IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i4p1435-d750732.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Complexity of Logistics Services at Transshipment Terminals

Author

Listed:
  • Ludmiła Filina-Dawidowicz

    (Department of Logistics and Transport Economics, Faculty of Maritime Technology and Transport, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, al. Piastów 41, 71-065 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Mariusz Kostrzewski

    (Division of Construction Fundamentals of Transport Equipment, Faculty of Transport, Warsaw University of Technology, ul. Koszykowa 75, 00-662 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

Transshipment is the process of off-loading an intermodal loading unit (for example, different types of containers, semitrailers, swap-bodies, and so on) from one means of transport (for example, a vessel, a freight railcar, etc.) and loading it onto another. Such a process, as well as other logistics services related to loading units, may take place at a transshipment terminal, which is the intermediate node added to an intermodal transport network when combining two or more liner services that facilitate freight transport. Growing customer requirements affect transshipment terminal operations and contribute to the development of comprehensive logistics services. Terminal clients expect the delivery of complex services that often pose serious challenges to terminals providing these services. The specific decision-making tools are essential for facilitating the shaping of terminals’ complex service offerings. In this study, we investigated the issues connected to the complexity of logistics services offered by transshipment terminals. The aim was to develop a decision-making approach to assess the complexity of logistics services offered by these terminals. A procedure for the formulation of complex and comprehensive service sets at transshipment terminals, which includes sustainable energy and energy efficiency issues, was proposed. The approach for assessing the complexity of services at terminals handling intermodal loading units was developed, and an appropriate mathematical model was applied. Consequently, indexes of the efficiency and comprehensiveness levels of ordered services in a terminal were proposed. The ranking of decision-making criteria influencing the shaping of complex service offerings was created based on the results of a questionnaire survey distributed among the managerial representatives of terminals located in Poland. The data obtained with the use of a questionnaire survey allowed us to verify the proposed approach. The research results may be useful for the management of transshipment terminals while making decisions on the creation of comprehensive services offered to their clientele.

