IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i19p6968-d1254411.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting the Performance of PEM Fuel Cells by Determining Dehydration or Flooding in the Cell Using Machine Learning Models

Author

Listed:
  • Jaydev Chetan Zaveri

    (Dhanushkodi Research Group, Department of Chemical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India)

  • Shankar Raman Dhanushkodi

    (Dhanushkodi Research Group, Department of Chemical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India)

  • C. Ramesh Kumar

    (Automotive Research Centre, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India)

  • Jan Taler

    (Department of Energy, Cracow University of Technology, 31-864 Cracow, Poland)

  • Marek Majdak

    (Department of Energy, Cracow University of Technology, 31-864 Cracow, Poland)

  • Bohdan Węglowski

    (Institute of Thermal Power Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, 31-864 Cracow, Poland)

Abstract

Modern industries encourages the use of hydrogen as an energy carrier to decarbonize the electricity grid, Polymeric Electrolyte membrane fuel cell which uses hydrogen as a fuel to produce electricity, is an efficient and reliable ‘power to gas’ technology. However, a key issue obstructing the advancement of PEMFCs is the unpredictability of their performance and failure events caused by flooding and dehydration. The accurate prediction of these two events is required to avoid any catastrophic failure in the cell. A typical approach used to predict failure modes relies on modeling failure-induced performance losses and monitoring the voltage of a cell. Data-driven machine learning models must be developed to address these challenges. Herein, we present a machine learning model for the prediction of the failure modes of operating cells. The model predicted the relative humidity of a cell by considering the cell voltage and current density as the input parameters. Advanced regression techniques, such as support vector machine, decision tree regression, random forest regression and artificial neural network, were used to improve the predictions. Features related to the model were derived from cell polarization data. The model’s results were validated with real-time test data obtained from the cell. The statistical machine learning models accurately provided information on the flooding- and dehydration-induced failure events.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaydev Chetan Zaveri & Shankar Raman Dhanushkodi & C. Ramesh Kumar & Jan Taler & Marek Majdak & Bohdan Węglowski, 2023. "Predicting the Performance of PEM Fuel Cells by Determining Dehydration or Flooding in the Cell Using Machine Learning Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:19:p:6968-:d:1254411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/19/6968/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/19/6968/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Afra, Mehran & Nazari, Mohsen & Kayhani, Mohammad Hasan & Sharifpur, M. & Meyer, J.P., 2019. "3D experimental visualization of water flooding in proton exchange membrane fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 967-977.
    2. Carton, J.G. & Lawlor, V. & Olabi, A.G. & Hochenauer, C. & Zauner, G., 2012. "Water droplet accumulation and motion in PEM (Proton Exchange Membrane) fuel cell mini-channels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 63-73.
    3. Pourrahmani, Hossein & Van herle, Jan, 2022. "Water management of the proton exchange membrane fuel cells: Optimizing the effect of microstructural properties on the gas diffusion layer liquid removal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    4. Colin Cameron, A. & Windmeijer, Frank A. G., 1997. "An R-squared measure of goodness of fit for some common nonlinear regression models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 77(2), pages 329-342, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Xiaoqing & Yang, Jiapei & Ma, Xiao & Zhuge, Weilin & Shuai, Shijin, 2022. "Modelling and analysis on effects of penetration of microporous layer into gas diffusion layer in PEM fuel cells: Focusing on mass transport," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    2. Liao, Shuxin & Qiu, Diankai & Yi, Peiyun & Peng, Linfa & Lai, Xinmin, 2022. "Modeling of a novel cathode flow field design with optimized sub-channels to improve drainage for proton exchange membrane fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    3. Abdin, Z. & Webb, C.J. & Gray, E.MacA., 2016. "PEM fuel cell model and simulation in Matlab–Simulink based on physical parameters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 1131-1144.
    4. Parnian, Mohammad Javad & Rowshanzamir, Soosan & Gashoul, Fatemeh, 2017. "Comprehensive investigation of physicochemical and electrochemical properties of sulfonated poly (ether ether ketone) membranes with different degrees of sulfonation for proton exchange membrane fuel ," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 614-628.
    5. Asadollahi, Arash & Esmaeeli, Asghar, 2018. "Simulation of condensation and liquid break-up on a micro-object with upper and lower movable walls using Lattice Boltzmann Method," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 498(C), pages 33-49.
    6. Okur, Osman & İyigün Karadağ, Çiğdem & Boyacı San, Fatma Gül & Okumuş, Emin & Behmenyar, Gamze, 2013. "Optimization of parameters for hot-pressing manufacture of membrane electrode assembly for PEM (polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells) fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 574-580.
    7. Salva, J. Antonio & Iranzo, Alfredo & Rosa, Felipe & Tapia, Elvira, 2016. "Validation of cell voltage and water content in a PEM (polymer electrolyte membrane) fuel cell model using neutron imaging for different operating conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 100-112.
    8. Yonghua Cai & Jingming Sun & Fan Wei & Ben Chen, 2022. "Effect of Baffle Dimensionless Size Factor on the Performance of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.
    9. Abdollahzadeh, M. & Ribeirinha, P. & Boaventura, M. & Mendes, A., 2018. "Three-dimensional modeling of PEMFC with contaminated anode fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 939-959.
    10. Dobersek, Danijela & Goricanec, Darko, 2014. "An experimentally evaluated magnetic device's efficiency for water-scale reduction on electric heaters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 271-278.
    11. Burkey, Mark L. & Obeng, Kofi, 2005. "Crash Risk Reduction at Signalized Intersections Using Longitudinal Data," MPRA Paper 36281, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Lu Zhang & Yongfeng Liu & Pucheng Pei & Xintong Liu & Long Wang & Yuan Wan, 2022. "Variation Characteristic Analysis of Water Content at the Flow Channel of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
    13. Jung, Chi-Young & Yi, Jae-You & Yi, Sung-Chul, 2014. "On the role of the silica-containing catalyst layer for proton exchange membrane fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 794-800.
    14. Yuan, Zhenyu & Yang, Jie & Li, Xiaoyang & Wang, Shikai, 2016. "The micro-scale analysis of the micro direct methanol fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 10-17.
    15. Zhang, Zhonghao & Guo, Mengdi & Yu, Zhonghao & Yao, Siyue & Wang, Jin & Qiu, Diankai & Peng, Linfa, 2022. "A novel cooperative design with optimized flow field on bipolar plates and hybrid wettability gas diffusion layer for proton exchange membrane unitized regenerative fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    16. Wang, Junye, 2015. "Theory and practice of flow field designs for fuel cell scaling-up: A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 640-663.
    17. Xing, Lei & Du, Shangfeng & Chen, Rui & Mamlouk, Mohamed & Scott, Keith, 2016. "Anode partial flooding modelling of proton exchange membrane fuel cells: Model development and validation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 80-95.
    18. John Fitzgerald & Peter Gottschalk & Robert Moffitt, 1998. "An Analysis of Sample Attrition in Panel Data: The Michigan Panel Study of Income Dynamics," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 33(2), pages 251-299.
    19. Hiau LooiKee & Alessandro Nicita & Marcelo Olarreaga, 2009. "Estimating Trade Restrictiveness Indices," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 119(534), pages 172-199, January.
    20. Xu, Liangfei & Fang, Chuan & Hu, Junming & Cheng, Siliang & Li, Jianqiu & Ouyang, Minggao & Lehnert, Werner, 2017. "Parameter extraction of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell based on quasi-dynamic model and periphery signals," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 675-690.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:19:p:6968-:d:1254411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.