IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i15p5749-d1208443.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental Comparison of Hydrogen Refueling with Directly Pressurized vs. Cascade Method

Author

Listed:
  • Matteo Genovese

    (Department of Mechanical, Energy and Management Engineering, University of Calabria, Arcavacata di Rende, 87036 Cosenza, Italy)

  • David Blekhman

    (Department of Technology, Hydrogen Research and Fueling Facility, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90032, USA
    Hydrogen Research and Fueling Facility, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90032, USA)

  • Michael Dray

    (Hydrogen Research and Fueling Facility, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90032, USA)

  • Francesco Piraino

    (Department of Mechanical, Energy and Management Engineering, University of Calabria, Arcavacata di Rende, 87036 Cosenza, Italy)

  • Petronilla Fragiacomo

    (Department of Mechanical, Energy and Management Engineering, University of Calabria, Arcavacata di Rende, 87036 Cosenza, Italy)

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of two hydrogen station configurations during the refueling process: the conventional “directly pressurized refueling process” and the innovative “cascade refueling process.” The objective of the cascade process is to refuel vehicles without the need for booster compressors. The experiments were conducted at the Hydrogen Research and Fueling Facility located at California State University, Los Angeles. In the cascade refueling process, the facility buffer tanks were utilized as high-pressure storage, enabling the refueling operation. Three different scenarios were tested: one involving the cascade refueling process and two involving compressor-driven refueling processes. On average, each refueling event delivered 1.6 kg of hydrogen. Although the cascade refueling process using the high-pressure buffer tanks did not achieve the pressure target, it resulted in a notable improvement in the nozzle outlet temperature trend, reducing it by approximately 8 °C. Moreover, the overall hydrogen chiller load for the two directly pressurized refuelings was 66 Wh/kg and 62 Wh/kg, respectively, whereas the cascading process only required 55 Wh/kg. This represents a 20% and 12% reduction in energy consumption compared to the scenarios involving booster compressors during fueling. The observed refueling range of 150–350 bar showed that the cascade process consistently required 12–20% less energy for hydrogen chilling. Additionally, the nozzle outlet temperature demonstrated an approximate 8 °C improvement within this pressure range. These findings indicate that further improvements can be expected in the high-pressure region, specifically above 350 bar. This research suggests the potential for significant improvements in the high-pressure range, emphasizing the viability of the cascade refueling process as a promising alternative to the direct compression approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Matteo Genovese & David Blekhman & Michael Dray & Francesco Piraino & Petronilla Fragiacomo, 2023. "Experimental Comparison of Hydrogen Refueling with Directly Pressurized vs. Cascade Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-14, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:15:p:5749-:d:1208443
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/15/5749/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/15/5749/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shunichi Hienuki & Yoshie Hirayama & Tadahiro Shibutani & Junji Sakamoto & Jo Nakayama & Atsumi Miyake, 2019. "How Knowledge about or Experience with Hydrogen Fueling Stations Improves Their Public Acceptance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Ludvik Viktorsson & Jukka Taneli Heinonen & Jon Bjorn Skulason & Runar Unnthorsson, 2017. "A Step towards the Hydrogen Economy—A Life Cycle Cost Analysis of A Hydrogen Refueling Station," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Dorota Burchart-Korol & Magdalena Gazda-Grzywacz & Katarzyna Zarębska, 2020. "Research and Prospects for the Development of Alternative Fuels in the Transport Sector in Poland: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Ji-Qiang Li & No-Seuk Myoung & Jeong-Tae Kwon & Seon-Jun Jang & Taeckhong Lee, 2020. "A Study on the Prediction of the Temperature and Mass of Hydrogen Gas inside a Tank during Fast Filling Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Markus Reuß & Paris Dimos & Aline Léon & Thomas Grube & Martin Robinius & Detlef Stolten, 2021. "Hydrogen Road Transport Analysis in the Energy System: A Case Study for Germany through 2050," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Remzi Can Samsun & Michael Rex & Laurent Antoni & Detlef Stolten, 2022. "Deployment of Fuel Cell Vehicles and Hydrogen Refueling Station Infrastructure: A Global Overview and Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-34, July.
    7. Matteo Genovese & Viviana Cigolotti & Elio Jannelli & Petronilla Fragiacomo, 2023. "Hydrogen Refueling Process: Theory, Modeling, and In-Force Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-31, March.
    8. Kosmas A. Kavadias & Vasileios Kosmas & Stefanos Tzelepis, 2022. "Sizing, Optimization, and Financial Analysis of a Green Hydrogen Refueling Station in Remote Regions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-22, January.
    9. Soyeong Park & Solji Nam & Myoungjin Oh & Ie-jung Choi & Jungwoo Shin, 2020. "Preference Structure on the Design of Hydrogen Refueling Stations to Activate Energy Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-13, August.
