IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i13p4880-d1177064.html

Spatial Decision-Making under Uncertainties for Supporting the Prospection of Sites for Hybrid Renewable Energy Generation Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Lívia Maria Leite Silva

    (Graduate Program in Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil
    Thunders Tecnologia, Rio de Janeiro 22640-100, Brazil)

  • Petr Ekel

    (Graduate Program in Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil
    Graduate Program inComputer Science, Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 30535-901, Brazil
    ASOTECH, Belo Horizonte 30380-002, Brazil)

  • Douglas Alexandre Gomes Vieira

    (ENACOM, Belo Horizonte 31275-100, Brazil
    Graduate Program in Mathematical Modeling, Federal Center of Technological Education of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 30421-169, Brazil)

  • Matheus Pereira Libório

    (Graduate Program inComputer Science, Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 30535-901, Brazil)

  • Marcos Flávio Silveira Vasconcelos D’angelo

    (Department of Computer Science, State University of Montes Claros, Montes Claros 39401-089, Brazil)

Abstract

This research aims at developing methodological tools for decision makers (DMs) to determine the locations for generating sites for hybrid renewable energy systems, considering complementarity characteristics of the corresponding sources and their seasonal availability. The decision process on new sites starts using Geographic Information Systems for modeling relevant spatial criteria. The problem solution is associated with using the Slide-OWA operator, which permits one to control the inter-criteria compensation levels by adjusting pessimism and optimism parameters. After constructing multicriteria estimates for generating sites, the general scheme of multi-objective decision-making is applied in conditions of uncertainty since these estimates are subject to significant levels of uncertainty. Such a scheme is based on the possibilistic approach, which involves the construction of payoff matrices. At this point, it is possible that some alternatives cannot be distinguished based only on the criteria considered so far, or the DM may want to evaluate the alternatives from the point of view of additional considerations. For this purpose, the framework of multi-attribute decision-making models is applied by employing methods for preference modeling in a fuzzy environment. The present work results are applied to a case study of the Minas Gerais State in Brazil. These results play a strategic role for governments and investors in their decisions while considering the ability to meet a wide range of criteria.

