    15. Li, Xiao-Yang & Chen, Wen-Bin & Kang, Rui, 2021. "Performance margin-based reliability analysis for aircraft lock mechanism considering multi-source uncertainties and wear," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    16. Vincenzo Basile & Francesca Loia & Nunzia Capobianco & Roberto Vona, 2023. "An ecosystems perspective on the reconversion of offshore platforms: Towards a multi‐level governance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1615-1631, July.
    17. Winkler, Lorenz & Kilic, Onur A. & Veldman, Jasper, 2022. "Collaboration in the offshore wind farm decommissioning supply chain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    18. García Márquez, Fausto Pedro & Peco Chacón, Ana María, 2020. "A review of non-destructive testing on wind turbines blades," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 998-1010.
    19. Spielmann, Vanessa & Brey, Thomas & Dannheim, Jennifer & Vajhøj, Jesper & Ebojie, Mandy & Klein, Johanna & Eckardt, Silke, 2021. "Integration of sustainability, stakeholder and process approaches for sustainable offshore wind farm decommissioning," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    20. Leimeister, Mareike & Kolios, Athanasios, 2018. "A review of reliability-based methods for risk analysis and their application in the offshore wind industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1065-1076.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:14:p:3631-:d:384501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.