IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v64y2016icp91-105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structural health monitoring of offshore wind turbines: A review through the Statistical Pattern Recognition Paradigm

Author

Listed:
  • Martinez-Luengo, Maria
  • Kolios, Athanasios
  • Wang, Lin

Abstract

Offshore Wind has become the most profitable renewable energy source due to the remarkable development it has experienced in Europe over the last decade. In this paper, a review of Structural Health Monitoring Systems (SHMS) for offshore wind turbines (OWT) has been carried out considering the topic as a Statistical Pattern Recognition problem. Therefore, each one of the stages of this paradigm has been reviewed focusing on OWT application. These stages are: Operational Evaluation; Data Acquisition, Normalization and Cleansing; Feature Extraction and Information Condensation; and Statistical Model Development. It is expected that optimizing each stage, SHMS can contribute to the development of efficient Condition-Based Maintenance Strategies. Optimizing this strategy will help reduce labor costs of OWTs׳ inspection, avoid unnecessary maintenance, identify design weaknesses before failure, improve the availability of power production while preventing wind turbines׳ overloading, therefore, maximizing the investments׳ return. In the forthcoming years, a growing interest in SHM technologies for OWT is expected, enhancing the potential of offshore wind farm deployments further offshore. Increasing efficiency in operational management will contribute towards achieving UK׳s 2020 and 2050 targets, through ultimately reducing the Levelised Cost of Energy (LCOE).