    10. Kevin Kendall, 2022. "Green Hydrogen in the UK: Progress and Prospects," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-11, April.
    11. Gregory Trencher & Achmed Edianto, 2021. "Drivers and Barriers to the Adoption of Fuel Cell Passenger Vehicles and Buses in Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-26, February.
    12. Jinsheng Xiao & Shuo Ma & Xu Wang & Shanshan Deng & Tianqi Yang & Pierre Bénard, 2019. "Effect of Hydrogen Refueling Parameters on Final State of Charge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-10, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arturo Vallejos-Romero & Minerva Cordoves-Sánchez & César Cisternas & Felipe Sáez-Ardura & Ignacio Rodríguez & Antonio Aledo & Álex Boso & Jordi Prades & Boris Álvarez, 2022. "Green Hydrogen and Social Sciences: Issues, Problems, and Future Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. José A. Ventura, 2023. "Climate Benefits Advocated by the Development of Sustainable Vehicles and Charging Infrastructures in the Transport Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-5, April.
    3. Shengyuan Wang, 2022. "Exploring the Sustainability of China’s New Energy Vehicle Development: Fresh Evidence from Population Symbiosis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, August.
    4. José Manuel Andújar & Francisca Segura & Jesús Rey & Francisco José Vivas, 2022. "Batteries and Hydrogen Storage: Technical Analysis and Commercial Revision to Select the Best Option," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-32, August.
    5. Piotr F. Borowski, 2022. "Management of Energy Enterprises in Zero-Emission Conditions: Bamboo as an Innovative Biomass for the Production of Green Energy by Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Li, Da & Zhang, Zhaosheng & Zhou, Litao & Liu, Peng & Wang, Zhenpo & Deng, Junjun, 2022. "Multi-time-step and multi-parameter prediction for real-world proton exchange membrane fuel cell vehicles (PEMFCVs) toward fault prognosis and energy consumption prediction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    7. Adam Saferna & Piotr Saferna & Szymon Kuczyński & Mariusz Łaciak & Adam Szurlej & Tomasz Włodek, 2024. "Effects of Hydrogen, Methane, and Their Blends on Rapid-Filling Process of High-Pressure Composite Tank," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Vijai Kaarthi Visvanathan & Karthikeyan Palaniswamy & Dineshkumar Ponnaiyan & Mathan Chandran & Thanarajan Kumaresan & Jegathishkumar Ramasamy & Senthilarasu Sundaram, 2023. "Fuel Cell Products for Sustainable Transportation and Stationary Power Generation: Review on Market Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-21, March.
    9. Razzaqul Ahshan, 2021. "Potential and Economic Analysis of Solar-to-Hydrogen Production in the Sultanate of Oman," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    10. Agustín Álvarez Coomonte & Zacarías Grande Andrade & Rocio Porras Soriano & José Antonio Lozano Galant, 2024. "Review of the Planning and Distribution Methodologies to Locate Hydrogen Infrastructure in the Territory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-25, January.
    11. Fan, Jing-Li & Yu, Pengwei & Li, Kai & Xu, Mao & Zhang, Xian, 2022. "A levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) comparison of coal-to-hydrogen with CCS and water electrolysis powered by renewable energy in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    12. Ján Horváth & Janka Szemesová, 2023. "Is a Carbon-Neutral Pathway in Road Transport Possible? A Case Study from Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-18, August.
    13. Lü, Xueqin & Deng, Ruiyu & Chen, Chao & Wu, Yinbo & Meng, Ruidong & Long, Liyuan, 2022. "Performance optimization of fuel cell hybrid power robot based on power demand prediction and model evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 316(C).
    14. Bhandari, Ramchandra & Shah, Ronak Rakesh, 2021. "Hydrogen as energy carrier: Techno-economic assessment of decentralized hydrogen production in Germany," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 915-931.
    15. Lu Zhu & Lanli Hu & Serhat Yüksel & Hasan Dinçer & Hüsne Karakuş & Gözde Gülseven Ubay, 2020. "Analysis of Strategic Directions in Sustainable Hydrogen Investment Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, June.
    16. Yilmaz, Hasan Ümitcan & Kimbrough, Steven O. & van Dinther, Clemens & Keles, Dogan, 2022. "Power-to-gas: Decarbonization of the European electricity system with synthetic methane," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    17. Kim, Kyungah & Moon, Sungho & Kim, Junghun, 2023. "How far is it from your home? Strategic policy and management to overcome barriers of introducing fuel-cell power generation facilities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    18. Wanming Chen & Shengyuan Wang & Xiaolan Wu, 2022. "Growth Mechanism and Synchronization Effect of China’s New Energy Vehicle Enterprises: An Empirical Analysis Based on Moving Logistic and Kuramoto Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-17, December.
    19. Khadijeh Hooshyari & Bahman Amini Horri & Hamid Abdoli & Mohsen Fallah Vostakola & Parvaneh Kakavand & Parisa Salarizadeh, 2021. "A Review of Recent Developments and Advanced Applications of High-Temperature Polymer Electrolyte Membranes for PEM Fuel Cells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-38, September.
    20. Marcin Połom, 2021. "Technology Development and Spatial Diffusion of Auxiliary Power Sources in Trolleybuses in European Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:15:p:5749-:d:1208443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.