Suggested Citation

  • Lívia Maria Leite Silva & Petr Ekel & Douglas Alexandre Gomes Vieira & Matheus Pereira Libório & Marcos Flávio Silveira Vasconcelos D’angelo, 2023. "Spatial Decision-Making under Uncertainties for Supporting the Prospection of Sites for Hybrid Renewable Energy Generation Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-29, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:13:p:4880-:d:1177064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/13/4880/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/13/4880/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. E. Bellman & L. A. Zadeh, 1970. "Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 141-164, December.
    2. Cradden, L. & Kalogeri, C. & Barrios, I. Martinez & Galanis, G. & Ingram, D. & Kallos, G., 2016. "Multi-criteria site selection for offshore renewable energy platforms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P1), pages 791-806.
    3. Amirinia, Gholamreza & Mafi, Somayeh & Mazaheri, Said, 2017. "Offshore wind resource assessment of Persian Gulf using uncertainty analysis and GIS," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 915-929.
    4. Ram, Camelia & Montibeller, Gilberto, 2013. "Exploring the impact of evaluating strategic options in a scenario-based multi-criteria framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(4), pages 657-672.
    5. Durbach, Ian N. & Stewart, Theodor J., 2012. "Modeling uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(1), pages 1-14.
    6. Beluco, Alexandre & de Souza, Paulo Kroeff & Krenzinger, Arno, 2008. "A dimensionless index evaluating the time complementarity between solar and hydraulic energies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(10), pages 2157-2165.
    7. Latinopoulos, D. & Kechagia, K., 2015. "A GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation for wind farm site selection. A regional scale application in Greece," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 550-560.
    8. Wang, Hsiao-Fan & Sung, Meng-Ping & Hsu, Hsin-Wei, 2016. "Complementarity and substitution of renewable energy in target year energy supply-mix plannin–in the case of Taiwan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 172-182.
    9. Herrera, F. & Martinez, L. & Sanchez, P. J., 2005. "Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 166(1), pages 115-132, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matheus Pereira Libório & Alexandre Magno Alvez Diniz & Douglas Alexandre Gomes Vieira & Petr Iakovlevitch Ekel, 2024. "Subjective–Objective Method of Maximizing the Average Variance Extracted From Sub-indicators in Composite Indicators," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 175(2), pages 613-637, November.
    2. Ingrid Assis Vosgrau & Matheus Pereira Libório & Douglas Alexandre Gomes Vieira & Petr Iakovlevitch Ekel & Thaís de Bessa Gontijo de Oliveira & Pâmela de Rezende Côrtes, 2026. "Group decision-making models and methods for identifying material sustainability reporting topics," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 3047-3073, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sajid Ali & Sang-Moon Lee & Choon-Man Jang, 2017. "Determination of the Most Optimal On-Shore Wind Farm Site Location Using a GIS-MCDM Methodology: Evaluating the Case of South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Petr Iakovlevitch Ekel & Matheus Pereira Libório & Laura Cozzi Ribeiro & Mateus Alberto Dorna de Oliveira Ferreira & Joel Gomes Pereira Junior, 2024. "Multi-Criteria Decision under Uncertainty as Applied to Resource Allocation and Its Computing Implementation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Kim, Choong-Ki & Jang, Seonju & Kim, Tae Yun, 2018. "Site selection for offshore wind farms in the southwest coast of South Korea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 151-162.
    4. Vasileiou, Margarita & Loukogeorgaki, Eva & Vagiona, Dimitra G., 2017. "GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis for site selection of hybrid offshore wind and wave energy systems in Greece," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 745-757.
    5. Jonasson, Erik & Temiz, Irina, 2026. "Evaluating complementarity: A review of metrics and their implications for hybrid renewable energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 226(PD).
    6. Hocine, Amine & Kouaissah, Noureddine, 2020. "XOR analytic hierarchy process and its application in the renewable energy sector," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    7. Cairns, George & Goodwin, Paul & Wright, George, 2016. "A decision-analysis-based framework for analysing stakeholder behaviour in scenario planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 1050-1062.
    8. Flocard, Francois & Ierodiaconou, Daniel & Coghlan, Ian R., 2016. "Multi-criteria evaluation of wave energy projects on the south-east Australian coast," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 80-94.
    9. Vinhoza, Amanda & Schaeffer, Roberto, 2021. "Brazil's offshore wind energy potential assessment based on a Spatial Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    10. Gkeka-Serpetsidaki, Pandora & Tsoutsos, Theocharis, 2022. "A methodological framework for optimal siting of offshore wind farms: A case study on the island of Crete," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    11. Tobias Witt & Matthias Klumpp, 2021. "Multi-Period Multi-Criteria Decision Making under Uncertainty: A Renewable Energy Transition Case from Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, June.
    12. Dimitriou, Iason C. & Sarmas, Elissaios & Trachanas, Georgios P. & Marinakis, Vangelis & Doukas, Haris, 2025. "Multi-Criteria GIS-based offshore wind farm site selection: Case study in Greece," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    13. Peters, Jared L. & Remmers, Tiny & Wheeler, Andrew J. & Murphy, Jimmy & Cummins, Valerie, 2020. "A systematic review and meta-analysis of GIS use to reveal trends in offshore wind energy research and offer insights on best practices," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    14. Abbas Mardani & Ahmad Jusoh & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Zainab Khalifah, 2015. "Sustainable and Renewable Energy: An Overview of the Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Making Techniques and Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-38, October.
    15. Shao, Meng & Han, Zhixin & Sun, Jinwei & Xiao, Chengsi & Zhang, Shulei & Zhao, Yuanxu, 2020. "A review of multi-criteria decision making applications for renewable energy site selection," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 377-403.
    16. Arshad Ahmad Khan & Muhammad Qiyas & Saleem Abdullah & Jianchao Luo & Mahwish Bano, 2019. "Analysis of Robot Selection Based on 2-Tuple Picture Fuzzy Linguistic Aggregation Operators," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-19, October.
    17. Dapeng Zhang & Yunsheng Ma & Huiling Zhang & Yi Zhang, 2024. "Marine Equipment Siting Using Machine-Learning-Based Ocean Remote Sensing Data: Current Status and Future Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-26, October.
    18. Sirbiladze, Gia & Khutsishvili, Irina & Ghvaberidze, Bezhan, 2014. "Multistage decision-making fuzzy methodology for optimal investments based on experts’ evaluations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(1), pages 169-177.
    19. Keroglou, I. & Tsoutsos, T., 2024. "Optimal siting of solar desalination plants in Crete, Greece employing a GIS/MCDM approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    20. Mahmoodi, Kumars & Ghassemi, Hassan & Razminia, Abolhassan, 2019. "Temporal and spatial characteristics of wave energy in the Persian Gulf based on the ERA5 reanalysis dataset," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:13:p:4880-:d:1177064. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.