Suggested Citation

  • Martinez-Luengo, Maria & Kolios, Athanasios & Wang, Lin, 2016. "Structural health monitoring of offshore wind turbines: A review through the Statistical Pattern Recognition Paradigm," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 91-105.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:64:y:2016:i:c:p:91-105
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.085
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032116301976
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.085?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schubel, P.J. & Crossley, R.J. & Boateng, E.K.G. & Hutchinson, J.R., 2013. "Review of structural health and cure monitoring techniques for large wind turbine blades," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 113-123.
    2. Sinha, Y. & Steel, J.A., 2015. "A progressive study into offshore wind farm maintenance optimisation using risk based failure analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 735-742.
    3. Borg, Michael & Collu, Maurizio & Kolios, Athanasios, 2014. "Offshore floating vertical axis wind turbines, dynamics modelling state of the art. Part II: Mooring line and structural dynamics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1226-1234.
    4. Borg, Michael & Shires, Andrew & Collu, Maurizio, 2014. "Offshore floating vertical axis wind turbines, dynamics modelling state of the art. part I: Aerodynamics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1214-1225.
    5. Maria Martinez Luengo & Athanasios Kolios, 2015. "Failure Mode Identification and End of Life Scenarios of Offshore Wind Turbines: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Adedipe, Oyewole & Brennan, Feargal & Kolios, Athanasios, 2016. "Review of corrosion fatigue in offshore structures: Present status and challenges in the offshore wind sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 141-154.
    7. García Márquez, Fausto Pedro & Tobias, Andrew Mark & Pinar Pérez, Jesús María & Papaelias, Mayorkinos, 2012. "Condition monitoring of wind turbines: Techniques and methods," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 169-178.
    8. Asdrubali, Francesco & Baldinelli, Giorgio & D’Alessandro, Francesco & Scrucca, Flavio, 2015. "Life cycle assessment of electricity production from renewable energies: Review and results harmonization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1113-1122.
    9. Liu, W.Y. & Tang, B.P. & Han, J.G. & Lu, X.N. & Hu, N.N. & He, Z.Z., 2015. "The structure healthy condition monitoring and fault diagnosis methods in wind turbines: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 466-472.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jijian Lian & Ou Cai & Xiaofeng Dong & Qi Jiang & Yue Zhao, 2019. "Health Monitoring and Safety Evaluation of the Offshore Wind Turbine Structure: A Review and Discussion of Future Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-29, January.
    2. Artigao, Estefania & Martín-Martínez, Sergio & Honrubia-Escribano, Andrés & Gómez-Lázaro, Emilio, 2018. "Wind turbine reliability: A comprehensive review towards effective condition monitoring development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1569-1583.
    3. Chen, Xuejun & Yang, Yongming & Cui, Zhixin & Shen, Jun, 2019. "Vibration fault diagnosis of wind turbines based on variational mode decomposition and energy entropy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 1100-1109.
    4. Beganovic, Nejra & Söffker, Dirk, 2016. "Structural health management utilization for lifetime prognosis and advanced control strategy deployment of wind turbines: An overview and outlook concerning actual methods, tools, and obtained result," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 68-83.
    5. Su, Jie & Lei, Hang & Zhou, Dai & Han, Zhaolong & Bao, Yan & Zhu, Hongbo & Zhou, Lei, 2019. "Aerodynamic noise assessment for a vertical axis wind turbine using Improved Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 559-569.
    6. Cheng, Biyi & Du, Jianjun & Yao, Yingxue, 2022. "Machine learning methods to assist structure design and optimization of Dual Darrieus Wind Turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    7. Miguel A. Rodríguez-López & Luis M. López-González & Luis M. López-Ochoa & Jesús Las-Heras-Casas, 2018. "Methodology for Detecting Malfunctions and Evaluating the Maintenance Effectiveness in Wind Turbine Generator Bearings Using Generic versus Specific Models from SCADA Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, March.
    8. Bayati, Ilmas & Foletti, Stefano & Tarsitano, Davide & Belloli, Marco, 2018. "A reference open data vertical axis wind turbine, with individual pitch control, for code validation purposes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 711-720.
    9. Hand, Brian & Kelly, Ger & Cashman, Andrew, 2021. "Aerodynamic design and performance parameters of a lift-type vertical axis wind turbine: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    10. Hesami, Ali & Nikseresht, Amir H., 2023. "Towards development and optimization of the Savonius wind turbine incorporated with a wind-lens," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    11. Wang, Xinbao & Cai, Chang & Cai, Shang-Gui & Wang, Tengyuan & Wang, Zekun & Song, Juanjuan & Rong, Xiaomin & Li, Qing'an, 2023. "A review of aerodynamic and wake characteristics of floating offshore wind turbines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    12. Unai Elosegui & Igor Egana & Alain Ulazia & Gabriel Ibarra-Berastegi, 2018. "Pitch Angle Misalignment Correction Based on Benchmarking and Laser Scanner Measurement in Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    13. Cheng, Zhengshun & Madsen, Helge Aagaard & Gao, Zhen & Moan, Torgeir, 2017. "A fully coupled method for numerical modeling and dynamic analysis of floating vertical axis wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 604-619.
    14. Wu, Chutian & Yang, Xiaolei & Zhu, Yaxin, 2021. "On the design of potential turbine positions for physics-informed optimization of wind farm layout," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1108-1120.
    15. Vergaerde, Antoine & De Troyer, Tim & Standaert, Lieven & Kluczewska-Bordier, Joanna & Pitance, Denis & Immas, Alexandre & Silvert, Frédéric & Runacres, Mark C., 2020. "Experimental validation of the power enhancement of a pair of vertical-axis wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 181-187.
    16. Lei, Hang & Su, Jie & Bao, Yan & Chen, Yaoran & Han, Zhaolong & Zhou, Dai, 2019. "Investigation of wake characteristics for the offshore floating vertical axis wind turbines in pitch and surge motions of platforms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 471-489.
    17. Borg, Michael & Collu, Maurizio, 2015. "Offshore floating vertical axis wind turbines, dynamics modelling state of the art. Part III: Hydrodynamics and coupled modelling approaches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 296-310.
    18. Athanasios Kolios & Varvara Mytilinou & Estivaliz Lozano-Minguez & Konstantinos Salonitis, 2016. "A Comparative Study of Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Methods under Stochastic Inputs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-21, July.
    19. Al-Nassar, W.K. & Neelamani, S. & Al-Salem, K.A. & Al-Dashti, H.A., 2019. "Feasibility of offshore wind energy as an alternative source for the state of Kuwait," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 783-796.
    20. Lam, H.F. & Peng, H.Y., 2017. "Measurements of the wake characteristics of co- and counter-rotating twin H-rotor vertical axis wind turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 13-26.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:64:y:2016:i:c:p:91-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.