Suggested Citation

  • Ludmiła Filina-Dawidowicz & Mariusz Kostrzewski, 2022. "The Complexity of Logistics Services at Transshipment Terminals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:4:p:1435-:d:750732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/4/1435/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/4/1435/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ma, Hoi-Lam & Wong, Collin Wai-Hung & Leung, Lawrence C. & Chung, Sai-Ho, 2020. "Facility sharing in business-to-business model: A real case study for container terminal operators in Hong Kong port," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    2. Guidon, Sergio & Wicki, Michael & Bernauer, Thomas & Axhausen, Kay, 2020. "Transportation service bundling – For whose benefit? Consumer valuation of pure bundling in the passenger transportation market," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 91-106.
    3. Zhang, Rong & Jian, Wenliang & Tavasszy, Lóránt, 2018. "Estimation of network level benefits of reliability improvements in intermodal freight transport," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-8.
    4. Carlo, Héctor J. & Vis, Iris F.A. & Roodbergen, Kees Jan, 2014. "Storage yard operations in container terminals: Literature overview, trends, and research directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 412-430.
    5. Shou, Yongyi & Zhao, Xinyu & Dai, Jing & Xu, Dong, 2021. "Matching traceability and supply chain coordination: Achieving operational innovation for superior performance," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    6. Macharis, Cathy & De Witte, Astrid & Turcksin, Laurence, 2010. "The Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis (MAMCA) application in the Flemish long-term decision making process on mobility and logistics," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 303-311, September.
    7. Paul Tae-Woo Lee & Jasmine Siu Lee Lam, 2015. "Container Port Competition and Competitiveness Analysis: Asian Major Ports," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Chung-Yee Lee & Qiang Meng (ed.), Handbook of Ocean Container Transport Logistics, edition 127, chapter 4, pages 97-136, Springer.
    8. Xinjia Jiang & Ek Peng Chew & Loo Hay Lee, 2015. "Innovative Container Terminals to Improve Global Container Transport Chains," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Chung-Yee Lee & Qiang Meng (ed.), Handbook of Ocean Container Transport Logistics, edition 127, chapter 1, pages 3-41, Springer.
    9. Saeedi, Hamid & Wiegmans, Bart & Behdani, Behzad & Zuidwijk, Rob, 2017. "European intermodal freight transport network: Market structure analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 141-154.
    10. Carlo, Héctor J. & Vis, Iris F.A. & Roodbergen, Kees Jan, 2014. "Transport operations in container terminals: Literature overview, trends, research directions and classification scheme," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 1-13.
    11. Fan, Di & Lo, Chris K.Y. & Zhou, Yi, 2021. "Sustainability risk in supply bases: The role of complexity and coupling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    12. Francisco Calderón & Eric J. Miller, 2020. "A literature review of mobility services: definitions, modelling state-of-the-art, and key considerations for a conceptual modelling framework," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 312-332, May.
    13. Magdalena Marczewska, 2016. "Knowledge As A Key Resource Contributing To The Development Of Eco-Innovations By Companies-Suppliers Of Environmentally Sound Technologies," CBU International Conference Proceedings, ISE Research Institute, vol. 4(0), pages 240-247, September.
    14. Kim, Nam Seok & Van Wee, Bert, 2011. "The relative importance of factors that influence the break-even distance of intermodal freight transport systems," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 859-875.
    15. Ruqin Yang & Yaolin Liu & Yanfang Liu & Hui Liu & Wenxia Gan, 2019. "Comprehensive Public Transport Service Accessibility Index—A New Approach Based on Degree Centrality and Gravity Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-20, October.
    16. Fadda, Edoardo & Manerba, Daniele & Cabodi, Gianpiero & Camurati, Paolo Enrico & Tadei, Roberto, 2021. "Comparative analysis of models and performance indicators for optimal service facility location," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    17. Tareq Abu Aisha & Mustapha Ouhimmou & Marc Paquet, 2020. "Optimization of Container Terminal Layouts in the Seaport—Case of Port of Montreal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, February.
    18. Bojan BEŠKOVNIK & Maja STOJAKOVIĆ, 2019. "Establishing An Efficient Outbound Overseas Logistics Chain Of Small Consignments: The Perspective Of Eastern Adriatic Region," Transport Problems, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, vol. 14(4), pages 113-126, December.
    19. Vasco Reis & Pedro Macedo, 2019. "Mapping and evaluating the complexity of information flows in freight transport chains," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(8), pages 757-776, November.
    20. Chen, Kee-Kuo & Chang, Ching-Ter & Lai, Cheng-Sheng, 2009. "Service quality gaps of business customers in the shipping industry," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 222-237, January.
    21. Peraphan Jittrapirom & Valeria Caiati & Anna-Maria Feneri & Shima Ebrahimigharehbaghi & María J. Alonso González & Jishnu Narayan, 2017. "Mobility as a Service: A Critical Review of Definitions, Assessments of Schemes, and Key Challenges," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2(2), pages 13-25.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hasselwander, Marc & Bigotte, Joao F. & Antunes, Antonio P. & Sigua, Ricardo G., 2022. "Towards sustainable transport in developing countries: Preliminary findings on the demand for mobility-as-a-service (MaaS) in Metro Manila," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 501-518.
    2. Benjamin Maas, 2022. "Literature Review of Mobility as a Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-28, July.
    3. Zhen, Lu, 2016. "Modeling of yard congestion and optimization of yard template in container ports," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 83-104.
    4. Domenico Gattuso & Domenica Savia Pellicanò, 2023. "HUs Fleet Management in an Automated Container Port: Assessment by a Simulation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Weihua Liu & Xinran Shen & Di Wang, 2020. "The impacts of dual overconfidence behavior and demand updating on the decisions of port service supply chain: a real case study from China," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 565-604, August.
    6. Kastner, Marvin & Kämmerling, Nicolas & Jahn, Carlos & Clausen, Uwe, 2020. "Equipment selection and layout planning - Literature overview and research directions," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Data Science in Maritime and City Logistics: Data-driven Solutions for Logistics and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conferen, volume 30, pages 485-519, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    7. Kumawat, Govind Lal & Roy, Debjit & De Koster, René & Adan, Ivo, 2021. "Stochastic modeling of parallel process flows in intra-logistics systems: Applications in container terminals and compact storage systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 159-176.
    8. Raeesi, Ramin & Sahebjamnia, Navid & Mansouri, S. Afshin, 2023. "The synergistic effect of operational research and big data analytics in greening container terminal operations: A review and future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 943-973.
    9. Lennart Zey & Dirk Briskorn & Nils Boysen, 2022. "Twin-crane scheduling during seaside workload peaks with a dedicated handshake area," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 3-34, February.
    10. Shujuan Guo & Cuijie Diao & Gang Li & Katsuhiko Takahashi, 2021. "The Two-Echelon Dual-Channel Models for the Intermodal Container Terminals of the China Railway Express Considering Container Accumulation Modes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    11. Sumin Chen & Qingcheng Zeng & Yushan Hu, 2022. "Scheduling optimization for two crossover automated stacking cranes considering relocation," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2099-2120, July.
    12. Wang, Mengyao & Zhou, Chenhao & Wang, Aihu, 2022. "A cluster-based yard template design integrated with yard crane deployment using a placement heuristic," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    13. Mantovani, Serena & Morganti, Gianluca & Umang, Nitish & Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Frejinger, Emma & Larsen, Eric, 2018. "The load planning problem for double-stack intermodal trains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(1), pages 107-119.
    14. Jenny Nossack & Dirk Briskorn & Erwin Pesch, 2018. "Container Dispatching and Conflict-Free Yard Crane Routing in an Automated Container Terminal," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 1059-1076, October.
    15. Rodrigues, Filipe & Agra, Agostinho, 2022. "Berth allocation and quay crane assignment/scheduling problem under uncertainty: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 501-524.
    16. Kress, Dominik & Dornseifer, Jan & Jaehn, Florian, 2019. "An exact solution approach for scheduling cooperative gantry cranes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 82-101.
    17. Kriswardhana, Willy & Esztergár-Kiss, Domokos, 2023. "Exploring the aspects of MaaS adoption based on college students’ preferences," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 113-125.
    18. Facchini, F. & Digiesi, S. & Mossa, G., 2020. "Optimal dry port configuration for container terminals: A non-linear model for sustainable decision making," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 164-178.
    19. Hamid Saeedi & Bart Wiegmans & Behzad Behdani, 2021. "Measuring concentration in transhipment markets: methodologies and application to a European case," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(3), pages 548-568, September.
    20. Sunil Tiwari & Joanna Rosak-Szyrocka & Justyna Żywiołek, 2022. "Internet of Things as a Sustainable Energy Management Solution at Tourism Destinations in India," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:4:p:1435-:d:750732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.